DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » House Wants the Dirt on CSAR-X

House Wants the Dirt on CSAR-X

CSARX-web.jpg

Now its time for the anti-Boeing crowd to fire back in the ongoing CSAR-X cat fight that DT is only too happy to keep tabs on.

According to an email sent to us, the House Appropriations Defense panel inserted language into the fiscal 2008 Pentagon funding bill that called into question the methodology of the CSAR-X decision in favor of Boeings HH-47 Chinook.

The language states:

The Committee is concerned about the selection criteria and process by which this program has proceeded to source selection. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to submit a report to the congressional defense committees detailing the source selection criteria and how they were established. The report shall include the significant factors for the Request for Proposal (RFP) that determined the source selection, their importance, and how each of the respondents to the RFP was rated against those factors. The report shall be delivered not later than September 15, 2007.

This is all well and good of course…But the irony is it is unlikely the Defense Appropriations bill will be passed by the report deadline. With arguments over Iraq strategy and Gen. Petraeus surge report coming, we doubt Congress will have the comity to pass a hotly-contested defense bill.

Even if we never get the Air Force report, at least one powerful committee in Congress is concerned about the decision and has put that concern into law. In the end, however, the debate may accomplish little other than delaying a much-needed upgrade to one of the most important missions the Air Force has.

– Christian

Share |

July 24th, 2007 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 363427 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/07/24/house-wants-the-dirt-on-csar-x/House+Wants+the+Dirt+on+CSAR-X2007-07-24+17%3A12%3A53Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « AESA Gets Full Rate Production Nod | Cross Deck Operations » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. chinook says:
    July 25, 2007 at 7:15 am

    ok and you have more than likely never flew or have seen one fly to it’s abilities. The Chinook was doing everything the blackhawk,pavehawk and pave low can do before those capabilites were common knowledge. Oh did I mention high altitude capabilities?

    Reply
  2. Harvey Meltzer says:
    July 25, 2007 at 8:49 am

    I was in the helio rescue field for over 12 yrs. I have had to hover over 100 ft in a canyon, that kept getting narrow. In this type of situation SIZE matters. We were in an HH-43B,and We barly fit at the top. CH-47 no way. And in VN many Nose wheel only hovers on the side of a mountain, with lots of trees CH-3 and 53. Barly fit. Whats needed is FAST<AGILE<and Very Stable in the hover​.In other words don’t send a B-52 when an F-16 is the only option.

    Reply
  3. Tom says:
    July 25, 2007 at 8:53 am

    In the CSAR-X, the USAF simply got what they wanted — first draw the lines, and then plot the data, in much the same manner they have repeatedly tried to get Bowing for their tankers.

    Reply
  4. Atkin says:
    July 25, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Bigger is better. Would you want a fully stocked ambulance to come pick you up from a car wreck, or argue that a Geo Storm with a roof rack haul you to the hospital…
    Go with the Chinook, faster, bigger, way more stable, and as for the RPG bull the only time you get hit with those is during hover, something EVERY evac has to do. Not to mention fuel range, internal fuel tanks if needed.
    How do you people base your decisions? Which one looks nicer or something?

    Reply
  5. Major TLP says:
    July 25, 2007 at 11:47 am

    The chinook is a great copter for what it does. but with the CV-22 coming on line soon you need a mixed sized fleet for all types of terrian.Also think of ground crew training and other programs out there and how can we save taxpayer money.The vh-71 is go enough for the president the us 101 can rescue the presidents men.The hh-60 an the s-92(canada’s sar copter)are produced by the same company that has training guidelines and similar systems on line.But like Mr Meltzer ‚Can’t put a 47 in a place you can put a hh60 or us 101. Leave it to the air force to look for the biggest an expensive answer.Help the marines with the uh-1y they have to replace there uh1n’s soon also.Look out side the box air force ‚you have to pay for those f-22s

    Reply
  6. Curt 22 says:
    August 1, 2007 at 6:50 am

    RPG magnet?
    Are we to pretend the H-60 hasn’t ‘caught’ its fair share of RPGs (Blackhawk down)?
    All helos are vulnerable in the terminal area…question is when you are in these environments, can you survive the engagement?
    Fact is that the most agile helo’s in the DoD inventory (H-60,AH-64, OH-58) are seeing 50% loses today from hostile fire…meanwhile, H-47s are seeing hostile fire loses at approx 20%.
    The reality on the battlefield doesn’t seem to match the antidotal assumption that a larger acft is at greater risk.

    Reply
  7. review says:
    April 29, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    It is imperative that a replacement copter be fielded ASAP. GWB’s military policy has worn out the H-60s (as well as most of the rest of the old Air Force fleets). Research yourself and read the GAO report. How the cost was calculated was the only problem they had with the decision. Cost was the least important driver as the rotor with the most capability was more important. READ THE GAO REPORT! Half truths from journalists (whether they have a prvious military background or not) is irrelevant.

    Reply
  8. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  9. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:04 pm

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me.

    Reply
  10. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    So I know my paradise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a variety of reasons, and the summer of cake, magic rabbit, blue shocks, such as several friends built a new council: Return of the King. And I recognized the beiertuo brotherhood. As the help of this friends and will help in growing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new president rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively participated in the mine warfare, winning glory for the family. Later, because a number of reasons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  11. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    It is wind outside the window, and I numbness under the keyboard, watching the computer screen in a daze, reminiscent of the past acid sweet, think of all people cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as reality, it also need friends, need a paternity can go with own people. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and eventually found nothing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  12. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:19 pm

    One day, I was killed by other people, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that people were very terrible, he had a lot of equipment, and I think he must be having much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no matter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I recognized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Committing resources, doesn't mean sending troops into...
      Thunder350
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Lockheed and Boeing: working both ends of a bent over taxpayer....
      John
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Actual costs of the F-22 are now down to about $110M per...
      Dan
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We need to put an end to the defense contractor corporate...
      John
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      I beg to differ about mortar being more...
      Gunnery Instructor
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The cost would likely (eventually) be much less...
      Gunnery Instr
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Ridiculous. Thanks goodness that F22 line hasn't...
      Robert
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      …or the Army and Marines could just develop...
      czech_6
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      "The 'Army' (as euphemism for...
      czech_6
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I'm going to stick with my previous statements...
      Vertigo
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage