DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » House Wants the Dirt on CSAR-​​X

House Wants the Dirt on CSAR-​​X

CSARX-web.jpg

Now its time for the anti-​​Boeing crowd to fire back in the ongo­ing CSAR-​​X cat fight that DT is only too happy to keep tabs on.

According to an email sent to us, the House Appropriations Defense panel inserted lan­guage into the fis­cal 2008 Pentagon fund­ing bill that called into ques­tion the method­ol­ogy of the CSAR-​​X deci­sion in favor of Boeings HH-​​47 Chinook.

The lan­guage states:

The Committee is con­cerned about the selec­tion cri­te­ria and process by which this pro­gram has pro­ceeded to source selec­tion. The Committee directs the Secretary of the Air Force to sub­mit a report to the con­gres­sional defense com­mit­tees detail­ing the source selec­tion cri­te­ria and how they were estab­lished. The report shall include the sig­nif­i­cant fac­tors for the Request for Proposal (RFP) that deter­mined the source selec­tion, their impor­tance, and how each of the respon­dents to the RFP was rated against those fac­tors. The report shall be deliv­ered not later than September 15, 2007. 

This is all well and good of course…But the irony is it is unlikely the Defense Appropriations bill will be passed by the report dead­line. With argu­ments over Iraq strat­egy and Gen. Petraeus surge report com­ing, we doubt Congress will have the comity to pass a hotly-​​contested defense bill.

Even if we never get the Air Force report, at least one pow­er­ful com­mit­tee in Congress is con­cerned about the deci­sion and has put that con­cern into law. In the end, how­ever, the debate may accom­plish lit­tle other than delay­ing a much-​​needed upgrade to one of the most impor­tant mis­sions the Air Force has.

– Christian

Share |

July 24th, 2007 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 363427 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/07/24/house-wants-the-dirt-on-csar-x/House+Wants+the+Dirt+on+CSAR-X2007-07-24+17%3A12%3A53Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « AESA Gets Full Rate Production Nod | Cross Deck Operations » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. chinook says:
    July 25, 2007 at 7:15 am

    ok and you have more than likely never flew or have seen one fly to it’s abil­i­ties. The Chinook was doing every­thing the blackhawk,pavehawk and pave low can do before those capa­bilites were com­mon knowl­edge. Oh did I men­tion high alti­tude capabilities?

    Reply
  2. Harvey Meltzer says:
    July 25, 2007 at 8:49 am

    I was in the helio res­cue field for over 12 yrs. I have had to hover over 100 ft in a canyon, that kept get­ting nar­row. In this type of sit­u­a­tion SIZE mat­ters. We were in an HH-43B,and We barly fit at the top. CH-​​47 no way. And in VN many Nose wheel only hov­ers on the side of a moun­tain, with lots of trees CH-​​3 and 53. Barly fit. Whats needed is FAST<AGILE<and Very Stable in the hover​.In other words don’t send a B-​​52 when an F-​​16 is the only option.

    Reply
  3. Tom says:
    July 25, 2007 at 8:53 am

    In the CSAR-​​X, the USAF sim­ply got what they wanted — first draw the lines, and then plot the data, in much the same man­ner they have repeat­edly tried to get Bowing for their tankers.

    Reply
  4. Atkin says:
    July 25, 2007 at 11:09 am

    Bigger is bet­ter. Would you want a fully stocked ambu­lance to come pick you up from a car wreck, or argue that a Geo Storm with a roof rack haul you to the hos­pi­tal…
    Go with the Chinook, faster, big­ger, way more sta­ble, and as for the RPG bull the only time you get hit with those is dur­ing hover, some­thing EVERY evac has to do. Not to men­tion fuel range, inter­nal fuel tanks if needed.
    How do you peo­ple base your deci­sions? Which one looks nicer or something?

    Reply
  5. Major TLP says:
    July 25, 2007 at 11:47 am

    The chi­nook is a great copter for what it does. but with the CV-​​22 com­ing on line soon you need a mixed sized fleet for all types of terrian.Also think of ground crew train­ing and other pro­grams out there and how can we save tax­payer money.The vh-​​71 is go enough for the pres­i­dent the us 101 can res­cue the pres­i­dents men.The hh-​​60 an the s-92(canada’s sar copter)are pro­duced by the same com­pany that has train­ing guide­lines and sim­i­lar sys­tems on line.But like Mr Meltzer ‚Can’t put a 47 in a place you can put a hh60 or us 101. Leave it to the air force to look for the biggest an expen­sive answer.Help the marines with the uh-​​1y they have to replace there uh1n’s soon also.Look out side the box air force ‚you have to pay for those f-​​22s

    Reply
  6. Curt 22 says:
    August 1, 2007 at 6:50 am

    RPG mag­net?
    Are we to pre­tend the H-​​60 hasn’t ‘caught’ its fair share of RPGs (Blackhawk down)?
    All helos are vul­ner­a­ble in the ter­mi­nal area…question is when you are in these envi­ron­ments, can you sur­vive the engage­ment?
    Fact is that the most agile helo’s in the DoD inven­tory (H-60,AH-64, OH-​​58) are see­ing 50% loses today from hos­tile fire…meanwhile, H-​​47s are see­ing hos­tile fire loses at approx 20%.
    The real­ity on the bat­tle­field doesn’t seem to match the anti­do­tal assump­tion that a larger acft is at greater risk.

    Reply
  7. review says:
    April 29, 2008 at 1:35 pm

    It is imper­a­tive that a replace­ment copter be fielded ASAP. GWB’s mil­i­tary pol­icy has worn out the H-​​60s (as well as most of the rest of the old Air Force fleets). Research your­self and read the GAO report. How the cost was cal­cu­lated was the only prob­lem they had with the deci­sion. Cost was the least impor­tant dri­ver as the rotor with the most capa­bil­ity was more impor­tant. READ THE GAO REPORT! Half truths from jour­nal­ists (whether they have a prvi­ous mil­i­tary back­ground or not) is irrelevant.

    Reply
  8. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:02 pm

    95 lev­els, to me this had been a friend of the peo­ple around, the new ser­vice first hand the hand of a per­son to man­u­ally 95, it is really dif­fi­cult for my them­selves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  9. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:04 pm

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeat­edly returned to the Rappelz game. I con­tinue for good equip­ment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the orig­i­nal is the lack of a per­son accom­pa­ny­ing me.

    Reply
  10. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:11 pm

    So I know my par­adise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a vari­ety of rea­sons, and the sum­mer of cake, magic rab­bit, blue shocks, such as sev­eral friends built a new coun­cil: Return of the King. And I rec­og­nized the beier­tuo broth­er­hood. As the help of this friends and will help in grow­ing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new pres­i­dent rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively par­tic­i­pated in the mine war­fare, win­ning glory for the fam­ily. Later, because a num­ber of rea­sons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  11. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:16 pm

    It is wind out­side the win­dow, and I numb­ness under the key­board, watch­ing the com­puter screen in a daze, rem­i­nis­cent of the past acid sweet, think of all peo­ple cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as real­ity, it also need friends, need a pater­nity can go with own peo­ple. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and even­tu­ally found noth­ing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  12. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:19 pm

    One day, I was killed by other peo­ple, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that peo­ple were very ter­ri­ble, he had a lot of equip­ment, and I think he must be hav­ing much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no mat­ter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I rec­og­nized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage