<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: House Cuts Major Programs</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Archlord money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164492</link> <dc:creator>Archlord money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:09:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164492</guid> <description>In the Beach City is such fearfulness, I am owning many Archlord money in my pocket. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Beach City is such fearfulness, I am owning many Archlord money in my pocket.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JMMC62</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164489</link> <dc:creator>JMMC62</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 21:23:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164489</guid> <description>I am sure there were a number of more urgent needs for personal vote appropreations.  We are only looking at a number of meaningless military members who will die as a result of funds needed for &quot;non-connected RIDER appropreations&quot; tied to the military appropreations bill.  As a matter of fact, I know from elected officials representing my district.  Unless someone out there knows an individual or group who knows how to get a national referendom vote, requiring that &quot;Rider Bills/Appropreations&quot; must be directly related to the Bill/Appropreation, we are stuck with this situation.  It is even very difficult to find out what the amount of the MILITARY appropreations actually is.... its not the number they&#039;ll be showing. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure there were a number of more urgent needs for personal vote appropreations.  We are only looking at a number of meaningless military members who will die as a result of funds needed for “non-connected RIDER appropreations” tied to the military appropreations bill.  As a matter of fact, I know from elected officials representing my district.  Unless someone out there knows an individual or group who knows how to get a national referendom vote, requiring that “Rider Bills/Appropreations” must be directly related to the Bill/Appropreation, we are stuck with this situation.  It is even very difficult to find out what the amount of the MILITARY appropreations actually is.… its not the number they’ll be showing.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: DO</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-63694</link> <dc:creator>DO</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-63694</guid> <description>The ARH is NOT cancelled.  They got some bad intel.  Watch for a retraction/correction. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ARH is NOT cancelled.  They got some bad intel.  Watch for a retraction/correction.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: max</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164488</link> <dc:creator>max</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:55:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164488</guid> <description>&quot;Oh yes; I did the research!&quot; Well according to Jeff you didn&#039;t! Don&#039;t get so political Tom-just as many folks from both sides of the aisle served. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Oh yes; I did the research!“<br /> Well according to Jeff you didn’t!<br /> Don’t get so political Tom-just as many folks from both sides of the aisle served.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164487</link> <dc:creator>VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:16:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164487</guid> <description>Err... for good info on the Armed Recce Helo program, see: http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/comanches-child-the-arh70-armed-reconnaissance-helicopter-updated-02421/#more It&#039;s a &#039;focus&#039; article, updated every time there&#039;s news on that subject. It might explain why DOD is not happy with Bell. Can someone tell us all what&#039;s needed on the ground? It sure looks strange to see Strykers and Bradleys with World War Two - type external skirts around them! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err… for good info on the Armed Recce Helo program, see: <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/comanches-child-the-arh70-armed-reconnaissance-helicopter-updated-02421/#more" rel="nofollow">http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/comanches-child-the-arh70-armed-reconnaissance-helicopter-updated-02421/#more</a><br /> It’s a ‘focus’ article, updated every time there’s news on that subject. It might explain why DOD is not happy with Bell.<br /> Can someone tell us all what’s needed on the ground? It sure looks strange to see Strykers and Bradleys with World War Two — type external skirts around them!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeff</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164486</link> <dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164486</guid> <description>Tom, The ARH has not been killed. Congress is not giving any production money, but they are continuing to give R&amp;D money. You don&#039;t kill a program and continue to fund its R&amp;D. From what I understand Bell has sucked it up and is fixing the problems while giving a nice price break to the government. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,<br /> The ARH has not been killed. Congress is not giving any production money, but they are continuing to give R&amp;D money. You don’t kill a program and continue to fund its R&amp;D.<br /> From what I understand Bell has sucked it up and is fixing the problems while giving a nice price break to the government.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tom</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164485</link> <dc:creator>tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:33:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164485</guid> <description>Do any of you do any homework before you comment.  I wonder with some of the rightwing remarks you make as though your are talking about something you know about, but really don&#039;t. A lot of programs are cut by congress when they fail to meet the expectations of the DOD.  These cuts are usually made when they DOD requests them because for what ever reason the contractor has failed to deliver.  The osprey is a classic example.  The Marines desperately need this type of aircraft for their current and future light mobile mission.  This is why congress is continuing to provide funding with the hope the bugs can be worked out.  As TB eluded to above, the Army killed the Bell Recon helo because it sucked.  Do a little research and remember that more democrats in congress actually served in the military unlike their coward counter parts on the republican side.  Oh yes; I did the research! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do any of you do any homework before you comment.  I wonder with some of the rightwing remarks you make as though your are talking about something you know about, but really don’t. A lot of programs are cut by congress when they fail to meet the expectations of the DOD.  These cuts are usually made when they DOD requests them because for what ever reason the contractor has failed to deliver.  The osprey is a classic example.  The Marines desperately need this type of aircraft for their current and future light mobile mission.  This is why congress is continuing to provide funding with the hope the bugs can be worked out.  As TB eluded to above, the Army killed the Bell Recon helo because it sucked.  Do a little research and remember that more democrats in congress actually served in the military unlike their coward counter parts on the republican side.  Oh yes; I did the research!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-63689</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:46:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-63689</guid> <description>What I want to know is why they are scrapping production of the Army Recon Helicopter and then they&#039;re going off and buying that piece of crap Osprey. That thing has cost the military more money than it is worth and has too many times failed to show great results. I say move the funding from the Osprey to the ARH at least. Of course if I had it my way none of it would be cut. Welcome to a left-wing Congress </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I want to know is why they are scrapping production of the Army Recon Helicopter and then they’re going off and buying that piece of crap Osprey. That thing has cost the military more money than it is worth and has too many times failed to show great results. I say move the funding from the Osprey to the ARH at least. Of course if I had it my way none of it would be cut. Welcome to a left-wing Congress</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-63688</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:44:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-63688</guid> <description>Zeroing funding for Armed Recon Helicopter but sustaining R&amp;D funds is really saying that the politicians will keep the contractors and civilian engineers and managers that went over budget employed but screw the warrior that desperately needs the upgraded capability. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeroing funding for Armed Recon Helicopter but sustaining R&amp;D funds is really saying that the politicians will keep the contractors and civilian engineers and managers that went over budget employed but screw the warrior that desperately needs the upgraded capability.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/07/25/house-cuts-major-programs/#comment-164484</link> <dc:creator>VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:10:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3637#comment-164484</guid> <description>Interesting, and I&#039;d love to hear the positive: Troops on the ground, What do you want? This might be as good a place as any to tell Washington what&#039;s really needed and wanted. So, let &#039;r rip! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, and I’d love to hear the positive:<br /> Troops on the ground, What do you want? This might be as good a place as any to tell Washington what’s really needed and wanted.<br /> So, let ‘r rip!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 02:34:29 -->
