DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Logistics » CYA Pentagon-​​Style

CYA Pentagon-​​Style

Tomcats-Crushed.jpg

The lead story at Military​.com this morn­ing adds a bit of clar­ity to why the Pentagon ordered moth­balled Tomcats to be crushed into lit­tle bits: They were cov­er­ing their asses.

A GAO report issued yes­ter­day states that roughly 1,400 parts that could be used to fix F-​​14s were sold in February. These sales hap­pened after the Pentagon announced it had sus­pended sales of all parts that could be used on the Tomcat while it reviewed the secu­rity situation.

According to the arti­cle “the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service, the Pentagon’s sur­plus sales divi­sion, told inves­ti­ga­tors the parts were sold because it failed to update an auto­mated con­trol list and remove the air­craft parts before they were listed on its Internet sales site.

“A Democratic sen­a­tor said the inves­ti­ga­tion shows why leg­is­la­tion he pro­posed that would ban the sale of all F-​​14 parts is needed.

“‘The Pentagon’s sys­tem is still rid­dled with holes,’ Sen. Ron Wyden said in a tele­phone inter­view with The Associated Press. ‘These are the very parts that they said they wouldn’t be sell­ing, and they still are, and so you’ve got to make sure the changes are going to actu­ally have teeth and work.’”

Sen. Wyden also added that his leg­is­la­tion rec­og­nizes “that the Pentagon has bum­bled to the point where they can’t make the dis­tinc­tion” between sen­si­tive and innocu­ous surplus.

So, again, the crush­ing of Tomcats was in essence a grand clos­ing of the barn door after the live­stock had escaped. As the GAO report cir­cu­lated around the Pentagon (weeks before you and I knew it was com­ing out) the pow­ers that be knew they had to do some dam­age con­trol to keep other pesky law­mak­ers like Wyden from mak­ing a big deal of their fum­ble. Okay … now it makes sense.

Of course, as mem­bers of the savvy DT audi­ence have pointed out before and as any­one who’s every worked around Tomcats knows first­hand, it’ll take more than a few Black Market items to keep the ridicu­lously old Iranian Tomcat fleet air­borne. Remember these are first-​​gen air­planes … like 158XXX bureau num­bers. Can you imag­ine their main­te­nance man hour per flight hour stat? Good frig­gin’ luck keep­ing those pup­pies FMC.

I say we slip ‘em just enough parts to keep the main­tain­ers pulling their hair out while the avi­a­tors twid­dle their thumbs in the ready room.

Here’s an AP video report on the GAO report:

Play Video
Pentagon Sold F-​​14 Parts Sought by Iran
Associated Press — (APTN)
Aug. 01, 2007. 11:13 PM EST
Government inves­ti­ga­tors say roughly 1400 parts that could be used on F-​​14 ‘Tomcat’ fighter jets were sold to the pub­lic in February, a move that could jeop­ar­dize national secu­rity because Iran is seek­ing such com­po­nents. (August 1)

– Ward

Share |

August 2nd, 2007 | Logistics | 365219 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/08/02/cya-pentagon-style/CYA+Pentagon-Style2007-08-02+12%3A01%3A56paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Iran’s New Fighter?(Updated) | Rifle Robots Rigged and Ready » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Foreign.Boy says:
    August 2, 2007 at 9:08 am

    The video clip men­tions that mis­sile parts were sold too. My ini­tial reac­tion was “So what, 1,400 parts… prob­a­bly enough to fix 1 jet.…“
    But mis­sile parts? That could be bad if they can reverse engi­neer them.
    Honestly.… is the Tomcat that good of a jet that it’ll ham­per US pilots with their new tech?

    Reply
  2. Grandjester says:
    August 2, 2007 at 9:18 am

    Effing ridicu­lous. Look at the arti­cle below this one, Iran buy­ing 250 SU-​​30s and they have 25 Tomcats. Hmmmm, why don’t we SELL them the parts and remain­ing air­frames with the caveat that they don’t buy the Suhkois? Facing 10X more in 4th Gen fight­ers seems like the more dan­ger­ous option.

    Reply
  3. Ward says:
    August 2, 2007 at 9:50 am

    Very good point, Grandjester. A cohe­sive approach to for­eign pol­icy would be nice, wouldn’t it? Unfortunately we have too many orga­ni­za­tions (DoD, State, NATO, UN) and not enough coordination.

    Reply
  4. AK says:
    August 3, 2007 at 12:20 am

    So no F-​​14 war­bird ever?? Pity. Would be an awe­some dis­play plane. Not as unre­al­is­tic as it might appear maintenance-​​wise (assum­ing bits some­where) given there’s a fly­ing English elec­tric Lightening, F-​​104, and mebbe a bunch of oth­ers peo­ple know about?

    Reply
  5. Nied says:
    August 3, 2007 at 12:17 pm

    There’s been cred­i­ble evi­dence that the IRIAF has been able to domes­ti­cally reverse engi­neer most of the parts they need to keep their Tomcats fly­ing. And while they are old they have lived con­sid­er­ably eas­ier lives than our Tomcats (nice soft flared land­ings on com­fort­ably long run­ways instead of hun­dreds con­trolled crashes into a car­rier) so while I don’t doubt they’ve become harder to keep fly­ing I’m sure they’re in a lot bet­ter shape than our F-​​14s at the end of their ser­vice lives.

    Reply
  6. Roy Smith says:
    August 7, 2007 at 8:26 am

    This is the work of inter­na­tional bankers & the neo-​​con men work­ing another neo-​​con job on all of us.The above men­tioned cul­prits are prop­ping up Iran,just like the bankers propped up Germany so that World War I could keep going on.While Iran is being propped up,our own forces are being emasculated.We are destroy­ing weapon sys­tems left & right which only serves to weaken our nation so it can be absorbed first into a NAFTA super state & then One World Government.Meanwhile,like I said,Iran is being given newer weapons to fur­ther the Hegelian Dialectical the­sis + antithe­sis = synthesis.I have yet to see that F-​​35 Carrier jet or VTOL Marine jet.I have yet to see any qual­ity weapon sys­tems replac­ing the weapons we retired,scrapped,&/or sunk.I still don’t know why the F-​​22 Raptor was con­sid­ered bet­ter than & cho­sen over the F-​​23 Black Widow.First the Comanche heli­copter is can­celled & now the ARH is cancelled,or at least close to it.I guess there is noth­ing more fear­ful to the New World Order than an inde­pen­dent USA with weapons that actu­ally work & who can defend itself.Open your eyes & look,our own gov­ern­ment is destroy­ing the qual­ity of our weapons & run­ning them done with­out replacements.I won­der if Rome was so blind before its fall.

    Reply
  7. Clint says:
    August 9, 2007 at 12:06 am

    He Ward… On the neo-​​con bit. Are you a mod­ern Rip Van Winkle or a Lilliputian. I have dealt with this method­ol­ogy for more than 35 years. It is the prod­uct of an entrenched bureau­cracy. Wake up and under­stand Gov is not inclined toward solu­tions and money invested gains returns inversely pro­por­tional to the amount invested.

    Reply
  8. Bradley says:
    August 9, 2007 at 12:39 am

    OH here we go with the infa­mous NAU/​SPP para­noia… America is going to lose all soverignty and become part of a one world govt…
    Nothing in the arti­cle proves the NAU any­more than it proves Roswell has ufo aliens in some stor­age facil­ity.
    ufo’s, crop cir­cles, the NAU con­spir­acy, proof that phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies are a great long term investment

    Reply
  9. JC says:
    August 9, 2007 at 1:43 pm

    More pro­pa­ganda from the left. After hear­ing on talk radio, that the democrats’s will be dis­s­a­pointed if the United States wins the war because it will put a big hole their plan to take the White House in the next elec­tion, I do not put any­thing pass the Dems and reporters (includ­ing those in this paper).

    Reply
  10. Harry says:
    August 9, 2007 at 2:06 pm

    I almost wish some­one would drop a bomb on the con­gress and the sen­ate build­ings, they are destroy­ing tha American way of life by their self serv­ing ways and com­plete dis­re­gard of the American tax pay­ing cit­i­zens.
    They can destroy usable mate­ri­als that any fool could do, but they can not solve the immi­gra­tion problems.…..what a bunch of “law­less lawyers” we have gov­ern­ing our coun­try. They should all be arrested for treason.…..

    Reply
  11. 22lr says:
    September 16, 2007 at 5:09 pm

    If Irna really wanted F-​​14 parts, why cant they just make em, any part can be made if you really want it. And why the heck do they even fly air­planes that were made by the “lesser satan” is it maybe that there own air­planes SUCK, HMMM. Big deal, let our f-​​22s go blow up a few f-​​14s, and all is well.

    Reply
  12. Anonymous says:
    June 11, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    http://​www​.​e​-infor​ma​tion​.biz

    Reply
  13. ????? says:
    June 11, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    http://​www​.​e​-infor​ma​tion​.biz

    Reply
  14. rigma says:
    April 3, 2009 at 5:53 pm

    That proves my appre­hen­sion of Iranian abil­ity!
    We don’t hate em…But Individuals do!We=Nation/divisions…Not all America is America!
    Foreign inter­ests suck.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage