DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Sixty-two Years Into the Nuclear Age

Sixty-two Years Into the Nuclear Age

Hiroshima_aftermath.jpg
Just a historical reminder: The atomic bomb named “Little Boy” was dropped on Hiroshima by the Enola Gay, a Boeing B-29 bomber, at 8:15 in the morning of August 6, 1945 — 62 years ago yesterday.

And here’s a decidedly American war-era newsreel capture of the event. Note the flowery language used by the narrator to brush over the savagery of the explosion.

– Ward

Share |

August 7th, 2007 | Nukes | 366114 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/08/07/sixty-two-years-into-the-nuclear-age/Sixty-two+Years+Into+the+Nuclear+Age2007-08-07+13%3A21%3A16paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Dragon Skin Gets the Shaft… | The Robot Plane Lives » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Eric says:
    August 7, 2007 at 11:38 am

    … and then I tell people about Operation Downfall.

    Reply
  2. ZI says:
    August 7, 2007 at 12:52 pm

    Yeah,we know the story.This is a site on military technology,the readers know their history.
    But god,the narrator’s tone is horrible.The voice is typical of this period but the contrast with the reality that it describe is really disturbing.

    Reply
  3. Ardentor says:
    August 7, 2007 at 12:56 pm

    hehe ward strikes again, the typical liberal feelery.

    Reply
  4. downwindjaxon says:
    August 7, 2007 at 1:42 pm

    To Ward: Are the human remains in the Arizona at Pearl Harbor any less dead than the human remains at Hiroshima? Of course not. You would do well to remember the dead of Pearl Harbor got that way by a coward’s sneak attack. The dead of Hiroshima got that way because the very same coward wouldn’t surrender. The Japanese government started a war which we finished, and that governments bears total responsibility for opening Pandora’s box. I wonder why you are posting sympathy for devil on a military Web site. Doesn’t the ACLU or moveon​.org let you post on their sites?

    Reply
  5. demophilus says:
    August 7, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    Hey, Ward:
    Gunga, la gunga.

    Reply
  6. Ward says:
    August 7, 2007 at 2:13 pm

    downwind:
    So let me get this straight: You’re comparing roughly 2,400 Navy men killed in the line of duty aboard warships to almost 12,000 civilians killed while wandering around their hometown?
    And Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack, but nothing I’ve ever read would suggest it was executed by cowards. Your logic is flawed, as well, with your “coward wouldn’t surrender” line. Most cowards have no trouble surrendering.
    Besides yesterday was August 6 not December 7. We generally note historic events on or about the date they happened.
    And Ardentor, is a “liberal” label all you got? Lame-age, shipmate.

    Reply
  7. TrafficGeek says:
    August 7, 2007 at 2:48 pm

    Remembering this date is important. There isn’t a day to remember this like we have for Pearl Harbor or September 11th.
    Remembering this is important not for the knee jerk feelings other posters may have, but it’s important for the following reasons:
    –This is the consequence to atrocities (Nanking, Shanghai, Phillipines, Batang
    –This is the consequence when a country initiate a war of aggression
    –This is a reminder your victims have not forgotten, forgiveness is a different story.
    –Don’t ever think your victims are afraid to repeat this if you try to go down the same path. Yes, even if it means starting another 40 years of Cold War II to stop you.
    Shed a tear for ALL the dead, not just the ones glowing in the dark.

    Reply
  8. downwindjaxon says:
    August 7, 2007 at 4:24 pm

    Ward: No, you didn’t get it straight. The comparison of Pearl Harbor dead to Hiroshima dead is that both came about because of the Tojo govt.‘s decision to go to war with the USA. That

    Reply
  9. demophilus says:
    August 7, 2007 at 5:29 pm

    Hey, downwind:
    Would you call yourself a conservative, a reactionary, or a crank?

    Reply
  10. Ward says:
    August 7, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    downwind:
    Your point is clouded by your personal attacks. Pity. We might have actually had an exchange of some value.

    Reply
  11. ziv says:
    August 7, 2007 at 10:53 pm

    Can’t help but wonder how someone could compare the attack on Pearl Harbor, during peace time, to the necessarily brutal culmination of a horrendous war. In December of 1941, America was pretty comfortable sleeping in on a Sunday morning, because the only war in the near future seemed to be at least a couple thousand miles away. Japan’s government changed that, not only by killing hundreds of thousands of civilians in China, by raping the thousands of women that were needed for their comfort women detachments, by killing and/or starving American/Australian/New Zealand soldiers they captured early in the war, but by attacking a nation that they were not at war with…
    Fuchida wasn’t a coward, but the men that sent him to attack America in a time of peace were.
    Thank God, Truman had the courage to end the war as quickly as possible.

    Reply
  12. jack says:
    February 7, 2008 at 9:04 am

    downwind, if there is a judgement day, it will be made possible by people like you.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Exoskeletons Make You Tough
      Runescape Gold , Runescape powerleveling package , Runescape...
      metin2u
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      And who exactly are you...
      Jack Frost
    • Multicam on the Loose
      The ol’boy in multicam could be an Air Force CCT. Not...
      Luke Bradshaw
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Use Google to look for Harrier or VAAC Harrier – by comparison...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage