<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Japan Launches Carrier…Sorta</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:24:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dennis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-255931</link> <dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:12:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-255931</guid> <description>Japan should have Nimitz Class size carriers. The U&#039;S Carrier Fleet has the full burden of the Pacific and it is time for the other country&#039;s (Japan and Australia) to help with that burden. Not sure about India. They seem to be playing the fence. There was times they could have been closer as allies but elected to buy Russian Military hardware instead. If they would have bought the KityHawk even if just to look at the ship for design considerations they would have been so far ahead as they are now in Carrier design. Would like to see Japan name their first true Carrier Akagi. LOL </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Japan should have Nimitz Class size carriers. The U’S Carrier Fleet has the full burden of the Pacific and it is time for the other country’s (Japan and Australia) to help with that burden.<br /> Not sure about India. They seem to be playing the fence. There was times they could have been closer as allies but elected to buy Russian Military hardware instead. If they would have bought the KityHawk even if just to look at the ship for design considerations they would have been so far ahead as they are now in Carrier design.<br /> Would like to see Japan name their first true Carrier Akagi. LOL</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kevin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-228499</link> <dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:02:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-228499</guid> <description>Hm. Straight out of the cold war rhetoric. First it was the Soviets. Then it was terrorists. Now it is China. Stop trying to dress up China as some bogey man. The US has been more belligerent than China. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Straight out of the cold war rhetoric. First it was the Soviets. Then it was terrorists. Now it is China. Stop trying to dress up China as some bogey man. The US has been more belligerent than China.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rohit</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-226889</link> <dc:creator>Rohit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:21:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-226889</guid> <description>India should buy F-35 Ligntenings. The IN can operate in the South China Sea in tandem with future American and Japanese naval assets, and IN F-35s can land, refuel, rearm on friendly carriers and vice versa. The future pacific conflict is democracy (US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, , Taiwan, Singapore) against the communist threat (PRC) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India should buy F-35 Ligntenings. The IN can operate in the South China Sea in tandem with future American and Japanese naval assets, and IN F-35s can land, refuel, rearm on friendly carriers and vice versa. The future pacific conflict is democracy (US, Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, , Taiwan, Singapore) against the communist threat (PRC)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220371</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:11:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220371</guid> <description>This is all good stuff.  But come on!!!  Do you think that the oil company&#039;s will go for that or the Japanese lawmakers that are in bed with them?  It will not end until a major event happens. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is all good stuff.  But come on!!!  Do you think that the oil company’s will go for that or the Japanese lawmakers that are in bed with them?  It will not end until a major event happens.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220370</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:08:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220370</guid> <description>yeah if you&#039;re not cheating or lying you&#039;re not winning.  Just ask the Chinese and the Americans.  I&#039;m curious to see how the events play out. History repeats itself... will you be ready? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah if you’re not cheating or lying you’re not winning.  Just ask the Chinese and the Americans.  I’m curious to see how the events play out.</p><p>History repeats itself…<br /> will you be ready?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220369</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:06:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220369</guid> <description>agreed.  Take the &quot;Self Defense&quot;. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed.  Take the “Self Defense”.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220368</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:05:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220368</guid> <description>I agree.  The Americans smacked the manhood out of Japan back in the 40&#039;s and 50&#039;s.  Japan needs to man-up and &#039;be&#039; the heavy mover and shaker in the region.  But of course not, they&#039;re more concerned with cute things, manga, and fake eyelashes.  Not enough time to cultivate the shogunate spirit. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  The Americans smacked the manhood out of Japan back in the 40’s and 50’s.  Japan needs to man-up and ‘be’ the heavy mover and shaker in the region.  But of course not, they’re more concerned with cute things, manga, and fake eyelashes.  Not enough time to cultivate the shogunate spirit.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220367</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:03:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220367</guid> <description>um, just more gas guzzling targets for submarines. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>um, just more gas guzzling targets for submarines.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220365</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 14:02:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220365</guid> <description>it&#039;s a half hearted attempt.  Japan will continue to be bullied by everyone around them because their too busy throwing up the peace sign and bowing to everyone.  The true test will come when NK loses it and missiles start flying or China decides to take control of an island or two.  Frankly, I just see more dialogue, bowing, and peace signs...someone give me a manga comic. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it’s a half hearted attempt.  Japan will continue to be bullied by everyone around them because their too busy throwing up the peace sign and bowing to everyone.  The true test will come when NK loses it and missiles start flying or China decides to take control of an island or two.  Frankly, I just see more dialogue, bowing, and peace signs…someone give me a manga comic.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 0pilot</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/08/28/japan-launches-carrier-sorta/#comment-220364</link> <dc:creator>0pilot</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:57:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3700#comment-220364</guid> <description>Helicopters, Harriers, F35&#039;s, you know it really doesn&#039;t matter.  It&#039;s a &quot;war&quot;ship.  Get over it.  If Japan wants to have a little bit revel in nostalgia of the rising sun over the pacific, let them.  A little bit of manhood wouldn&#039;t hurt them at all. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helicopters, Harriers, F35’s, you know it really doesn’t matter.  It’s a “war“ship.  Get over it.  If Japan wants to have a little bit revel in nostalgia of the rising sun over the pacific, let them.  A little bit of manhood wouldn’t hurt them at all.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 03:42:47 -->
