DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Amazing MRAP Survival Photos

Amazing MRAP Survival Photos

MRAP-blast.jpg

Ive caught a lot of flak for my lack of enthu­si­asm with the MRAP vehi­cle. Some read­ers have maligned my intent, expe­ri­ence, report­ing and gen­eral under­stand­ing of the issue with­out con­sid­er­ing my argu­ment care­fully and read­ing closely to what I say.

I rec­og­nize that my stance on the MRAP debate is con­tro­ver­sial and con­trar­ian, but I see that as part of my job as DefenseTech edi­tor to seed the conversation.

One thing I have never argued is the pro­tec­tive capa­bil­ity of the MRAP. Its con­struc­tion and design run cir­cles around the Humvee if pro­tect­ing the pax and crew is your sole pri­or­ity. Its an amaz­ing vehi­cle that can really take a pounding.

DefenseTech ran across these pic­tures that attest to the MRAPs sur­viv­abil­ity.mrap-thumb.jpg
As you can see, the entire Marine con­voy is com­prised of MRAPs, and the Cougar which was hit by the IED gets truly banged up. But no one inside was killed and every­one escaped with only minor injuries. (Check out the engine blown 100 yards away)…

I dont nec­es­sar­ily agree with the idea that all Humvees in Iraq should be replaced with MRAPs. But see­ing these pho­tos has me almost convinced.

– Christian

Share |

August 30th, 2007 | Ground Vehicles | 370682 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/08/30/amazing-mrap-survival-photos/Amazing+MRAP+Survival+Photos2007-08-30+12%3A21%3A51Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Heat Ray Too Scary for Iraq | China Rolls Over Taiwan » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ohwilleke says:
    August 30, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    As I under­stand your argu­ment against the MRAP, the con­cern you have raised is basi­cally that these pur­chases will dis­cour­age the Army from buy­ing some­thing bet­ter later on.
    If I have that right, then this pic­ture is indeed a per­fect deal maker. The MRAP is bro­ken, so it will still need to be replaced, but the troops are pro­tected.
    For my druthers, I think putting sol­diers are risk so that we can make bet­ter pro­cure­ment deci­sions in the future is a pretty dodgy argu­ment, but in any event, if the Iraq War con­tin­ues on the way it has so far for too many more years, it may be a false dilemma, as there may not be many MRAPs left when the dust settles.

    Reply
  2. Jeff says:
    August 30, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    It seems to me like mod­ern war­fare will be more and more urband mis­sions that the MRAP would be beter suited for than the HUMVEE. The Humvee would be great in a wide open con­flict like the Easter European Theater in WWII but in mod­ern com­bat it seems that the USA has no, or at least very few, con­ven­tional ene­mies left. With urban war­fare being the stan­dard of these new guerilla forces it only makes sense to arm up for this style of war. More MRAPs.

    Reply
  3. The Hooded Swan says:
    August 30, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Jeff is on to you Christian. Your prob­lem isn’t really with the MRAP. This is about pre­dict­ing the future. Whether it will be fire & maneu­ver between large for­ma­tions out in the open or counter-​​insurgencies in urban areas.
    My guess? The ser­vices will even­tu­ally spend as much time prepar­ing to fight inside urban areas as they do out­side of them. Watch for the use of the term “rural warfare”.

    Reply
  4. Sapper says:
    August 31, 2007 at 3:33 am

    The prob­lem with this vehi­cle is that as nice as it is for pro­tec­tion it is very dif­fi­cult to recover if it breaks down. I have had the bad expe­ri­ence time and time again in Afghanistan where I was broke down and wait­ing for a recov­ery asset to be deployed to recover me and then find­ing out that since there is noth­ing in the army sys­tem to recover the vehi­cle we were going to have to spend addi­tional time exposed wait­ing for a wheeled crane and a truck with a lowbed to come and recover us. This prob­lem needs to be addresed before pro­duc­tion continues.

    Reply
  5. Sapper 1 says:
    August 31, 2007 at 3:38 am

    The prob­lem with this vehi­cle is that as nice as it is for pro­tec­tion it is very dif­fi­cult to recover if it breaks down. I have had the bad expe­ri­ence time and time again in Afghanistan where I was broke down and wait­ing for a recov­ery asset to be deployed to recover me and then find­ing out that since there is noth­ing in the army sys­tem to recover the vehi­cle we were going to have to spend addi­tional time exposed wait­ing for a wheeled crane and a truck with a lowbed to come and recover us. This prob­lem needs to be addresed before pro­duc­tion continues.

    Reply
  6. CS says:
    August 31, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    The MRAP’s sheer size and mass would limit the num­ber of roads it can drive on, reduce its capa­bil­ity for eva­sive manuev­ers and also reduce its offroad capa­bil­ity. In some ways, this may make it less able to avoid IEDs than Humvees. On the other hand, if it is hit by an IED it offers vastly bet­ter pro­tec­tion for the crew than any Humvee. So over­all, replac­ing all Humvees with MRAPs will hugely reduce the num­ber of US casu­al­ties and will be an essen­tial step if the occu­pa­tion is to be continued.

    Reply
  7. Brian H says:
    August 31, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    A smashed vehi­cle and safe pas­sen­gers is the same prin­ci­ple as hav­ing crum­ple zones on cars; it’s all about who or what absorbs the energy. Deflecting is good, but what gets through should be absorbed by metal.
    It just occurs to me that the same prin­ci­ple that is built into some road dividers could be used: water-​​filled com­part­ments that pop a cork and blast a jet of water straight up on impact. Can absorb a huge amount of com­pres­sion energy safely.

    Reply
  8. txzen says:
    September 1, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    the rg31 doesn’t look as big as a hum­mer but the cougar and buf­falo are huge compared

    Reply
  9. doesnt matter says:
    September 6, 2007 at 7:20 pm

    how about lets not post things the enemy can use against us!

    Reply
  10. 22lr says:
    September 7, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    IF we were serius about pro­tect­ing the sol­diers inside, and noth­ing else we would be rid­ing around in M1 tanks. Polititions need to get there noses out of teh mil­i­tarys bussi­ness so that the com­man­ders can decide (with no pres­sure) the best way to go.
    Same goes for the M-​​4, and Humvee. How can the com­man­ders even make a desi­sion when they get stuff shoved up their noses. Polititions will make us lose every war we fight, if we let them. I would love to see a gen­eral tell them to shut the heck up and lis­ten to what i need for my troops, and for them to git that stuff to the gen­eral.
    Wishful think­ing I know, but its ok to dream.

    Reply
  11. Rich says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:40 am

    per­son­ally, humvees capa­bil­i­ties have been pushed to there max and beyond. Unarmoured humvees are great for mis­sions that require armour out the wazoo. I have seen a leve 3 armormed humvee. at 25mph it would roll over in a turn. WAY WAY TO HEAVY. That is whats killing more of our troops then any­thing else. Traffic acci­dents etc, not bul­lets or bombs.

    Reply
  12. rich says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:50 am

    do you think the govt, is going to just throw away all those humvee’s? of course not, its pub­lic knowl­edge that they are pro­to­typ­ing new uses for the humvee, 2 manned armored assault vehi­cles, I would describe it as an apache on wheels. and oth­ers that Im not at lib­erty to discuss.

    Reply
  13. JKA says:
    October 22, 2007 at 2:56 am

    Replace all the Humvees in Iraq? Not nec­es­sar­ily. But what are the mis­sions?
    What are the require­ments of the mis­sions?
    How many Humvees are suf­fi­cient for lightly-​​armoured mis­sions?
    How many MRAPs are required for highly-​​armoured mis­sions?
    And for heaven’s sake get the politi­cians out of the deci­sion process. Ask the gen­er­als and majors what they need and get it too them.
    (PS. what hap­pened to the Strykers? Dead end?)

    Reply
  14. 3536 wrecker operator says:
    November 7, 2007 at 1:56 am

    I was tasked to fig­ure out a way to recover the MRAP vehi­cle. The army used their wrecker and i used my faith­ful MK36 wrecker. The army seemed to be hav­ing prob­lems attach­ing its tow asse­bly from its multi use adap­tor (MUA)and was not able to lift tow but was able to flat to the MRAP vehi­cle.
    Since my tow assem­bly adapters and sus­pen­sion are alot diffrent i was able to lower my sus­pen­sion and my MUA on wrecker and aline the my MUA to the MRAPS tow eyes.
    I devoloped a way to attach the chains to the MUA so that it does not dam­age the front bumper.
    I am the first Marine to devolop a safe lift tow method that will hope­fully be used in IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN.
    So to those that say it can be towed, Marines impro­vise and over come and thats what just what i did.
    CPL.….….…

    Reply
  15. Brian says:
    November 25, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    I would like for this per­son to con­tact me if all pos­si­ble to see what he thinks as being the first to lift tow this vehilce?? If you can please post this and if you have any infor­ma­tion about this please e-​​mail me at the above e-​​mail so i can talk to you. Been out here twice and have done it my own way and recovied all mis­sion type thrown at me.
    Posted by: 3536 wrecker oper­a­tor at November 7, 2007 01:56 AM
    SSgt Brian Newsom
    Wrecker Section SNCOIC
    Al Asad Iraq

    Reply
  16. NOMAD says:
    January 21, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    FIRST NAVISTAR DEATH REPORTED TONIGHT

    Reply
  17. david says:
    February 5, 2008 at 11:31 pm

    As a gov­er­ment con­trac­tor wok­ing for and around the MRAPs you have a great truck .there are more ppl mak­ing the trucks the FPI anf the BAE sys­tem trucks are will built , there are FRAG kit 6 being made now to add more armor to them which will help. alot bet­ter than to old hum­mer that has been used , it is get­ting too heavy with the AOA on the 1151

    Reply
  18. danner123 says:
    July 10, 2008 at 12:03 am

    my name is steven dan­ner i work for bae land sys­tems i was one of the first mechan­ics to work on mrap.unfortunatley we dont build them no more i am now a bradley fight­ing vehichle mechanic but i do miss the mrap very much but am glad to see it is doing what it was designed to

    Reply
  19. Dave says:
    July 24, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    i love the MRAP, oh yea you guys heard about the new light assault vehilce

    Reply
  20. gw gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 12:46 am

    My neg­a­tive, as my bosss brother was very sad. He said vent­ing to find out the game we play games together, together fight mon­ster, how to kill on how to kill. Later, we played the GuildWars game, my brother helped me apply a num­ber, and she also bought some GW gold to me. Choose the name, I think a long time, in order to no longer immerse in the lovelorn, so I need to find indi­vid­u­als to love me, want to per­ma­nently, I hope that it is no longer the past fire­works fleet­ing. Finally, I choose love me 9 long time as my name. Brother saw and laughed; he said he hoped I will be happy. He let me go to play, beware of being cheated, do not give other peo­ple my phone and QQ.

    Reply
  21. rappelz rupees says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:02 am

    Three years ago, after friends intro­duced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and con­fused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rap­pelz rupees, but I became the most evil vil­lains in the game. Until I encoun­tered her, I found the mean­ing of survival.

    Reply
  22. ro zeny says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:04 am

    The friend took me to the game, but she own was leav­ing the game. A per­son to game is bor­ing, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feel­ings and mov­ing. Once, the two boys for me quar­reled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to mar­ried, I think per­haps all this to change, and I pray to become a real­ity, a few days after he dis­ap­peared. A per­son was play­ing a mar­riage num­ber, what would it have taken place.

    Reply
  23. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  24. M.Burhanuddin says:
    July 11, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    Weird!!, We Muslim going to war our inten­tion are to death (syahid) but you all going to war to keep you safe and go back to your family

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage