DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Amazing MRAP Survival Photos

Amazing MRAP Survival Photos

MRAP-blast.jpg

Ive caught a lot of flak for my lack of enthusiasm with the MRAP vehicle. Some readers have maligned my intent, experience, reporting and general understanding of the issue without considering my argument carefully and reading closely to what I say.

I recognize that my stance on the MRAP debate is controversial and contrarian, but I see that as part of my job as DefenseTech editor to seed the conversation.

One thing I have never argued is the protective capability of the MRAP. Its construction and design run circles around the Humvee if protecting the pax and crew is your sole priority. Its an amazing vehicle that can really take a pounding.

DefenseTech ran across these pictures that attest to the MRAPs survivability.mrap-thumb.jpg
As you can see, the entire Marine convoy is comprised of MRAPs, and the Cougar which was hit by the IED gets truly banged up. But no one inside was killed and everyone escaped with only minor injuries. (Check out the engine blown 100 yards away)…

I dont necessarily agree with the idea that all Humvees in Iraq should be replaced with MRAPs. But seeing these photos has me almost convinced.

– Christian

Share |

August 30th, 2007 | Ground Vehicles | 370625 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/08/30/amazing-mrap-survival-photos/Amazing+MRAP+Survival+Photos2007-08-30+12%3A21%3A51Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Heat Ray Too Scary for Iraq | China Rolls Over Taiwan » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. ohwilleke says:
    August 30, 2007 at 12:36 pm

    As I understand your argument against the MRAP, the concern you have raised is basically that these purchases will discourage the Army from buying something better later on.
    If I have that right, then this picture is indeed a perfect deal maker. The MRAP is broken, so it will still need to be replaced, but the troops are protected.
    For my druthers, I think putting soldiers are risk so that we can make better procurement decisions in the future is a pretty dodgy argument, but in any event, if the Iraq War continues on the way it has so far for too many more years, it may be a false dilemma, as there may not be many MRAPs left when the dust settles.

    Reply
  2. Jeff says:
    August 30, 2007 at 1:31 pm

    It seems to me like modern warfare will be more and more urband missions that the MRAP would be beter suited for than the HUMVEE. The Humvee would be great in a wide open conflict like the Easter European Theater in WWII but in modern combat it seems that the USA has no, or at least very few, conventional enemies left. With urban warfare being the standard of these new guerilla forces it only makes sense to arm up for this style of war. More MRAPs.

    Reply
  3. The Hooded Swan says:
    August 30, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    Jeff is on to you Christian. Your problem isn’t really with the MRAP. This is about predicting the future. Whether it will be fire & maneuver between large formations out in the open or counter-insurgencies in urban areas.
    My guess? The services will eventually spend as much time preparing to fight inside urban areas as they do outside of them. Watch for the use of the term “rural warfare”.

    Reply
  4. Sapper says:
    August 31, 2007 at 3:33 am

    The problem with this vehicle is that as nice as it is for protection it is very difficult to recover if it breaks down. I have had the bad experience time and time again in Afghanistan where I was broke down and waiting for a recovery asset to be deployed to recover me and then finding out that since there is nothing in the army system to recover the vehicle we were going to have to spend additional time exposed waiting for a wheeled crane and a truck with a lowbed to come and recover us. This problem needs to be addresed before production continues.

    Reply
  5. Sapper 1 says:
    August 31, 2007 at 3:38 am

    The problem with this vehicle is that as nice as it is for protection it is very difficult to recover if it breaks down. I have had the bad experience time and time again in Afghanistan where I was broke down and waiting for a recovery asset to be deployed to recover me and then finding out that since there is nothing in the army system to recover the vehicle we were going to have to spend additional time exposed waiting for a wheeled crane and a truck with a lowbed to come and recover us. This problem needs to be addresed before production continues.

    Reply
  6. CS says:
    August 31, 2007 at 7:54 pm

    The MRAP’s sheer size and mass would limit the number of roads it can drive on, reduce its capability for evasive manuevers and also reduce its offroad capability. In some ways, this may make it less able to avoid IEDs than Humvees. On the other hand, if it is hit by an IED it offers vastly better protection for the crew than any Humvee. So overall, replacing all Humvees with MRAPs will hugely reduce the number of US casualties and will be an essential step if the occupation is to be continued.

    Reply
  7. Brian H says:
    August 31, 2007 at 8:52 pm

    A smashed vehicle and safe passengers is the same principle as having crumple zones on cars; it’s all about who or what absorbs the energy. Deflecting is good, but what gets through should be absorbed by metal.
    It just occurs to me that the same principle that is built into some road dividers could be used: water-filled compartments that pop a cork and blast a jet of water straight up on impact. Can absorb a huge amount of compression energy safely.

    Reply
  8. txzen says:
    September 1, 2007 at 3:11 pm

    the rg31 doesn’t look as big as a hummer but the cougar and buffalo are huge compared

    Reply
  9. doesnt matter says:
    September 6, 2007 at 7:20 pm

    how about lets not post things the enemy can use against us!

    Reply
  10. 22lr says:
    September 7, 2007 at 10:20 pm

    IF we were serius about protecting the soldiers inside, and nothing else we would be riding around in M1 tanks. Polititions need to get there noses out of teh militarys bussiness so that the commanders can decide (with no pressure) the best way to go.
    Same goes for the M-4, and Humvee. How can the commanders even make a desision when they get stuff shoved up their noses. Polititions will make us lose every war we fight, if we let them. I would love to see a general tell them to shut the heck up and listen to what i need for my troops, and for them to git that stuff to the general.
    Wishful thinking I know, but its ok to dream.

    Reply
  11. Rich says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:40 am

    personally, humvees capabilities have been pushed to there max and beyond. Unarmoured humvees are great for missions that require armour out the wazoo. I have seen a leve 3 armormed humvee. at 25mph it would roll over in a turn. WAY WAY TO HEAVY. That is whats killing more of our troops then anything else. Traffic accidents etc, not bullets or bombs.

    Reply
  12. rich says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:50 am

    do you think the govt, is going to just throw away all those humvee’s? of course not, its public knowledge that they are prototyping new uses for the humvee, 2 manned armored assault vehicles, I would describe it as an apache on wheels. and others that Im not at liberty to discuss.

    Reply
  13. JKA says:
    October 22, 2007 at 2:56 am

    Replace all the Humvees in Iraq? Not necessarily. But what are the missions?
    What are the requirements of the missions?
    How many Humvees are sufficient for lightly-armoured missions?
    How many MRAPs are required for highly-armoured missions?
    And for heaven’s sake get the politicians out of the decision process. Ask the generals and majors what they need and get it too them.
    (PS. what happened to the Strykers? Dead end?)

    Reply
  14. 3536 wrecker operator says:
    November 7, 2007 at 1:56 am

    I was tasked to figure out a way to recover the MRAP vehicle. The army used their wrecker and i used my faithful MK36 wrecker. The army seemed to be having problems attaching its tow assebly from its multi use adaptor (MUA)and was not able to lift tow but was able to flat to the MRAP vehicle.
    Since my tow assembly adapters and suspension are alot diffrent i was able to lower my suspension and my MUA on wrecker and aline the my MUA to the MRAPS tow eyes.
    I devoloped a way to attach the chains to the MUA so that it does not damage the front bumper.
    I am the first Marine to devolop a safe lift tow method that will hopefully be used in IRAQ and AFGHANISTAN.
    So to those that say it can be towed, Marines improvise and over come and thats what just what i did.
    CPL.….….…

    Reply
  15. Brian says:
    November 25, 2007 at 2:30 pm

    I would like for this person to contact me if all possible to see what he thinks as being the first to lift tow this vehilce?? If you can please post this and if you have any information about this please e-mail me at the above e-mail so i can talk to you. Been out here twice and have done it my own way and recovied all mission type thrown at me.
    Posted by: 3536 wrecker operator at November 7, 2007 01:56 AM
    SSgt Brian Newsom
    Wrecker Section SNCOIC
    Al Asad Iraq

    Reply
  16. NOMAD says:
    January 21, 2008 at 11:21 pm

    FIRST NAVISTAR DEATH REPORTED TONIGHT

    Reply
  17. david says:
    February 5, 2008 at 11:31 pm

    As a goverment contractor woking for and around the MRAPs you have a great truck .there are more ppl making the trucks the FPI anf the BAE system trucks are will built , there are FRAG kit 6 being made now to add more armor to them which will help. alot better than to old hummer that has been used , it is getting too heavy with the AOA on the 1151

    Reply
  18. danner123 says:
    July 10, 2008 at 12:03 am

    my name is steven danner i work for bae land systems i was one of the first mechanics to work on mrap.unfortunatley we dont build them no more i am now a bradley fighting vehichle mechanic but i do miss the mrap very much but am glad to see it is doing what it was designed to

    Reply
  19. Dave says:
    July 24, 2008 at 5:47 pm

    i love the MRAP, oh yea you guys heard about the new light assault vehilce

    Reply
  20. gw gold says:
    August 13, 2008 at 12:46 am

    My negative, as my bosss brother was very sad. He said venting to find out the game we play games together, together fight monster, how to kill on how to kill. Later, we played the GuildWars game, my brother helped me apply a number, and she also bought some GW gold to me. Choose the name, I think a long time, in order to no longer immerse in the lovelorn, so I need to find individuals to love me, want to permanently, I hope that it is no longer the past fireworks fleeting. Finally, I choose love me 9 long time as my name. Brother saw and laughed; he said he hoped I will be happy. He let me go to play, beware of being cheated, do not give other people my phone and QQ.

    Reply
  21. rappelz rupees says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:02 am

    Three years ago, after friends introduced, I played the Rappelz game. At that time, I dazed and confused, I like to go my own way, I have a lot of rappelz rupees, but I became the most evil villains in the game. Until I encountered her, I found the meaning of survival.

    Reply
  22. ro zeny says:
    August 13, 2008 at 1:04 am

    The friend took me to the game, but she own was leaving the game. A person to game is boring, every day, I only know to upgrade and earn ro zeny. I can not sad dot this mess of feelings and moving. Once, the two boys for me quarreled utterly, until I leaved and tool sad. Later, I found a boy to married, I think perhaps all this to change, and I pray to become a reality, a few days after he disappeared. A person was playing a marriage number, what would it have taken place.

    Reply
  23. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 8:33 pm

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  24. M.Burhanuddin says:
    July 11, 2009 at 9:35 pm

    Weird!!, We Muslim going to war our intention are to death (syahid) but you all going to war to keep you safe and go back to your family

    Reply
    • alf says:
      January 15, 2010 at 1:53 pm

      Not so Weird, You wanna die and we wanna get you there. Makes sense to me

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And flush ALL those dollars already spent down the...
      WillyPete
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      My personal experience being on the ground in less...
      shark60
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage