DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Toilet Tech

Toilet Tech

I just want to know how all the par­ties involved kept a straight face through this interview…

Thanks good­ness for the leg restraints. Wouldnt want to get in trou­ble for hav­ing a wide stance, huh?

Ugh, the jokes just keep coming…

Play Video
NASA Buys Multimillion Dollar Space Toilet
Associated Press — (APTN)
Aug. 28, 2007. 10:04 AM EST
Check out this Russian-​​designed toi­let NASA’s buy­ing for the expanded International Space Station. It costs a whop­ping 19-​​million dol­lars. (Aug. 28)

– Christian

Share |

September 3rd, 2007 | Bizarro | 371125 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/03/toilet-tech/Toilet+Tech2007-09-03+11%3A17%3A28Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « The Sunday Paper | How To Avoid Another Va. Tech » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Camp says:
    September 3, 2007 at 10:12 am

    19 Million for a sin­gle toi­let… WTF!? Are you kid­ding me? You can swing by the local hard­ware store and pick up a 16 Gallon Wet/​Dry Vacuum & a cou­ple bungee cords for about $150.00. Heck Space is a giant vac­uum, just crack the air­lock a bit & let it rip… or maybe not. 8P
    It’s sto­ries like these, that make me won­der if manned space flight is really worth it. I hope it came with a life-​​time war­ranty.
    In space no one can hear you… ?

    Reply
  2. meh says:
    September 3, 2007 at 6:24 pm

    It isn’t about manned space flight it’s the way NASA does it. Whatever the Russians pay for their own space toi­lets, I’m pretty sure it isn’t $20 mil­lion; it’s just that they’ve embraced the first rule of cap­i­tal­ism: Go find a sucker.
    Project Constellation is more or less the log­i­cal con­tin­u­a­tion of Apollo/​Saturn V. It’s 30 years late after the Shuttle suc­cess­fully burned prob­a­bly $100 bil­lion or so but hey, what’s a few bil­lions amongst gov­ern­ment agencies?

    Reply
  3. The Cenobyte says:
    September 4, 2007 at 1:03 pm

    because me and the Devil are such great friends I am going to take his side on this one…
    The cost of devel­op­ing a good work­able sys­tem for space is any­thing but cheap. The devel­op­ment cost for a new sys­tem like this would be very very very expen­sive, but for 12million we get the design for one that we can make cheap from here on out. So while it sounds like a bad deal, I sus­pect it’s really cheaper than doing it ourselves.

    Reply
  4. William says:
    September 5, 2007 at 7:50 am

    Let me know when the next avail­able 19$ mil toi­let is avail­able, I’d like to take my turn ..

    Reply
  5. Wynne L. Daughters says:
    September 5, 2007 at 7:55 am

    This makes the 1970’s rev­e­la­tion of the USAF Lockheed C-​​5 $ 800 + toi­let seat very rea­son­able.
    I know about ris­ing costs because of the U. S. Congress pro­mo­tion of con­tin­u­ing infla­tion, but isn’t this $ 18M toi­let sys­tem a bit rediuclus ?

    Reply
  6. Dale says:
    September 5, 2007 at 10:27 am

    What I would like to know is this: Did they arrive at the “cost” for this “toi­let sys­tem” the same way they arrived at the “cost” for the “toi­let seat” in the C-​​5A?
    If so, the cred­i­bil­ity of this story is less than ZERO!!!

    Reply
  7. Thoughts says:
    September 5, 2007 at 11:49 am

    Just won­der­ing… is it pos­si­ble that we’re really pay­ing for this so that we can improve rela­tions with the Russians? I mean, doesn’t seem like there could be other motives besides just get­ting a toi­let that works well in space?

    Reply
  8. ryan says:
    September 5, 2007 at 11:57 am

    remind me what NASA is good for again. really besides buy­ing a toi­let for 19 mil­lion and mak­ing multi bil­lion dol­lar space explo­rations for life on mars what pos­i­tive gains has NASA pro­duced except for humor­ous scandels?

    Reply
  9. AFRet91 says:
    September 5, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    Who cares if we spend a few mil­lion for a pooper?
    George Bush/​Dick Cheney spend that much in Iraq in a half day to pay their con­trac­tors. BIg Deal.

    Reply
  10. Zach says:
    September 5, 2007 at 2:42 pm

    I dont think that is nes­sary to spend that much on that we could be spend­ing it on some­thing that would be put to bet­ter use.

    Reply
  11. Marley says:
    September 5, 2007 at 4:15 pm

    First of, I want to say that I think that all the space travel and every­thing we are doing, while it may be con­sid­ered hon­or­able is a load of c**p. (no pun intended). I there are many resources that are being put toward the space pro­gram that can be used in other aspects of our life. Why not put the $19 mil­lion toward sav­ing the envi­ro­ment or cre­at­ing alternte energy con­cepts. There are enough causes out there that actu­ally need sup­port and that affect our daily life that the money and resource that go into manned space travel are not fis­cally respon­si­ble. I mean coe on we don’t even truly have a cure for the com­mon cold yet and I bet there is aleast one per­son out there that gets sick in America every­day. Can we not jus­tify spend­ing the $19 mil on some­thing to help us all.
    And sec­ond, in response to AFRet91, I am a mil­spouse and although my veiws on the war on ter­ror may be slanted, and I’m not say­ing which way,The con­tracters that are being paid this exor­bi­tant amount of money are doing so to hep pro­tect the lives of sol­diers. Personally, I don’t believe that te mil­i­tary per­sonal are apid enough and yes civi­alian con­trac­tors are paid more, but are you vol­un­teer­ing to risk your life in a war torn coun­try every­day for a year or more in order to receive it. Most aren’t, so unless you are will­ing to do some­thing about this, I sug­gest that you don’t talk any­more on the sub­ject and if you want to know what gives me the right to say this, it’s because my hus­band right now is over­seas fight­ing and pos­si­bly dying for my right to say it.
    Honestly I don’t think the money we spent on this was a good thing, but unless we have a time machine or a money back guar­an­tee, there is no use in talk­ing about this, becuase lets face it, in all actu­al­ity we have no say so in the things the gov­ern­ment does unless we decide to become the president.

    Reply
  12. Charles says:
    September 6, 2007 at 8:40 am

    Russian-​​designed toi­let NASA’s buy­ing for the expanded International Space Station. It costs a whop­ping 19-​​million dol­lars.
    If this is an International Space Station why NASA have to pay for the toi­let? Don’t the Russian’s use the toi­lets? I thought it was a joint project and every body pay their equal share.

    Reply
  13. Msgt,USAF Ret73 says:
    September 6, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    With all the crap (toi­let) this should be squashed! Instead give the money to the VA to help
    all the ser­vice peo­ple who will be scarred both men­tally and phys­i­cally. We still have vets from Korea and Viet Nam who have yet to get results about agent Orange and these were the peo­ple who
    became our first being diag­nosed with PTSD. With the length some of our ser­vice peo­ple who have been there for 4 tours they most assur­adly will have prob­lems the rest of their lives. Look at how many have com­m­mit­ted sui­cide upon return!

    Reply
  14. Msgt,USAF Ret73 says:
    September 6, 2007 at 9:39 pm

    With all the crap (toi­let) this should be squashed! Instead give the money to the VA to help
    all the ser­vice peo­ple who will be scarred both men­tally and phys­i­cally. We still have vets from Korea and Viet Nam who have yet to get results about agent Orange and these were the peo­ple who
    became our first being diag­nosed with PTSD. With the length some of our ser­vice peo­ple who have been there for 4 tours, they most assur­adly will have prob­lems the rest of their lives. Look at how many have com­m­mit­ted sui­cide upon return!
    God Bless all the servicemen&women and thanks for
    all your efforts.

    Reply
  15. Jim says:
    September 7, 2007 at 7:15 pm

    They must all be hit­ting the bot­tle at NASA now!
    What about the home­less VETS that live in card­board boxes around the White House? We have lost our way.

    Reply
  16. bert says:
    June 6, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    what about all of the guys that were in Thialand dur­ing the 60s, i was thair in 68 & 70 agent orange was sprayed thair long before it was in viet­nam. most of the agent orange that was sprayed in viet­man came from the depot in Korat,thailand, whair i was sta­tion in 68.

    Reply
  17. fsf43 says:
    November 24, 2008 at 8:15 pm

    [link http://www.gulouhospital.com/changshi/2005/3–14/22547.htm ] [/​link]

    Reply
  18. fdf34 says:
    November 24, 2008 at 8:35 pm

    [link http://​www​.gulouhos​pi​tal​.com/​c​h​a​n​g​s​h​i​/​C​l​a​s​s​/​g​m​x​z​d​xsx ] [/​link]
    [link http://www.gulouhospital.com/changshi/2004/6–27/2004627174636.htm ] [/​link]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage