DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eye on China » Sino Scramjet in the Works

Sino Scramjet in the Works

sino-scramjet.jpg

China is start­ing to ramp up its scram­jet propul­sion workan ini­tia­tive that will ben­e­fit high-​​speed mis­sile pro­grams while also help­ing the coun­try to develop advanced aero­space mate­ri­als, greater com­pu­ta­tional capa­bil­i­ties and a cadre of young engi­neers who have matured as a result of cutting-​​edge engine and aero­dy­namic challenges.

Building on its ram­jet expe­ri­ence, China is embrac­ing the much more dif­fi­cult task of devel­op­ing Mach 5 air vehi­cle con­cepts in which propul­sion and aero­dy­nam­ics are highly coupled.

As part of this effort, an inte­grated scram­jet model is about to begin test­ing at up to Mach 5.6 in a new wind tun­nel in Beijing.

In addi­tion to the tech­nol­ogy and engi­neer­ing expe­ri­ence to be gained, the mid-​​term mil­i­tary pay­off is likely to be more advanced high-​​speed tac­ti­cal and medium-​​range Chinese mis­siles, espe­cially for anti­ship war­fare that could threaten U.S. air­craft car­ri­ers in the Pacific or oper­at­ing in sup­port of Taiwan…

…And over the next sev­eral decades, the scram­jet work could even­tu­ally pro­vide China with a tac­ti­cal hyper­sonic global-​​strike capa­bil­ity beyond the country’s strate­gic bal­lis­tic mis­sile force. The U.S. has sim­i­lar goals for its own grow­ing scram­jet program.

Read the Aviation Week story “China Developing Scramjet Propulsion.“
(Starting soon, Defense Tech and Military​.com will be fea­tur­ing fre­quent arti­cles from our friends at Aviation Week.)

– Christian

Share |

September 4th, 2007 | Eye on China | 371311 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/04/sino-scramjet-in-the-works/Sino+Scramjet+in+the+Works2007-09-04+14%3A53%3A26Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « How To Avoid Another Va. Tech | Recent DoD Network Attack Disclosed » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. C. Foskey says:
    September 4, 2007 at 11:31 am

    I always won­dered where all my Chinese class­mates went after grad­u­a­tion from my years at Purdue. I dont see them in the US defense indus­try due to them being for­eign nation­als. The idea that we might be edu­cat­ing for­eign nation­als at our best aero uni­ver­si­ties only to have them return home — and the poten­tial use of that infor­ma­tion — makes me a lit­tle uneasy.

    Reply
  2. Dennis says:
    September 4, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    I have to agree with the fel­low at the bot­tom. The engi­neer­ing depart­ment at UCONN was full of Chineese nation­als.
    Why are we giv­ing away the house?

    Reply
  3. murc says:
    September 4, 2007 at 8:17 pm

    “BT” said:“An impos­si­ble state­ment to make“
    There is noth­ing incor­rect about that state­ment.
    Are you say­ing its bad to have goals?
    China wants the same thing all the coun­tries want, the abil­ity to strike very rapidly. The USAF has laid ou its plans…its called FALCON.
    Our time as “#1″ is not over. the US is still the best coun­try on earth.…and I dont expect a com­mu­nist coun­try to top­ple us.
    BT said — “We can’t even defeat some bar­bar­ians in Iraq and Afghanistan so we will retreat back to our bor­ders“
    Only the democ­rats (like you) want the US mil­i­tary to get beat, and have to retreat.
    Urban war­fare is very tough, we are doing a pretty good job over there. and I know that you hate to hear it but the surge is show­ing signs that the tide is turn­ing. Iran hasn’t helped any either, they con­tinue to export (into Iraq) weapons, like guns, rpgs, and enhanced IED’s.
    Iran is cur­rently fight­ing the US mil­i­tary by Proxy, but we cant go after Iraq because (non intel­li­gent) peo­ple see Bush as a war-​​monger, and think that he is the one caus­ing all the trou­ble over there.…and so they (includ­ing the demo­c­ra­tic con­gress) try and see Iran as the good guy, and our President, as the bad guy.
    I sure hope a repub­li­can stays in the white house, cause if not.….were in for some very rough times ahead.
    I’m push­ing for Mit Romney, Rudy is a close second.

    Reply
  4. j house says:
    September 5, 2007 at 11:05 am

    As oil and other other vital strate­gic energy resources become even more valu­able to the explo­sive growth of China’s econ­omy, they will cer­tainly move to exploit the resources of weaker nation states in their back yard.Malaysia, Brunei and other energy play­ers in the S. China Sea are vul­ner­a­ble to a China that may feel embold­ened to move against them if they feel their econ­omy or national secu­rity is threat­ened by unsta­ble oil prices.
    In years to come, I’m not so sure the US will come to the aid of these states even if China is still depen­dent on US trade..by that time, they may be hold­ing so much US debt we are obliged to do noth­ing to upset the sta­tus quo.

    Reply
  5. murc says:
    September 5, 2007 at 6:41 pm

    ‘j house’ — said “I’m not so sure the US will come to the aid of these states even if China is still depen­dent on US trade..by that time, they may be hold­ing so much US debt we are obliged to do noth­ing to upset the sta­tus quo.“
    I hate that the US has so much debt, that is some­thing that every amer­i­can wants to get rid of. I relize that its nearly imm­pos­si­ble to do at a time of war.…but still. While the war on ter­ror­ism will be long last­ing, thats not what suck­ing mas­sive funds.…Iraq, is.
    Hopefully in a year or 2 we will begin width­draw­ing from Iraq, and have 95% of our troops out of there in around 4 years, and hope­fully that is when the red ink turns black.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage