<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Laser Plane Moves Closer to Missile Kill Test</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:06:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Gerald Higdon (SFC-R)</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166592</link> <dc:creator>Gerald Higdon (SFC-R)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:45:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166592</guid> <description>Why not put one of the lasers in every large city and put the reflector on the tallest buildings.. That way it is always at ready and cheaper to maintain and deploy and nobody internationally can complain for this defensive mechanism? Rev. Gerald Higdon, SFC-R </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not put one of the lasers in every large city and put the reflector on the tallest buildings.. That way it is always at ready and cheaper to maintain and deploy and nobody internationally can complain for this defensive mechanism?<br /> Rev. Gerald Higdon, SFC-R</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Emilio Santiago</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-65975</link> <dc:creator>Emilio Santiago</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:55:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-65975</guid> <description>I allways dreamed about this technology and I think my dream came trught. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I allways dreamed about this technology and I think my dream came trught.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bluejayraven</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166589</link> <dc:creator>bluejayraven</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:41:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166589</guid> <description>already testing by l.e.s....bae...ucla/military &#039;non-lethal shots to rfid/verichip...ongoing since 2002-topoff war games 90272/90403...movable command center/ground sights and public &#039;air conditioning&#039;fixtures on buildings fed owned...federal connsent decree cover... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>already testing by l.e.s.…bae…ucla/military ‘non-lethal shots to rfid/verichip…ongoing since 2002-topoff war games 90272/90403…movable command center/ground sights and public ‘air conditioning’fixtures on buildings fed owned…federal connsent decree cover…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nb</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166588</link> <dc:creator>nb</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 17:16:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166588</guid> <description>Every discussion of ABL seems to forget that it may be good at destroying aircraft, probably certain ground targets, SR missiles - and perhaps even cruise missiles with other linked systems providing basic acquisition and tracking. One wonders if they couldn&#039;t take out A-A missiles, and S-A missiles as well. Maybe they could escort a bomber package (from a distance) making the bombers somewhat less vulnerable. They could monitor a fleet of naval vessels and destroy their missiles almost as they&#039;re launched. I wonder if they may not be more successful with all these short range missiles and missions than with longer range ones. Thus I propose they make a bunch of dirigibles like the proposed Walrus with the ABL system aboard, and just float them over the top of US fleets and off dangerous coastlines.... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every discussion of ABL seems to forget that it may be good at destroying aircraft, probably certain ground targets, SR missiles — and perhaps even cruise missiles with other linked systems providing basic acquisition and tracking. One wonders if they couldn’t take out A-A missiles, and S-A missiles as well. Maybe they could escort a bomber package (from a distance) making the bombers somewhat less vulnerable. They could monitor a fleet of naval vessels and destroy their missiles almost as they’re launched. I wonder if they may not be more successful with all these short range missiles and missions than with longer range ones.<br /> Thus I propose they make a bunch of dirigibles like the proposed Walrus with the ABL system aboard, and just float them over the top of US fleets and off dangerous coastlines.…</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PHIL OLDFIELD</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166587</link> <dc:creator>PHIL OLDFIELD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 07:12:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166587</guid> <description>I LIVE IN THE UK AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT OVER HERE WERE SICK OF THESE SO CALLED KNOW ALLS TRYING TO STOP FUNDING THAT WOULD MAKE THIS PLANET A SAFER PLACE.PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON MARS NOT THIS PLANET,PEOPLE WHO THINK YOU SHOULD GIVE A TERORIST A CUDDLE INSTEAD INSTEAD OF A SMACK IN THE MOUTH.WAKE UP AND LET THE GUYS WHO WANT TO KEEP US SAFE DO THERE JOB </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LIVE IN THE UK AND I CAN TELL YOU THAT OVER HERE WERE SICK OF THESE SO CALLED KNOW ALLS TRYING TO STOP FUNDING THAT WOULD MAKE THIS PLANET A SAFER PLACE.PEOPLE THAT LIVE ON MARS NOT THIS PLANET,PEOPLE WHO THINK YOU SHOULD GIVE A TERORIST A CUDDLE INSTEAD INSTEAD OF A SMACK IN THE MOUTH.WAKE UP AND LET THE GUYS WHO WANT TO KEEP US SAFE DO THERE JOB</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: FD Thompson</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166586</link> <dc:creator>FD Thompson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:43:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166586</guid> <description>IF THIS TEST WAS THE LAST ONE BEFORE THE LIVE FIRE AGAINST AN ACTUAL MISSLE, WHAT IS THE HOLD UP? LETS SEE IF THE THING WORKS. LET NORTH KOREA LAUCH A FEW AND SEE IF BIG BIRD CAN REALLY KNOCK &#039;EM DOWN. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF THIS TEST WAS THE LAST ONE BEFORE THE LIVE FIRE AGAINST AN ACTUAL MISSLE, WHAT IS THE HOLD UP? LETS SEE IF THE THING WORKS. LET NORTH KOREA LAUCH A FEW AND SEE IF BIG BIRD CAN REALLY KNOCK ‘EM DOWN.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166585</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166585</guid> <description>If some knuckle head country does actually get a nuke airborne, seems like we would have to be orbiting the area when that occured..24/7 so they would probably be aware of our presense and just resort to putting it in a truck and driving to the target area for detonation. I can see having a small fleet of these to be used in hotspot areas but not too practical for global control of the airspace against a missle attack. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If some knuckle head country does actually get a nuke airborne, seems like we would have to be orbiting the area when that occured..24/7 so they would probably be aware of our presense and just resort to putting it in a truck and driving to the target area for detonation. I can see having a small fleet of these to be used in hotspot areas but not too practical for global control of the airspace against a missle attack.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: CLINT DOUGLAS</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-65968</link> <dc:creator>CLINT DOUGLAS</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-65968</guid> <description>HELL IF WE CAN AFFORD TO SEND BILLIONS INTO IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN WHY IN HELL CAN&#039;T WE AFFORD A WEAPON THAT COULD PROTECT OUR CITIZENS FROM KNUCKLEHEADS WHO WOULD DO US HARM....hERE WE GO AGAIN SCREAMING WE&#039;ER POOR WHILE WE THROW BILLION AT OTHER COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELL IF WE CAN AFFORD TO SEND BILLIONS INTO IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN WHY IN HELL CAN’T WE AFFORD A WEAPON THAT COULD PROTECT OUR CITIZENS FROM KNUCKLEHEADS WHO WOULD DO US HARM.…hERE WE GO AGAIN SCREAMING WE’ER POOR WHILE WE THROW BILLION AT OTHER COUNTRY!!!!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166584</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166584</guid> <description>What in the hell is so &quot;controversial&quot; about making something that can only be used to save lives, possibly thousands if not millions. There is no question about it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the hell is so “controversial” about making something that can only be used to save lives, possibly thousands if not millions. There is no question about it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Louis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/06/laser-plane-moves-closer-to-missile-kill-test/#comment-166582</link> <dc:creator>Louis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3718#comment-166582</guid> <description>I think we better be safe than sorry, and this layer of defense provided by the ABL is a good thing...! No amount of money spent on anti ballistic missile defense is too much in my opinion, if it will prevent some lunatic out there, like the ones in Iran or Korea from launch nuke missiles at people and hitting them with them....! Those 2 in particular (Iran and Norht Korea) are not kidding about the treats they make once in a while, and like the one in Iran, if left unchecked can start a global war! So we better be ready to stop them with everything we can muster...that is just been cautious and safe... just my opinion. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we better be safe than sorry, and this layer of defense provided by the ABL is a good thing…! No amount of money spent on anti ballistic missile defense is too much in my opinion, if it will prevent some lunatic out there, like the ones in Iran or Korea from launch nuke missiles at people and hitting them with them.…! Those 2 in particular (Iran and Norht Korea) are not kidding about the treats they make once in a while, and like the one in Iran, if left unchecked can start a global war! So we better be ready to stop them with everything we can muster…that is just been cautious and safe… just my opinion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 04:17:27 -->
