DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Terror Tech » Armor-Piercing Grenade Hitting US Troops

Armor-Piercing Grenade Hitting US Troops

Heres an interesting and disturbing report from CBS news on a new weapon being used against US troops in Iraq: Russian-made armor-piercing hand grenades. I’ve never heard of these before, but I’d be interested to hear what DT readers know about them.

– Christian

Share |

September 7th, 2007 | Terror Tech | 372339 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/07/armor-piercing-grenade-hitting-us-troops/Armor-Piercing+Grenade+Hitting+US+Troops2007-09-07+20%3A06%3A36Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More on Osprey Ops | Bears R Us » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Trent Telenko says:
    September 7, 2007 at 3:33 pm

    The old Soviet and current Russian Republic’s army’s have used anti-tank hand grenades since WW2. Designs included the RPG-40, PPG-43 and
    RPG-6.
    Wikipedia has an article up on the grenades used in Iraq at this link:
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​R​K​G​-​3​_​a​n​t​i​-​t​a​n​k​_​g​r​e​n​ade
    …with the following text:
    Design
    RKG stands for Ruchnaya Kumulyativnaya Granata (Handheld Shaped Charge Grenade). When the pin is pulled and the grenade is thrown a four-panelled drogue parachute is deployed by a spring. This parachute stabilizes the grenade in flight and ensures that the grenade comes down vertically onto the target.
    [edit] History
    The RKG-3M was used extensively during the 1973 Yom Kippur War.
    RKG-3 grenades have also been used by Iraqi insurgents against coalition forces. On 1 June 2006, RKG-3 grenades were used in an attack on an American Humvee,[1] and RKG-3 grenades have been captured by US Marines from insurgents in Al Anbar.[2]
    RKG-3 grenades have been intercepted en-route to Palestinian forces in Gaza. [3]

    Reply
  2. J. Brenner says:
    September 7, 2007 at 3:36 pm

    They are a shaped charge or HEAT (high explosive anti-tank) weapon that the Russians used for years. This technology is considered obsolete by any conventional armed force. I suppose the advantage to Iraqi insurgents is that the grenades are small enough to be easily concealed by persons appearing to be innocent pedestrians and, due to the fact that the explosive charge is directional, can be employed without killing the thrower (although they sure seem like a risky proposition). Not sure what to make of a sudden spike in their use — perhaps they found a Russian supplier willing to unload a bunch of old munitions cheaply.

    Reply
  3. Trent Telenko says:
    September 7, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    This mil-blog reports that this Ex-Soviet grenade has been in Iraq for close to a year:
    http://​rofasix​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​7​/​0​6​/​a​t​t​a​c​k​s​-​o​n​-​h​u​m​v​e​e​s​-​u​s​i​n​g​-​r​k​g​-​3​e​m​.​h​tml

    Reply
  4. campbell says:
    September 7, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    inventory of weapons listed here indicate how easily these can flow into Iraq from other sources. (Note that smugglers admitted to (2) successful runs in the past)
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​R​K​G​-​3​_​a​n​t​i​-​t​a​n​k​_​g​r​e​n​ade

    Reply
  5. Camp says:
    September 7, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    I maybe wrong here, but…
    It’s not just the weapon you have to consider, but the target as well. An enemy (an intelligent enemy) isn’t going to attack an M1A2 with a tea spoon… though, I’m sure somebody has. These SOB’s stand on the side of the road waiting for the right target to peddle through there kill zone, or peek over a wall to see what light or soft targets they can kill on the other side.
    In the video the ‘reporter’ says, “…and they undermine the advantage the U.S. has in hi-tech weaponry and heavy armor”. The only thing, in the video clip shown, that I saw being attacked were HMMWV patrols. That POS, I’m pretty sure, isn’t classified as ‘heavy’. Though it has probably gotten more soldiers killed than… but I digress.
    I wonder if the Trophy Anti-RPG/Anti-Missile Protection System, or a lighter variant, would work against something like this… maybe it could zap the guy who threw it as well. Heck, design the system to kill the thrower/shooter who attacks the vehicle.… rocks, grenades, or RPGs… they’ll stop eventually.
    Here’s an idea: Outfit a HMMWV with a Trophy system under the rear cargo hatch, but make it indistinguishable from the other convoy vehicles…it might make them think twice about which target to hit. That or build an anti-RPG system into the HMMWV turret, and have the vehicle work choke points & road blocks… eh… who knows.

    Reply
  6. Matt says:
    September 7, 2007 at 6:40 pm

    There is a good discussion (along with info, pics, video, etc.) of these grenades here:
    http://​www​.roguesci​.org/​t​h​e​f​o​r​u​m​/​s​h​o​w​t​h​r​e​a​d​.​p​h​p​?​t​=​6​689

    Reply
  7. demophilus says:
    September 7, 2007 at 8:33 pm

    Like others said, these are from an old Soviet concept: engaging tanks in urban combat with shaped charges. IIRC, they were thrown out of upper stories of buildings to attack thinner top armor. Don’t think they were ever particularly successful.
    Tossing one at a Humvee from a horizontal aspect is a chancy proposition, for a lot of reasons. The only benefit to an insurgent/terrorist is it doesn’t print through clothing like a larger device, and wouldn’t leave trace evidence on you, assuming you were far enough away from the blast (like, behind a wall).
    Otherwise, it’s practically a suicide weapon. If you aren’t attacking a lone vehicle, or the last in a formation, you’re dead meat for counterfire if you don’t throw from cover. Even then, a gunner in the target vehicle or another stands a good chance of waxing you.
    Other countermeasures are easy, too. Bird cage slats will divert a shaped charge blast like they do for an RPG; you might be able to turn one of these with plywood slats, or camo netting. Changing course, speed or convoy position, or using bounding overwatch routes and stops, will make it harder for Johnny Jihad to put a grenade on target without getting really close.
    IMHO, EFPs, IEDs and RPGs are worse problems, and this sort of thing is practically a PR stunt. But then again, it ain’t my ass on the line. Probably seems different from the back seat of a Humvee. If I was there, I’d probably want a shotgun, or buckshot rounds for the 40mm, plus a tweak or two to the ROE.
    Good luck, youngbloods.

    Reply
  8. glenn says:
    September 9, 2007 at 2:55 pm

    Your comment about this being “propaganda” seems to be contradicted by the other things you list, all of which seem to indicate the insurgency is quite successful at finding low-budget ways to injure and kill our troops, all while wasting our time and budget chasing ghosts. This is 4th generation warfare, and the giant can’t fight the lilliputians. It works exactly for the reasons you describe — hard to fight against, might cause a PR black eye, and is extremely effective.
    We need to wake up and get out of this thing, there are urban terrorists here in the US this money would be better spent fighting and preventing. People get shot and killed every night here in the streets of Los Angeles, do you think this is acceptable for a 1st world nation that calls itself the leader of the civilized world? This war was a budget grab, check out the latest article on the war profiteering in Rolling Stone.
    Eisenhower was right — the military-industrial complex has taken over.

    Reply
  9. anti american says:
    September 10, 2007 at 6:42 pm

    hahaha!!! thats what the u.s troops get for invading iraq

    Reply
  10. damien says:
    September 10, 2007 at 9:26 pm

    Soviet RGK-3 based on the german WW2 Panzerwurfmine http://​www​.geocities​.com/​A​u​g​u​s​t​a​/​8​1​7​2​/​p​a​n​z​e​r​f​a​u​s​t​9​.​htm
    Because of the problems to stabilize the dedicated anti-tank grenades for flight — the shaped charge needed to be pointed straight at the armor to work efficiently — the Panzerwurfmine (“tank throw mine”) or PWM (L) (L for “lang” = “long”) was developed by the Luftwaffe weapon’s bureau (the Luftwaffe also contained ground forces in the form of it’s field units and the paratroopers).
    The weapon weighed 1.36kg, had a length of 53.3cm and used a stabilizing assembly of four fins made of canvas at it’s rear. It was introduced into service in May of 1943 but proved rather impractical. Still, 203,800 were produced in 1943.
    It’s successor model was the Panzerwurfmine Kz (Kz = kurz (“short”)) that weighed only 1 kg. Flight stabilization now was achieved by a long canvas strip that rolled out when the weapon was thrown and extended from it’s rear. The warhead had a diameter of 11.4 cm and carried a shaped charge of 500g that had an armor penetration of 150mm.

    Reply
  11. oz says:
    September 11, 2007 at 2:20 am

    John — Why don’t you try arms control in your own country first? …just a thought.
    – oz

    Reply
  12. j house says:
    September 11, 2007 at 1:01 pm

    I wonder whether these grenades were part of Saddam’s arsenal, or are being imported into the theatre? If not, it is likely these are being smuggled into Iraq from Iran or Syria. Has there been any reporting as to their markings or origin? (other than the fact they are probably of Soviet-era manufacture?)
    I would think we are adjusting our TTP’s to counter this type of attack. Where is the mounted .50 cal gunner in the convoy? Are the bad guys directing the attack on this vehicle?
    It is unfortunate the DOD does not have or release their own video of a counter-attack wiping out these bomb throwers. It may not serve as a deterrent, but it would surely boost morale.

    Reply
  13. For Oz says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:42 am

    OZ
    True, I don’t think we should be able to buy assault rifles here. However, Walmart doesnt carry WWII potatoe mashers either. I was talking about grenades, rocket launchers, etc. not hand guns or hunting rifles. So its oK that an Iraqi kid learns how to throw and get access to a potatoe masher before he learns how to play guitar, do algebra, kiss a girl because we have hand guns in the US?

    Reply
  14. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 12:38 am

    Add these to RPGs, damn.
    Very scary.
    No wonder we need MRAP vehicles en masse.
    Time to Beef up Body Armor BIG Time.
    Test some of these @ Ft Irwin CA base.
    Find flaw someplace.
    Save Lives.
    Now have some suicide bomber tie about 10 of these on his, her body-Wham.

    Reply
  15. Christian Peper says:
    February 4, 2008 at 11:21 am

    The killing of over 230,000 innocent civilians in Iraq alone has caused a great deal of shame to befall the American people.
    From the beginning of the war the preservation of civilian life has never been given top priority. In the first two years alone of the invasion 25,000 civilians were killed. The number of dead continues to rise due to irresponsible bombing of critical infrastructure like sewers and clean water supplies.
    There have been numerous bombings and indiscriminate mass shootings committed by US Troops. The sheer number of these atrocities and mass murders are truly staggering. Many US Troops who view themselves as morally superior and in the good graces of God due to their Christian faith have been found to relish both the torture and murder of non Christians.
    I urge the reader to further investigate the killing of the innocent in Iraq to, at the very least, find out how their tax money is being spent.

    Reply
  16. ajmeer says:
    March 5, 2008 at 11:36 am

    this is am amazing clip for the people of iraq to get on thier toes and kick thier asses.

    Reply
  17. PLYWAK says:
    March 5, 2008 at 2:18 pm

    ANYONE HERE MENTIONED THERMOBARIC WEPONS? US IS MAYBE USING THEM , BUT FROM WHAT I AM READING RUSSIANS HAVE THEM AND ARE SELLING TO AFGANIS AND IRAQIS…quite possibly HEAT (SHAPED CHARGES) …FOR THOSE YOU NEED MORE ARMOUR, bigger tank etc. I believe hand held anti armour wepons are being developed faster than development or armor and tanks or both. JUST A THOUGHT…

    Reply
  18. cheap gw gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    Together and he is not a very long time, but I feel very comfortable. He was sometime as a child, lovely, simple, not too many worries, likes a fish in a pure travel freely in the sea. He often took his only cheap GW gold send to me. His world simple, but he is happy.

    Reply
  19. cheap rf gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    During the time pass, my union was larger; my union members are very solidarity, when some people have difficult, we all go to help. I also remembered once a people

    Reply
  20. rohan money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:28 pm

    I felt you seems not as me to your wife, you called me wife is very rarely, although you often send rohan money to me. Every time you ask me, as I am very happy. I really think you are me, just my own, I do not want you leave me. I am afraid you forget me. I slowly understand, sister and brother in law why they will love so painful, why sister in the final will be sad to leave.
    It is love, it is also hurt.

    Reply
  21. cheap rappelz rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 8:30 pm

    And I apply a new number, I prepared to play with her, upgrade and earn cheap rappelz rupees together. I felt she is a good girl, I decided I must change myself for her. Later, we often played together, and we are very happy. She also became my wife. But after a few time, I met many things, I was very sad, and I did not spent a long time to play the game. I did not often to play with her. Finally, I said to her, I will leave the game. I let her find another husband. She was very sad, when I left the game, she also left.

    Reply
  22. reshtet says:
    September 15, 2008 at 4:50 pm

    DAMN!You people are nuts…You write about magic
    on the wrong subject idiots…But truly,only a magician would make such a Grenade anyway!

    Reply
  23. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 5:15 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 experience without nokia mobile learning is better than learning without excperi-ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose headphones is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.leadsoftstore​.com/

    Reply
  24. S. Jager says:
    September 27, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    The USA is a mistake what have we ever done right? usa just screws up the world more. usa is just a goddam kid being power hungry

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The real issue is not what type of plane but trying...
      Bill
    • Paris Hilton: Patriot
      Omg! You can find her pictures and video here...
      WebWarez
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Marine Air Light? Wait…don't they...
      LtCol Ben
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Except its really not that stealthy… The...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Is an F-22 capable of landing even on a big deck carrier,...
      joe
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      F4 was origionally a Navy Fighter, so coming up with a...
      Curt
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The US Navy was right to bypass congress and develop the...
      Tony C
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The fly-away cost of a F-22 is between 130 and...
      The Norwegian
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage