Author’s Note: An error that appeared in the below text regarding Russian air-to-air refueling capabilities has been amended to reflect the author’s (me, in other words) original intent. Apologies go out from Defense tech and the author for this inadvertent yet gargantuan transposition of terms. The corrected text appears below in bold type. Thanks.
Taking a look at the picture to the right, you’d be excused if you thought it was taken in the mid 1980’s.
It was taken in Sept of last year and there are many more of these photos lately.
A little less than a month ago Former Soviet KGB head and current Russian President Vlad Putin told the world that the Russians would, after a 15 year hiatus, begin long range reconnaissance flights again with their strategic bomber assets, most notably the Tu-95 Bear.
Whether or not this will mean anything in the long term of geostrategic military hegemony or is just a flexing of an increasingly atrophied strategic recon arm remains to be seen. The Bear, however, is the characteristic icon of these flights, with US and allied intercepts occurring around the world — in the Indian Ocean, along the US east coast, in the western Pacific, around the North Cape of Norway and many points in-between.
The Bear, first slipping the surly bonds of earth in the early to mid 1950’s, remains Russia’s premier strategic long range bomber. Powered by 4 BIG Kuznetsov NK-12MV turboprops (pumping out 14,795 shaft-horsepower (shp) each — by comparison, the C-130 and P-3 aircraft’s Allison T56 turbo props generate only 4,600 shp each), the bug bomber can reach speeds up to 525 mph, making it one of the fastest prop aircraft in the world and definitely the fastest BIG prop-driven aircraft.
Comparisons are somewhat moot with the US’s aged long-range strategic bomber, the B-52, which was discussed here on DT with its upgraded avionics system. I say moot because while both are big and have a strategic use, that’s where the similarities end!
The B-52 has 8 Pratt & Whitney TF33 turbofan engines, pumping out 17,000 lbs of thrust from each engine (compare that to the shaft horsepower of those Bear Kuznetsovs above). Those engines, as smoky as they are at times, can push the BUFF up to 650 mph.
Ranges are somewhat similar, with the Bear reaching out to around 8,200 miles and the BUFF able to make 8,800 miles unrefueled. Both aircraft have air-to-air refueling capabilities, making their true range almost unlimited, 
however Russian air-refueling tactics, techniques and procedures are far below that of the US and her allies.
There’s not much on the unclass side regarding the usage of the big Russian bomber over the years, but it appears that it was never used in any conventional bombing roles, whether in Afghanistan or any other nation where Soviet/Russian hardware was employed. It appears it has been used strictly in a deterrence mode, oftentimes to let the carrier battle group know that it is targeted — after a fashion.
There are about 71 scattered through out Russia (compared to 85 B-52s). Ukraine had some at the dissolution of the USSR, but transferred those back to Moscow as part of a debt reduction deal. India has a few, obtained in the late 80’s for long-range reconnaissance and ASW. Like the BUFF, they’ll be around for a while.
Some good webpages to get more info are at Global Security and Federation of American Scientists.
–Pinch Paisley
|
Bears R UsLeave a Reply |
|
When did the Soviets get “far in advance of the US” when it comes to air-to-air refueling ops?
“however Russian air-refueling tactics, techniques and procedures are far beyond that of the US and her allies.“
I think you meant to say the opposite
“There’s not much on the unclass side regarding the usage of the big Russian bomber over the years, but it appears that it was never used in any conventional bombing roles, whether in Afghanistan or any other nation where Soviet/Russian hardware was employed.“
Tu-95MS16 aircraft (which make up approximately half of Russia’s current Tu-95MS force) are being upgraded to Tu-95MSM standard as they go through overhaul. This gives them a new missile launch control system, designated Sigma, that equips them to use conventional weaponry — particularly the Kh-555 remanufacture of the Kh-55 (aka CALCMski) — and the “stealth” conventional Kh-101 and nuclear Kh-102 cruise missiles. The first upgrade was IIRC in 1999.
The Tu-160s are getting the same upgrade, amongst others (both the Tu-95MS16 and Tu-160 have the same missile launch control system, whereas the Tu-95MS6 has an older model, hence it’s ability to only fire 6 cruise missiles at a time as opposed to the Tu-95MS16s 16.)
Funny how everyone seizes on the air-to-air refuelling capability; I was about ready to do the same until I saw the preceding comments.
You would’ve thought that our expeditionary airforce would have greater impetus to have air to air refuelling, as opposed to the Soviet one where their landmass occupies many more timezones (not flying over oceans that much, just land and take off between Moscow and Vladivostok). Additionally, during the ‘90s when they couldn’t even keep up deterrence flights, how could they keep up air to air refuelling planes?
Rather more to the point, both the U.S. and Russia have 1950s technology that is more than capable of doing immense damage. The mutual assured destruction notion is still alive and well.
Ocean Safari: 1975 somewhere off of Norway we got three bears at once to pay us a visit. Lousy formation. And followed by Phantoms of VF-33 and VF-102. Another day at work.
Hellgate London, I played this game for four years, let me give up, I can not do. It is part of my life, although not for the life of all the games, over the past few years it has accounted for the majority of my space time, I find the time in amateur to own one of the sky, when I bored on it. In the game I spent a lot of money to buy Hellgate Palladium. And I bought my favorite things. I see a faithfully accompany so many times through the friends and feel good when friends come to chat on a single share their happiness, and feel very satisfactory thing.
No longer limited to playing one character at a time, players can instantly switch between their favorite character classes or control them all at once. Each one of those character classes — musketeer, wizard, fighter, scout, elementalist, and the unique player characters (UPCs) — acquires, over time, an impressive set of combat stances. Each stance offers Sword of the New World money unique skills, abilities and equipment options, making every class as powerful as it is versatile.
In the two years I made many good friends also spend much money to buy the Archlord gold, but I do not have a little sad, because I make many good friends, they are very kindliness.
In fact I think in the game the most important was not the fiesta Gold or the upgrade, in my mind play with friends and get more friendship were the most important.
because he always play the game, so we often together to play and chat and discuss how to earn the 2moon dil, at that day I told him, I liked him, but he did not say anything, I was very sad, unknowingly the tears streaming down.