DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Drone Chalks Up First Iraq Kill

Drone Chalks Up First Iraq Kill

So we all heard about killer drones hunting down AQ bigwigs in Afghanistan (and maybe even Pakistan) and Yemen. But now we got word of a new battlefield for the armed drone.
MQ5B.jpg

Sure, the MQ-9 “Reaper” has made some headlines in the past, but in what sounds like a first, the Armys newly armed MQ-5B/C Hunter targeted a team of bad guys implanting a roadside bomb near Qayyarah.

We reported that the Army was to deploy these robot killers to Iraq, but the Pentagon announced this weekend the Hunters first kill. The attack occurred on Sept. 1, according to officials in Iraq, but why it took a week to announce the development is anyones guess.

Drones are a ubiquitous presence in Iraq. You can hear their lawn-mower buzz overhead all day and all night. I know more than a few Soldiers and Marines who had wished all along that the little plane buzzing overhead could just zap the target itself, rather than force troops to run the IED gauntlet and possibly miss the enemy team.

From MNF-I:

A Hunter unmanned aerial vehicle engaged and killed two suspected improvised explosive device emplacers overwatching a major thoroughfare for Coalition Forces during a historic flight near Qayyarah, Iraq, in Nineveh province Sept. 1.

A scout weapons team from 2nd Battalion, 25th Aviation Regiment, 25th Combat Aviation Brigade, observed the two unknown enemy fighters in a tactical overwatch near the roadside. The SWT requested support from the Hunter UAV.

The pilots guided the Hunter operator to the scene where it set up for a strike mission and dropped its precision munition, killing both unknown enemies and marking a first in Army Aviation history.

“Its very humbling to know that we have set an Army historical mark in having the first successful launch in combat from an Army weaponized UAV,” said Capt. Raymond Fields, commander, Unmanned Aerial Surveillance Company. “This would not be possible without my Soldiers and civilians working hard day in and day out in Iraq to accomplish this feat.”

Fields continued, “I think that this success will set the tone for Army Aviation in years to come. We will see more weaponized Army unmanned vehicles being used instead of manned platforms to save not only our aviator brethren but our Army ground brethren from enemy contact.”

“This accomplishment adds a precise and discriminate means for our Army to successfully engage the enemy in counterinsurgency warfare,” said Col. A.T. Ball, commander, 25th CAB.

(Gouge: NC; Photo: Defense Update)

– Christian

Share |

September 10th, 2007 | Drones | 372819 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/10/drone-chalks-up-first-iraq-kill/Drone+Chalks+Up+First+Iraq+Kill2007-09-10+16%3A53%3A21Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Seeing the Counterinsurgency Forest From the Trees | Document Alert! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Camp says:
    September 10, 2007 at 2:23 pm

    And after having successfully engaged it’s targets, the Reaper announced, in a deep Austrian accent, “I’ll be back”. Then proceeded to stamp two little insurgent figures upon the side of it’s fuselage… Maybe.

    Reply
  2. txzen says:
    September 10, 2007 at 2:52 pm

    I think get the nuance of what he is saying but I assume someone else will be able to convey the specifics better and enlighten me.
    This is the first Army drone kill, as in all the other predator and if there are reaper kills have been by the air force of CIA? Or what. And is this a confirmed kill with th vipyr strike munition.
    I could have sworn I had seen 10s of hellfires being fired at insurgents on video sites but are those all apaches or are they just not army predators?

    Reply
  3. JS says:
    September 10, 2007 at 2:59 pm

    Every drone kill you have seen — up until September 1– have been AF or CIA drones.

    Reply
  4. demophilus says:
    September 10, 2007 at 8:38 pm

    Good to see the Army’s got organic fixed wing air support again, even if it’s a UAV.
    Be interesting if you could take it further. The ordnance in the picture’s a BAT/Viper Strike; not the most common item in inventory, and one originally designed for other purposes. Might be interesting to see if you can integrate common TOE ordnance into Army UAV operations. Like, say, a small drone that can launch AT-4, Hydra/APKWS, or LAW rounds, or cough an 81mm bomb out of a recoilless tube array around its CoG.
    That might “empower the warfighter” some, give a company or platoon commander more persistent air options, maybe shorten the aerial targeting cycle some. Shouldn’t cost an arm and a leg either, or take a decade to implement.

    Reply
  5. Garrick says:
    September 13, 2007 at 7:42 am

    CIA preditor drones have been taking out targets throughout Afghanistan and Iraq since ’02.
    This is just the first “Army” Drone kill.

    Reply
  6. Walter M Reardon says:
    September 13, 2007 at 7:07 pm

    I would think that these drons would have infared beams, to use on routs the melitary vheicals will use ‚to pick up insergents during the night planting road side bombs and blow them up .

    Reply
  7. Wozzie says:
    September 13, 2007 at 9:21 pm

    I love the way that it can just kill ‘suspected’ people rather than people that have actually been proved to be acting offensively. This will save so much tax payers money on ridiculous and wasteful ‘trials’.

    Reply
  8. Bob says:
    September 13, 2007 at 10:19 pm

    and I love the way that it can just kill people before they have the chance to kill you. That’s what you’re suppose to do in WAR !!

    Reply
  9. infowarrior says:
    September 14, 2007 at 9:50 am

    what about the one that hit the pentagon

    Reply
  10. Matias Almeida says:
    September 14, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    I

    Reply
  11. bob says:
    September 15, 2007 at 7:40 pm

    And how exactly do we stop each and every war if the otherside is intent on killing us? When the otherside insists that you “convert or be killed” then you have no choice. Violence is sometimes the only answer. Sometimes you have to take a stand and kill or be killed. “Give peace a chance.….” yeah right, do the “Killing Fields” ring a bell? or how about the Holocaust?

    Reply
  12. Rodger Morris says:
    September 17, 2007 at 12:36 am

    Matias Almeida said in part:
    ——
    Violence is never the answer… when violence wins, nobody else does.
    ——
    Tell that to the Carthaginians.
    Hint: Third Punic War. See:
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​T​h​i​r​d​_​P​u​n​i​c​_​War
    Wishing you and yours the very best, I remain…

    Reply
  13. johnathan says:
    September 18, 2007 at 12:43 pm

    yeaah, I saw the video clip on liveleak​.com. It showed a guy and a boy around 10 watching presumably his unarmed dad digging a hole,then wam, no dad no son. They didn’t look like Iranian AQ to me, more like local iraqi opposing the illegal invasion, like the french ristance against the NAZIs. Anyway, its good not to be able to hear the enemies screams.
    One other thing, you always get American soldier accusing the insurents of

    Reply
  14. Jeff Storm says:
    September 20, 2007 at 9:14 am

    Why doesn’t Jonathan and the other whiny A-Holes use their real names like Col. A.T. Ball, commander, 25th CAB. Try saying your BS to a Marine or soldiers face!
    I used my real name, how about you punk?!

    Reply
  15. Dan McCall says:
    September 20, 2007 at 12:24 pm

    Would you rather see our Marines or other military personnel die because of a road side bomb they ran over or should we save lives and let the Hunter do the job? Ask any one in the military and they will tell you it’s one heck of a great weapon. Yes I used my real name unlike some others.

    Reply
  16. Thomas P Astley says:
    September 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm

    Kill them all and let alllah sort them out! A dead sand bunny is a good sand bunny.

    Reply
  17. bujnos says:
    October 8, 2007 at 4:12 am

    just give us the video from this plane, ok?

    Reply
  18. Jeff Dulin says:
    August 28, 2008 at 2:30 pm

    I wonder how long it’s going to be before one of the tech savy folks on the other side, our our’s, will develope a FIGHTER DRONE/UAV,… to shoot ours down or distroy theM by crashing into them,… Kamakze-style.
    Perhaps a hand grenade on a guidable platform of some sort would be the least expensive but, obviously not reusable.
    Employing some of the tech. that the company (Stack-fire?)(???) that makes the stackable, high rate weapons in Australia would make a workable anti-drone unit. The projectles are “stacked” and electriclly fired, leaving only a honeycomb type container behind. Very high rate of fire; LOTS of bullets and little weight. Disposible gun sort of. That might work. (We ought to put those on our UAV’S to patrol the pipelines. They’d shoot streight down, & would kill bad guys without hurting the pipe!)
    You know the world isn’t going to stand still on this! Somewhere there’s an fighter “Anti-Drone” UAV on somebody’s drawing board/CAD. It’s going to happen, if it hasn’t already. This stuff never ends. I bet the Fighter Anti-Drone UAV is developed by the same guys sell US these NOW!
    JD

    Reply
  19. ?? says:
    September 23, 2009 at 4:57 am

    ??????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
    • Cancel Cyber Command
    • Rough Week for F-35
    • Taking Back the Infantry Half-Kilometer (Part 3)
    • China’s Military Spending Slows
    • Army React To NLOS-LS Missile Miss
    Recent Comments
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
      I love the vehicle commander with the super high-speed digi-camo,...
      Sheepdog0351
    • Another Wanat Lesson: 700 Ball Bearings
      As a Natl Guard Sniper Tm Ldr during OIF2 (2004),...
      Jimbo
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
      If China messs with sea trade, there...
      stephen russell
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
      Yes & Chinese are using spies for more data on...
      stephen russell
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
      the chicoms still show their russky fascination with white sidewall tires
      pete
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
      All camo is technically 'digital', hence the need...
      kisl
    • Rough Week for F-35
      It is worth recalling that the Harriers were hardly the stars of the...
      ohwilleke
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
      Also, countries like Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia,...
      ohwilleke
    • Those Wonderful Sea Lines of Communication
      Taiwan, yes. We should at least take China at...
      ohwilleke
    • Army’s GCV Not Just MGV Warmed Over
      Places like Kosovo and Afghanistan have favored...
      ohwilleke
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage