DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Persistent Eye in the Sky

Persistent Eye in the Sky

RAID-blimp.jpg

Beware the all-seeing eye.

You know, I remember seeing a few of these in Afghanistan back in 04. The troops at Bagram joked that the only reason these surveillance aerostats were tethered above was to keep an eye on frisky co-eds and boozing Netherlanders.

But as Gen. David Petraeus describes his plans for the future force posture in Iraq one of increasing overwatch and support it only makes sense that Iraq will look more and more like the Israeli border. You can do a lot of surveillance without a lot of manpower using these aerostats, leaving your manpower for quick reaction and the real kinetic kind of stuff.

Raytheon:

Raytheon Company has been awarded a $5 million U.S. Army contract option to provide Rapid Aerostat Initial Deployment (RAID) Mobile Eagle Eye tower systems to protect U.S. and coalition forces in Iraq.

The contract calls for nine Mobile Eagle Eye elevated sensor systems with deliveries beginning in February 2008. Work will be performed at Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems’ Integrated Air Defense Center, Andover, Mass., and at the Warfighter Protection Center, Huntsville, Ala.

“The equipment Raytheon is providing to support U.S. military operations is helping to save the lives of our warfighters,” said Pete Franklin, vice president, National & Theater Security Programs, for Raytheon Integrated Defense Systems. “The joint Raytheon and U.S. government team takes great pride in rapidly delivering this critical capability to our soldiers.”

Raytheon first developed RAID to meet the military’s increasingly critical need for persistent surveillance in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. RAID consists of infrared sensor systems and ground-based motion detection radars, elevated on a stationary platform, capable of detecting hostile troop and equipment movement at great distances. This capability enables U.S. and coalition forces to respond rapidly to threatening situations.

(Gouge: NC)

– Christian


Digg!

Share |

September 12th, 2007 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 37323 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/12/persistent-eye-in-the-sky/Persistent+Eye+in+the+Sky2007-09-12+12%3A32%3A31Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « DT Readers Search for Fossett | Look Downrange Will Ya? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. txzen says:
    September 12, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    I like the idea of this stuff. Wasn’t the story of vietnam and the spookies that said a base that has a spooky or shadow doing overflight and base defense that base was never overrun? I know these things aren’t armed but their surveliance laser range finders/gps equiptment would make the base’s mortars and artillery almost as effective by having a spotter with a good vantage point at all times. With this the mortars and artillery could be working out the fire data as the enemy is just starting to set up. Combine with that boomerang sniper spotter and I wonder if they could locate single shots coming from any direction around a blimp.
    and btw that blimp looks pregnant

    Reply
  2. j house says:
    September 13, 2007 at 12:43 am

    there are several positioned around BIAP in the current google earth imagery
    These have been flying down in south Florida and S. California, Arizona for years, looking for the low-flying dope runners.

    Reply
  3. Hooded swan says:
    September 13, 2007 at 2:05 pm

    Amazed, dumbfounded, apalled…
    4 1/2 years into this thing & US forces are just getting started on limiting the flow of men & munitions across the borders.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    Recent Comments
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      You sort of prove my point there. Cigarettes started fueling...
      Nadnerbus
    • Is the F-35 Militarily Vital?
      With SDD completion now 4 years behind schedule, the unit...
      Weaponhead
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      The (at the time) Soviet Union poured countless...
      dragon6actual
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      It’d a pity that the 20 year olds returning to a...
      Oblat
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      I'm not sure you can attribute a fall in homicides to the...
      Nadnerbus
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      The LCS is what you get when you don't know what the...
      Oblat
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      The war on drugs shouldn''t be thrown away, But it...
      Thunder350
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
      The problem the US faces is an inability to...
      Oblat
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      The volume of legitimate cross-border traffic is immense, and...
      ohwilleke
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      In WWI they still hadn't entirely phased out horse...
      ohwilleke
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage