DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Tactical Development » The Hunt for Future Navy Air Weapons

The Hunt for Future Navy Air Weapons

Defense Tech reader Ned Conger just sent us a thorough list of weapons and munitions the U.S. Navy thinks are key to winning the future aerial fight.

“Our program develops a mix of legacy, advanced and next-generation weapons that will outpace the capable threat across the spectrum of military operations,” wrote Rear Adm. Kenny Floyd, the director of aviation and aircraft carrier plans and requirements (OpNav N880).

“Current combat operations and analytic scenarios in a wide variety of tactical environments have kept the pressure on my Strike Aircraft Plans and Requirements staff to refine weapons requirements and to work closely with program management and industry to ensure the timely delivery of relevant warfighting capabilities to the fleet.“
air-strike.jpg

There’s a lot of red meat on these bones, so Ill include the whole thing to let you all chew over it without any of my long-winded commentary. There are some interesting tidbits in there, so be sure to let other readers know what you think about Rear Adm. Floyds shopping list.

NEAR-TERM DEVELOPMENTS

Direct Attack Moving Target Capability (DAMTC)

DAMTC will be a level-of-effort weapon intended to provide Naval and Joint warfighters with a lethal, interoperable and cost-effective precision strike weapon system that can engage moving targets. As adversary threats advance in capacity and mobility, the improved capability to engage moving targets from legacy aircraft becomes crucial to strike warfare. I expect that an open competition for DAMTC will result in a retrofit kit for existing direct attack weapons and be available to the fleet in the near future.

Low Collateral Damage Bomb (LOCO)

The BLU-126/B, also known as the Low Collateral damage bomb (LOCO), delivers ordnance to urban targets with reduced collateral damage. It fulfills a need for a weapon that is both combat effective and adheres to United States Central Commands collateral damage rules of engagement. Air-to-ground weapons historically were produced to deliver the maximum amount of explosives. In modern urban warfare, there is often little delineation between friendly, neutral and enemy forces, requiring better blast control. LOCO allows tactical aircraft to employ a precision strike weapon with reduced collateral damage.

Externally, LOCO is identical to the 500-lb. BLU-111, but it contains less explosive mass. Therefore, it produces a reduced fragmentation pattern and blast radius. Our team developed the weapon for use in situations in which friendly forces or civilians are in close proximity to the target. LOCO can be used with the same guidance kits as the BLU-111, including those for laser-guided bombs (LGB), dual-mode laser-guided bombs (DMLGB) and Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM). By modifying an existing weapon system, the program reduced costs associated with design, production and sustainment of this new weapon.

Dual-Mode Laser-Guided Bomb

The DMLGB is a retrofit to legacy LGBs that converts them to the dual-mode configuration using common components. It provides increased flexibility by combining proven technology of laser terminal guidance with all-weather fire-and-forget capability of Inertial Navigation System/Global Positioning System (INS/GPS).

The retrofit involves replacing the existing Computer Control Group (CCG) system with an INS/GPS to provide legacy LGBs with an all-weather guidance system. By using a retrofit strategy vice developing a new weapon, we can streamline qualification time lines and put a new weapon capability in the warfighters hands faster. DMLGB is currently scheduled for IOC in August 2007 on both the AV-8B and F/A-18 with future integration on F-35.

Standoff Land Attack Missile Extended Range (SLAM-ER)

SLAM-ER is a long-range, highly precise air-launched strike missile capable of attacking high-value fixed and relocatable land targets, as well as surface ship targets under way or in port. Terminal control of the weapon is accomplished by the aircrew designating the impact point on the imaging infrared scene transmitted from the weapon and displayed in the cockpit. Man-in-the-loop commands are sent to the SLAM-ER via a data link pod, which is carried by the launch or secondary control aircraft. Hornet A/B/C/D and Super Hornet E/F variants can provide terminal control of SLAM-ER, but only the legacy Hornets can launch the weapon. Launch capability for Super Hornets is scheduled for release to the fleet in 2008.

MIDTERM DEVELOPMENTS

Harpoon Block III

The Harpoon Block III weapon system upgrade provides the U.S. Navy and its allies with surface warfare (SuW) capabilities from ships, aircraft, submarines and coastal defense systems by retrofitting Harpoon missiles in the existing inventory. This upgrade creates a highly capable weapon for the open water and littoral warfare environment by adding GPS capability and inflight target solutions. GPS capabilities provide significant littoral performance improvements such as target discrimination, minimized target-to-shore separation and a land-attack capability with JDAM/GPS accuracy. The addition of a data-link system provides inflight target updates, positive terminal control and connectivity with future network architecture. This enables the weapon to receive information from intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) targeting platforms and gives the launching platform a man-in-the-loop, over-the-horizon SuW solution for the emerging threat.

The Harpoon Block III upgrade offers the option of an inherent spiral development path for future Department of the Navy targeting improvements as well as the ability to integrate the data link on new platforms like the P-8A, organic vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) vehicles and unmanned vehicles.

Joint Standoff Weapon C-1

The JSOW-C-1 variant, also known as a JSOW Block III, provides upgraded capability to strike moving land targets as well as maritime targets. The JSOW-C-1 will be introduced to the fleet as an engineering change proposal to the existing Block II JSOW-C base line. JSOW-C-1 will employ a secure, jam-resistant, high-speed digital tactical data link using Link-16. It also will provide attributes necessary for launch and control or relay of weapon data links by F/A-18E/F aircraft. Future increments will address other control platforms, weapon and data link options.

The JSOW-C-1 will incorporate new target tracking algorithms into the seeker for moving targets, giving Joint force commanders an affordable, air-delivered standoff weapon that is effective against fixed and relocatable land and maritime targets. The JSOW-C-1 system must maintain legacy JSOW-C functionality to be effective against point targets in or through adverse weather conditions, both day and night. JSOW-C-1 must provide low and high altitude launch capability to enable launch platforms to stand off beyond target point defenses. Used in conjunction with accurate targeting information and anti-radiation weapons, JSOW-C-1 will destroy enemy air defenses and create sanctuaries that permit the rapid transition to low-cost, direct attack ordnance.

LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENTS

Joint Air-to-Ground Missile (JAGM)

JAGM is critical to long-term Navy and Marine Corps Aviation. This missile will replace aging Hellfire, TOW and Maverick missiles. JAGM will provide extended standoff, all-weather moving-target capability in a high-countermeasure battlefield environment. JAGM will be the first fixed-wing, rotary-wing and UAV compatible missile in the DoD inventory and will greatly enhance the warfighters operational flexibility.

Small Diameter Bomb Increment II (SDB II)

SDB II is a Joint interest program providing the capability to attack mobile targets in all weather at standoff ranges. SDB II addresses the following requirements attack mobile targets, multiple kills per pass, multiple ordnance carriage, all-weather operations, precision munitions capability, capability against fixed targets, reduced munitions footprint, increased weapons effectiveness, minimized potential for collateral damage, reduced susceptibility of munitions to countermeasures and a migration path to network centric operations capability. The Navy and Marine Corps aircraft planned for integration are F/A-18E/F and F-35B/C.

SDB II will continue incremental development to pursue net-centric interoperability. Navy initial operating capability (IOC) is scheduled for Fiscal Year 2016 on the F-35B short takeoff/vertical landing (STOVL) aircraft, followed by IOC on the F-35C CV (aircraft carrier-capable) variant.

(Gouge: NC)

– Christian

Share |

September 13th, 2007 | Tactical Development | 373712 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/The+Hunt+for+Future+Navy+Air+Weapons2007-09-13+20%3A13%3A27Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Why Bin Laden Isn’t Rotting at Gitmo | Are We Seeing the Next-Gen Bomber? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. 22lr says:
    September 13, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    Cool stuff. Theres nothing really thats to far away from becoming a reality, like direct energy beams.

    Reply
  2. Stephen Trimble says:
    September 14, 2007 at 11:26 pm

    I’m stunned that AARGM didn’t make the list. That’s the replacement for HARM, with the added bonus of being accurate even when the enemy is smart enough to switch off their radar.
    I’m also a little surprised the Navy’s HyFly hypersonic program didn’t make the cut either.
    I wonder what the air force’s list would look like? My guess is that it would start with a replacement for AMRAAM and work it’s way down.

    Reply
  3. demophilus says:
    September 15, 2007 at 1:13 am

    What about APKWS? If it’s for real, it’ll let any Hydra 70mm/2.75″ pod launch laser guided PGM. That would turn any Navy/USMC system that can carry a rocket pod into a sharpshooter, at a relatively low price. If they can work in an ability to hit GPS waypoints on Block Two, you’d have a relatively cheap PGM for indirect fire from air, sea or land.
    Sometimes “quantity has a quality all its own”, and swarming carries the day. APKWS is a good fit for that.

    Reply
  4. txzen says:
    September 16, 2007 at 11:48 am

    Good point about the laser guided hydra missles. I have seen video of the aiming/accuracy and the stopping power problems of 30mm chain gun usage from apaches. Hellfire being too much often and they are designed for anti armor and sometime don’t have the anti infantry effect they need, the 1 pound of explosive coming from a hydra hitting in the 2 to 10 meter accuracy of laser and gps sounds like a great idea. Watching the video of the Hydras now is pretty tough to watch they are wild.
    Also what is so different about a 250 pound bomb and the 500 pound low coloateral damage munition?

    Reply
  5. Randy K. Jensen says:
    September 17, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    I’ve seen Designs of all types for planes and bombers but in this age of technology I have never seen a missle that fires to the reverse of the flight of the aircraft to defend against approching enemy technology is here its just not being used you can shoot down and approaching plane from behind. Randy Jensen

    Reply
  6. step says:
    June 15, 2008 at 6:55 am

    future weapon,lethal weapon,nuclear weapon,military weapon ‚arts martial weapon,medieval weapon,destruction mass weapon,ninja weapon, 2 war weapon world,1 war weapon world,channel discovery future weapon,

    Reply
  7. iPod says:
    July 25, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    thank you

    Reply
  8. danny says:
    August 28, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    nice.…! this is a really good idea developing weapons and reducing collateral really impressive!
    but if you could developed a weapon that 100% accuracy and 100% less collateral damage that may work a risk!

    Reply
  9. Joe says:
    September 14, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    yo

    Reply
  10. Joe says:
    September 14, 2009 at 3:05 pm

    yo

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Hey if it works for the troops on the...
      Marshall Tall Eagle
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      If you are going to do close air support (CAS),...
      LTCMike69
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The Air Force has got it backwards again. Here it...
      gmanaz
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Damn it! I thought this hole tanker BS was over with...
      Thunder350
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      my bad… i misread your second to last...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      excuse me… were you reading what i...
      Project Thor
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      Welfare and warfare are necessary. The argument on...
      calw
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      Get out of wheeled CrapMobiles and get off the roads...
      IEDDEFEAT
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Nope. Crash a Harrier every other flight and it would still be...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      That's a misleading response – the issue...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage