<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The Hunt for Future Navy Air Weapons</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:11:02 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166868</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:05:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166868</guid> <description>yo </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Joe</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166867</link> <dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:05:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166867</guid> <description>yo </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yo</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danny</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-66296</link> <dc:creator>danny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 20:46:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-66296</guid> <description>nice....! this is a really good idea developing weapons and reducing collateral really impressive!
but if you could developed a weapon that 100% accuracy and 100% less collateral damage that may work a risk! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice.…! this is a really good idea developing weapons and reducing collateral really impressive!<br
/> but if you could developed a weapon that 100% accuracy and 100% less collateral damage that may work a risk!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: iPod</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-66295</link> <dc:creator>iPod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:59:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-66295</guid> <description>thank you </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thank you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: step</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166866</link> <dc:creator>step</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 11:55:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166866</guid> <description>future weapon,lethal weapon,nuclear weapon,military weapon ,arts martial weapon,medieval weapon,destruction mass weapon,ninja weapon, 2 war weapon world,1 war weapon world,channel discovery future weapon, </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>future weapon,lethal weapon,nuclear weapon,military weapon ‚arts martial weapon,medieval weapon,destruction mass weapon,ninja weapon, 2 war weapon world,1 war weapon world,channel discovery future weapon,</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Randy K. Jensen</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-66292</link> <dc:creator>Randy K. Jensen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:08:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-66292</guid> <description>I&#039;ve seen Designs of all types for planes and bombers but in this age of technology I have never seen a missle that fires to the reverse of the flight of the aircraft to defend against approching enemy technology is here its just not being used you can shoot down and approaching plane from behind.              Randy Jensen </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve seen Designs of all types for planes and bombers but in this age of technology I have never seen a missle that fires to the reverse of the flight of the aircraft to defend against approching enemy technology is here its just not being used you can shoot down and approaching plane from behind.              Randy Jensen</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: txzen</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166864</link> <dc:creator>txzen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166864</guid> <description>Good point about the laser guided hydra missles. I have seen video of the aiming/accuracy and the stopping power problems of 30mm chain gun usage from apaches. Hellfire being too much often and they are designed for anti armor and sometime don&#039;t have the anti infantry effect they need, the 1 pound of explosive coming from a hydra hitting in the 2 to 10 meter  accuracy of laser and gps sounds like a great idea. Watching the video of the Hydras now is pretty tough to watch they are wild.
Also what is so different about a 250 pound bomb and the 500 pound low coloateral damage munition? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the laser guided hydra missles. I have seen video of the aiming/accuracy and the stopping power problems of 30mm chain gun usage from apaches. Hellfire being too much often and they are designed for anti armor and sometime don’t have the anti infantry effect they need, the 1 pound of explosive coming from a hydra hitting in the 2 to 10 meter  accuracy of laser and gps sounds like a great idea. Watching the video of the Hydras now is pretty tough to watch they are wild.<br
/> Also what is so different about a 250 pound bomb and the 500 pound low coloateral damage munition?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: demophilus</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166863</link> <dc:creator>demophilus</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 06:13:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166863</guid> <description>What about APKWS?  If it&#039;s for real, it&#039;ll let any Hydra 70mm/2.75&quot; pod launch laser guided PGM.  That would turn any Navy/USMC system that can carry a rocket pod into a sharpshooter, at a relatively low price.  If they can work in an ability to hit GPS waypoints on Block Two, you&#039;d have a relatively cheap PGM for indirect fire from air, sea or land.
Sometimes &quot;quantity has a quality all its own&quot;, and swarming carries the day.  APKWS is a good fit for that. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about APKWS?  If it’s for real, it’ll let any Hydra 70mm/2.75″ pod launch laser guided PGM.  That would turn any Navy/USMC system that can carry a rocket pod into a sharpshooter, at a relatively low price.  If they can work in an ability to hit GPS waypoints on Block Two, you’d have a relatively cheap PGM for indirect fire from air, sea or land.<br
/> Sometimes “quantity has a quality all its own”, and swarming carries the day.  APKWS is a good fit for that.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Trimble</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166862</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Trimble</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:26:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166862</guid> <description>I&#039;m stunned that AARGM didn&#039;t make the list. That&#039;s the replacement for HARM, with the added bonus of being accurate even when the enemy is smart enough to switch off their radar.
I&#039;m also a little surprised the Navy&#039;s HyFly hypersonic program didn&#039;t make the cut either.
I wonder what the air force&#039;s list would look like? My guess is that it would start with a replacement for AMRAAM and work it&#039;s way down. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m stunned that AARGM didn’t make the list. That’s the replacement for HARM, with the added bonus of being accurate even when the enemy is smart enough to switch off their radar.<br
/> I’m also a little surprised the Navy’s HyFly hypersonic program didn’t make the cut either.<br
/> I wonder what the air force’s list would look like? My guess is that it would start with a replacement for AMRAAM and work it’s way down.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 22lr</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/09/13/the-hunt-for-future-navy-air-weapons/comment-page-1/#comment-166861</link> <dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:10:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3737#comment-166861</guid> <description>Cool stuff. Theres nothing really thats to far away from becoming a reality, like direct energy beams. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool stuff. Theres nothing really thats to far away from becoming a reality, like direct energy beams.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/25 queries in 0.057 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-21 22:39:39 -->