DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Polmar's Perspective » Opening Up the PLA

Opening Up the PLA

pace-china.jpg

Major progress is being made in increas­ing the “trans­parency” of China’s armed forces — known col­lec­tively as the Peoples Liberation Army (PLA). “Transparency” is a Washington term as senior U.S. mil­i­tary offi­cers, defense offi­cials, and ana­lysts seek to know more about the strength and inten­tions of China’s defense estab­lish­ment.

The out­go­ing chair­man of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine General Peter Pace, vis­ited China in March 2007 and gave the PLA high marks for the access that he was given. Pace was allowed to see China’s newest fighter air­craft and was given a ride in the PLA’s most advanced tank. “They took me to places no other U.S. offi­cer had been,” Pace said. “They took me to their pri­vate offices. They took me to their com­mand cen­ters and showed me their maps and their plans.”


More recently, Admiral Mike Mullen, the U.S. Chief of Naval Operations who will relieve General Pace as JCS chair­man this fall, returned from a China visit. Mullen declared that he now had a bet­ter grasp of the PLA mod­ern­iza­tion efforts and “There’s a long way to go, but I’m reassured…I’m very encour­aged about their com­mit­ment to con­tin­u­ing to improve this relationship.”


Reportedly, other Pentagon offi­cials are less impressed, not­ing that U.S. mil­i­tary offi­cers are rou­tinely denied access to Chinese sites dur­ing trips there, even as the Americans allowed vis­it­ing Chinese offi­cers into some of the United States’ most sophis­ti­cated and advanced facilities.


“What we expect the Chinese to do is give us the same level of access that we give them here in the United States,” explained Richard P. Lawless, who recently stepped down as the Pentagon’s senior expert on Asia. “We make a great effort to give them access — rea­son­able access — and we make a great effort to let them under­stand how our mil­i­tary really works, and if that can­not be rec­i­p­ro­cated, then we have a very seri­ous dis­con­nect,” Lawless added.


Still, Chinese mil­i­tary offi­cers in the United States tend to have more restric­tions placed on them than many other for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives, includ­ing offi­cers from the Russian Federation. And, con­sid­er­ing the long-​​closed soci­ety of China and the high degree of secrecy that shrouded all PLA activ­i­ties and pro­grams until a few years ago, China is becom­ing increas­ingly trans­par­ent from a mil­i­tary viewpoint.


Although some observers view U.S. and Chinese naval ship visit exchanges as super­fi­cial, as well as the recent U.S.-China naval search-​​and-​​rescue exer­cise, such steps are truly land­mark changes in the rela­tion­ship of the two nations.

– Norman Polmar

Share |

September 18th, 2007 | Polmar's Perspective | 37475 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/18/opening-up-the-pla/Opening+Up+the+PLA2007-09-18+18%3A27%3A55Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Army Optic Combines Heat, Light for Better Sight | Army Gets Sweet New Combat Threads » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. SMSgt Mac says:
    September 18, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    Re: “Chinese mil­i­tary offi­cers in the United States tend to have more restric­tions placed on them than many other for­eign rep­re­sen­ta­tives, includ­ing offi­cers from the Russian Federation.“
    I sup­pose that is an improve­ment of sorts. In the 80’s I sat through a brief on China in prepa­ra­tion of some of their gen­er­als vis­it­ing Hill AFB. The briefer noted that the Chinese view of equal treat­ment between rep­re­sen­ta­tives of dif­fer­ent gov­ern­ments meant that they treated every­one the same: poorly — while they expected to be treated like ‘more equal’ equals. Shortly there­after I was star­tled by the sight of three big-​​hatted PRC offi­cers (there is no mis­tak­ing that funky green) stand­ing on a side­walk near the BX watch­ing F-​​16s in the pat­tern with­out an escort in sight. I’m sure there had to be SOMEBODY “with” them if only for pro­to­col pur­poses, but you couldn’t ID who it might be because they were stand­ing all alone.

    Reply
  2. slntax says:
    September 18, 2007 at 9:10 pm

    hey lets not get it twisted the chi­nese are not our allies and their past actions prove me so. over and over they try to steal our tech and attack us covertly. so all this is friendly pos­tur­ing is just that pos­tur­ing. the real facts are on the ground is that they are build­ing pro­jec­tion forces to take and hold Taiwan and secure and con­trol the Asian ship­ping lanes.

    Reply
  3. Roy Smith says:
    September 18, 2007 at 10:55 pm

    This may seem off topic,but I’ll get to my point.I remem­ber get­ting into a dis­cus­sion with a British nurse in 1993 about Hong Kong’s return to China in 1997 & the UK’s refusal to allow British sub­jects with valid pass­ports to leave Hong Kong & move to the UK sim­ply because they were Chinese,even though most were born & raised to be British subjects.She said they couldn’t come to the U.K. because “they were Chinese you see.” I’m sorry that I never though t rebut her be saying,“You mean to say,‘because they are not white you see’.“
    Anyway,so the UK gives Hong Kong with her inhab­i­tants over to China.The British gov­er­nor gives them a con­sti­tu­tion garun­tee­ing civil rights before they are fed to the Chinese lions & the UK leaves.
    So,well I think China is just being like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe & Mbeki of South Africa,waiting for a suf­fi­cient amount of time passes before they let the ham­mer fall & oppress the peo­ple of Hong Kong.Right now,its just a “Potemkin Village” to impress the world about how benev­o­lent the Chinese gov­ern­ment is. Concerning Taiwan,the only thing that China wants from it is its loca­tion in con­trol­ling ship­ping to Japan & South Korea.Also,because of the imbal­ance of men of mar­ry­ing age out­num­ber­ing women almost 100 to 1.They’ll most likely kill every Taiwanese male on the Island,because they have enough Chinese males & keep alive all of the Taiwanese women to reduce the imbal­ance that they have right now.Then,maybe they’ll finally do the same thing with hong Kong & Macao & wipe their males out & keep the women alive.After all,the males of Hong Kong & Macao are most likely immune to hav­ing to serve in the mil­i­tary like West Berliner males were excempt from serv­ing in the west German army & thus of no value to Beijing.

    Reply
  4. Drive By Thought says:
    September 19, 2007 at 2:45 am

    “such steps are truly land­mark changes in the rela­tion­ship of the two nations.” <-Let’s see how long that lasts.
    I mean remem­ber here, Republicans are war mon­gers. Democrats are “glob­al­ists”, and least if I buy what the back of the base­ball card tells me. Point being, the cur­rent U.S. lead­er­ship under­stands how to engage with other for­eign mil­i­tary lead­er­ships.
    The next poten­tial admin­is­tra­tion would sim­ply tell the poten­tial ChiCaps that ChiCom was the way to go all along.

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    January 1, 2008 at 1:42 pm

    The more U know the better,Know thy enemy.
    Helps in plan­ning & war gam­ing & poli­cies.
    If we trade with them , why not exam­ine the PLA & PLN etc.
    Examine Tech, Tactics & Training.
    BUT dont give out US secrets.
    Wine & dine in Hong Kong Macau area.
    Use Phillpines as Fwd base for Chinese Relations esp since Games due in 8–08

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage