DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Fast Movers » Typhoons come to Saudi Arabia

Typhoons come to Saudi Arabia

No, not the weather-​​type, although that would be inter­est­ing just to see the reac­tion of the Global Warming crowd.
These are of the Eurofighter-​​type Typhoon, gen­er­ally con­sid­ered a Eurofighter.jpg4.5th gen­er­a­tion fighter, and the Saudis are pur­chas­ing 72 of the for either 6bn (or 4.43bn, depend­ing on the news site,or 6.4 bil­lion or about $8-​​12bn USD) which is part of a larger 20bn arms deal between the Saudi gov­ern­ment and the British defense con­trac­tor BAE Systems.
As Kris Alexander wrote here on DT back in February of this year, this is just the expected result of …“Iraq-​​fueled ten­sion in the Middle East…setting off a defense buy­ing binge.” Lots of money fly­ing around there, but that is noth­ing new.
The Typhoon itself is a fine look­ing and per­form­ing fighter, ranked up there with other air­craft from the past decade or so, includ­ing the French Dassault Rafael, the the var­i­ous SU-​​27 deriv­a­tives, the F/​A-​​18 E/​F and the lat­est ver­sions of the F-​​15.
With super­cruise, a dig­i­tal cock­pit, direct voice inputs for spe­cific air­craft func­tions, canards to aug­ment flight capa­bil­i­ties, the abil­ity to carry all the cur­rent inven­to­ries of weapons (advanced weapons.jpgshort and medium range IR and radar mis­siles, anti-​​ship mis­siles, laser guided bombs, laser des­ig­nat­ing pod, inter­nal gun, the works) to meet any mis­sion require­ment, the jet is one sweet machine. I just won­der about its stealth abil­i­ties against enemy radars with that big delta wing and those huge square intakes.
With two EJ200 after­burn­ing engines (or “reheat” as the Brits and folks over there call it), each motor puts out 13,500 lbs of thrust in mil­i­tary and 20,000 lbs of thrust in full blower. Compared to the F/​A-​​18 GE F414s, which pump out 14,000 and 20,000 respect­fully, they com­pare favor­ably but keep in mind the his­tor­i­cal dif­fer­ences between an Air Force land-​​based jet and a Navy jet and even a less pow­er­ful engine will still make the Air Force jet do eye-​​watering things because of its greater thrust-​​to-​​weight ratio.
Max take­off weight is 51,200 lbs (com­pare that to the Tomcat’s 72,000 max t/​o weight!) and again this per­son­i­fies a land-​​based Air Force-​​type strike-​​fighter capa­bil­ity — a light air­craft with beasty engines that can haul the mail and doesn’t need the extra strength and weight nec­es­sary for car­rier oper­a­tions.
Bottom line with this Saudi deal is a cou­ple of things. It widens an already wide gap with the main threat in the region, that being Iran’s increas­ingly anti­quated and anachro­nis­tic menagerie of an Air Force with its Dassault/​Sukhoi/​Grumman/​McDonnell Douglas/​Northrop dinosaurs (what an International Flight Museum that would make!) and its home-​​grown Saeqeh twin-​​tailed F-​​5 knock­off. Should any aer­ial con­flict arise that would involve the Iranian air order of bat­tle, this patch­work air force really wouldn’t last long against any regional air capa­bil­ity with the pos­si­ble excep­tion of Iraq’s C-​​130s and heli­copters.
The other ele­ment is to watch the Peyton Place aspect of this as BAE goes under the micro­scope of the US Justice depart­ment for accu­sa­tions of brib­ing the Saudi gov­ern­ment and Prince Bandar bin Sultan, for­mer ambas­sador to the United States and now head of Saudi Arabia’s National Security Council dur­ing a $86 bil­lion Al-​​Yamamah arms deal (includ­ing Hawk and Tornado jets) nego­ti­ated in 1985. This inves­ti­ga­tion comes after Britain’s “Serious Fraud Office” (what a *great* gov­ern­ment agency name!) dropped its inves­ti­ga­tion of BAE Systems based on national secu­rity rea­sons.
More infor­ma­tion on the Typhoon is here at the Eurofighter home page and here at FAS.
Stay tuned!
–Pinch Paisley

Share |

September 21st, 2007 | Fast Movers | 375515 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/21/typhoons-come-to-saudi-arabia/Typhoons+come+to++Saudi+Arabia2007-09-22+00%3A16%3A02murdoc You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « What Actually Happened in the Syrian Desert? | The Sunday Paper (Real Estate Section) » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Roy Smith says:
    September 22, 2007 at 1:01 am

    Hmmm,maybe Saudi Arabia got tired of wait­ing for the F-​​35 JSF to come out.I see the future of manned com­bat avi­a­tion & it is the Eurofighter Typhoon,the French Rafale,the Swedish Gripen,& the still being pro­duced F-​​16E/​F Block 60/​F-​​16I Soufa fighter jets.Oh,I for­got to men­tion the Japanese F-​​2 Attack Fighter in that list.How about adding the F-​​15E/​F-​​15I Strike Eagle to this list?

    Reply
  2. 22lr says:
    September 22, 2007 at 10:27 am

    Well let them buy the older stuff, and let us keep one step ahead, just incase.

    Reply
  3. David Rocheleau says:
    September 22, 2007 at 12:33 pm

    I think the Eurofighter super­cruise abil­ity is in ques­tion — some­thing about need­ing a clean configuration.

    Reply
  4. Camp says:
    September 22, 2007 at 10:04 pm

    Wouldn’t it be an inter­est­ing world, if sev­eral of the Arab nations (maybe with some help from the U.S.) joined together & removed Iran’s cur­rent gov­ern­ment from power. Replacing it with a democ­racy… It very well might be one of the most sta­bi­liz­ing acts to ever occur in the region.

    Reply
  5. Guest says:
    September 23, 2007 at 3:36 am

    DT is b0rked; only the com­ments show up, not the arti­cles themselves…

    Reply
  6. Mike Scirocco says:
    September 23, 2007 at 5:01 am

    I don’t see any arti­cle, only the cap­tion, same as Guest at September 23, 2007 03:36 AM

    Reply
  7. Roy Smith says:
    September 24, 2007 at 3:26 am

    I see that the South Koreans have a newer ver­sion of the F-​​15E Strike Eagle,the F-​​15K. You know,unless we have just started using a cloak­ing device,I see VERY LITTLE of the new air­craft that we are sup­posed to have.The F-​​18 Super Hornet is a big step back­wards from the old F-​​14 Tomcat.We may never see the F-​​35 JSF deployed in our lifetime.Also,we may have enough F-​​22s to fill,what,4 squadrons? All of those new F-​​22s promised to be built are just F-​​22s not built yet.But then,we’ll never go to war with Russia &/​or China because we’re all just kumbiya with each other.How come they(American plane mak­ers) are still build­ing “yesterday’s” jet fighters(F-16s & F-15s),but we are hav­ing such a hard,if not impos­si­ble time get­ting “tomorrow’s” jet fighters(F-22s & F-​​35s) on line,hmmmm?

    Reply
  8. Roy Smith says:
    September 24, 2007 at 3:35 am

    Hmmm,3 F-​​22 Squadrons.Well thats one more squadron than our soon to be retired F-​​117 squadrons.I looked it up on Global Security.org.I also saw the “myth­i­cal” F-​​22J for Japan.I hon­estly think that the F/​A-​​37 Talon from the movie “Stealth” has a more real­is­tic of being built than a ver­sion of the F-​​22 for Japan or Israel(but then again,why should we build F-​​22s for Japan or Israel? Its ours,all ours,bwahahaha).

    Reply
  9. Grandjester says:
    September 25, 2007 at 10:18 am

    Camp, Iran is cur­rently a Democracy.

    Reply
  10. blue star says:
    April 14, 2008 at 4:36 pm

    Tranche 2 block 5 will have some air-​​to-​​ground capa­bil­i­ties. GB is also heav­ily push­ing for­ward towards inte­grat­ing such weapons. One of their Eurofighters has already suc­cess­fully dropped an Enhanced Paveway II, that was a block 5 pro­duc­tion air­craft.
    You com­pare prices which are not com­pa­ra­ble. Lets wait and see, I think the F-​​35 will be much more expensive.

    Reply
  11. khan says:
    June 12, 2008 at 5:19 am

    The saudi’s are stupid!They have the cap­i­tal so why not build the own fighter jet. When the british or amer­i­cans stop sup­ply­ing them they are f*cked.

    Reply
  12. Stig says:
    June 17, 2008 at 4:32 am

    Its a good thing that Saudi Arabia are get­ting these Typhoons, its the best choice & its the best multi role fighter money can buy, what other air­craft can carry two cruise mis­siles, two LGB’s, two ALARM mis­siles, two ASRAAM’s and four BVRAAM’s (Meteor), and a 27mm can­non on a sin­gle mis­sion? Yes thats six air to air mis­siles on a bomb­ing mis­sion. Thats a hell of a com­bi­na­tion to have in a air force. And so what if its not “Stealthy”? Theres always going to be some­thing to counter it, and why have a “Stealth” fighter like the F-​​35 that will be able to only carry two air to air mis­siles, two LGB’s (Internally), and why have “Stealth” if you’re going to add bombs & mis­siles exter­nally? The F-​​35, and the F-​​22 is just some­thing the yanks can brag about, but they don’t brag about fit­ting “Stealthy Drop Tanks” get­ting into a sit­u­a­tion with makes them hav­ing to drop their pre­cious “Stealthy Drop Tanks” onto land or sea where some­one can just come along & pick them up, i.e. The enemy! Pointless! And sad if their just going to bully 3rd world coun­tries.
    Typhoon, best choice!

    Reply
  13. k7 says:
    June 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm

    oh goof

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage