DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » Bombs vs. Bayonets? USAF Picks Bombs

Bombs vs. Bayonets? USAF Picks Bombs

jtac.jpg

The Air Force may have adopted a doc­trine on irreg­u­lar war­fare — com­bat­ing insur­gents and guer­ril­las while try­ing to win the hearts and minds of a local pop­u­la­tion — but it’s not about to aban­don the advan­tages of air­power and sophis­ti­cated weaponry in the name of “fight­ing fair.”

Maj. Gen. Allen Peck, com­man­der of the Air Force Doctrine Development and Education Center, made that pretty clear today at the Air & Space Conference spon­sored by the Air Force Association in Washington, D.C.

Peck — not­ing that the Air Force’s irreg­u­lar war­fare doc­trine stip­u­lates that mil­i­tary actions must come sec­ond to influ­enc­ing the pop­u­la­tion you’re try­ing to win over — heard that an ear­lier speaker said that just using air­power, even on a legit­i­mate tar­get, gives the enemy a pro­pa­ganda opportunity.

The argu­ment made by the ear­lier speaker is that enemy troops will claim the Air Force attacks them from the air but will not come face to face to fight them.

It was obvi­ously not a ques­tion Peck usu­ally gets. Or, per­haps, one hed ever heard.

“We should eschew capa­bil­i­ties that the enemy doesn’t have and just drive up and put a bay­o­net in his chest because that’s the only capa­bil­ity they have?” Peck asked. “We’re using weapons from the air, and that’s cheat­ing? And we’re doing it at night and we have pre­ci­sion weapons and they don’t? I don’t even know how to respond to that.”

The fact is, Peck said, “I don’t want a fair fight.”

The Air Force drew up an irreg­u­lar war­fare doc­trine that was approved by Chief of Staff Gen. T. Michael Moseley on Aug. 24. A key part of the doc­trine is that while com­bat­ing and defeat­ing the enemy, you don’t things to turn the civil­ian pop­u­la­tion against you.

Legitimacy and influ­ence are crit­i­cal, accord­ing to the doc­trine, and “the bat­tle of arms” must work in har­mony with “the bat­tle for influ­ence,” but not become more important.

Still, its war­fare. And some­body has to decide when a par­tic­u­lar action is nec­es­sary — even if it may be viewed neg­a­tively by the population.

If the tar­get is a mosque, for exam­ple, “chances are some­thing like that, the approval level is going to be pretty high,” Peck said, with the per­son mak­ing that call likely being the one who will have to pub­licly jus­tify it later.

– Bryant Jordan

Share |

September 25th, 2007 | Strategery | 3764114 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/09/25/bombs-vs-bayonets-usaf-picks-bombs/Bombs+vs.+Bayonets%3F+USAF+Picks+Bombs2007-09-25+21%3A19%3A30Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Drone Cargo Drops | San Fran Again » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DDeRamus says:
    September 28, 2007 at 5:35 pm

    There are times when the “pike” or a K-​​Bar may be the the weapon of choice or last resort. But, I am sure not at 40,000 feet. The good gen­eral needs to be on the ground kick­ing doors and clear­ing build­ings before he says more.

    Reply
  2. DDeRamus says:
    September 28, 2007 at 5:36 pm

    There are times when the “pike” or a K-​​Bar may be the the weapon of choice or last resort. But, I am sure not at 40,000 feet. The good gen­eral needs to be on the ground kick­ing doors and clear­ing build­ings before he says more.

    Reply
  3. breechblock says:
    September 28, 2007 at 6:31 pm

    As a Former Marine, there is no such thing in war as a fair fight! The Palestinians & the Islamic rad­i­cals have no qualms about using women & chil­dren as shields, the major­ity are cow­ards & have no morals or scru­ples about killing All of us Infedels! Shoot first…Investigate later, only com­mon sense! Mike. SEMPER FIDELIS!!!!!

    Reply
  4. Steve says:
    September 28, 2007 at 6:50 pm

    When we catch Bin Laden, let’s put him in the ring with the Rock. THAT would be a FAIR fight! And one I’d pay to see.

    Reply
  5. Jack Greutman says:
    September 28, 2007 at 8:24 pm

    My only com­ment is God Bless the Men and Women that put them­selves in harms way and go ahead and drop the Bombs shoot the enemy do what ever gets the job done so you can come home. Be unfair if it will get you home sooner.
    498244

    Reply
  6. Santiago Tello says:
    September 28, 2007 at 10:11 pm

    Why don’t we let the ear­lier speaker go into Iraq with a Rifle and a Bayonet. Let him/​her take a radio to call in an air strike. Any tak­ers on which one’s used first? Most of the arm chair gen­er­als out there have never been where the bul­lets are fly­ing, so it’s easy for them to shoot their mouths off. Are you sure the ear­lier speaker wasn’t Comrad Fonda? That’s about her speed.

    Reply
  7. Andrew White says:
    September 29, 2007 at 12:02 am

    It no longer met­ters why we are there. It instad mat­ters that now we need to WIN and then leave. The US has never lost a war althogh there have been times we didnt win either. So my ques­tion to the lib­er­als is where is your sense of Americanism? We arent like the rest of this world we didnt start this fight with the ter­ror­ists but we will sure as hell win and fin­ish it.

    Reply
  8. josh says:
    September 29, 2007 at 2:56 am

    Weapons are made to be dead­lier, more presice, and bet­ter. During the world wars the ger­mans didn’t care how the rus­sians were equiped when they killed them , we didn’t care about how the native amer­i­cans were eqiped when we killed them, and no real army that wants to win will play “fair”. Weapons are made bet­ter so the enemy dies faster and more so your fam­ily and friends don’t; and its looks cooler when a bomb goes off.

    Reply
  9. LtJg Birchmore says:
    September 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm

    I am always tempted toward a semi-​​eloquent rant, but in this case I can sim­ply agree with every­thing Rodosbc has said. I think I might have met him on the Cua Viet. War is not a game. You can pre­tend to have rules, but if your oppo­nent has none, you are not going to win by crip­pling your­self with yours. No mat­ter how civ­i­lized it may feel, you just can­not bring a ten­nis rac­quet to a gun­fight and expect to prevail.

    Reply
  10. Zach says:
    September 29, 2007 at 7:06 pm

    Who cares about fair. They attacked us so we go in there and Buttf@#$ them to hell. If thay can’t take it when the S!@# hits the fan then don’t throw the first punch. If they don’t like get­ting bombed back to the F@#$ING stone age thats to bad. Life is a B!@#H.

    Reply
  11. Christopher R. Castro says:
    September 29, 2007 at 7:22 pm

    War, war is a drug. There is no way of stop­ping globliz­tion, and a one gov­ern­ment. The UN, the power sta­tion with the top five country’s con­trol­ling its

    Reply
  12. Christopher R. Castro says:
    September 29, 2007 at 7:23 pm

    War, war is a drug. There is no way of stop­ping globliz­tion, and a one gov­ern­ment. The UN, the power sta­tion with the top five country’s con­trol­ling its

    Reply
  13. Nick says:
    September 29, 2007 at 7:42 pm

    ok know every stfu and lis­ten for a min #1 iraq did not swing first the afangs did with Bin laden infact we went in say­ing they had wom and yet the UN DID NOT FIND THE WOM so dont be say­ing they got what they deserved ok
    #2 if we would not have invaded the iraqi’s we would need nei­ther bombs not Bayonets
    THINK ABOUT THAT

    Reply
  14. Daniel says:
    September 30, 2007 at 2:35 am

    I per­son­ally think we should bomb them back to the stone age and turn Iran into a sheet of glass while we’re at it.

    Reply
  15. king says:
    September 30, 2007 at 3:27 pm

    its not wether we fight fair or not. there is no such thing! you win by what u have and what u and it can do! fair­ness does not exist in this type of thing

    Reply
  16. I am Commassar says:
    September 30, 2007 at 5:25 pm

    Fair fights sim­ply don’t exist. fair wars sim­ply do not either. The sim­plest truth to war is “He who has the biggest gun wins.” mean­ing sim­ply that tech­nol­ogy has in almost any war, decided who wins it. From the time of bronze and iron weapons of ancient wars,Plate body armor, the Briton’s long­bow, gun­pow­der and re load­able firearms, to the machine gun and fighter planes, nuclear weapons, long range mis­siles, and end­less vari­a­tions of the last four. Sure, morale, num­bers, sup­plies, for­tify able posi­tions, tac­tics, troop train­ing and brute man­power are cards in the deck as well. But tech­nol­ogy is the ace in the hole. All to com­plete one objec­tive, to win.
    therein lies the prob­lem. The goal of this war is to ‘lib­er­ate’ a coun­try and allow it suit­able time to come to strength to pro­tect itself. (As were all told but I’m not going to get into that on this post.) that means we sim­ply cant bomb the place till it resem­bles a bath­room mir­ror. That means we have to hold in the thoughts of the peo­ple that we are indeed lib­er­a­tors and not con­querors. Conquerors care not, (or very lit­tle,) of things such as civil­ian casu­al­ties. Liberators, on the other hand, have to. they have to hold in the mind of the cit­i­zenry that we are the “good” guys.
    any­way i went off on a tan­gent. The fact of the mat­ter is war isn’t fair, to pre­tend that it is on any level is to truly be igno­rant on a level unfit of any human being. To say that we are too afraid to face you in a ground fight as we bomb you over and over from the air is just show­ing your frus­tra­tion that you cant do any­thing about it other then keep your heads down.

    Reply
  17. Juan says:
    October 1, 2007 at 6:14 pm

    Well nany nany boo boo. We have bombs, and they have rocks. It is not our fault they haven’t made any sort of tech­no­log­i­cal advance­ments in cen­turies because they are too busy killing peo­ple in the name of their god. Let’s keep bomb­ing them until all the retards are gone.

    Reply
  18. Um... says:
    October 1, 2007 at 6:17 pm

    Nick WTF are you talk­ing about? Do you know who sad­dam hus­sein was? Do you know the kind of life that peo­ple in Iraq were brought up in? Um…by the way, do you know why you aren’t using gay british gram­mar right now?

    Reply
  19. Chaleah says:
    October 1, 2007 at 8:50 pm

    In ref­er­ence to Mr. Juan, I must say that his response was not only imma­ture, but polit­i­cally incor­rect. Just because they are narrow-​​minded doeesn’t mean they’re retards. Also, they are advanc­ing in tech­nol­ogy, just a lit­tle slower than the super­pow­ers.
    To the topic though. There is no such thing in the his­tory of mankind and war as fair. Really, when you think about it the first war/​ fight was because some tribe or coun­try wanted some­thing mate­ri­al­is­tic or had an author­i­ta­tive com­plex and sub­dued who­ever to get it. War and the urge to fight is a cruel, self­ish car­nal­ity that seems ingrained in some (for­merly in myself too). I’m just sev­en­teen and I real­ize that. These mid­dle east could pos­si­bly trace their lin­eage to Ishmael, a wild war-​​like man. They may not have the sophis­ti­ca­tion in weaponry, but they have a deter­mi­na­tion that has stopped most races from con­quer­ing them but each other. They will also use any­thing and every­thing to make us look bad. We just need to be care­ful with where and when we use weapons on them

    Reply
  20. Cris says:
    October 1, 2007 at 9:24 pm

    Yo, wus­sup peo­ples? Uh, i ain’t the smartest per­son around, but you gotta be a com­plete idiot to think that you gonna get a fair war. Why don’t we all just go pick a cou­ple daisies for each other now? No won­der peo­ple say the air force are sissies. What the devil you mean fair war? Okay, let me put it this way. You drop a bomb on some­one right? Now drop one on your­self cuz you gotta make it fair. Dont you agree? Sounds like some­one needs to snap outa lala land.

    Reply
  21. Ris says:
    October 1, 2007 at 9:35 pm

    Hey, Ris here. Mister what’s’face doesn’t want a fair war. Define fair war. The guy is an idiot. Since when was war fair? I’m gonna fight you because you got some­thin i want. Yeah, real fair. Does he think it’s fair we’re fight­ing the whole iraqi pop­u­la­tion cuz of a cou­ple of ter­ror­ists? I dont. People need ta wake up and smell the roses. Today, noth­ing is fair. Does any­one think it’s fair for those of us who have to put up with gay peo­ple? By the way, if any of you are gay, too bad. I aint takin back what i said. If you’re gen­der con­fused, you got problems.

    Reply
  22. swimmerbob says:
    October 2, 2007 at 11:33 am

    Ever loose track of what you where think­ing when you walk into a Home Depot or record store(ex). ? I think that some­thing sim­i­lar hap­pens to reporters when they finally get the “big gig”. There minds go blank & they will say/​write any­thing that keeps there ad-​​executives happy.
    To: The grunts on the ground & in the “Air”,
    Disregard the Washington rhetoric, they are only try­ing to pacify our country’s nancy’s so you guys can con­cen­trate on keep­ing each other alive. I lost a friend on 9–11. One of the fun­ni­est bas­tards you’ve ever met. Get Some , But don’t stick your necks out to do it,huh? It’s a coun­try run by Dick-​​weeds & might remain so for awhile. Live & let the hea­thens die.–over,out.

    Reply
  23. John Allcott says:
    October 7, 2007 at 11:51 pm

    my name is mud. i want to lick your earlobes…please.
    sincerely,john allcott

    Reply
  24. LCPL KILL says:
    October 12, 2007 at 7:45 pm

    JC, go back to ele­men­tary school and learn to spell and punc­tu­ate. Ok, with that out there now, I can con­cen­trate on the sub­ject at hand. There is no such thing as fair. Nothing has ever been fair, nor will any­thing ever be fair. Go ahead and let that dream go. As to the Chair Force chos­ing bombs, I guess that’s why they are the Chair Force. They are lazy. FIX BAYONETS!! OOHRAH!!

    Reply
  25. thegame says:
    July 27, 2008 at 8:50 pm

    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? 6 ? ? ? ? ? 6
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ?
    ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage