DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » 50 Years of Racing in Space

50 Years of Racing in Space

sputnik.jpg

Alright, in case you all missed it, here’s a reminder of how important today is…I mean, this is where the real “tech” in “Defense Tech” all began.

From USA Today:

As a high school junior in the fall of 1957, Gerry Wheeler knew what he was destined to do the following summer: work in the family milk-delivery business in Peterboro, N.H. It’s what he and his older brother had always done.

But on Oct. 4, 1957, 50 years ago today, he and the rest of America got a bleep-bleep-bleeping wake-up call. Its name: Sputnik.

Launched by scientists in the Soviet Union, Sputnik I was the first artificial object to orbit Earth. It quietly changed Wheeler’s life and those of millions more.

As Sputnik jump-started the space race, the little aluminum sphere also jolted the nation’s education system. The aftershocks are still felt today.

That autumn, many Americans feared that Sputnik presaged a possible ballistic nuclear attack by the Soviets. But Wheeler’s parents took a more pragmatic approach: They urged him to take a science course that summer.

“Once Sputnik went up, the conversation changed around the dinner table,” he says.

Wheeler spent the summer studying advanced physics; he went on to earn a Ph.D. in nuclear physics at Boston University, teach at Temple University and Montana State, and head the National Science Teachers Association.

It’s tempting to believe that before Sputnik, the USA’s math and science education system was moribund, but historians disagree. U.S. scientists and engineers had helped win World War II, after all, and plans for better coursework already were in place in 1957. But they got a much-needed push.

At the time, many Americans feared that federal funding could lead to federal control. But in 1957, educators quickly seized on the launch and pushed for more government money.

“They saw Sputnik as an opportunity to bang the drum,” says New York University education historian Diane Ravitch. It also settled the question of “whether the federal government should be involved in education at all.”

In 1958, Congress approved $1 billion for the National Defense Education Act, or NDEA, the first of an alphabet soup of more than a dozen programs meant to help U.S. students compete with the Soviets. Schools also began focusing on gifted students, handpicking them for upper-level courses.

Then-Sen. Lyndon Johnson held the first hearings on spending for school construction. That summer, schools began receiving matching funds, not only for math and science but also for foreign languages.

Those 1960s-era “language labs” with headphones and microphones also were a direct result of Sputnik, says Peggy Kidwell, a curator at the Smithsonian Institution’s National Museum of American History.

“That was something that was really big after Sputnik,” she says.

Baby-boomer families began buying educational toys telescopes and plastic models of the human body. A Gilbert chemistry set that already had been on the market “sold really well” the Christmas after Sputnik, Kidwell says.

Though schools’ focus on gifted students was short-lived, Ravitch says replaced in the 1960s by a move toward equal education for all what survived was Congress’ commitment to help pay for education.

In 1964, President Johnson signed the landmark Elementary and Secondary Education Act, which today lives on as No Child Left Behind.

Many educators now say the nation needs another Sputnik-like scare to motivate the nation to improve schools. They say the two most likely candidates global warming and global economic competition are close, but they’re no Sputnik.

“It wasn’t a trend,” Ravitch says. “It was a space shot, and I don’t know what the equivalent of a space shot today would be.“

– Christian

Share |

October 4th, 2007 | Space | 25757 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/10/04/50-years-of-racing-in-space/50+Years+of+Racing+in+Space2007-10-04+22%3A36%3A33Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Good News — Bad News on UAVs (Depending on Who You Are) | iPod Translator is Music to My Ears » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Lord Vader :) says:
    October 5, 2007 at 8:31 am

    “…another Sputnik-like scare to motivate the nation…” — alien?:)

    Reply
  2. Rix says:
    October 5, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    Our education system is a nightmare. Our system is designed to focus on underperformers and raise them to minimal employability and functionality at a brutally high cost. Our best and brightest go into fields like law, ethnic studies, art, etc. Meanwhile, the Chinese crank out competent engineers and scientists by the hundreds of thousands. We respond by doubling down on failure by increasing the funding of our miserable system without major reforms. Our children spend less time in school, benefit less from the hours they spend in school and cost more to ‘educate’ than any other country. This is the greatest national security disaster in America right now, ranking far higher than all of our procurement problems combined.

    Reply
  3. Cheerio says:
    October 8, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    Our education system today is based on standardized testing. Our children learn what is considered necessary on the national level, but it leaves out innovation and creativity. The reason why we’re not ‘pumping out’ engineers and scientists is because our kids aren’t able to discover their own natural abilities. ‘Brainiacs’ are taught to study selected (and usually out-dated) textbooks, instead of reasearching through history for new ideas. I would rather pay for my childs’ quality education than get a mediocre one for free.

    Reply
  4. G A Tolmas says:
    October 25, 2007 at 5:12 pm

    The shift in funding has shifted the stupidity from “Flatearth, State of the Idiot Politician” to Washington, Dumb Critter. (Opps, I sorry a redundent term). Al Capp’s Pogo was right in stating we have met the enemy and he is us. The Mentally Gifted program has more than likely decreased the number of new creative science since the Inquisition. An original or nor orthidox thought disturbs the straight line to get more money by following the PROGRAM outlined toward STANDARD TESTS. If, it is not standard, then is it not orthidox: hence, disruptive. Euler and Edison were just non standard students and were exiled as disruptive.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Every person posting here has made good points,...
      eyes_up
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage