Comments on: More C-RAMs for the Army? http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:47:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: yanghttp://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-221805 yang Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:57:57 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-221805 i swear that picture sooo looks like the Phalanx the Phalanx is obviously very capable of engaging fast projectiles e.g a missile for an aircraft carrier so i dont see why they cant use it for ground defence i swear that picture sooo looks like the Phalanx
the Phalanx is obviously very capable of engaging fast projectiles e.g a missile for an aircraft carrier so i dont see why they cant use it for ground defence

]]> By: Macshttp://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168172 Macs Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:45:25 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168172 Funny, the number of stories about mortars landing in the green zone or any other base in Iraq seems to be getting fewer and fewer. I wonder if there is a connection. Hope so! Funny, the number of stories about mortars landing in the green zone or any other base in Iraq seems to be getting fewer and fewer. I wonder if there is a connection. Hope so!

]]> By: 22lrhttp://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168171 22lr Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:15:39 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168171 Cool system, sounds like something that were spending a boat load of money on is finally working. Cool system, sounds like something that were spending a boat load of money on is finally working.

]]> By: demophilushttp://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168170 demophilus Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:42:28 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168170 davids: Don't know if you'd need a proximity fuse, if you had time fusing, and could extrapolate a likely hit window. I mean, you probably want the shells bursting in air anyway, rather than continuing down (or up) range. davids:
Don’t know if you’d need a proximity fuse, if you had time fusing, and could extrapolate a likely hit window.
I mean, you probably want the shells bursting in air anyway, rather than continuing down (or up) range.

]]>