<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More C-RAMs for the Army?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yang</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-221805</link>
		<dc:creator>yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-221805</guid>
		<description>i swear that picture sooo looks like the Phalanx 
the Phalanx is obviously very capable of engaging fast projectiles e.g a missile for an aircraft carrier so i dont see why they cant use it for ground defence </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i swear that picture sooo looks like the Phalanx<br />
the Phalanx is obviously very capable of engaging fast projectiles e.g a missile for an aircraft carrier so i dont see why they cant use it for ground defence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macs</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168172</link>
		<dc:creator>Macs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168172</guid>
		<description>Funny, the number of stories about mortars landing in the green zone or any other base in Iraq seems to be getting fewer and fewer. I wonder if there is a connection. Hope so!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, the number of stories about mortars landing in the green zone or any other base in Iraq seems to be getting fewer and fewer. I wonder if there is a connection. Hope so!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 22lr</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168171</link>
		<dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168171</guid>
		<description>Cool system, sounds like something that were spending a boat load of money on is finally working.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool system, sounds like something that were spending a boat load of money on is finally working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: demophilus</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/08/more-c-rams-for-the-army/#comment-168170</link>
		<dc:creator>demophilus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 20:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2581#comment-168170</guid>
		<description>davids:
Don&#039;t know if you&#039;d need a proximity fuse, if you had time fusing, and could extrapolate a likely hit window.
I mean, you probably want the shells bursting in air anyway, rather than continuing down (or up) range.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>davids:<br />
Don’t know if you’d need a proximity fuse, if you had time fusing, and could extrapolate a likely hit window.<br />
I mean, you probably want the shells bursting in air anyway, rather than continuing down (or up) range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

