<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another New Sniper Rifle on the Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:45:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhacker</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-194274</link>
		<dc:creator>rhacker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 20:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-194274</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s sandbox snipers want/neet a gas gun, not a bolt gun.  The need for quick follow-up shots far exceeds the need for a 2300 meter bolt gun.  Come on guys, how about designing a sub-moa gas gun for our snipers that can reach out there and touch the bad guys!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today’s sandbox snipers want/neet a gas gun, not a bolt gun.  The need for quick follow-up shots far exceeds the need for a 2300 meter bolt gun.  Come on guys, how about designing a sub-moa gas gun for our snipers that can reach out there and touch the bad guys!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-32263</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 04:25:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-32263</guid>
		<description>Looks like a hunters gun rather than a new &quot;rifle.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a hunters gun rather than a new “rifle.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhyno327</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-32262</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhyno327</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-32262</guid>
		<description>Looks like something the Brits use. RM&#039;s in mountain warfare school were using a .338 Lapua rnd with thier rifle. Looks familiar.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like something the Brits use. RM’s in mountain warfare school were using a .338 Lapua rnd with thier rifle. Looks familiar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-168248</link>
		<dc:creator>R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-168248</guid>
		<description>&quot;Barret in .338 lapua, it even looks suspiciously like this one&quot;
Post a link.
The TRG design dates back to the 80s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sako_TRG
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Barret in .338 lapua, it even looks suspiciously like this one“<br />
Post a link.<br />
The TRG design dates back to the 80s.<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sako_TRG" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sako_TRG</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: delphi</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-32259</link>
		<dc:creator>delphi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-32259</guid>
		<description>Tactical Warfighter did an interesting piece on sniper craft at www.TacticalWarfighterGear.com
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tactical Warfighter did an interesting piece on sniper craft at <a href="http://www.TacticalWarfighterGear.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.TacticalWarfighterGear.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P.J. Busche</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-32254</link>
		<dc:creator>P.J. Busche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-32254</guid>
		<description>Outstanding weapon!  But I have two questions:
1.  Does the 338 Lapua Magnum really offer any significant performance over other more common 338 calibers such as the 340 Weatherby Magnum and 338 Winchester Magnum?
2.  Is a 20-inch barrel really enough to gain the increased potential of the 338 Lapua Magnum?  Most comercially sold magnum-caliber rifles are usually sold with 24 or 26-inch barrels.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outstanding weapon!  But I have two questions:<br />
1.  Does the 338 Lapua Magnum really offer any significant performance over other more common 338 calibers such as the 340 Weatherby Magnum and 338 Winchester Magnum?<br />
2.  Is a 20-inch barrel really enough to gain the increased potential of the 338 Lapua Magnum?  Most comercially sold magnum-caliber rifles are usually sold with 24 or 26-inch barrels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fmJK-47</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-168243</link>
		<dc:creator>fmJK-47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 03:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-168243</guid>
		<description>It looks nice but what are the production costs? is it really worth the amount it takes to manufacture it?
I don&#039;t see whats wrong with using the current rifles we have in the field. The M40A3 in 7.62 and the Barrett M82A3 in .50 BMG have proven themselves in the field as accurate reliable weapons that have their own niche on the battlefield and achieves it very well. Why improve something that doesn&#039;t need improvement.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks nice but what are the production costs? is it really worth the amount it takes to manufacture it?<br />
I don’t see whats wrong with using the current rifles we have in the field. The M40A3 in 7.62 and the Barrett M82A3 in .50 BMG have proven themselves in the field as accurate reliable weapons that have their own niche on the battlefield and achieves it very well. Why improve something that doesn’t need improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saigonjohn</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-168242</link>
		<dc:creator>Saigonjohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-168242</guid>
		<description>The 20&quot; tube will preclude 2000+meter shots, but if you are that far away call in Arty or air support, or stalk closer!  Clip-goes in a Garand, also known as an enbloc clip, magazine, a multiplicity of meanings, is also the 20 rd device that snaps into the mag well of an m-14.  As always in long range marksmanship, it&#039;s the shooter, not the delivery system.  An earlier comment on the 6.5x284, the same traj as a 300 Win Mag/WSM with 1/2 the recoil is a guarantee for more hits and greater precision and if it&#039;s head shots who cares what body armour they are wearing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20″ tube will preclude 2000+meter shots, but if you are that far away call in Arty or air support, or stalk closer!  Clip-goes in a Garand, also known as an enbloc clip, magazine, a multiplicity of meanings, is also the 20 rd device that snaps into the mag well of an m-14.  As always in long range marksmanship, it’s the shooter, not the delivery system.  An earlier comment on the 6.5x284, the same traj as a 300 Win Mag/WSM with 1/2 the recoil is a guarantee for more hits and greater precision and if it’s head shots who cares what body armour they are wearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Stewart</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-168241</link>
		<dc:creator>J Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-168241</guid>
		<description>The 20&quot; tube will preclude 2000+meter shots, but if you are that far away call in Arty or air support, or stalk closer!  Clip-goes in a Garand, also known as an enbloc clip, magazine, a multiplicity of meanings, is also the 20 rd device that snaps into the mag well of an m-14.  As always in long range marksmanship, it&#039;s the shooter, not the delivery system.  An earlier comment on the 6.5x284, the same traj as a 300 Win Mag/WSM with 1/2 the recoil is a guarantee for more hits and greater precision and if it&#039;s head shots who cares what body armour they are wearing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 20″ tube will preclude 2000+meter shots, but if you are that far away call in Arty or air support, or stalk closer!  Clip-goes in a Garand, also known as an enbloc clip, magazine, a multiplicity of meanings, is also the 20 rd device that snaps into the mag well of an m-14.  As always in long range marksmanship, it’s the shooter, not the delivery system.  An earlier comment on the 6.5x284, the same traj as a 300 Win Mag/WSM with 1/2 the recoil is a guarantee for more hits and greater precision and if it’s head shots who cares what body armour they are wearing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m. backes</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/another-new-sniper-rifle-on-the-block/#comment-168240</link>
		<dc:creator>m. backes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2584#comment-168240</guid>
		<description>The best you can have, and you would know this if you have used it  AS-50 cal.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best you can have, and you would know this if you have used it  AS-50 cal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

