<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Barn Busting, Remington Rand Style</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:50:17 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: RossRoy</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32282</link> <dc:creator>RossRoy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:23:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-32282</guid> <description>Was left a R-R 1911 by my uncle to his &quot;favorite&quot; nephew.  Same story... a tighter bushing took a &quot;rattler&quot; with dubious accuracy to pistol that my local range officer embarrassed me with.  Had S&amp;W 59&#039;s and a few others.. alway enjoyed (and respected) the 1911 and the late Sgt. who left it to me. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was left a R-R 1911 by my uncle to his “favorite” nephew.  Same story… a tighter bushing took a “rattler” with dubious accuracy to pistol that my local range officer embarrassed me with.  Had S&amp;W 59’s and a few others.. alway enjoyed (and respected) the 1911 and the late Sgt. who left it to me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jim</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32281</link> <dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:39:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-32281</guid> <description>What year was my M1911 A1.45 with serial # 1457740 made? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What year was my M1911 A1.45 with serial # 1457740 made?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: RANDY</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-168264</link> <dc:creator>RANDY</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:11:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-168264</guid> <description>I WORK FOR A LOCAL SHERIFF OFFICE AND WE CAME ACROSS A DUPLICATE SERIAL NUMBER REM RAND 45 AND A COLT THAT SUPPOSEDLY THE ORGINAL WAS DESTROYED BUT WE HAVE THE WEAPON. AS FAR AS THE MILITARY IS CONCERNED, IT&#039;S DESTROYED BY SHOWED UP AGAIN 20YEARS AFTER IT WAS DESTROYED. MAN, TALK ABOUT DURABILITY!!!!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WORK FOR A LOCAL SHERIFF OFFICE AND WE CAME ACROSS A DUPLICATE SERIAL NUMBER REM RAND 45 AND A COLT THAT SUPPOSEDLY THE ORGINAL WAS DESTROYED BUT WE HAVE THE WEAPON. AS FAR AS THE MILITARY IS CONCERNED, IT’S DESTROYED BY SHOWED UP AGAIN 20YEARS AFTER IT WAS DESTROYED. MAN, TALK ABOUT DURABILITY!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Combat vet</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-168263</link> <dc:creator>Combat vet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:23:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-168263</guid> <description>I have a US Army Remington Rand built in 1943 and out shot every modern 45 acp in the match. You can bet that my life can depend on this fine weapon. But an opinion is like an asshole everyone has one. Some assholes have more negitive opinions. AS we say in war have a nice day!!!!!!!!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a US Army Remington Rand built in 1943 and out shot every modern 45 acp in the match. You can bet that my life can depend on this fine weapon. But an opinion is like an asshole everyone has one. Some assholes have more negitive opinions. AS we say in war have a nice day!!!!!!!!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JMD</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32277</link> <dc:creator>JMD</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:15:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-32277</guid> <description>I had always heard that the old 1911 were purposefully &quot;sloppy&quot; for practical reasons of interchangeability and durability similar to the AK-47 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had always heard that the old 1911 were purposefully “sloppy” for practical reasons of interchangeability and durability similar to the AK-47</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dave</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-168261</link> <dc:creator>dave</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:07:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-168261</guid> <description>With the bounty of aftermarket parts available, there is no reason to carry an inaccurate or unreliable 1911. Good commercial magazines are other items that are much better than GI issue. If you&#039;re packing a .45, it might make sense to pony up for a couple. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the bounty of aftermarket parts available, there is no reason to carry an inaccurate or unreliable 1911. Good commercial magazines are other items that are much better than GI issue. If you’re packing a .45, it might make sense to pony up for a couple.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: chs</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32274</link> <dc:creator>chs</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:21:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-32274</guid> <description>My license plate: &quot;M1911 45&quot;
It&#039;s my favorite firearm. Period. We even just got my girlfriend a .22 1911 from Kimber.
I get some great thumbs up for the license plate on occasion. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My license plate: “M1911 45″<br
/> It’s my favorite firearm. Period. We even just got my girlfriend a .22 1911 from Kimber.<br
/> I get some great thumbs up for the license plate on occasion.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrustButVerify</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-168258</link> <dc:creator>TrustButVerify</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 23:16:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-168258</guid> <description>My sentiments are split between matching Takeo&#039;s and thinking that one should leave well enough alone. I&#039;ve never been satisfied with the M9, partly because of the wimpy ammunition and partly because I&#039;m a poor shot with it. I agree with the multitude who think discarding the .45 for 9mm was a mistake. I&#039;m still waiting for the DoD to get with the program on coming up with a replacement. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sentiments are split between matching Takeo’s and thinking that one should leave well enough alone. I’ve never been satisfied with the M9, partly because of the wimpy ammunition and partly because I’m a poor shot with it. I agree with the multitude who think discarding the .45 for 9mm was a mistake. I’m still waiting for the DoD to get with the program on coming up with a replacement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Takeo</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-168257</link> <dc:creator>Takeo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:45:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-168257</guid> <description>Let&#039;s not discount the fact that the 1911 in GI guise is a very old design, there are modern designs for .45s that are vastly cheaper to produce, have far fewer parts and are capable of equal or better than a tuned GI-spec 1911.
my Springfield XD in .45ACP (made in Croatia) holds 10 rounds, is famously durable and reliable for HALF the price of even a lower-end accurized 1911. I love the 1911s for their triggers and good ergonomics but it&#039;s time we started looking at other guns for a replacement. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let’s not discount the fact that the 1911 in GI guise is a very old design, there are modern designs for .45s that are vastly cheaper to produce, have far fewer parts and are capable of equal or better than a tuned GI-spec 1911.<br
/> my Springfield XD in .45ACP (made in Croatia) holds 10 rounds, is famously durable and reliable for HALF the price of even a lower-end accurized 1911. I love the 1911s for their triggers and good ergonomics but it’s time we started looking at other guns for a replacement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 22lr</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/09/barn-busting-remington-rand-style/comment-page-1/#comment-32270</link> <dc:creator>22lr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2585#comment-32270</guid> <description>That LT is a smart one. I wish wonder is the AF will let me do that? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That LT is a smart one. I wish wonder is the AF will let me do that?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/25 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-12 07:45:24 -->