DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » War Update » How Small Raids Net Big Gains

How Small Raids Net Big Gains

sinjar.jpg

The com­man­der in charge of help­ing local Iraqis orga­nize and fight al Qaeda and other anti-​​coalition forces said Wednesday that a raid last month net­ted a trea­sure trove of infor­ma­tion that could spell the doom of al Qaeda ter­ror­ist smug­gling oper­a­tions in Iraq and, poten­tially, worldwide.

The descrip­tion of the find exem­pli­fies the kind of intel­li­gence American and Iraqi forces are gain­ing, with the help of local tip­sters, and pro­vides a win­dow into how com­man­ders speak with such author­ity on insur­gent ties to Iran and al Qaeda activ­ity in Iraq.

The raid, con­ducted Sept. 11 in the town of Sinjar near the Syrian bor­der, tar­geted what Maj. Gen. Kevin Bergner called a for­eign ter­ror­ist facil­i­ta­tion cell.

As coali­tion forces busted in on the seven-​​man AQ team, one of them det­o­nated a sui­cide vest, killing him­self and one of his com­pan­ions, while the U.S. team made short work of the rest.

Aside from dis­rupt­ing the small smug­gling team, coali­tion forces found lit­er­ally ter­abytes of elec­tronic files, Bergner said, includ­ing 800 names of al Qaeda ter­ror­ists 143 of those either en route or already deliv­ered to Iraq.

The intel included the ter­ror­ists names, pass­port num­bers, home addresses and their tran­sit routes that were involved in get­ting them here, Bergner said in an inter­view with mil­i­tary blog­gers Oct. 10.

The com­puter files included doc­u­ments on logis­tics and admin­is­tra­tive activ­i­ties, we saw how they spend their money on every­thing from food, fuel and weapons and even allo­ca­tion of money to sup­port some of their fam­i­lies, Bergner added.

In one macabre find, Bergner said troops obtained copies of sui­cide pledges that al Qaeda is using to help lead these indi­vid­u­als towards the per­for­mance of a sui­cide mission.

Though the raid net­ted only seven dead AQ ter­ror­ists, the infor­ma­tion gleaned from it could crip­ple the groups oper­a­tions in Iraq. Home addresses, phone num­bers, tran­sit routes, money infor­ma­tion, food pro­cure­ment, ammo, gun­s­think how many strands of the web were picked up and the down-​​stream effects those have to the entire AQ network.

I won­der if AQ cells are going to change their record keep­ing after this. And it also makes me won­der why they keep such detailed oper­a­tional records. I thought we were being led to believe these groups were loosely affil­i­ated cells. Only some­one that was being held to strict account would keep such detailed records.

– Christian

Share |

October 11th, 2007 | War Update | 258923 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/10/11/how-small-raids-net-big-gains/How+Small+Raids+Net+Big+Gains2007-10-11+12%3A27%3A04Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Security Contractors: A Necessary Evil | A Little LUV for the Future Military Jeep » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Galrahn says:
    October 11, 2007 at 8:02 am

    Makes me won­der if there is any truth to the tho­ery that war is a busi­ness for AQ as well.
    In other words, in the larger sense AQ is no dif­fer­ent than a drug smug­gler or pirate, that the bot­tom line mat­ters in the end.

    Reply
  2. Traveler says:
    October 11, 2007 at 8:28 am

    “That could spell the doom of AQ ops”??–please. This arti­cle might as well have been writ­ten by the MNF press office.
    Serious news please, not PR spin.

    Reply
  3. Oogie says:
    October 11, 2007 at 8:33 am

    This arti­cle makes you won­der about the OPSEC train­ing within AQ. Seems to me that you would want to use that sui­cide vest to take out the intel­li­gence infor­ma­tion first and then worry about tak­ing out others.

    Reply
  4. Dave says:
    October 11, 2007 at 9:02 am

    Perhaps al Qaeda has fallen into com­mon trap of hav­ing to rely on sta­tis­tics to mea­sure suc­cess. The truth about who is win­ning the bat­tle cer­tainly is being argued and al Qaeda may need to pro­duce inter­nal pro­pa­ganda to main­tain morale.

    Reply
  5. b says:
    October 11, 2007 at 9:51 am

    That’s the same Kevin Bergner who until recently was Special Assistant to the President and Senior Director for Iraq in the white­house.
    He sure learned to spin.
    And Al Qaeda is col­lect­ing the pass­port num­bers of poten­tial sui­cide bombers. Is Bergner sure he didn’t raid a TSA shack?

    Reply
  6. Nixer says:
    October 11, 2007 at 9:54 am

    Talk about OPSEC.….
    IF this is true, then some­body really blew it by let­ting this info out.
    I smell BS.….I hope

    Reply
  7. Sunshine Goodness says:
    October 11, 2007 at 10:06 am

    WAHEY!

    Reply
  8. Christian Lowe says:
    October 11, 2007 at 11:02 am

    Are you THAT short-​​sighted “trav­eler”? Give me a break. Think about the infor­ma­tion gained and the peo­ple to whom it leads. Home addresses, facil­i­ta­tors, net­works, the actual NAMES of the smug­gled in ter­ror­ists and their where­abouts? That points to much more than just a local oper­a­tion. That’s global and the way that infor­ma­tion can be used and exploited goes well beyond Iraq. Open your eyes bro and acknowl­edge a small vic­tory when you see it. The dis­cus­sion I’d rather see around here is the dif­fer­ent ways this infor­ma­tion could be exploited…

    Reply
  9. Blake says:
    October 11, 2007 at 11:19 am

    Spin: The US has been los­ing the spin war since this started. If it were just this story alone I would take it for what its worth. However, in Iraq it sure mat­ters. BUT… since every­one knows that AQ (global ware on ter­ror­ism) is not related to Iraq it won’t have any long term affect — right?
    It is not until one looks at other events in order to judge whether there is broader impli­ca­tions: It was reported around this time frame that major AQ sites shut down so they can regroup from NIA snoop­ers ;-) .
    AQ is dan­ger­ous. However, if I were invest­ing in these clowns I wouldn’t be happy about these neg­a­tive returns. I guess it is all part of the same fan­tasy, I meant spin.

    Reply
  10. Nixer says:
    October 11, 2007 at 12:58 pm

    “unless we are assum­ing that AQ is extremely well orga­nized and can alert its ter­ror­ist mem­bers instantly“
    IM
    “SPAM”?
    Innocuous forum post­ings
    Internet clas­si­fied ads
    Wrong num­ber cell phone calls
    How many ways do ya want?

    Reply
  11. fred says:
    October 11, 2007 at 1:16 pm

    This is noth­ing more than pro­poganda — you peo­ple need to stop drink­ing the kool-​​aid..

    Reply
  12. txzen says:
    October 11, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    I can actu­ally see that they might keep track so this stuff, it would make work­ing forg­eries eas­ier to make, you know wich pass­ports and ID num­bers worked then some­one dies and you have all their infor­ma­tion to give to the forger to make a new pass­port with a new pic­ture. They want peo­ple that can travel freely from say Iraq to Iran for train­ing. I can see hav­ing this infror­ma­tion would be impor­tant to an orga­nized crime group. Maybe even hold the pass­ports so the fight­ers can’t leave until you let them. But yeah speak­ing to pro­poganda I saw a shift in the num­ber and “qual­ity” of videos released since petraus took over. I think the shift was from win­nin the hearts and minds of Iraq, wich meant no videos of peo­ple being killed, to win­ning the sup­port for a war where they show the might of the US mil­i­tary more and the suc­cess­ful operations.

    Reply
  13. demophilus says:
    October 11, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Maintaining fake files is coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence SOP. Some of the 800 names might be for real; oth­ers may not be. There may be a key pad or nota­tion for or in the list that would tell a user who was for real, or not.
    In that sce­nario, it would behoove our guys to announce that they had the list, and believed it.
    Apart from that, maybe the list was encrypted, and they haven’t cracked all of it, yet. I’m under the impres­sion that when you force some­one to change codes or secu­rity arrange­ments, it makes it eas­ier to com­pro­mise both the next, and the last.
    Apart from that, I’m under the impres­sion that some­times it’s eas­ier to decon­struct or take down a net­work after you shake it up a lit­tle, watch the links and nodes read­just.
    The pass­port num­ber stuff is inter­est­ing. It might show that they weren’t too sure about some of the recruits, and needed to track and vet them. Might also show that they have a line to immi­gra­tion and bor­der con­trol data­bases in some states — that would let them cross ref­er­ence hard pass­port stamps and actual entry/​exit records.
    Hard to say what’s for real, when you read some­thing like this. “Bodyguard of lies”, and all that.

    Reply
  14. Patvann says:
    October 11, 2007 at 6:11 pm

    Looks as though the BDS-​​suffering cheer­lead­ers for AQ are well rep­re­sented within the com­ments section…Waiting under the rocks, to emerge and dimin­ish any and all good news from the front.
    It’s been a few days kiddy’s, how about ask­ing Mommy for more Cheetoe’s and some clean under­ware (not to men­tion tak­ing a shower) before the next round of news, cuz ya’ll kinda smell like Che.

    Reply
  15. Jamie says:
    October 11, 2007 at 7:16 pm

    Maybe they gleaned the needed infor­ma­tion out of the op and acted on it. Therefore thought the value of the mes­sage was impor­tant and the ter­ro­tist know that their net­work was com­pro­mised or that par­tic­u­lar cell so keep­ing it secret no longer mat­tered that we also know that the gen­er­ally the level of bomb­ing has sig­nif­i­cantly dropped off in Iraq.

    Reply
  16. Juan says:
    October 11, 2007 at 9:25 pm

    I can’t imag­ine this is the sort of thing that would be easy to keep secret.
    Mohammed: Hey, you remem­ber how Ali had all those pass­port num­bers, addresses, and trans­port routes on a com­puter?
    Yasef: Yeah, what about it?
    Mohammed: What hap­pened to that guy?
    Yasef: No idea.
    I’m pretty sure they fig­ured that one out pretty quickly.

    Reply
  17. PorcupineTree says:
    October 11, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    This arti­cle is redicu­lous, why on earth would we ever announce we have cred­i­ble intel? Why are no other news ser­vices car­ry­ing this story…BBC net­work news and cable news have noth­ing. OTH it sure would be nice to get a break if it were true, but I cant beleive our armed forces would be so stu­pid as to dis­close it.

    Reply
  18. demophilus says:
    October 12, 2007 at 12:03 am

    @Patvann:
    Are you piss­ing on every­one here, or any­one in par­tic­u­lar? Or, do you just need to piss? If so, take it out­side, behind a dump­ster, like a man.
    FTR, sum­mer sol­diers and sun­shine patri­ots make a bet­ter impres­sion when they can spell.
    I mean, I read a lot of stu­pid knee jerk lib­eral AND reac­tionary bullsh$t here, and else­where on teh Internets, but I can hack it. Once upon a time, I took an oath to pro­tect the Constitution, includ­ing the First Amendment. I can take the noise to pro­tect the sig­nal, thank you very much.
    If you can’t hack free speech, move to North Korea, or China, or Iran. If you have some­thing cogent to say about the arti­cle, sober up and say it. Otherwise, STFUAGBTW.

    Reply
  19. Wembley says:
    October 14, 2007 at 6:25 am

    Curious how much they con­cen­trate on AQ in Iraq when they’re only about 5% of the insur­gent prob­lem.
    Maybe it looks bet­ter to push the ‘for­eign agi­ta­tor angle’ — or maybe some­one has tun­nel vision.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage