http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168668 rappelz gold Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:03:26 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168668 I recognized her is an occasional, When I was just upgrade and earn rappelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my number is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad people, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade. I recognized her is an occasional, When I was just upgrade and earn rappelz gold. She also just through, and she is a new player, she saw me my number is high. So she asked me how to play. And I said I was a bad people, I asked if did you not heard in this game. She said she heard, but she did not believe. I smiled. So I took her to play, I told her how to play, how to upgrade.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168666 cheap rf gold Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:51:46 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168666 During the time pass, my union was larger; my union members are very solidarity, when some people have difficult, we all go to help. I also remembered once a people During the time pass, my union was larger; my union members are very solidarity, when some people have difficult, we all go to help. I also remembered once a people

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168664 goonzu money Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:42:41 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168664 So I decided to closed my own heart, I played lonely, I gave up to find, put aside feeling. I upgrade, take account and earn goonzu money a person. I live a little good; I think I have been really put aside. So I decided to closed my own heart, I played lonely, I gave up to find, put aside feeling. I upgrade, take account and earn goonzu money a person. I live a little good; I think I have been really put aside.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168663 GuildWars Gold Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:38:45 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168663 Initial contact this game, I did not very like. Since find good reason to release point, I also began to like it. Every day after work, I always go to play this game. Perhaps little girls will like me, in order to give went to all I like it. I dull playing a few weeks, very few speak to people and I have 26 levels and also I earn a little GuildWars Gold. Initial contact this game, I did not very like. Since find good reason to release point, I also began to like it. Every day after work, I always go to play this game. Perhaps little girls will like me, in order to give went to all I like it. I dull playing a few weeks, very few speak to people and I have 26 levels and also I earn a little GuildWars Gold.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168658 GARY OKUPANT Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:43:19 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168658 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target. What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability. Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG? I do believe Steel Thunder 'IS" the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it's antagonizer "at the moment"; is the "Caliber" to use. After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD? The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it's need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size. Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability. It's simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn't think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you'd trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the "45" 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target.
What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability.
Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG?
I do believe Steel Thunder ‘IS” the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it’s antagonizer “at the moment”; is the “Caliber” to use.
After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD?
The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it’s need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size.
Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability.
It’s simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn’t think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you’d trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the “45”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168657 GARY OKUPANT Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:42:25 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168657 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target. What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability. Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG? I do believe Steel Thunder 'IS" the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it's antagonizer "at the moment"; is the "Caliber" to use. After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD? The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it's need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size. Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability. It's simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn't think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you'd trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the "45" 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target.
What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability.
Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG?
I do believe Steel Thunder ‘IS” the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it’s antagonizer “at the moment”; is the “Caliber” to use.
After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD?
The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it’s need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size.
Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability.
It’s simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn’t think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you’d trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the “45”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168656 GARY OKUPANT Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:40:56 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168656 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target. What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability. Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG? I do believe Steel Thunder 'IS" the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it's antagonizer "at the moment"; is the "Caliber" to use. After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD? The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it's need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size. Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability. It's simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn't think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you'd trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the "45" 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target.
What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability.
Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG?
I do believe Steel Thunder ‘IS” the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it’s antagonizer “at the moment”; is the “Caliber” to use.
After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD?
The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it’s need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size.
Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability.
It’s simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn’t think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you’d trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the “45”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168655 GARY OKUPANT Tue, 08 Jan 2008 17:37:45 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168655 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target. What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability. Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG? I do believe Steel Thunder 'IS" the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it's antagonizer "at the moment"; is the "Caliber" to use. After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD? The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it's need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size. Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability. It's simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn't think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you'd trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the "45" 38 Super; more rounds carried; very very similar 45 type foot pounds of energy on target.
What about the 5x7 (MP90); long range, armour defeat ability.
Then again; Why are the Northern European Countries going to the 4x6 SMG?
I do believe Steel Thunder ‘IS” the future; just make it so; now, but until the technology is agreed to as a standard; we must evaluate existing accepted calibers. The ability to keep the enemy from engaging it’s antagonizer “at the moment”; is the “Caliber” to use.
After all the B-52 is now HOW OLD?
The 1911 type frame is proven to be the starter; now fit the round to the most likely carrier to be used. The weapon is needed now; based on it’s need. Stopping power! is the need now; whether 45cal, 5x7 or 4x6. Unless the carrier is dramatically changed(technology of the round to be accelerated; the small arm, is needed NOW! We know what works; for the sake of cost pick the size.
Let technology catch up with production cost and technical capability.
It’s simple; there is NO ONE issued a 45 CAL ROUND; that worries about stopping the target. And there is no antagonist who doesn’t think twice when the 45 is the preferred weapon of returning fire. Last bullet theory(lbt)? What is the round/weapon you’d trust your life with to defend your wife or child? This is the question, one round one kill or denying the attack; the “45”

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168654 fmJK-47 Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:20:38 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168654 I think the Kriss is an interesting concept but one that was unnessesary. We already have highly effective SMGs in service; most of which very few have problems with MP5, UMP, UZI, MAC-10 etc. It's a good idea, but maybe there's little reinventing the wheel being done here. Enhance and improve concepts that are controversial and have many weaknesses. I think the Kriss is an interesting concept but one that was unnessesary. We already have highly effective SMGs in service; most of which very few have problems with MP5, UMP, UZI, MAC-10 etc.
It’s a good idea, but maybe there’s little reinventing the wheel being done here. Enhance and improve concepts that are controversial and have many weaknesses.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/10/12/a-new-look-at-an-old-classic-the-45-sub/#comment-168653 Rhyno327/lrsd Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:36:17 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2594#comment-168653 I saw the Kriss fire. Good grouping evan at f/a. But, if it only can fit 15 rnds in a mag., wat good is that? It needs 20 to 30 to really make a difference. If they can fit 20,25,30 then damn a thats a lotta firepower. If not, i'll take the MP-5 or UMP. the UMP in .40 or .45, thank you. I saw the Kriss fire. Good grouping evan at f/a. But, if it only can fit 15 rnds in a mag., wat good is that? It needs 20 to 30 to really make a difference. If they can fit 20,25,30 then damn a thats a lotta firepower. If not, i’ll take the MP-5 or UMP. the UMP in .40 or .45, thank you.

]]>