DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Eat DT's Dust » DT Takes a First Hand Look at Army Weapons

DT Takes a First Hand Look at Army Weapons

M110.jpg

One of the distinct advantages of working for a place like Military​.com and Defense Tech is that on occasion you get to spend a day at the firing range slingin’ lead from the latest in military weaponry.

Our boy Bryant Jordan went down to Blackwater USA to test fire the Kriss .45 cal. submachine gun a couple weeks ago, and I just had the pleasure of spending the day out at the Army’s Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland getting some trigger time on a variety of weapons the service is pushing to troops in the field.

First of all, it’s a big deal to even be allowed on base at Aberdeen. Some of the U.S. military’s most closely-held testing and evaluation of armor, ballistics and explosives goes on there and officials are loath to let anyone in — especially the press — to get even a preliminary glance at what they’re up to.

But thanks to an invitation from the Fort Belvoir, Va.-based PEO Soldier, Aberdeen opened its doors on Wednesday for a small group of journalists to come out and learn more about Army weapons. On hand were program managers, test directors, engineers and everyday Joes to answer questions and give the ground truth on what’s being developed.

Testers showed off six different systems either already deployed to the field or ready to be fielded with units in the Sandbox, including:

XM320 Grenade Launcher — Pretty close to my favorite one to shoot, the XM320 is a major upgrade for the M203, 40mm grenade
XM320.jpg
slinger attached to the barrel of M4s and M-16s. Finally H&K has gotten through to the Army about its side-eject under-barrel grenade launcher. The Army plans to field about 71,600 XM320s in a one-to-one replacement of the M203 beginning in late 2008 and it’s a good thing. The XM320 can be detached from your combat rifle and fired as a stand-alone weapon (which is how we fired it at Aberdeen) but I’ll tell you, it’s tough to handle in that configuration for tall people like me since the butt stock doesn’t extend very far.

The best part of the system, however, is the integrated electronic sighting system that comes with it. Developed by Insight Technology, the optic uses an iron sight reticule that’s precision balanced. A soldier uses a hand-held range finder to determine the distance to a target, dials in the yardage in five-yard intervals on the XM320 sight and a handy green/red light and digital bar tells the shooter whether he’s on target and shooting level. I hit the target at 150 yards on my first shot. The rifle-mounted laser illuminator can be used at night with the system to find a target even in darkness, making the new grenade launcher far more effective in all conditions, said Maj. Larry Dring, assistant product manager for individual weapons with PEO Soldier.

M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System (MASS) — Here was another modular weapon that’s pretty cool, but a little more M26.jpg
difficult to use than the grenade launcher. Mounted under the combat rifle — or configured as a stand-alone weapon using a standard M4 pistol grip and collapsible butt stock, the M26 is designed to fire both standard 12 gauge rounds and non-lethal munitions. The M26 has an extendable choke-tube that allows the shooter to place breeching rounds against a door frame from a safe distance with the shotgun attached to his rifle — a method that eases the transition between shotgun and rifle in combat situation, said Sgt. 1st Class William Kone, test and evaluation NCO at Aberdeen.

That’s all well and good, but I found the cocking mechanism to be clunky and inefficient. Instead of an under-barrel pump-gun style action, a metal bar attached to the bolt extends out to the side, forcing the shooter to transition his hand position to load another round into the breach. I’m sure with practice, I could have gotten as fast on the action as Kone, but I wasn’t the only one with that complaint. The Army plans to field 38,000 MASSs beginning in late 2008 to replace its Mossberg 12ga. pump guns.

Read the rest of my weapons report from the Aberdeen range at Military.com’s Warfighter’s Forum

– Christian

Share |

October 25th, 2007 | Eat DT's Dust | 26187 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/10/25/dt-takes-a-first-hand-look-at-army-weapons/DT+Takes+a+First+Hand+Look+at+Army+Weapons2007-10-25+20%3A31%3A25Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Martian Spacesuit Proposed (hmmmm…) | Feds Nab Point Blank Armor Officials » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tim says:
    October 25, 2007 at 4:54 pm

    Should’ve posted a link to the actual article, instead of to the forums:
    http://​www​.military​.com/​f​o​r​u​m​s​/​0​,​1​5​2​4​0​,​1​5​4​7​9​1​,​0​0​.​h​tml

    Reply
  2. Crass says:
    October 25, 2007 at 8:42 pm

    .50 cal sniper rifle. Don’t care if the enemy knows where your at? Want to put down an enemy soldier, or an IFV? We have your solution.
    Like things that go boom? Like it even better when your boom stick puts our explosion where you want it with improved sights? Well, we sure do. Try our new GL today!
    Need a house cleaned? A door in your way? Take the handy dandy Shotgun attachment!
    Remote controlled bliss? Yes, sir, little kids toys this Christmas are going to make a killing. Literally.
    Silenced Semi-Auto 7.62 Sniper Rifle: Go for those times when you want to scare the hell out of a lot of dead people.

    Reply
  3. Camp says:
    October 26, 2007 at 1:22 pm

    The MASS looks a bit heavy & awkward hanging from the front of an M-4. Is it?
    What ever happened to the U.S. Army’s rifle “shoot-off” competition? Anyone know?

    Reply
  4. demophilus says:
    October 27, 2007 at 2:04 am

    Yeah, there might be something a little off about the MASS. A straight pull bolt action might as well be a pump, particularly if it’s also going to be mounted on a M4/16 grip and/or buttstock as a PDW.
    Like the article says, that straight bolt handle doesn’t seem to be what you’d call ergonomic. Pump actions are — tried, and true.
    FWIW, Idaho National Labs designed an underbarrel breaching accessory that put the shotgun trigger on the bolt/slide. You could thoretically operate both the M4 and the shotgun at the same time. They apparently licensed it to ProSWAT, which is offering a redesigned version as “The Greeter”.
    I can see the need for a breaching weapon. Not too sure a dedicated 40mm round couldn’t do the job, but I guess if 12 ga. ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Just seems the same goes for a non-pump shotgun. Like I said, they’re tried, and true. Why reinvent the wheel?

    Reply
  5. txzen says:
    October 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm

    I sure remember when the internet was abuzz with reports that insurgents in Iraq weren’t afraid of the m16 but a shotgun was something that really got to their morale. But that is a door breacher I guess.

    Reply
  6. stephen russell says:
    December 31, 2007 at 12:30 am

    Love 2 own both & shoot both esp MASS.
    Issue to TX Ranger on TX Mex border & all Minutemen on US Mex Border.
    & for forces in Iraq & Afganistan.
    Great to deter gangs.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Wait, but aren't the Predator and Reaper...
      Mike E
    • F-35B Jumpjet Comes In For Short Landing
      I'm not a test pilot, but just a regular...
      katchup
    • Secretary Gates and the F-22 Raptor
      You are in idiot…
      Anthony
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Who cares, everyone, including EADS knows this tanker contract is...
      Scott D
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I think the approach would be a two-fold benefit for...
      ed!
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 : http://www.google.com/searc...
      google
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      f-22 articles with comments and replies :...
      freepublic
    • Was the Gates Counter-USAF Sortie Fair?
      criticism of f-22 :...
      criticism of f-22
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      "The US retired the ideal littoral combat...
      Matthew S.
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      Lockheed did put out the Surface Combat...
      Camp
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage