<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Aberdeen Outtakes: The M110 Sniper Rifle</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Weldon Kovacevic</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-255096</link> <dc:creator>Weldon Kovacevic</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:17:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-255096</guid> <description></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: crackedlenses</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-222074</link> <dc:creator>crackedlenses</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:58:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-222074</guid> <description>This was designed for use in urban scenarios where the snipers were found to be leaving their M24s behind and using tricked-out M16s and M4s...... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was designed for use in urban scenarios where the snipers were found to be leaving their M24s behind and using tricked-out M16s and M4s.…..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: crackedlenses</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-222073</link> <dc:creator>crackedlenses</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:57:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-222073</guid> <description>Might not work too bad as a sniper/DMR weapon in conjunction with other more modern weapons..... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might not work too bad as a sniper/DMR weapon in conjunction with other more modern weapons.….</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: USMC Engineer</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-222072</link> <dc:creator>USMC Engineer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-222072</guid> <description>Yeah, lets run around a modern battlefields with a Mauser, thanks for your input. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, lets run around a modern battlefields with a Mauser, thanks for your input.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jerod</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-220602</link> <dc:creator>Jerod</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-220602</guid> <description>i&#039;m a little over 10,000 rounds through my POF &quot;AR knock off&quot;, without having to clean or lube it one time. so much for your reliability theories. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i’m a little over 10,000 rounds through my POF “AR knock off”, without having to clean or lube it one time. so much for your reliability theories.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: danny</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-213573</link> <dc:creator>danny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 06:23:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-213573</guid> <description>when i used this rifle at sniper school, thee was no noticable effect on flight path or ballistics @ 800m. out to 1000m there is only a slight deviation from flight path. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i used this rifle at sniper school, thee was no noticable effect on flight path or ballistics @ 800m. out to 1000m there is only a slight deviation from flight path.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: M Squared</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-207641</link> <dc:creator>M Squared</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:47:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-207641</guid> <description>The Army Marksmahship Unit  is using the M110 with iron sights as a service rifle in NRA competition.  I just finished competing against them at Quantico.  They were shooting high X count cleans with the IRON SIGHTS with this rifle at 1000 yards, that&#039;s hitting a 20 inch circle every time in changing wind slow fire (single load). immagine what the rifle is capable of with a good optic. any questions on weather the system is capable of hitting a man sized target? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Army Marksmahship Unit  is using the M110 with iron sights as a service rifle in NRA competition.  I just finished competing against them at Quantico.  They were shooting high X count cleans with the IRON SIGHTS with this rifle at 1000 yards, that’s hitting a 20 inch circle every time in changing wind slow fire (single load).</p><p>immagine what the rifle is capable of with a good optic.</p><p>any questions on weather the system is capable of hitting a man sized target?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bill Looper</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-190461</link> <dc:creator>Bill Looper</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 08:54:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-190461</guid> <description>This looks like a great replacement for the M-14 sniper version of Nam era.  I remember seeing film of a sniper team with scoped M-14s taking out a group of 50 NVA in a couple of minutes.  This looks like the weapon for that mission. One shot one kill at a mile or more and this is not the right weapon. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a great replacement for the M-14 sniper version of Nam era.  I remember seeing film of a sniper team with scoped M-14s taking out a group of 50 NVA in a couple of minutes.  This looks like the weapon for that mission.</p><p>One shot one kill at a mile or more and this is not the right weapon.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Michael</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-169347</link> <dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 03:20:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-169347</guid> <description>Looks like a nice rifle, ive shot the SR25 before was as accurate as the M24 till about 500 meters then the M24 shot half the group,  And i see alot of pepople talkn about the 338 and the 300 those are great rounds but fromn a training stand point its not good, at the AF Sniper school we shot between 60-80 rounds a day for three weeks and could any of you imagine shooting that in 300 win mag for three weeks,  the M24 is proven out to 1000 meters on a steady basis. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a nice rifle, ive shot the SR25 before was as accurate as the M24 till about 500 meters then the M24 shot half the group,  And i see alot of pepople talkn about the 338 and the 300 those are great rounds but fromn a training stand point its not good, at the AF Sniper school we shot between 60–80 rounds a day for three weeks and could any of you imagine shooting that in 300 win mag for three weeks,  the M24 is proven out to 1000 meters on a steady basis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: D.Jenkins</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/10/30/aberdeen-outtakes-the-m110-sniper-rifle/#comment-33470</link> <dc:creator>D.Jenkins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:44:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2630#comment-33470</guid> <description>I am a fan of the M-14 it is by far one of the best shooting rifles i have ever used. For targets at ranges of 600m or more it gets the job done. I also like the 300 win mag to reach out and touch the target. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a fan of the M-14 it is by far one of the best shooting rifles i have ever used. For targets at ranges of 600m or more it gets the job done. I also like the 300 win mag to reach out and touch the target.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:14:48 -->
