DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Afghan Update » Getting Afghans Into the Air

Getting Afghans Into the Air

Afghan-air-corps.jpg

About two months ago, the American mil­i­tary went into high gear to cre­ate an air corps for Afghanistans mil­i­tary. Of course, that seems like a long time in com­ing, but com­man­ders there wanted to set their pri­or­i­ties on build­ing a robust ground force before switch­ing to the more com­pli­cated task of form­ing an avi­a­tion force.

According to the gen­eral in charge of estab­lish­ing the new Afghan air corps which will be the avi­a­tion wing of the Afghan National Army the coali­tion is build­ing the fledg­ling fleet at a fever pace. In an inter­view with mil­i­tary blog­gers Wednesday, Air Force Brig. Gen. Jay Lindell said his 130 mem­ber team got started in earnest to build an air corps for the Afghan mil­i­tary on a pretty tight sched­ule. Luckily, its not as if the team is build­ing the Afghan air corps from the ground up. Currently, the Afghan air corps has seven Mi-​​17 Hip trans­port heli­copters; six Mi-​​35 Hind attack helos; two An-​​32 Cline and two An-​​26 Curl fixed-​​wing trans­port air­craft and two Czech-​​made L-​​39 Albatross train­ing air­craft — used pri­mar­ily for flight demon­stra­tion shows.

But the coali­tion isnt stop­ping there. The air corps is in the process of receiv­ing sev­eral Russian-​​made troop-​​carrying heli­copters from allies. The list includes: six Mi-​​17s and six Mi-​​35s from the Czech Republic; one Mi-​​17 from Slovakia; 10 Mi-​​17s from the United Arab Emirates and four An-​​32s from the Ukraine. All of these air­craft should be here in Kabul in the next six months, Lindell said.

The coali­tion train­ers are also check­ing out whats avail­able to boost the Afghans medium lift trans­port inven­tory. That pro­cure­ment will be han­dled through the U.S. for­eign mil­i­tary sales accounts, but Lindell said he likes the looks of the C-​​27A Spartan, though Lindell is look­ing at refur­bished ver­sions of this Italian-​​made transport.

So who exactly is going to fly these birds, you ask? Well, Lindell said there are 165 Afghan pilots cur­rently in the Afghan air corps. Theyre Soviet trained, run about 2,500 flight hours each, but theyre on aver­age about 43 years old. Theyre actu­ally very capa­ble pilots. Theyre not too cur­rent. Thats why we need to get them the air­craft to fly in, Lindell said.

The air corps has its own crew of instruc­tors and they have a Soviet-​​era flight train­ing syl­labus theyre already famil­iar with, so get­ting them up to speed wont be too dif­fi­cult. Its the night and foul-​​weather oper­a­tions that are going to be the tough­est to train. The plan is to estab­lish mobile train­ing teams manned by Eastern European NATO pilots who fly the same types of air­craft to men­tor the Afghan pilots on all-​​weather, day-​​night tac­ti­cal flying.

Lindell hopes to set up a train­ing pro­gram for new pilots to ascend through the ranks from the Afghan National Military Training Academy in Kabul, so a fresh gen­er­a­tion of Afghan air corps pilots can take over for the vets.

Of course, logis­tics is what makes a func­tion­ing air corps and Lindell is bull­ish on the Afghans capa­bil­i­ties there. Hes seen a knack for keep­ing air­craft aloft with even the most rudi­men­tary resources (just ask the spooks who flew into Afghanistan in 2001), but a good inven­tory of spare parts and mod­ern main­te­nance equip­ment will also be needed.

The Afghan air corps has abil­ity and desire. They need resources to give them capa­bil­ity, Lindell said.

– Christian

Share |

October 31st, 2007 | Afghan Update | 263442 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/10/31/getting-afghans-into-the-air/Getting+Afghans+Into+the+Air2007-10-31+19%3A13%3A08Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Aberdeen Outtakes: M26 Modular Accessory Shotgun System | Rebuilding the Iraqi Air Force » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Solomon says:
    October 31, 2007 at 4:10 pm
    Reply
  2. 22lr says:
    October 31, 2007 at 4:18 pm

    Ya your right, there just afghans they only beat Russia in war, they don’t stand a chance *sar­casm*. Dude this is a good start, and they have to start some­how. They arnt going to be the best overnight, but they have good poten­tial. There soci­ety of tribes sure beat the crap out of the Russians. Ability and Desire is the very thing they have.

    Reply
  3. Foreign.Boy says:
    October 31, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Solomon,
    Don’t you think that heli-​​borne troops would be nec­es­sary the moun­tain fight­ing they’ll even­tu­ally need to take on?

    Reply
  4. Solomon says:
    October 31, 2007 at 4:23 pm

    That was sup­pose to be load…I was beyond “pissed” after read­ing this article.

    Reply
  5. campbell says:
    October 31, 2007 at 5:00 pm

    sigh.…once again, please READ the arti­cles, and posts, before mak­ing addi­tional remarks.
    the arti­cle says the “AIR CORP” has abil­ity and desire; it does not address “afghans” as a whole, nor their infantry skills or lack thereof, nor their tribal asso­ci­a­tions. It speaks of the AIR CORP. Small it may be (with 165 pilots), and an un-​​named num­ber of sup­port per­son­nel.
    hav­ing said the above, I’d add my own take on the effort described in the arti­cle:
    why bother? Afghanistan is des­tined to be sim­ply a drive thru for Pakistan/Iran.….as it has been for cen­turies, from Alexander to the British to USSR

    Reply
  6. Solomon says:
    October 31, 2007 at 5:01 pm

    22lr
    That tribal soci­ety only beat the Soviets back due to the fund­ing pro­vided by the CIA and a good sup­ply of MANPADS. Even then, the Afghans were on the verge and only a soft­en­ing by the Soviets allowed them to claim vic­tory. On what do you base the state­ment that they have good poten­tial? Some hack that wears stars in the Air Force? Not bloody likely. How long have we been at war in Afghanistan? And where would you rate their mil­i­tary??? Until they have a truly func­tion­ing Army, an Air Force is a lux­ury. I view this as pork and only pork. I am not con­vinced.
    Foreign Boy
    Helo-​​borne troops again is a lux­ury until they have demon­strated the basic Infantry skills. Helo borne assaults are an advanced skill set. Until you can point out an Afghan sol­dier thats been to pathfinder school or HRST mas­ter course, then they don’t need to go near a helicopter(the 101st has been there, but I don’t know if they’ve ran them through any courses). Mountain Warfare is indeed what they need to be gear­ing up for and until they send some of their peo­ple to Ft Drum or Bridgeport (or hell they can even do some good OJT in their own back­yard again I know the 10th Mountain and Rangers were their so maybe they’ve tried) they’ll never get that job done. Just my opinion

    Reply
  7. 22lr says:
    October 31, 2007 at 5:17 pm

    I never said they were already the best. I said they have abil­ity and desire. The AF has a role in spray­ing pop­pie crops that the Taliban (and oth­ers) are using to make opium. Also they have to start some­ware, and at the begin­ning is a good start­ing point. Any per­son that has abil­ity and desire is a potent weapon.

    Reply
  8. demophilus says:
    October 31, 2007 at 7:58 pm

    The C-​​27 might be a good fit for inter­op­er­abil­ity with our forces, but the Antonovs are dirt cheap, and there are a lot of pilots out there with time in type, includ­ing Afghanis. Ditto for L-​​39s.
    IIRC, Air America and the USAF had some suc­cess with the Pilatus Porter/​PC-​​6/​AU-​​23. Of course, that was pretty much before MANPADS, but there it is. If they need some­thing to fly in and out of moun­tain airstrips, they could do worse than buy­ing Swiss.

    Reply
  9. Ziv says:
    October 31, 2007 at 8:07 pm

    Solomon, I have read that the USSR’s mil­i­tary thought pretty much the same way you do about the Afghani mil­i­tary capa­bil­ity in 1978, they too mis­took a tribal soci­ety for a weak one. I would stand with Nate Forrest (admit­tedly prob­a­bly apoc­ryphal) on this one, if the Afghani Army can get to a hotspots ‘Fustest with the Mostest’ they will kick the Taliban to the curb every time. They won’t be fight­ing Rangers or Marines, they don’t have to be up to west­ern stan­dards, they just have to deploy a cred­i­ble force over long dis­tances as rapidly as pos­si­ble despite hor­ren­dous ground trans­port con­di­tions.
    It doesn’t mat­ter in the least that their ‘tribal’ soci­ety needed the CIA’s help to defeat the USSR and its local lack­eys, Afghanistan will have west­ern help against any of their most prob­a­ble ene­mies any­way. Forget the C-​​27, they almost might be beter served by deploy­ing a squadron of rebuilt C-​​47 Dakotas. Low tech and sim­ple beats high tech and broke most every time.

    Reply
  10. Solomon says:
    October 31, 2007 at 10:06 pm

    demophilus
    If they’re going to have an air force then I pre­fer your solu­tion more than what they’re try­ing to put together right now.
    Ziv
    A tribal soci­ety is not weak, just prim­i­tive. If locat­ing, clos­ing with and destroy­ing the enemy was all it took to win insur­gen­cies then we’d be out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Being able to deploy a bat­tal­ion or two of indige­nous fight­ers will not change the con­di­tions on the ground (in my opin­ion). As far as west­ern sup­port for the Afghan gov­ern­ment fight­ers is concerned…WE ARE NOW IN THE ROLE OF THE SOVIETS…with the Iranians and cer­tain fac­tions in Pakistan play­ing the part of the US! But again thats just my opinion.

    Reply
  11. Rix says:
    October 31, 2007 at 10:33 pm

    People for­get that the Afghan air force, in the 1980’s was one of the most bat­tle hard­ened forces around…they flew migs in ground attack com­bat every day against advanced MANPADs and Oerlikon guns. For what they will face…good preparation.

    Reply
  12. cocuk oyunu says:
    March 19, 2008 at 7:47 am

    That was sup­pose to be load…I was beyond “pissed” after read­ing this article.

    Reply
  13. bak?ml?y?z says:
    May 18, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    thnks

    Reply
  14. Meleklermekan? says:
    May 18, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    That was sup­pose to be load…I was beyond “pissed” after read­ing this article.

    Reply
  15. kpss says:
    May 31, 2008 at 9:05 am

    thnks

    Reply
  16. n73 tema says:
    May 31, 2008 at 9:07 am

    thank you

    Reply
  17. jiajiacom says:
    June 11, 2008 at 2:04 am

    http://​www​.exam​s​marter​.com

    Reply
  18. oyun oyna says:
    June 17, 2008 at 6:25 am

    thank alot

    Reply
  19. sex videos says:
    June 25, 2008 at 3:33 am

    Very splen­did

    Reply
  20. bayrak says:
    July 20, 2008 at 1:06 pm

    thank you so much
    http://​www​.aybayrak​-tr​.com

    Reply
  21. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 2:36 am

    ???
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ??
    ??
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ????
    ???
    ???
    ???
    SM
    ????
    ???
    ???
    ???
    ??
    ????
    ????

    Reply
  22. greg stocks says:
    September 13, 2008 at 5:45 pm

    iam still for turn­ing the place into glass its time we let the world see what could hap­pen when they mess with us. we must never get to the place where we don’t have the balls to do what we need to do to win a war, iam begin­ing to wander…9/11 have we forgotten…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage