DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Ground Vehicles » Getting Sideways at the DARPA Derby

Getting Sideways at the DARPA Derby

darpa-challenge.jpg

The U.S. military’s sprawl­ing logis­tics sys­tem has always been its most vul­ner­a­ble flank. Two years ago Iraqi insur­gents fig­ured that out. In 2004 and 2005, attacks on sup­ply trucks killed hun­dreds of U.S. troops. More escorts and thicker armor even­tu­ally trumped insur­gent attacks — for now — but the mil­i­tary hasn’t for­got­ten just how hairy it got. In typ­i­cal American fash­ion, the mil­i­tary decided one of the best ways to pro­tect logis­tics troops was to fire them, and make sup­ply con­voys autonomous.

It’s freez­ing cold this morn­ing at an aban­doned U.S. Air Force base near Victorville, California. In just a few min­utes, offi­cials from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency will fire the gun to begin the 60-​​mile, 6-​​hour Urban Challenge robot race. The idea: to demon­strate the tech­nol­ogy that might one day result in fully robotic sup­ply trucks that can find their way through inter­sec­tions, maneu­ver around obsta­cles, change lanes and stop on a dime when some kid runs across the road. The prize: a $3.5 mil­lion check from Uncle Sam.

Two weeks ago, there were 35 teams from uni­ver­si­ties and indus­try vying for a spot in the final race. After rig­or­ous test­ing, dur­ing which the robots were required to adhere to California traf­fic laws, only 11 teams are left. One dis­qual­i­fied robot plowed into a human-​​driven Darpa car. Others freaked out at inter­sec­tions, park­ing lots or left turns.

Read the rest of David Axe’s brief from Aviation Week HERE.

– Christian

Share |

November 6th, 2007 | Ground Vehicles | 264624 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/11/06/getting-sideways-at-the-darpa-derby/Getting+Sideways+at+the+DARPA+Derby2007-11-06+11%3A54%3A57Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Grounded Eagles | China One Step Closer to Planting Flag on Moon » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Tartan69 says:
    November 6, 2007 at 11:24 am

    Woo hoo, go Tartans!

    Reply
  2. Tartan69 says:
    November 6, 2007 at 11:26 am

    BTW, more info here:
    http://​www​.pop​u​larme​chan​ics​.com/​b​l​o​g​s​/​t​e​c​h​n​o​l​o​g​y​_​n​e​w​s​/​4​2​2​9​7​4​5​.​h​tml

    Reply
  3. Camp says:
    November 6, 2007 at 3:08 pm

    TG Daily has some video of the race.
    http://​www​.tgdaily​.com/​c​o​n​t​e​n​t​/​v​i​e​w​/​3​4​6​8​7​/​1​13/
    I’m really sur­prised the mil­i­tary doesn’t pro­mote this event more… It’s like NASCAR for geeks.
    IMHO. The Army should host an Armed Combat Robot Shootout. It could con­sist of an obsta­cle course, a basic task test, a Hogans alley, and end with an all out death match. You could have divi­sions for remotely oper­ated, semi-​​autonomous, & fully autonomous (team or sin­gle bots)(big, lit­tle, or small). It could take place in a old quarry, or at NTC. End the death match with a 155mm Fire For Effect, slap some Army recruit­ment logos, and broad­cast it over the net.
    Post a prize, date, and reg­u­la­tions… & peo­ple will com­pete. Maybe Military​.Com could co-​​sponsor. :)

    Reply
  4. Dan says:
    November 6, 2007 at 8:10 pm

    Camp,
    I agree. I watched the event via the DARPA web­site on the day of the race … their cov­er­age was mediocre at best.
    Considering where this tech was in 2004 at the first race and where it is now, I’m sur­prised this sort of forum (open com­pe­ti­tion between uni­ver­si­ties) isn’t used more.

    Reply
  5. Greg says:
    November 6, 2007 at 8:45 pm

    Dan,
    This sort of thing does hap­pen is used quite a bit, just not at this level. Back at Michigan State when I was in school the engi­neer­ing stu­dents ran com­pe­ti­tions in mini-​​baja rac­ing and solar cars with their own vehi­cles they designed and built. Things like that are done all the time between uni­ver­si­ties, but there aren’t that many groups out there with the abil­ity to spon­sor an all-​​out com­pe­ti­tion of the mag­ni­tude that DARPA is. And DARPA has been doing this type of thing annu­ally since the orig­i­nal Space-​​X competition.

    Reply
  6. 22lr says:
    November 6, 2007 at 9:43 pm

    Once again were pay­ing some­one a boat load of money, just so they can tell us that a human in the dri­ver seat is bet­ter. Honestly what chance are those high tech censers going to have once they get shot. It will take maybe a sin­gle day for the enemy to learn that all you need to do is shoot the first one, and you just got a whole con­voy of sup­plies. Maybe im exas­per­at­ing a lit­tle but I hate the idea of robots dri­ving com­bat con­voys. We will spend a zil­lion dol­lars just to real­ize a human in the dri­ver seat can do the job 50 times better.

    Reply
  7. Camp says:
    November 7, 2007 at 3:57 am

    22lr,
    This tech­nol­ogy isn’t just for autonomous vehi­cles. It can also be used for enhanc­ing humans “in the dri­ver seat”, such as dri­vers who fall asleep or become impaired, or high­light­ing obsta­cles & choices to dri­vers via a HUD (ie. AI co-​​driver/​co-​​pilot). But it’s great­est advan­tage will come when you have to recon an urban area or a route that may be too dan­ger­ous for peo­ple… or when you don’t have enough peo­ple. Not to men­tion there isn’t enough sig­nal space (clear, crypt, or jammed) for every­ones toys in the future… so autonomous has a place.
    Greg,
    I maybe wrong, but I think the lack of vis­i­bil­ity is the great­est prob­lem when try­ing to get spon­sors. If the Universities pooled their resources & cre­ated a sin­gle entity to admin/​promote these events, as well as cre­at­ing a sin­gle place on the net where you can watch the “games”… they might have bet­ter success.

    Reply
  8. pedestrian says:
    November 7, 2007 at 4:15 am

    >Once again were pay­ing some­one a boat load of money, just so they can tell us that a human in
    >the dri­ver seat is bet­ter. Honestly what chance are those high tech censers going to have once
    >they get shot.
    Here is another idiot who knows noth­ing. Well, its not your bussi­ness and you don’t need to know any­ways. Only the ter­ror­ists will know at the time a ter­ri­ble thing to tar­get these, but at the time they know, they will be dead.

    Reply
  9. 22lr says:
    November 7, 2007 at 10:17 am

    @ camp
    LOL, I can drive my truck faster, with more fire­power, safer, and deliver my pas­sen­gers to there des­ti­na­tion bet­ter than any robot could ever do. how is one of these going to stand up to a sand storm? How is one going to take a bul­let? How is one going to respond when the truck in front gets hit, can the com­puter help a down sol­dier. No com­puter is going to run over and get a wounded sol­dier help.

    Reply
  10. Hooded Swan says:
    November 7, 2007 at 3:43 pm

    Not going to get into the argu­ment of manned vehi­cle vs remote con­trolled vs autonomous robot. If you want to get your sup­plies through to, putting them in a robotic vehi­cle doesn’t help. All it does is keep a dri­ver alive when the bad guys stop the truck. And as other peo­ple have already men­tioned, makes it more likely that the truck gets stopped in the 1st place.

    Reply
  11. Charles says:
    November 8, 2007 at 10:23 am

    The arti­cle seems to imply more con­voys will make it through with robotic tech­nol­ogy; but all it does is lower the body count when a con­voy is stopped in the first place.
    Much eas­ier to test out robotic tech­nol­ogy on logis­tics con­voys than say, tanks. They’ll prob­a­bly get a bunch of use stateside…we may have Transport Company (drone) with a bunch of mechan­ics and auto­mated trans­ports for a lit­tle while, until the whole force is ready for the technology.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage