DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Sabra Tech » Train Cable UAVs Soar

Train Cable UAVs Soar

train-UAV.jpg

From Aviation Week’s Ares weblog and posted at Military​.com.

Israeli company Planum Vision is pushing a new type of fixed-route UAV that relies on an electric train cable line. As is the tendency of smaller companies these days, Planum Vision is using YouTube to get the word out. The word being that a fixed-route, train cable UAV, or TCUAV, is ideal for border patrol and protection of military bases by creating an automated surveillance that eliminates the failures associated with flight control, communications and human error.

TCUAV would also be useful in protecting oil pipelines, energy facilities and ports and other transportation hubs, according to the company. It’s not clear the company has any contracts or partners yet, although a related patent application was filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization late last week.

– Christian

Share |

November 9th, 2007 | Sabra Tech | 265315 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/11/09/train-cable-uavs-soar/Train+Cable+UAVs+Soar2007-11-09+18%3A24%3A07Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Russia’s 5th Gen Fighter Delayed | The Freaky F-35 Lid » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. nb says:
    November 9, 2007 at 2:50 pm

    So when the “bad” guys see it coming, they hide or move. I’d want a much, much longer tether than 60 meters — and a lower profile aircraft. I might propose a gyrocopter that you simply tow. With less wing area it might be less visible. You could also consider a counter rotating rotor electric helicopter. Interesting — with a large retractable coil of cable you could actually fly these out over the border a ways…
    On the other hand — perhaps you could just put up static blimps like JLENS etc. They seem a far better solution, fly much higher (less susceptible to ground fire), and thus can cover a larger area.

    Reply
  2. sglover says:
    November 9, 2007 at 2:56 pm

    I don’t get it. Is towing the UAV like a kite supposed to save fuel? Because it seems to me that all you’re getting for the capital investment of laying track is a UAV that can follow a fixed course, which I’m pretty sure isn’t rocket science. Or you could just post sensor-equipped aerostats at intervals along the line you’re trying to patrol. This looks like another solution in search of a problem — although if it came in HO scale, it might be pretty cool.

    Reply
  3. sglover says:
    November 9, 2007 at 2:57 pm

    Whoa.…. Good thinking, nb!

    Reply
  4. Davila, S says:
    November 9, 2007 at 3:32 pm

    i think that the idea is for the uav to follow a wire under the ground not to be on a tether. also i think that this tech. coupled with human monitoring and the capability for it to be flown off course by human control you could have it patrol a certain area then when it spots something a pilot could take over and fly it to that area

    Reply
  5. 22lr says:
    November 9, 2007 at 4:48 pm

    SO you get limited or no ability to check out anything suspicious. You would be limited to a single pass, so you would have to have eagle eyes yourself. Heck I Cessna 150 is a better bet. This would also be a very predictable system and easy to attack/destroy. Also even if you saved on fuel you have a massive cost associated with installing the system. Maybe im not understanding the system but it sounds like a really bad idea.

    Reply
  6. Christian Lowe says:
    November 9, 2007 at 5:32 pm

    Kaltes, quit whining and click the link at the top of the story to see the full text…WITH LINKS…

    Reply
  7. pedestrian says:
    November 10, 2007 at 9:19 am

    It sure did take a long time for Israel to come up with similar ideas I already had in mind years ago. In Iraq, there are reports terrorist spotters watch outside of military installations to track UAV movements. This was not new since this already happened long ago in the conflict of Yugoslavia which Seria intel were watching military aircraft movement from NATO bases and alert any possible attacks by NATO jets including the F-117. I predict if this train cable UAV is in operation, it will have limited effect, and is vulnerable of vandalization of the cable to derail the UAV. Terrorists has creativity and its tactics evolve fast. It won’t take long for Hamas and Hezbollah to tackle its vulnerability. I’ll bet they will monitor its movement, and attempt to destroy the cable. My approach was just using trains. You can’t do an U-turn easily with these UAVs, but with unmanned trains, that is possible. It’s vulerable to destruction of the rail, but the border of US is less hostile and attacks on rails wouldn’t happen so often. Planum Vision thinks they had a great idea, but it’s nothing but trash to me.
    >I don’t get it. Is towing the UAV like a kite supposed to save fuel?
    You’ve got great creativity for mentioning a kite. You were one step near a better approach. I had in mind installing a power kite or tugged paraglider onto a ground vehicle and install sensors on it. It is more mobile and move more free without restrictions of cables or rails. I’ve sent mails to the Pentagon several times long ago installing power kites or paragliders as a low cost tactical UAV, but the Pentagon doesn’t seem to be interested in the idea. Well, it’s a low cost platform that is vulnerable to weather conditions, as same as the Israelis’ approach using cables, never to mean the silver bullet, but only a quantity issue.
    >On the other hand — perhaps you could just put up static blimps like JLENS etc.
    Israel used balloons for years installing sensors on it. Israel was not the first to use balloons as a surveillance platform, even it may have been the first unmanned balloon, there was once in US for use of manned observation balloon during civil war, and even way back in the 18th century by France, but it was very shocking for me to see balloons as sensor platforms by Israel the first time I recognized it. However, Pentagon has been one step further and smarter than Israel for using blimps. Well, not even the Israelis will beat the creativity of Americans.

    Reply
  8. Global Concern says:
    November 10, 2007 at 9:47 am

    You know what? Satellites are still the best. They’re becoming way more sophisticated and will continue to do so in the future. No technology is invulnerable. We’re seeing now that even ICBMs are not invulnerable, for the USA now has a very small number of operable anti-missile-missiles. Very successful tests have already been carried out. So the enemy will have to evolve…they ALWAYS do. Then the allies will evolve. It’s just a never-ending game. Peace would be so much easier, beneficial, and less expensive.

    Reply
  9. Dan says:
    November 10, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Well, Global Concern, just make the world a perfectly fair place, make everyone happy, eliminate every cultural grievance/jealousy, and we

    Reply
  10. C-Low says:
    November 10, 2007 at 3:45 pm

    I don’t see how hundreds of miles of rail electirfied no less would be cheaper than just adding the guidence and fuel to a regular UAV running a aireal track.
    Not to mention if its on rail when they find enemy how do they begin orbits? Run back and forth on a track letting everyone know what time it is at the first turn.
    Now if you used this instead for say a base perimeter we may have something. But even then is it cheaper than a balloon system? Although a short tower on a wheel with a low gear ratio, and one of these birds kiting it in a orbit from say 200–300 yard line?
    Cell phones and cameras are so dam cheep nowadays it maybe cheaper to just buy a wireless internet mobile carrier and put camera phones tagged with small solar panel and battery every 200 yards or so on 20′ posts. Run it all to some of this recognition software that will recognize and que up suspicious activity for the monitor to approve and deploy intercept crews.

    Reply
  11. marcus fountain says:
    November 12, 2007 at 11:40 am

    I’m a bad guy let’s say I’ll wait by the rail for it to come around and destroy it. You can even see me do it and by the time you get to that point i won’t be there. Infastructure maintenance costs for fixed rail systems, a breakdown of a unit on the rail will prevent another from getting past. Bottom line you loose your flexibility.

    Reply
  12. wacher says:
    November 17, 2007 at 8:44 am

    What is better network of 1,800 towers + UAVs that will cover the dead areas of those towers or building all in one system that cover all circles of defense ‚over all cost and maintenance much less is .….

    Reply
  13. ONwebCHECK says:
    November 19, 2007 at 11:49 am

    I worked togeather with some ingeniers who made a prototype for a military drone — very interessting — it was abel to operate for hours. It shuold be used for spyflights — even in the night.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Not completely true-remember the Navy can be very picky...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I think by the end of the year some of those flags are...
      Tom
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I am not advocating non use of F22s&F35s in daylight...
      Chops
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Guys this platform is about CAS but not in the...
      ANGRYTACP
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Blaming the contractors for a development system created...
      G Lof
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage