DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Israel’s Cyber Shot at Syria

Israel’s Cyber Shot at Syria

ew-ac.jpg

Our friends at Av Week have this story so wired, I couldnt wait to post this update. And, as you well know, Im a bit obsessed with it.

It now seems that one of Israels first shots in its raid into Syria in September was a fusillade of 1s and 0s.

From Aviation Week:

The U.S. was monitoring the electronic emissions coming from Syria during Israels September attack; andalthough there was no direct American help in destroying a nuclear reactorthere was some advice provided beforehand, military and aerospace industry officials tell Aviation Week & Space Technology.

That surveillance is providing clues about how Israeli aircraft managed to slip past Syrian air defenses to bomb the site at Dayr az-Zawr. The main attack was preceded by an engagement with a single Syrian radar site at Tall al-Abuad near the Turkish border. It was assaulted with what appears to be a combination of electronic attack and precision bombs to enable the Israeli force to enter and exit Syrian airspace. Almost immediately, the entire Syrian radar system went off the air for a period of time that included the raid, say U.S. intelligence analysts.

There was no U.S. active engagement other than consulting on potential target vulnerabilities, says a U.S. electronic warfare specialist.

Elements of the attack included some brute-force jamming, which is still an important element of attacking air defenses, U.S. analysts say. Also, Syrian air defenses are still centralized and dependent on dedicated HF and VHF communications, which made them vulnerable. The analysts dont believe any part of Syrias electrical grid was shut down. They do contend that network penetration involved both remote air-to-ground electronic attack and penetration through computer-to-computer links.

There also were some higher-level, nontactical penetrations, either direct or as diversions and spoofs, of the Syrian command-and-control capability, done through network attack, says an intelligence specialist.

These observations provide evidence that a sophisticated network attack and electronic hacking capability is an operational part of the Israel Defense Forces arsenal of digital weapons.

Despite being hobbled by the restrictions of secrecy and diplomacy, Israeli military and government officials confirm that network invasion, information warfare and electronic attack are part of Israels defense capabilities.

And the cool thing was that it seems that Israel was able to do this cyber attack from the air.

That ability of nonstealthy Israeli aircraft to penetrate without interference rests in part on technology, carried on board modified aircraft, that allowed specialists to hack into Syrias networked air defense system, said U.S. military and industry officials in the attacks aftermath.

Network raiders can conduct their invasion from an aircraft into a network and then jump from network to network until they are into the targets communications loop. Whether the network is wireless or wired doesnt matter anymore, says a U.S. industry specialist.

And it seems the Syrian governments self-imposed secrecy was partly to blame for the shut-down.

The raid on Syria was a strategic signal, not a threat, says a retired senior military official who flew combat in the region for decades. This [raid] was about what we perceived are their capabilities [for developing weapons of mass destruction] and about deterrence more than creating damage.

He contends that Syrian procedures even contributed to the successful bombing raid.

Part of the vulnerability of the Syrian facility was that they kept it so secret that there werent enough air defenses assigned to it, the official contends.

Be sure to read the rest of this fascinating story and really kick ass reporting HERE.

(Gouge: NC)

– Christian

Share |

November 26th, 2007 | Around the Globe | 267818 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/11/26/israels-cyber-shot-at-syria/Israel%27s+Cyber+Shot+at+Syria2007-11-26+16%3A52%3A49Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Blackbird Drivers Strut Their Stuff | Scan Eagle From a DDG » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Roy Smith says:
    November 26, 2007 at 1:37 pm

    Tom Bearden would have a field day with this.He is the one advocating super weapons based on Nikola Tesla’s theories of electromagnetics & scalar longitudinal waves.I know that it is more plausible to talk about UFOs & space aliens compared to what I’m about to say,but what if what Israel bombed was just a simple antenna array like the array set up used for HAARP(High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program).Most people talking about this seem to agree that it wasn’t a nuclear plant or facility.What if it was an EMP generating station being built with the help of the Russians?A Less science fiction sounding explanation could be that the Syrians & Russians were setting up a “STEEL YARD/STEEL WORKS” Over-the-Horizon Radar facility,the kind that transmits the infamous “Russian Woodpecker” signal.Conspiracy theorists believe that the STEEL YARD OTH Radar can be used as an EMP weapon just like,supposedly,HAARP can.Both operate,I believe,in the ionosphere of our atmosphere.
    Whatever the Israelis attacked,it was something that they felt very threatened by,& it wasn’t nuclear.Also,the Israelis used some “voodoo(a “figurative” description for lack of a better one)” against Syria’s air defenses.I’ll bet that EMP was involved somehow with whatever Israel did.

    Reply
  2. Wembley says:
    November 26, 2007 at 2:20 pm

    How about something on the key part of the story — what did they attack, and why?
    It wasn;t a nuke plant, but what was it??

    Reply
  3. Roy Smith says:
    November 26, 2007 at 2:31 pm

    What if what was being built was along the lines of a Duga-3 “STEEL YARD” OTH Radar system? The value of such a system escapes me,but I did some further reading on this type of radar system & a facility was located in the Ukraine with the transmitter located outside of Chernobyl(& we all know what happened in Chernobyl).I’m trying to tie this all in with what Israel attacked.Also,right now Israel is having problems on their northern borders with their home satellite dishes’ signals being interfered with(& interrupting their getting Desperate Housewives).Something “non-nuclear” in nature is going on in Syria & is big enough to cause Israel to attack it.

    Reply
  4. txzen says:
    November 26, 2007 at 3:03 pm

    A facility in the works wouldn’t have all of the final components in the machines. I still don’t see how you can say what it was or wasn’t just by over head sat shots.

    Reply
  5. Roy Smith says:
    November 26, 2007 at 3:16 pm

    Obviously,Israel had Mossad agents or maybe some other special ops assets in Syria & they found out something important enough to bomb it.I looked at the photographs too & it just looks like a building & nothing more​.It had to be something of WMD(nuclear,biological,or chemical) magnitude in order for Israel to bomb it.Whatever it was,it spooked the Israelis enough to attack it.

    Reply
  6. Brian says:
    November 26, 2007 at 5:19 pm

    Well, if the thing is a carbon copy of a NK nuclear facility, then anyone with detailed knowledge of that facility would be able to recognize this one. If Israel had knowledge of NK advisors on site, then that’s a good tip off.

    Reply
  7. Roy Smith says:
    November 26, 2007 at 6:46 pm

    I looked at pictures of Russian OTH radar system like Duga-3 & no wonder it was nicknamed “STEELYARD” because thats what it looks like,a big steel yard.I guess we’ll never really know what the Israelis bombed,we can only guess.
    Hey,off topic,can somebody start a thread about India sending combat trained “camels” to the Sudan.That should really irk the worshipers of modern technology that someone would have to resort to a Dromedary camel(they didn’t say if the Indian camels had one hump or two) for transportation.
    Back to Israel,I wish that someone would blow up that photograph of the area bombed,both before & after pictures.The pictures are too small to figure out what the buildings are or were.

    Reply
  8. Deus Vult says:
    November 26, 2007 at 8:21 pm

    Roy Smith said:
    > Whatever it was,it spooked the Israelis enough to attack it.
    Yeah, that’s one of the many interesting things about this tale. If the AvWeek story is right, then Israel has revealed in a very explicit way a major capability for network/cyber attack. But, once warned, people who might think they’re going to get the same treatment (think Iran) will start implementing countermeasures, of which there are probably many.
    So what was of such immediate importance to Israel that they made that sacrifice? Something actually connected with the former building? Sending an urgent message to Iran?
    Or what?

    Reply
  9. C-Low says:
    November 27, 2007 at 12:11 am

    Sorry to interrupt the Scalar Theory debate BUT..
    Has anyone consider the possibility that this was just another location of Syrian Chem/Bio weapon production plant?
    Such a target would require the odd literal “cover up” from the Syrian Army. Such a target would be justified by any western even pansy playbook.
    Such a target would make a excellent example of “what if” senerio for other such locations of more importance in say more important nations?”.
    Lets recap Israel strikes mystery site (basically b*tch slapping Syria WITH EASE DID I SAY EASE) and then all the sudden out of their grace of piece (I am sure)„, Iran halts EFP transports, Syria cuts Jihad Road by over half and now the kicker Syria wants to come back to the jaw jaw table. Hmmmmmm
    Yeahh no connection at all.
    I can just imagine being Assad a Western styled dictator from a MINORITY SECT, allied with a Revolutionary Radical Islamist Nation that over 70% of his Gen pop consider heretics, while at the same time his own western ways are consider heretics by both groups, and then I just got a in your face example of Infidel Magic trying to decide between WAR and Jaw Jaw.

    Reply
  10. Roy Smith says:
    November 27, 2007 at 5:23 am

    Syria is too close to Israel to be allowed to house nuclear weapons.Maybe this was Israel’s “Cuban Missile Crisis.” Maybe this was an Iranian site being set up for listening &/or storing Iranian missiles.I read somewhere that Iran already has nuclear warheads that she bought from Pakistan’s Abdul Qadeer Khan.Maybe what Israel bombed was a staging area where Iran could put together her acquired nuclear warheads with missiles she supplied to Syria or was storing in Israel.A scenario like that though makes me wonder why Syria would have built such a sensitive site ABOVE ground & not underground like Iran is doing with her sensitive sites.

    Reply
  11. Roy Smith says:
    November 27, 2007 at 5:37 am

    Sorry,I meant missiles Iran was possibly storing in Syria not Israel.Knowing even less about missile silos,could this building be the beginning stage of building ICBM missile silos,maybe for Iran’s long range missiles or for Russia? Or maybe it was a storage building for Syria’s newly acquired Iskander missiles,which also could possibly be mated with Iran’s acquired nuclear warheads​.It doesn’t make sense to me though that Syria would not build deep hardened bunkers to store any valuable weapons KNOWING what a short hair trigger that Israel operates on.Maybe Syria put TOO MUCH faith into the air defense system she just bought from Russia.

    Reply
  12. MzK says:
    November 27, 2007 at 6:53 pm

    Does anyone know which plane that is in the picture ?
    Thanks

    Reply
  13. Roy Smith says:
    November 28, 2007 at 7:02 am

    Is that a picture of a C-37A Gulfstream V?

    Reply
  14. Roy Smith says:
    November 28, 2007 at 7:07 am

    Is that the EC-37 version of the Gulfstream V?

    Reply
  15. Roy Smith says:
    November 28, 2007 at 7:18 am

    Thank God for the Internet,I looked up Gulfstream V & Israel has a version called the Special Electronic Mission Aircraft.

    Reply
  16. Common Sense says:
    March 18, 2008 at 8:23 pm

    What a load of baloony…especially coming from C-Low. Utter garbage. Neither Iran nor Syria possess even a resemblence of a nuclear weapon…further, Israel was only testing routes to attach Iran…all this bs speculation about Israeli capabilities etc is just hype…overinflated egos trying to overinflate thier egos again.…please spare us the BS and get back into the real world.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I have always loved this idea. More survivable,...
      nraddin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      As an old ex-USAF cop, I am way out of my league...
      Sgt Ken
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Actually every time one of these articles goes up on...
      TMB
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      A lot of these comments are missing the mark –...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      And the attitude that gets the USAF continually...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      You're still confused. You're arguing...
      Why
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      First, what’s wrong with have a variety of...
      Mrcjis
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I agree. More organic precision fire, like the...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      This has been thoroughly covered in DefenseTech:...
      SMSgt Mac
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      It looks like a Russian firm may offer an Il-96 tanker plane:...
      Brian H
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage