Comments on: Secret Service Whoop Ass

By: Graham Strouse

Graham Strouse — Sat, 08 Dec 2007 23:18:21 +0000

I want one. Free gas from friendly Shell clerks and no more speeding tickets.

By: jsallison

jsallison — Wed, 05 Dec 2007 01:24:41 +0000

I’m sure Kiefer Sutherland would love it. On a damped mount with some sights worthy of the name it might have some utility but on a free swinging flex mount like this…not so much.

By: Rudy

Rudy — Sun, 02 Dec 2007 17:57:55 +0000

You can’t fire along the sides without hitting the hatch doors?

By: steve

steve — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 20:01:50 +0000

Definitely cool. But, there’s absolutely no freaking way that the Secret Service would ever buy something like this. Even if you used this as a defensive weapon, to pull the trigger would require absolutely no regard for innocent life. Only the biggest a-hole could imagine using this to protect a VIP in what I would assume to be an urban enviroment. Cool video, but, I shudder to think anyone actually has this somewhere.

By: Smith

Smith — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 17:30:25 +0000

I wonder when Ford will unveil their competition. A Bradley turret on an Expedition, maybe?

By: CodeBlue

CodeBlue — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 16:44:14 +0000

Code Pink is going down!!!!! Hard

By: TrustButVerify

TrustButVerify — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:27:23 +0000

In terms of sheer awesomeness, a pop-up minigun turret is right up there with the rocket-powered chainsaw launcher.

By: Dinirich

Dinirich — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 05:36:05 +0000

This vehicle was featured on an episode of Mythbusters recently when the were testing out the myth of how easy it was to shoot fish in a barrel. With this gun it was pretty damn easy. Youtube the clip.

By: Pantera

Pantera — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 03:46:51 +0000

Once again, a weapon that looks really freakin’ awesome, but has no practical purpose has gotten onto Defensetech
Not that I have any problem with it.

By: Mike

Mike — Sat, 01 Dec 2007 02:10:13 +0000

Ward… Are you positive this is for the secret service and not something else like citanon stated??