Comments on: There’s No ‘I’ in UAV

By: Quinta

Quinta — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:01:27 +0000

Well hello guys :) Great job! Congrats :).
I am from Serbia and learning to speak English, please tell me right I wrote the following sentence: ““
THX 8), Quinta.

By: jerkbait

jerkbait — Tue, 04 Dec 2007 18:55:24 +0000

My question is when are our police forces going to start using these? How about the border patrol? Arm the uav’s fire at will. Crime will take a drop.

By: TB

TB — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 17:11:27 +0000

So you’re saying “let’s take an unproven, untried and probably bug-ridden piece of software and give it power to launch lethal weaponry.“
Maybe you missed the part in the article where the sensor-only program will spend the next two years testing. IF we put a weapon on this, it won’t be till long after these initial tests are completed.

By: Dennis

Dennis — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:59:19 +0000

Nothing wrong with sensors. However, they might think about putting Laser guidance on them.
This way the Air force can bring the bomb and join the party.
When you throw a war, peoples feelings get hurt when they are not invited. Then they have to cry on their stars as they go to bed early.…

By: Wembley

Wembley — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:51:45 +0000

So you’re saying “let’s take an unproven, untried and probably bug-ridden piece of software and give it power to launch lethal weaponry.“
I can’t see any problems with that. I for one welcome our new Skynet overlord!

By: insider

insider — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 13:35:42 +0000

Weapons are out of scope for HURT because it is an army supported. As soon as you start dropping things from UAVs, you have to clear it with the Air Force. It’s one of those silly turf war things that the HURT people understand and have been careful to avoid. So that’s why it’s just sensors, sensors, sensors for now.