DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Lasers and Ray Guns » Laser Gunship Revealed

Laser Gunship Revealed

atl-gunship.jpg

So, a few months ago you might remem­ber we talked about a series of tests of Boeing’s air­borne laser — a mas­sive, Rube Goldberg con­trap­tion housed in a 747 freighter aimed at knock­ing down bal­lis­tic missiles.

During a phoner press con­fer­ence, Boeing offi­cials men­tioned in pass­ing they were work­ing on another sys­tem that could engage ground tar­gets. To me, this seems far more log­i­cal for such a weapon than one that’s designed to knock out missiles…that mis­sion strikes me as redundant.

Well, now it seems Boeing has taken the first step in mak­ing the laser gun­ship a real­ity by installing the weapon on a C-130H…

Boeing com­pleted the laser instal­la­tion Dec. 4 at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M. The laser, includ­ing its major sub­sys­tem, a 12,000-pound inte­grated laser mod­ule, was moved into place aboard the air­craft and aligned with the previously-installed beam con­trol sys­tem, which will direct the laser beam to its target.

With the laser installed, Boeing is set to con­duct a series of tests lead­ing up to a demon­stra­tion in 2008 in which the pro­gram will fire the laser in-flight at mission-representative ground tar­gets to demon­strate the mil­i­tary util­ity of high-energy lasers. The test team will fire the laser through a rotat­ing tur­ret that extends through the aircraft’s belly.

“The instal­la­tion of the high-energy laser shows that the ATL pro­gram con­tin­ues to make tremen­dous progress toward giv­ing the warfighter a speed-of-light, pre­ci­sion engage­ment capa­bil­ity that will dra­mat­i­cally reduce col­lat­eral dam­age,” said Scott Fancher, vice pres­i­dent and gen­eral man­ager of Boeing Missile Defense Systems.

“Next year, we will fire the laser at ground tar­gets, demon­strat­ing the mil­i­tary util­ity of this trans­for­ma­tional directed energy weapon.” 

I just love the idea that a JTAC could soon call in for a laser strike on a tar­get. Move over Spectre, say hello to the new “Vulcan” can­non (Star Trek ref­er­ence here).

ATL, which Boeing is devel­op­ing for the U.S. Department of Defense, will destroy, dam­age or dis­able tar­gets with lit­tle to no col­lat­eral dam­age, sup­port­ing mis­sions on the bat­tle­field and in urban oper­a­tions. Boeing’s Advanced Tactical Laser indus­try team includes L-3 Communications/Brashear, which made the laser tur­ret, and HYTEC, Inc., which made var­i­ous struc­tural ele­ments of the weapon system. 

Can’t wait to see the test shoot next year…

– Christian

Share |

December 11th, 2007 | Lasers and Ray Guns | 270583 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/12/11/laser-gunship-revealed/Laser+Gunship+Revealed2007-12-11+16%3A48%3A18Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Warm up the Croissants, Nautical Nerds! | Winner –Take-All Tanker Deal Criticized » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Champion says:
    December 13, 2007 at 10:22 am

    This ver­sion makes a lot more sense doc­tri­nally than the ABL. The ABL is a won­der­ful piece of equip­ment, if not hor­rif­i­cally expen­sive. Unfortunately it

    Reply
  2. deaths_little_helper says:
    December 13, 2007 at 3:35 pm

    When’s this thing going to be avail­able for air-to-air com­bat?
    P.S. EVIL!

    Reply
  3. nb says:
    December 13, 2007 at 5:13 pm

    I see sev­eral posts about this and the ABL being use­less. I dis­agree. These are the future. Those ene­mies who can afford them will develop them as well — thats the nature of weapons. “if we don’t they will”. At any rate, both of these sys­tems, with their some­what lim­ited ranges are the­atre weapons.
    Both will be deployed with hos­tile intent, or the threat of hos­tile intent, when­ever and when­ever ten­sions are high. But they’re no more and provoca­tive than say cruise or other mis­siles includ­ing ABM’s — like say a PAC3, espe­cially one on an F-15. But for many types of attacks they will be much more effec­tive, and actu­ally con­sid­er­ably less provoca­tive than explo­sives.
    As to those con­cerned about acci­dently blind­ing civil­ians — of course that will hap­pen. Innocents will always be injured in con­flict. But as a civil­ian in an insur­gency zone would you rather take your chances with the acci­den­tial reflec­tions of a laser off your highly pol­ished Mercedes or would you rather be in the vicin­ity of a highly accu­rate ATACMS, a small Viper Strike, or a burst of 30mm rounds from an AC-130?

    Reply
  4. citanon says:
    December 13, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    The trou­ble with the ATL as a low col­lat­eral dam­age weapon is that you can be 100–500 meters away from a laser strike and prob­a­bly still suf­fer sig­nif­i­cant vision dam­age. I don’t think you can say that about weapons like viper strike.
    @people who say that ABL is use­less
    That’s just non­sense. The ABL is our best shot at boost phase inter­cep­tion, period. As for jus­ti­fi­able cause, etc etc. First of all, no one will care. Second of all, the NK are not crazy enough to start a war because No Dong 5 has been shot down. Lastly, they are not stu­pid enough to start a war after their only means at strik­ing US and allies have just been defeated.

    Reply
  5. CSS says:
    December 13, 2007 at 7:32 pm

    Another prob­lem is if the weapon is acci­dently fired towards the hori­zon instead of the ground. My knowl­edge of laser physics is very small, but I think the beam would defo­cus and scat­ter, spread­ing over a fairly wide area and poten­tially caus­ing vision loss for peo­ple sev­eral kilo­me­ters away. Humans are so reliant on their eye­sight that the thought of par­tial or com­plete blind­ness is a source of unique hor­ror for most peo­ple.
    This could become, like napalm, a seri­ous blot on America’s reputation.

    Reply
  6. Don Herrick says:
    December 14, 2007 at 4:53 am

    Don’t get all excited. This is an early test model. In time all your con­cerns will be addressed and it will be the pre­ferred weapon
    Sleep well. Just do your job.

    Reply
  7. dah says:
    December 14, 2007 at 9:52 am

    Mr. Scott: it is as if I had writ­ten it myself but to not let these idiots teach their “rot” would be far worse. There would be no com­par­a­tive thought, which is nec­es­sary to be edu­cated. That is why the dems wanted the 18-year old vot­ing act: the younger, the more one can be molded to lib­er­al­ism, or any “ism” for that matter.

    Reply
  8. osama says:
    December 14, 2007 at 10:27 am

    ‘Because we are deal­ing with an enemy that is by and large igno­rant, prim­i­tive and super­sti­tious a sud­den death by flash fry would have a sig­nif­i­cant effect.’
    that is so true.
    remem­ber towers?

    Reply
  9. Larry says:
    December 14, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    What if, what if, what if? The US would never us this if not already at war as the con­gress wouldn’t let them period. It is like the nuke, who many have been used since 1945?

    Reply
  10. Larry says:
    December 14, 2007 at 12:44 pm

    What if, what if, what if? The US would never us this if not already at war as the con­gress wouldn’t let them period. It is like the nuke, who many have been used since 1945?

    Reply
  11. Bill says:
    December 14, 2007 at 7:27 pm

    It will never be deployed. The lawyers run­ning the Army set up the rules of engage­ment; you must stop them and ask them to sur­ren­der, if they don’t, you hit them with a marsh­mel­low and detain them in our local Holiday Inn.

    Reply
  12. Dennis says:
    December 15, 2007 at 1:26 am

    Let’s give the tech­nol­ogy to the Japanese. They always fig­ure out how to build things smaller, quickly. Then take the minia­ture ver­sion and mount them on remote con­trol planes. Fly about 50,000 of them through the moun­tains of Afghanistan and elim­i­nate any­thing that doesn’t belong there. Snap, crackle, POP!

    Reply
  13. Dennis says:
    December 15, 2007 at 1:27 am

    Let’s give the tech­nol­ogy to the Japanese. They always fig­ure out how to build things smaller, quickly. Then take the minia­ture ver­sion and mount them on remote con­trol planes. Fly about 50,000 of them through the moun­tains of Afghanistan and elim­i­nate any­thing that doesn’t belong there. Snap, crackle, POP!

    Reply
  14. Sgawn Earnest says:
    December 15, 2007 at 8:12 am

    I just want to see a large a space­ship called enter­prise, lol. What are we going to do when the enemy shots one down and acquires the tech­nol­ogy? We need more tech­nol­ogy war machines like this, but tech­nol­ogy and econ­omy plays hand and hand so we have to sit on the more amaz­ing stuff we have.
    If we had a real world war againthe gov­ern­ment would release the higher tech­nolo­gies they have been sit­ting on for over 40 years, would be nice.
    Heart of War
    Shawn Earnest
    Sun Tzu.

    Reply
  15. Vulcan_Bomber says:
    December 16, 2007 at 10:28 pm

    I won­der if it is any­thing like the 400 Terra Joule (400,000,000,000,000 Joules (Watts / sec­ond) chem­i­cal laser that I attended the course for back in 1977 — this had to use a ‘pre-cursor’ laser to part the air mol­e­cules so that the main laser didn’t turn the air to plasma try­ing to fight it’s way through.

    Reply
  16. Elen Prague says:
    December 17, 2007 at 7:35 am

    I just thing that this is a fan­tasy of offi­cials. If not, it is far more worse — what would hap­pen to the rest of weapons, If the US Army con­verts to laser? I tell you what. They will dis­trib­ute them for afford­able prices to Muslim and African coun­tries, so they could carry on their ‘mon­key tribes’ wars.

    Reply
  17. Paul says:
    December 18, 2007 at 10:57 am

    They had laser can­nons in air­planes, jeeps and ships for over thirty years. Reagan gave the tech­nol­ogy to the reds when he announced his so-called “star wars” pro­gram to pre­vent a first strike by them. I have no doubt that our “gov­ern­ment by crooks” will use the tech­nol­ogy for “assas­si­na­tions from space” IE “spon­ta­neous combustion’s” to con­trol the masses. Our secret laser mis­sile shield has been oper­a­tional for years.
    It is being made pub­lic so they can start sell­ing these sys­tems, more than likely to the Arabs. Pretty soon Mohammad will be the only one with enough money to buy them.

    Reply
  18. Paul says:
    December 18, 2007 at 11:13 am

    Some of these sys­tems are capa­ble of hun­dereds of pulses a sec­ond. I read a report in the sev­en­ties where a mil­i­tary test only knocked out 4 tar­gets in a sec­ond. They were try­ing for a lot more. It is more than likely that the mil­i­tary has a secret orbit­ing laser and smart bomb can­nons on a plat­form in space, opper­a­tional for years. .

    Reply
  19. SBD says:
    December 24, 2007 at 12:23 pm

    “Monkey Tribe” Wars? what an igno­rant twit Elen Prague is.…

    Reply
  20. WITBOER says:
    January 7, 2008 at 5:23 am

    the amer­i­cans are mas­ters when it comes to build­ing all types of ter­ri­ble weapons that they can use to steal the wealth of other coun­tries in the name of demoncracy.then they tell the inno­cent SHEEP of the world, that they pro­tect and advance demoncracy.the amer­i­cans and the brits are the lakeys of the money power the HOGGENHEIMERS.they gave all of africa demon­cracy now the mon­key tribes are destroy­ing them­selves. the most lethal weapon of mass destrion and suf­fer­ing ‚is demon­cracy they will think up all shit to blind the SHEEP of the world„ to pre­vent them from see­ing WHAT’S REALY GOING ON!!!!

    Reply
  21. JON says:
    April 6, 2008 at 7:06 am

    I can’t believe they finally got it to work. This is cool.
    The tech­nol­ogy is so intense… pretty much impos­si­ble for the freaks to steal it.

    Reply
  22. Steven says:
    July 3, 2008 at 7:11 am

    OR we could spend the money on inter­na­tional events, edu­ca­tion upgrades to under­stand eachother and lets have peace instead??
    I own 2 rifles but use them for sport. I don’t believe in war.

    Reply
  23. Julie Mueller says:
    May 23, 2009 at 9:29 am

    They don’t have to think of what to tell the sheep
    they just mind con­trol them. They don’t have to work that hard.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Popular Posts
    Recent Comments
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
      "One exam­ple is the replace­ment...
      Valcan
    • What Does this Handle Do?
      Wonder how much that cost?!?!?!!? haha
      Hunter
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Good Evening Folks, I like it, dt 2.0 ALLONS, Byron Skinner
      Byron Skinner
    • The Sunday Paper
      Here is some actual Defenese Tech: TYPE: US Army M4 Horse Gas Mask ALIASES: n/a...
      b
    • Osprey Deployment Update
      Firing 105mm’s out of an aicraft is nothing very new. I know...
      Jones
    • It Was Dragon Skin All Along
      atacms, There is a huge difference between the blast and...
      TB
    • It Was Dragon Skin All Along
      It seems as though the Pentagon has changed its front man,...
      Zandor
    • It Was Dragon Skin All Along
      I still can’t believe how butt-ugly the new uniforms are....
      d-fens
    • JSF Hits Money Wall
      Ei! Como vai você? espero que bien! Eu encontrei seu...
      http://pt.ogigames.com
    • It Was Dragon Skin All Along
      Atacms, I think the grenade test you talk about was more a...
      Brian
    Recent Articles
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Data Centers Unprepared For A Cyber Attack
    • While Obama ‘Consults’
    • Don’t be Too Quick to Dis the Contractors
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • Land Warrior Going to Special Forces
    • UK Gives Eyes To FIST
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage