<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: FYI: USAF F-22 FOC</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-201438</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 06:51:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-201438</guid> <description>Once the Russian Sukhoi PAK-TA becomes operational, the US will be forced to either re-open the F-22 Raptor production line or begin a F-22 replacement program because 187 will simply be not enough and there&#039;s no possible way that any of the UAVs on design or prototype stage can match the performance of a F-22 because there are some cost associated in building a Mach 2+ aircraft and whether it&#039;s manned or not will not change the price very much. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once the Russian Sukhoi PAK-TA becomes operational, the US will be forced to either re-open the F-22 Raptor production line or begin a F-22 replacement program because 187 will simply be not enough and there’s no possible way that any of the UAVs on design or prototype stage can match the performance of a F-22 because there are some cost associated in building a Mach 2+ aircraft and whether it’s manned or not will not change the price very much.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: @T40DAN</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-191601</link> <dc:creator>@T40DAN</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-191601</guid> <description>The F-22 is also my favorite. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The F-22 is also my favorite.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Walter S</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-35904</link> <dc:creator>Walter S</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:05:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-35904</guid> <description>I love the F-22 its the only thing i want to fly. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the F-22 its the only thing i want to fly.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TrustButVerify</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-171588</link> <dc:creator>TrustButVerify</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:55:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-171588</guid> <description>I&#039;m surprised, this Raptor article has been up for an entire day without someone making snarky comments about the international dateline. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m surprised, this Raptor article has been up for an entire day without someone making snarky comments about the international dateline.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: phekal</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-35902</link> <dc:creator>phekal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:45:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-35902</guid> <description>im a regular reader here and a warcraft player... and damn...i cant get away from their spam no matter where i go...its everywhere </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im a regular reader here and a warcraft player…<br /> and damn…i cant get away from their spam no matter where i go…its everywhere</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Blake</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-171587</link> <dc:creator>Blake</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 17:03:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-171587</guid> <description>I would say this site is not anti-china.  A better description would be that it&#039;s readers strongly point out that China is in no way &quot;our pal&quot;.  If  China is actively modernizing its military at the expense of American Tax Payers, American Corporations and American consumer through many channels not limited to technology and intellectual property theft for the intended purpose to kill American service people, while at the same time using this money to support organizations and governments that are actively pursuing our demise, well then I guess your right. We are kinda rough on them, just a little. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say this site is not anti-china.  A better description would be that it’s readers strongly point out that China is in no way “our pal”.  If  China is actively modernizing its military at the expense of American Tax Payers, American Corporations and American consumer through many channels not limited to technology and intellectual property theft for the intended purpose to kill American service people, while at the same time using this money to support organizations and governments that are actively pursuing our demise, well then I guess your right.<br /> We are kinda rough on them, just a little.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: C</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-171586</link> <dc:creator>C</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:07:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-171586</guid> <description>i find it extremely hilarious that even though there is a substantial anti-china rhetoric on this site, chinese spam seems to be infiltrating without much issue </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i find it extremely hilarious that even though there is a substantial anti-china rhetoric on this site, chinese spam seems to be infiltrating without much issue</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Charley</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-35899</link> <dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:26:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-35899</guid> <description>who the frik let a Warcraft player on here? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who the frik let a Warcraft player on here?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: dan</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2007/12/12/fyi-usaf-f-22-foc/#comment-35898</link> <dc:creator>dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2708#comment-35898</guid> <description>i found this site from blogs of war.  i come over here and the raptor is the first thing i see.  i&#039;m going to really enjoy this blog! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i found this site from blogs of war.  i come over here and the raptor is the first thing i see.  i’m going to really enjoy this blog!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 732/736 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 01:42:58 -->
