DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Polmar's Perspective » Russian Fleet Sails Into Med

Russian Fleet Sails Into Med

In his latest move to demonstrate that Russia is again a world power, President Vladimir Putin has sent an 11-ship carrier task force to the Mediterranean Sea. Speaking at a Kremlin conference also attended by Putin, Minister of Defense Anatoly Serdyukov said that the sole Russian aircraft carrier, two large anti-submarine ships, and a guided missile cruiser, along with replenishment ships from Russia’s Northern and Black Sea Fleets as well as 47 naval aircraft would be part of the task force that will operate in the “Med” beginning in mid-December. It is not clear if submarines are included in the force.
russian-fleet.jpg

Earlier this year, Admiral Vladimir Masorin, the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy, called for restoring a permanent Russian presence in the Mediterranean. He declared that the Mediterranean was a strategically important zone for the Black Sea Fleet. The Soviet Navy had maintained an almost continuous naval presence in the Mediterranean from the mid-1960s until the demise of the Soviet Union in late 1991. Since then Russian naval operations there have been intermittent and brief.

The current deployment of the nation’s only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Kuznetsov, has been delayed for two or three years because of the poor condition of the ship and the lack of qualified carrier pilots. Reportedly, there are only about a dozen Su-33 shipboard multi-role aircraft available for the Kuznetsov. The Su-33 — with the NATO code-name Flanker-D — is a carrier-based version of the highly capable, Mach 2-plus Su-27 land-based aircraft.

The remainder of the ship’s air group probably consists of a few Su-25 (NATO Frogfoot) attack-trainer aircraft and helicopters. The latter include Ka-27 Helix anti-submarine and rescue variants, and Ka-31 Helix helicopters configured for the Airborne Early Warning (AEW) role. The Ka-31 has large air-search radar suspended under its fuselage which folds upward for landing and takeoff. (This is a variation of the British Sea King AEW-configured helicopter concept.)

A Russian spokesman has said that the Kuznetsov task group would conduct three tactical exercises with real and simulated launches of sea– and air-launched missiles, and would make nearly a dozen port calls. The ports will include Syria’s Tartus, once a major port-of-call of the Soviet Mediterranean squadron. There is still a Russian technical facility there.

The Kuznetsov deployment, believed to be only the second such sortie into the Mediterranean since the end of the USSR, is important for Russia as President Putin attempts to demonstrate that the country is again a major military power. At this time his only other means of demonstrating the prowess of the Russian armed forces is by the long-range flights of bomber aircraft over international waters, which periodically approach Western countries.

– Norman Polmar

Share |

December 13th, 2007 | Polmar's Perspective | 271090 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/12/13/russian-fleet-sails-into-med/Russian+Fleet+Sails+Into+Med2007-12-13+17%3A53%3A27Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « JSF Hoping for a Brighter New Year | Inside a Cyber Attack » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Judge Dredd says:
    December 13, 2007 at 1:12 pm

    2 fleet tugs are also part of this deployment.

    Reply
  2. eric says:
    December 13, 2007 at 2:58 pm

    The Russian gnp is a lot less than countries like Spain, Italy and Canada. About one third of that of the UK and 6 % of that of the US.“Putin attempts to demonstrate that the country is again a major military power”. Thanks for the demo Putin, but you should be shot for waisting money that could have been used for the future of your people.

    Reply
  3. Andrew says:
    December 13, 2007 at 3:41 pm

    Eric,
    I don’t want to get into a GNP vs. GDP debate. Even considering the differences between GNP and GDP your figures seem a little off. The Russian GDP is approximately 90.5% British GDP and approximately 13% of the American GDP according to the the CIA World Factbook.
    Russian GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $1.746 trillion (2006 est.)
    Spainish GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $1.109 trillion (2006 est.)
    Italian GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $1.756 trillion (2006 est.)
    Canadian GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $1.181 trillion (2006 est.)
    British GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $1.928 trillion (2006 est.)
    American GDP (purchasing power parity):
    $13.06 trillion (2006 est.)
    Source: https://​www​.cia​.gov/​l​i​b​r​a​r​y​/​p​u​b​l​i​c​a​t​i​o​n​s​/​t​h​e​-​w​o​r​l​d​-​f​a​c​t​b​o​o​k​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml

    Reply
  4. Mackie says:
    December 13, 2007 at 4:20 pm

    In the last years, Russia starts some Programms to modernize their military. But they only want flex their muscles.
    We in Europe only laugh about the Russian Propaganda.
    The US missle defense system in Poland makes Russia angry.^^
    Greetings from Germany
    or
    Auf Wiedersehen^^

    Reply
  5. Wild Bill says:
    December 13, 2007 at 4:21 pm

    Are the two tugs to help tow broken Russian ships back to port?

    Reply
  6. James says:
    December 13, 2007 at 10:51 pm

    lol hate to say it but from what ive heard about the condition of the Admiral Flota Sovetskogo Soyuza Kuznetsov(omfg i hope thats shorter in russian)they may need a few more tugs
    anyone know if russian warships have as little armor as our ships do now
    lol wish we had the iowas to send to the med should bring back the battleships and not the retardedly expensive ddx how many carriers could have been built for the money weve spent on that god awful project

    Reply
  7. Rix says:
    December 13, 2007 at 11:27 pm

    I fear the Russian bear’s nukes. That is, I fear the nuke reactors in their carriers and cruisers due to the pathetic maintenence record of the Russian navy.

    Reply
  8. George Skinner says:
    December 14, 2007 at 1:46 am

    I think it’s nice that the US Navy finally has somebody to play with again. Supporting ground operations is important work and all, but nothing warms a naval officer’s heart like sinking somebody else’s ships.

    Reply
  9. eric says:
    December 14, 2007 at 3:47 am

    Hi Andrew,
    True I’ve seen a lot very different figures, but this one (IMF 2005) was shared by (with?) more sources. If your figures are more accurate, does it mean Italy could be the next Big thing? Flexing their Italian muscles? Russia is no longer a superpower Putin, get over it!

    Reply
  10. Crass says:
    December 14, 2007 at 4:59 am

    Good for the Russians. They really do need to bring up their morale.

    Reply
  11. Frank Williams says:
    December 15, 2007 at 1:15 pm

    This deployment is basically a win-win for the Russian Navy. If it goes off well, there’s a boost in National pride and a corresponding willingness to spend some rubles on Fleet requirements. Perhaps some degree of reconstitution of the 5thESK. If the delployment turns into a fiasco, then the Navy can, rightly so, point to paltry funding as the primary cause of National embarassment, and Putin will be responsive. LRA will point to their recent successful flights as evidence of what a little funding can do for a mission.
    Either way, the West has all but lost continuity on Russian maritime interests. Somone better dust of the rolodex and see if there are any reservists out there willing to share sea stories from back in the day when going toe to toe with the Bear was a norm. Good fodder for an new Clancy novel, huh?

    Reply
  12. sinan says:
    December 16, 2007 at 9:33 am

    I am happy that Russia, after nearly two decades of stagnation, is starting to move up again. Not with the idealistic motives of the USSR but at least as a force to potentially balance the Americans. The world needs this. We all know that we non-americans, are capable of doing better than the americans in science, engineering, sports, arts and literature, we are not meant to be dominated by the tasteless and 100% commercially based American culture.

    Reply
  13. Wild Bill says:
    December 16, 2007 at 6:28 pm

    Sinan,
    Let us see if the Russians can “balance” us at the next great natural disaster. It was the American peolple and their great US Navy that came to the aid those were hit the hardest by the tusnami. Then the US Army, Air Force and Marines came to the aid of Pakistan recently when they experinced a huge earthquake. Yeah I am waitng for that “balance”.
    All that help and aid ws made possible by tasteless 100% commercially based Americans. And don’t you forget it.

    Reply
  14. wpnexp says:
    December 21, 2007 at 4:17 pm

    Well said Wild Bill.
    Sinan, the world does product good scientists and people of all sorts, then they come to America, where there talents can be used. Don’t hold your breath waiting for Russia to balance our Navy. They have a long way to go, and we are hardly trying. Of course, the last time the Russian fleet ventured into Med, they needed US warships to supply them with water. I remember something about a big submarine exploding under water recently also.
    What country are you from? Does your tasteful country have a Navy? When was the last time they built a 100,000 ton aircraft carrier. I doubt you would even mention your country from embarrassment.
    You can even ask the North Koreans if they appreciate our Navy. Seems some pirates took over one of there ships. Our Navy had to rescue them. Since the N. Korean navy is unable to travel more than a few miles from port, there ship was helpless without us. Sounds a lot like jealousy to me.

    Reply
  15. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 21, 2009 at 9:45 am

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  16. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 21, 2009 at 9:52 am

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  17. ed hardy says:
    September 14, 2009 at 3:14 am

    It was a very nice idea! Just wanna say thank you for the information you have shared. Just continue writing this kind of post. I will be your loyal reader. Thanks again.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      of course it will be a...
      Roy M Brown
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Lets see what happens when the Russian T-50 or what ever...
      Pete
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The AF could put T-6s in service for A-stan in a...
      lcdr_kent
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It is necessary to limit excess profits of military...
      Dmitry
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Oh my god, scrap the entire thing already!
      MPY
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      The PT boats were specifically designed for littoral...
      PolicyWonk
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Blah, Blah, Blah They've been talking about this...
      Tim
    • Life Can Go On — JLTV Protest Denied
      are any of yall even in the army or marines...
      ARMY SPC
    • Russia’s Sneaky Missile: Details Here
      russia hydrofoil-carrier :...
      hydrofoil
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      No problem if US with Obama...
      landouzy
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage