DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » The Sunday Paper » The Sunday Paper (Sports section)

The Sunday Paper (Sports section)

The Juice Rocket.jpg

This week’s big news centered around the “Mitchell Report” and its allegations that steriod use around Major League Baseball involved many more players than just Barry Bonds. Superstars like Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte were dragged into the juice blender. Worse still, perhaps, is the notion that adult leadership knew about the use of performance improving substances but turned a blind eye. Here’s an excerpt from today’s Washington Post:

Perhaps what is most chilling in the Mitchell report is the casual business-as-usual comments of general managers and scouts as they discuss what they assume is the steroid use of players such as Lo Duca and Gagne. No problem, just factor it into the price of the deal, like a bad knee or a problem hitting the change-up. The report also gives us new characters to disrespect, such as Giants General Manager Brian Sabean who, when his trainer brings him information about drug use, says, in effect, you take care of it. Or Cards Manager Tony La Russa, who once told “60 Minutes” how much he knew about steroids in his Oakland clubhouse long ago yet, when quizzed for details by Mitchell, suddenly says he “exaggerated” for TV.

So as the media (including DT, obviously) hits “puree” we’re all obliged to figure out how we feel about the issue. So your Sunday Paper question is this: Is this scandal much ado about nothing or a sad commentary on the pressure to win in professional sports or something else altogether?

– Ward

Share |

December 16th, 2007 | The Sunday Paper | 271338 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/12/16/the-sunday-paper-sports-section-3/The+Sunday+Paper+%28Sports+section%292007-12-16+14%3A34%3A04paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Libyan-French Connection Rekindling? | Drone AEW Not Too Far Off » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bristow says:
    December 16, 2007 at 10:34 am

    I enjoy your blog very much. It has been very good for reading interesting and timely information about military developments.
    The sports (entertainment) pieces have left me cold, however. They seem very odd and incongruous to the DefenseTech blog, and have sapped some of my desire to read DefenseTech. Maybe opening another blog called SportsNews would be a better venue for this type of entertainment news … We appreciate and thank you for the hard effort required to provide the Defense info that you do, and respect the fact that you can include anything that you want in your blog.

    Reply
  2. Ward says:
    December 16, 2007 at 11:06 am

    Don’t mean to leave anyone cold. The Sunday Paper is the one time each week we might color outside of the lines. As Joe Satriani says after an extended jam, “Thanks for indulging us.”

    Reply
  3. KragCulloden says:
    December 16, 2007 at 3:24 pm

    Sad little men playing a childrens’ game and calling it a career. Cheating at it too. Who cares? Most major sports in the US is nothing but a jobs program for felons anyway.
    Just put the sports news with the daily comics, as its all just a bad, tired joke.

    Reply
  4. Byron Skinner says:
    December 16, 2007 at 3:34 pm

    Good Afternoon Folks,
    I’m not sure what the big deal is here. There is no purity in sports, over the years the equipment, playing fields, rules etc. have evolved. Drugs are just another factor of the game. I mean really is there a difference between a player taking a pain killer shot in order to stay in the game or Barry Bonds taking what ever to bulk up and hit home runs, get real there isn’t.
    Drugs are technology and should be treated as such. The people making decisions to use or not in professional are adults. The know that the window for making money is only a few years at best and that making money in entering the fans who want more and more for there ticket price. If that shortens one life that like a steel worker or roofer who take risks daily to earn their bread should be feft to the individual.
    Let Drugs evolve with the game.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  5. Roy Smith says:
    December 16, 2007 at 3:37 pm

    When I was in the military during the 80s & they started the drug screening against pot & cocaine,I felt that the one drug that the military could care less about was anabolic steroids.Why? Because the use of anabolic steroids could be used in the creation of “super soldiers.” I wonder if this attitude might still be in existence today in our armed forces.I’m not at all advocating the use of steroids for our military,but in war the object is not a gold metal like in the Olympics.Its not in a “sports” trophy.The goal is to win & since most of our troops seem to be viewed as disposable & throwaways,the temptation to use steroids to create “super soldiers” must be great.The health risks would be off set by the fact that they’d probably be killed in combat anyway.

    Reply
  6. Solomon says:
    December 16, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    This is much ado about nothing…they keep moving the bar on what performing enhancing drugs are…
    The saddest thing about this is that its the Mothers of America club and the castrated males that luv them that are constantly lowering the bar on what a performance enhancing drug is. Show me one more picture of Barry Bonds now compared to what he looked like coming out of Triple A and I’ll raise you 100 recruits after bootcamp. They all look like they were injected after lights out but they weren’t they just put the time in. And I’ll say this without hesitation, the biggest segment of the population using anabolic steroids are the Military, State and local Police departments and lastly Fire departments. So Congress GIVE ME A BREAK and stop reaching for the low hanging fruit. Tackle the tuff stuff and leave this minor issue alone.

    Reply
  7. El gusanito says:
    December 16, 2007 at 6:27 pm

    I’ll go along with the rest of the “let technology reign” posters. It’s going to happen anyway, the players know what they’re doing, so let’s stop obsessing about it.

    Reply
  8. ELP says:
    December 16, 2007 at 7:51 pm

    In the long term it is a good thing. Baseball moved on after other scandals too. It will be a good object lesson.

    Reply
  9. Byron Skinner says:
    December 16, 2007 at 11:36 pm

    Good Evening Folks,
    On the issue of the military using drugs, to enhance the performance of soldiers, they have been at it for a long time. A hundred years ago more men died of desease then in battle, in Iran and Afghanistan soldiers dieing from desease is very rare. The reason is of course everybody gets vacinated against nearly anything that can get them. This like it or not is biologicaly modifing soldiers to enhance their performance.
    How can American soldiers can fight all night then function during the day with only a few hour sleep or pilots fly long missions, amphetamines.
    The future for the American service personal is more biological modifications. Currently the military can give the BRAC 1 & 2 tests to see what emotional problems a soldiers is biologicaly prone to. Those at risk can be sourted from those not at are at lower risks for certain missions. In the future genetic modifications to construct the “Super Soldier” who has more strenght, improved eyesight, better hearing, run faster and consumes fewer calories and water are not out of the question.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  10. FOARP says:
    December 17, 2007 at 9:19 am

    On the issue of wheher military/law enforcement should pump ‘roids to build muscle mass: what about the effect that all those hormones etc. are going to have on their health (not to mention their masculinity)?
    Plus — is it really that much of an advantage in modern warfare to be built like a brick s**thouse? Surely anyone who decides to put on that kind on muscle mass is going to just make a bigger target out of himself and a great drain on food/water supplies.

    Reply
  11. Steven says:
    December 17, 2007 at 12:10 pm

    @ Solomon: How many of those 100 recruits you’ll raise me bulked up like that in their late 30’s? Barry Bonds went from being normal to hulk in just about one off-season. I myself gained 15 pounds in basic training. But then again, I was SEVENTEEN YEARS OLD. Also, how many adults do you know whose head, wrist, hands and feet had a growth spurt in their late thirties?
    As for military, police and firefighters being the biggest steroid users — do you have any facts to back up this incredible claim? Maybe I’ve had a sheltered life in my 20 years of service, but I have not seen the kind of steroid/hgh use that would even come close to being described as pervasive. Then again, I’ve mostly been around knuckle-dragger types, so what do I know. Do some do it? Absolutely. I’ve worked with guys that have. They were definitely the exception.

    Reply
  12. Byron Skinner says:
    December 17, 2007 at 2:19 pm

    Good Morning Folks,
    All good argurments about bulking up but they don’t wash. Tha military spends and lot of time and money on PT and physical conditioning as it is now. If you made soldiers bodies more efficient as to the use of water, calories and oxygen you would have stronger soldiers who requird less time engaged in PT and they would have more time to train on weapons and their MOS’s.
    The concern about what this does to one body is really not a concern of the military. Most careers are over by the soldiers mid fourites and serious health problems, if they happen usually don’t really set in for ten years. Besides when you join the military you are going into the most hazardious job in the world.
    For the military if they had a study source of smaller, stronger members armored vehicles, aircraft and other equipment could be designed smaller.
    One interesting project that DARPA is working on and was made public a couple of years ago is creating a soldier who could stay underwater without an air supply for 15–20 min. This is no pie in the sky program but one being actively worked on now.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  13. cronous cro says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:23 am

    Afterward my several schoolmates forced me to play; I did not want to sweep their interests, and to play, from the very beginning they have given me 100,000,000 cronous cro.

    Reply
  14. cheap kamas says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:26 am

    So I take my all cheap kamas to help you, because it is unworthy much money.

    Reply
  15. Requiem gold says:
    August 5, 2008 at 12:27 am

    My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

    Reply
  16. cheap Lord of the Rings Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    If your attitude to me can be slightly good, I will be having much happiness, although I only was 89 levels and I only have some cheap Lord of the Rings Gold.

    Reply
  17. cheap Habbo Coins says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    As your apprentice, I always waste your cheap Habbo Coins. But I really not to think that you left so suddenly, then am duty-bound not to turn back!

    Reply
  18. Hellgate London gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:24 pm

    Because each people is not so rich, you have Hellgate London gold and you might save much time that practice the level.

    Reply
  19. cheap lastchaos gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:32 pm

    The husband, for you, I will want to adjust myself diligently and I will make cheap lastchaos gold.

    Reply
  20. cheap mabinogi says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:36 pm

    I was excited, originally it was such simple, and it also needs a little cheap mabinogi.

    Reply
  21. imvu money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 9:37 pm

    But you every time always were left after you took my imvu money. You will also be not giving me a smile.

    Reply
  22. cheap Lunia gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    My friends also told me that there is a web site http://​www​.hameim​.com supplies cheap Lunia gold. If one day you want to buy Lunia gold you can go to the above company.

    Reply
  23. Sword of the New World Vis says:
    August 16, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    Now I have more Sword of the New World Vis in this game. Of course the Sword of the New World Gold is gained by I upgrade and kill the monsters. If you kill a big monsters you can get more Sword of the New World money.

    Reply
  24. health products says:
    April 20, 2009 at 1:49 pm

    Quite a week, indeed. — health products

    Reply
  25. health products says:
    April 20, 2009 at 1:54 pm

    Quite a week, indeed. — health products

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      'Nor really stealthy'? LOL! – Only in...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      That is not a 120mm mortar please check it out. My was 11C...
      Jim
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      With the exception of his Boeing Tanker blindspot ;-) ...
      SMSgt Mac
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      i heard recently that rules of engagement in...
      mad mike
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Would I be correct in assuming that means a noise or...
      bduff509
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: But their advantage is reduced by daytime...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And to get back on topic…Don’t think...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      RE: "shown your contempt for every service...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      135,000,000 $ each for a fighter aircraft that's...
      Joseph
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage