http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:45:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-171857 cloutstore.com Sun, 25 Oct 2009 15:48:50 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-171857 Read Reviews and Find Best Technology Gadgets From amazon http://www.cloutstore.com Read Reviews and Find Best Technology Gadgets From amazon http://www.cloutstore.com

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-171854 www.shoespaty.com Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:03:30 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-171854 cheap-prada-shoes mens-prada-shoes comfortable cheap fashion prada-shoes cheap comfortable cheap-prada-shoes
mens-prada-shoes
comfortable cheap fashion
prada-shoes cheap
comfortable

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-171819 Brad B. Mon, 17 Dec 2007 20:04:05 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-171819 With no crew, who is going to destroy all of the equipment on board if one of these is about to go belly up over hostile territory? Maybe with no crew, it could be told to just nose dive into the ground? With no crew, who is going to destroy all of the equipment on board if one of these is about to go belly up over hostile territory? Maybe with no crew, it could be told to just nose dive into the ground?

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-36071 NTV Mon, 17 Dec 2007 19:59:21 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-36071 Japan has a 767 based AWACS and Australia has a 737 based one that beat out an Airbus model. If the Boeing wins the KC-X contract it would seem that the AWAC/TACAMO/RIVET JOINT/COMAND SENT/ airframes would migrate over to the 767 body. IF Airbus wins then I would think the future airframes would be a big question. Maybe some of those jobs could be handeled by a 737? Japan has a 767 based AWACS and Australia has a 737 based one that beat out an Airbus model. If the Boeing wins the KC-X contract it would seem that the AWAC/TACAMO/RIVET JOINT/COMAND SENT/ airframes would migrate over to the 767 body. IF Airbus wins then I would think the future airframes would be a big question. Maybe some of those jobs could be handeled by a 737?

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-36070 EMastro Mon, 17 Dec 2007 15:55:42 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-36070 Are there any long term studies to replace AWACS? I know they were upgraded recently- but I imagine a massive improvement can be made- both in capability and operating costs (two engine Gulfstream versus 4 engine 707: pilot with datalink versus 20 or so techs on the E-3) Are there any long term studies to replace AWACS? I know they were upgraded recently– but I imagine a massive improvement can be made– both in capability and operating costs (two engine Gulfstream versus 4 engine 707: pilot with datalink versus 20 or so techs on the E-3)

]]> http://defensetech.org/2007/12/17/drone-aew-not-too-far-off/comment-page-1/#comment-36069 Noclegi Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:37:52 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2714#comment-36069 Thanks for very interesting article. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. So please keep up the great work. Greetings. Thanks for very interesting article. I really enjoyed reading all of your posts. So please keep up the great work. Greetings.

]]>