DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Could Israel Deploy C-RAM for Border?

Could Israel Deploy C-RAM for Border?

C-ram.jpg

Our Defense Tech contributor who keeps a close eye on the Middle East, Aharon Etengoff of Weaponsurvey, reports:

The Israeli Defense Ministry holds high-level talks with the Pentagon on purchasing the Phalanx B, or C-RAM, a rapid-fire cannon to protect strategic installations against Palestinian projectiles. It should be noted that the C-RAM (manufactured by Raytheon) is fully operational and available for immediate deployment.

The C-RAM is a radar-controlled gun adapted from a US Navy original, which can fire 4,500 rounds a minute and destroy incoming mortar bombs before impact. According to Jane’s Defense Weekly, the Land-based Phalanx Weapon System (LPWS) “is a reconfigured variant of the widely sold Phalanx 20 mm shipborne close-in weapon system [that] combines a 20 mm M61A1 Gatling gun with a Ku-band search-and-track radar featuring closed loop spotting.”

Sean Osborne, Associate Director of NEIN Military Affairs & NEIN Blog:

“The C-RAM is deployed at US FOBs (Forward Operating Bases) all over Iraq — not just in the so-called Green Zone. C-RAMs success rate in shooting mortar rounds and other incoming indirect ordnance out of the sky is better than 85% according to data I’ve received from those who’ve installed these systems in Iraq. C-RAM counter-fires which miss the incoming target do not simply fall to ground — each 20mm round is fused to self-destruct if contact is not made with the target.

The IDF Research & Development Directorate’s (MAFAT) refusal to acquire and deploy the C-RAM system in defense of Sderot or other Israeli towns is several echelons below unfortunate, and appears to be couched in political considerations which have nothing to do with the suffering of the citizens of Sderot. The non-acquisition is sending a message of abandonment to the women and children of Sderot who are under severe traumatic stress and psychological pressures not unlike that of soldiers in combat.“

Uzi Rubin:

“This is a very effective system for protecting strategic installations…It covers a radius of up to a kilometer and would be ideal for protecting key installations like power plants and IDF bases.”

IDF Chief Intelligence Officer Brig.-Gen. Yuval Halamish:

“This [Palestinian rockets] is a close-to-home threat that has an impact on the home front as well as the national morale…Our ability to deal with this threat is difficult until being almost impossible in certain places.“

– Aharon Etengoff

Share |

December 21st, 2007 | Around the Globe | 272526 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/12/21/could-israel-deploy-c-ram-for-border/Could+Israel+Deploy+C-RAM+for+Border%3F2007-12-21+13%3A02%3A29Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Navy-Coast Guard Ship Merger Proposed | Russia Completes Hybrid Submarine » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nick Smith, La Grande, OR says:
    December 21, 2007 at 9:45 am

    Unfortunate that USAID does not have a “Rent to Own” Program.

    Reply
  2. Matt Roth says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:22 am

    What happens to the projectiles that DON’T hit the incoming target? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well populated…
    Anyone know?

    Reply
  3. Matt Roth says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:23 am

    What happens to the projectiles that DON’T hit the incoming target? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well populated…
    Anyone know?

    Reply
  4. KragCulloden says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:32 am

    @Matt Roth — read closer.

    Reply
  5. Roy Smith says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:09 am

    I read up on this & saw that the Skyguard 35mm System was also being considered for this by Israel.Would the Metal Storm System,like a 40mm with Self-Destruct Fuse 36-barrel System also work for this?

    Reply
  6. txzen says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:18 am

    I hope this math is close to correct… The C-Ram system has a radius effect of 1000 meters. Thats 2000 meters in diameter, So about 6000 feet so about 1 mile of effective defense. The Gaza strip is 25 miles long and 6 miles deep. So would about 25–30 really be all it would take to stop 85 percent of the munitions flying out of Gaza? Take into consideration some angles wouldn’t be needed as protecting desert isn’t as important as cities and you cut the number or double up in populated or sensitive areas. Sound about right or is that just overkill or overspend?

    Reply
  7. JDS says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:35 am

    I’d shut off the self destruct on the Gaza bound shells. A little incentive to stop the attacks.

    Reply
  8. TB says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:52 am

    txzen, other way around. You only need the system to protect your assets, not to create a shield around the launch site. Rockets and mortars are shot down by the system while in mid-flight or during their descent towards the target. It doesn’t matter where in Gaza the mortars are launched from as long as the target has the C-RAM nearby.

    Reply
  9. coolhand77 says:
    December 21, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    Dang, someone beat me to the idea.
    Actually it wouldn’t be practical to shut off the fuses for targeting incoming. Chances are you would be hitting it from angles other than straight on, so the rounds would be impacting blocks away from the launcher…now having a second system with the 30mm goal keeper set up to track back to the launch site and hose it…that has promise. Or better yet, artillary…
    Can you say counter battery fire?

    Reply
  10. C says:
    December 21, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    counterbattery capability would be ideal, especially with the “smart” artillery rounds available today.

    Reply
  11. James says:
    December 21, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    hell yea always wondered why they wernt foaming at the mouth for this system. i mean its gotten good test results and review in iraq right

    Reply
  12. pedestrian says:
    December 21, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    Middle East Newsline reported years ago about the difficulties of anti-mortar radars, and low detection rate by these radars within Iraq. Integrated with C-RAM, it’s not going to be a silver bullet what the Israelis are going to want.

    Reply
  13. Sam says:
    December 21, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    If the C-RAM proves effective, Israel had better be prepared for the Palestinians to switch tactics. Homegrown Qassam missles are much preferable to suicide bombers or Katyusha rockets.

    Reply
  14. A. Nony says:
    December 21, 2007 at 8:23 pm

    What happens to the projectiles that DON’T hit the incoming target? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well populated…
    Anyone know?
    +++++++++++
    Would the jews care if uninvolved arab civilians got killed? No. They never have in the past, so no reason to see why they would start now.

    Reply
  15. Vercingetorix says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:43 pm

    Would the jews care if uninvolved arab civilians got killed? No. They never have in the past, so no reason to see why they would start now.
    Hey A.Nony, your blood libel is showing.

    Reply
  16. mattrmsf says:
    December 22, 2007 at 2:07 am

    A.Nony, the article stated that rounds which don’t impact their targets are fused to explode. Did you bother reading the article before showing your “blood libel?”

    Reply
  17. Kaltes says:
    December 22, 2007 at 3:23 am

    Metal storm sucks, and would be terrible in this role.
    Just because you can fire rounds REALLY FAST doesnt mean anything if your ammo capacity is small, which is always going to be the case with metal storm, thanks to the fact that the ammo has to be stored in barrels, so each barrel can only take a handful of shots.
    You need a lot of ammo to shoot down incoming mortars and such, and that means endurance. Maybe a metal storm would take out 1 target then be spent, and you’d have to send it back to the factory to be reloaded, what nonsense.
    Metal storm is basically an overglorified big shotgun.

    Reply
  18. pedestrian says:
    December 23, 2007 at 9:28 pm

    >A.Nony, the article stated that rounds which don’t impact their targets are fused to explode.
    What do you think will happen to the fragments of the rounds after the explosion?

    Reply
  19. stephen russell says:
    December 29, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    Need one on our US Mex border alone.
    Deter any funny narcodealings.
    Just 10 sec burst & Illegals Gone IE killed or Ran away\.
    Nice hidden or mobile Gun.
    Terror Tech use.
    Need 10 on US Mex border area.
    Camoflouged for use during day.

    Reply
  20. SoCalSooner says:
    March 7, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Use counter battery fire and get the hole enchilada.

    Reply
  21. ICE_MAN says:
    November 7, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Self-exploding rounds, the rounds are set to detonate next to the target so even though the locals might get a light shower of lead, the rounds would not continue down-range and cause carnage.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • Blog Note
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Do you know General Mattis?
      David
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      …FER CRYING OUT LOUD….JUST BRING BACK...
      Sandy
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      How does this get us closer to giant humanoid battle...
      Alex`
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      The real issue is not what type of plane but trying...
      Bill
    • Paris Hilton: Patriot
      Omg! You can find her pictures and video here...
      WebWarez
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Marine Air Light? Wait…don't they...
      LtCol Ben
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Except its really not that stealthy… The...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Is an F-22 capable of landing even on a big deck carrier,...
      joe
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      From a national security perspective we should do all we can to keep...
      mike
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Please define what is "best". Boeings plane is cheaper and...
      Curt
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage