DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Around the Globe » Could Israel Deploy C-​​RAM for Border?

Could Israel Deploy C-​​RAM for Border?

C-ram.jpg

Our Defense Tech con­trib­u­tor who keeps a close eye on the Middle East, Aharon Etengoff of Weaponsurvey, reports:

The Israeli Defense Ministry holds high-​​level talks with the Pentagon on pur­chas­ing the Phalanx B, or C-​​RAM, a rapid-​​fire can­non to pro­tect strate­gic instal­la­tions against Palestinian pro­jec­tiles. It should be noted that the C-​​RAM (man­u­fac­tured by Raytheon) is fully oper­a­tional and avail­able for imme­di­ate deployment.

The C-​​RAM is a radar-​​controlled gun adapted from a US Navy orig­i­nal, which can fire 4,500 rounds a minute and destroy incom­ing mor­tar bombs before impact. According to Jane’s Defense Weekly, the Land-​​based Phalanx Weapon System (LPWS) “is a recon­fig­ured vari­ant of the widely sold Phalanx 20 mm ship­borne close-​​in weapon sys­tem [that] com­bines a 20 mm M61A1 Gatling gun with a Ku-​​band search-​​and-​​track radar fea­tur­ing closed loop spotting.”

Sean Osborne, Associate Director of NEIN Military Affairs & NEIN Blog:

“The C-​​RAM is deployed at US FOBs (Forward Operating Bases) all over Iraq — not just in the so-​​called Green Zone. C-​​RAMs suc­cess rate in shoot­ing mor­tar rounds and other incom­ing indi­rect ord­nance out of the sky is bet­ter than 85% accord­ing to data I’ve received from those who’ve installed these sys­tems in Iraq. C-​​RAM counter-​​fires which miss the incom­ing tar­get do not sim­ply fall to ground — each 20mm round is fused to self-​​destruct if con­tact is not made with the target.

The IDF Research & Development Directorate’s (MAFAT) refusal to acquire and deploy the C-​​RAM sys­tem in defense of Sderot or other Israeli towns is sev­eral ech­e­lons below unfor­tu­nate, and appears to be couched in polit­i­cal con­sid­er­a­tions which have noth­ing to do with the suf­fer­ing of the cit­i­zens of Sderot. The non-​​acquisition is send­ing a mes­sage of aban­don­ment to the women and chil­dren of Sderot who are under severe trau­matic stress and psy­cho­log­i­cal pres­sures not unlike that of sol­diers in combat.“ 

Uzi Rubin:

“This is a very effec­tive sys­tem for pro­tect­ing strate­gic installations…It cov­ers a radius of up to a kilo­me­ter and would be ideal for pro­tect­ing key instal­la­tions like power plants and IDF bases.”

IDF Chief Intelligence Officer Brig.-Gen. Yuval Halamish:

“This [Palestinian rock­ets] is a close-​​to-​​home threat that has an impact on the home front as well as the national morale…Our abil­ity to deal with this threat is dif­fi­cult until being almost impos­si­ble in cer­tain places.“ 

– Aharon Etengoff

Share |

December 21st, 2007 | Around the Globe | 272526 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2007/12/21/could-israel-deploy-c-ram-for-border/Could+Israel+Deploy+C-RAM+for+Border%3F2007-12-21+13%3A02%3A29Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Navy-​​Coast Guard Ship Merger Proposed | Russia Completes Hybrid Submarine » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nick Smith, La Grande, OR says:
    December 21, 2007 at 9:45 am

    Unfortunate that USAID does not have a “Rent to Own” Program.

    Reply
  2. Matt Roth says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:22 am

    What hap­pens to the pro­jec­tiles that DON’T hit the incom­ing tar­get? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well pop­u­lated…
    Anyone know?

    Reply
  3. Matt Roth says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:23 am

    What hap­pens to the pro­jec­tiles that DON’T hit the incom­ing tar­get? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well pop­u­lated…
    Anyone know?

    Reply
  4. KragCulloden says:
    December 21, 2007 at 10:32 am

    @Matt Roth — read closer.

    Reply
  5. Roy Smith says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:09 am

    I read up on this & saw that the Skyguard 35mm System was also being con­sid­ered for this by Israel.Would the Metal Storm System,like a 40mm with Self-​​Destruct Fuse 36-​​barrel System also work for this?

    Reply
  6. txzen says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:18 am

    I hope this math is close to cor­rect… The C-​​Ram sys­tem has a radius effect of 1000 meters. Thats 2000 meters in diam­e­ter, So about 6000 feet so about 1 mile of effec­tive defense. The Gaza strip is 25 miles long and 6 miles deep. So would about 25–30 really be all it would take to stop 85 per­cent of the muni­tions fly­ing out of Gaza? Take into con­sid­er­a­tion some angles wouldn’t be needed as pro­tect­ing desert isn’t as impor­tant as cities and you cut the num­ber or dou­ble up in pop­u­lated or sen­si­tive areas. Sound about right or is that just overkill or overspend?

    Reply
  7. JDS says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:35 am

    I’d shut off the self destruct on the Gaza bound shells. A lit­tle incen­tive to stop the attacks.

    Reply
  8. TB says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:52 am

    txzen, other way around. You only need the sys­tem to pro­tect your assets, not to cre­ate a shield around the launch site. Rockets and mor­tars are shot down by the sys­tem while in mid-​​flight or dur­ing their descent towards the tar­get. It doesn’t mat­ter where in Gaza the mor­tars are launched from as long as the tar­get has the C-​​RAM nearby.

    Reply
  9. coolhand77 says:
    December 21, 2007 at 1:25 pm

    Dang, some­one beat me to the idea.
    Actually it wouldn’t be prac­ti­cal to shut off the fuses for tar­get­ing incom­ing. Chances are you would be hit­ting it from angles other than straight on, so the rounds would be impact­ing blocks away from the launcher…now hav­ing a sec­ond sys­tem with the 30mm goal keeper set up to track back to the launch site and hose it…that has promise. Or bet­ter yet, artillary…
    Can you say counter bat­tery fire?

    Reply
  10. C says:
    December 21, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    coun­ter­bat­tery capa­bil­ity would be ideal, espe­cially with the “smart” artillery rounds avail­able today.

    Reply
  11. James says:
    December 21, 2007 at 3:15 pm

    hell yea always won­dered why they wernt foam­ing at the mouth for this sys­tem. i mean its got­ten good test results and review in iraq right

    Reply
  12. pedestrian says:
    December 21, 2007 at 4:00 pm

    Middle East Newsline reported years ago about the dif­fi­cul­ties of anti-​​mortar radars, and low detec­tion rate by these radars within Iraq. Integrated with C-​​RAM, it’s not going to be a sil­ver bul­let what the Israelis are going to want.

    Reply
  13. Sam says:
    December 21, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    If the C-​​RAM proves effec­tive, Israel had bet­ter be pre­pared for the Palestinians to switch tac­tics. Homegrown Qassam missles are much prefer­able to sui­cide bombers or Katyusha rockets.

    Reply
  14. A. Nony says:
    December 21, 2007 at 8:23 pm

    What hap­pens to the pro­jec­tiles that DON’T hit the incom­ing tar­get? Israel and Gaza etc…are pretty well pop­u­lated…
    Anyone know?
    +++++++++++
    Would the jews care if unin­volved arab civil­ians got killed? No. They never have in the past, so no rea­son to see why they would start now.

    Reply
  15. Vercingetorix says:
    December 21, 2007 at 11:43 pm

    Would the jews care if unin­volved arab civil­ians got killed? No. They never have in the past, so no rea­son to see why they would start now.
    Hey A.Nony, your blood libel is showing.

    Reply
  16. mattrmsf says:
    December 22, 2007 at 2:07 am

    A.Nony, the arti­cle stated that rounds which don’t impact their tar­gets are fused to explode. Did you bother read­ing the arti­cle before show­ing your “blood libel?”

    Reply
  17. Kaltes says:
    December 22, 2007 at 3:23 am

    Metal storm sucks, and would be ter­ri­ble in this role.
    Just because you can fire rounds REALLY FAST doesnt mean any­thing if your ammo capac­ity is small, which is always going to be the case with metal storm, thanks to the fact that the ammo has to be stored in bar­rels, so each bar­rel can only take a hand­ful of shots.
    You need a lot of ammo to shoot down incom­ing mor­tars and such, and that means endurance. Maybe a metal storm would take out 1 tar­get then be spent, and you’d have to send it back to the fac­tory to be reloaded, what non­sense.
    Metal storm is basi­cally an over­glo­ri­fied big shotgun.

    Reply
  18. pedestrian says:
    December 23, 2007 at 9:28 pm

    >A.Nony, the arti­cle stated that rounds which don’t impact their tar­gets are fused to explode.
    What do you think will hap­pen to the frag­ments of the rounds after the explosion?

    Reply
  19. stephen russell says:
    December 29, 2007 at 6:35 pm

    Need one on our US Mex bor­der alone.
    Deter any funny nar­codeal­ings.
    Just 10 sec burst & Illegals Gone IE killed or Ran away\.
    Nice hid­den or mobile Gun.
    Terror Tech use.
    Need 10 on US Mex bor­der area.
    Camoflouged for use dur­ing day.

    Reply
  20. SoCalSooner says:
    March 7, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Use counter bat­tery fire and get the hole enchilada.

    Reply
  21. ICE_MAN says:
    November 7, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    Self-​​exploding rounds, the rounds are set to det­o­nate next to the tar­get so even though the locals might get a light shower of lead, the rounds would not con­tinue down-​​range and cause carnage.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage