About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for January, 2008

Navy Railgun Goes For Record (Updated)

Wednesday, January 30th, 2008


Update: They did it! Check the arti­cle and video here.

If you are near Dahlgren, Virginia tomor­row and you hear a big “WHOOOOOMP”, no need for con­cern. The Navy is just fir­ing its elec­tro­mag­netic rail­gun at a power level untested before:

U.S. Navy Set to Break Electromagnetic Railgun Record
The Office of Naval Research will test fire an elec­tro­mag­netic rail­gun (EMRG) at the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, Va. on Jan. 31, 2008, between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. EST. The gun will be fired at over 10 mega­joules of energy a power level never before achieved by an EMRG.

This weapon is pretty cool — we’ve talked about it before on Defense Tech here and here (among other arti­cles) and with a great arti­cle here at Military​.com. Using a pulsed power sys­tem uti­liz­ing elec­tro­mag­netic energy — the same energy that pow­ers many roller­coast­ers these days and will power the launch­ing sys­tems of future car­ri­ers (at some point) — it will be a pow­er­ful sys­tem, with a pro­jected range of 250 nau­ti­cal miles and a speed at launch of mach 7.5 and an impact speed of mach 5 with no explo­sives or pow­der or pro­pel­lant used in the sys­tem. The Navy con­tin­ues to increase its capa­bil­ity to “reach out and touch” some­one from its domain in the lit­torals. Imagine what this thing would do to a pirate boat off HOA?
Ouch.
–Pinch Paisley

New Stryker Sucking

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

FL_mgs_012908.jpg

BAQUBAH, Iraq — The newest ver­sion of the Armys pop­u­lar Stryker com­bat vehi­cle is gar­ner­ing poor reviews here from Soldiers assigned to man its tank-​​like hull.

The General Dynamics Corp.-built Mobile Gun System looks like a typ­i­cal eight-​​wheeled Stryker, except for a mas­sive 105mm gun mounted on its roof. The gun fires three dif­fer­ent types of pro­jec­tiles, includ­ing explo­sive rounds, tank-​​busters and a “can­is­ter round” that ejects hun­dreds of steel pel­lets sim­i­lar to a shot­gun shell.

But while the sys­tem looks good on paper and the Armys all for it, Soldiers with the 4th Battalion of the 9th Infantry Regiment — one of the first units to receive the new vehi­cle for their deploy­ment to Iraq — dont have a lot of good things to say about it.

“I wish [the enemy] would just blow mine up so I could be done with it,” said Spec. Kyle Handrahan, 22, of Anaheim, Calif., a tanker assigned to Alpha Company, 4/​9s MGS platoon.

“Its a piece,” another MGS pla­toon mem­ber chimed in. “Nothing works on it.”

Read the rest here.

Christian

First MRAP Fatality

Monday, January 28th, 2008

FL_mrap_012208.jpg
Hey, folks, greet­ings from O’Hare air­port. My con­nect­ing flight to Kansas City is delayed a cou­ple of hours (I dis­cov­ered after run­ning from one ter­mi­nal to the other like OJ back in the old Hertz com­mer­cials), so I have a lit­tle time on my hands here.

Here’s an item Military​.com reported on a few days back that I thought would be wor­thy of a dis­cus­sion among the DT clan. Our man Eric Daniel relays that it’s impor­tant to note that the Soldier killed was seated in the most vul­ner­a­ble posi­tion in the MRAP and that an IED that size would’ve taken out every­one in a Humvee. Also, it’s unclear if the gun­ner died from the blast or the MRAP’s sub­se­quent roll. But, still, this casu­alty is a sur­prise since most con­sid­ered the MRAP to be IED-​​proof altogether.

Here’s a bit of the report:

A Soldier killed over the week­end south of Baghdad was the first American casu­alty in a road­side bomb attack on a newly intro­duced, heav­ily armored vehi­cle, a mil­i­tary spokes­woman said Jan. 22.

The V-​​shaped hull of the huge MRAP — Mine-​​Resistant, Ambush-​​Protected — truck is designed to deflect blasts from road­side bombs, a weapon that has killed more American Soldiers than any other tac­tic used by Sunni insur­gents and mili­tia fight­ers in Iraq.

The Soldier who died Jan. 19 was the gun­ner who sits atop the MRAP vehi­cle. Three crew mem­bers tucked inside the cabin were wounded. The vehi­cle rolled over after the blast and it was not clear how the gun­ner died — from wounds in the explo­sion or in the sub­se­quent roll-​​over.

Maj. Alayne P. Conway, deputy spokes­woman for the 3rd Infantry Division, said the attack and the death were under investigation.

There now are more than 1,500 of the costly vehi­cles in ser­vice in Iraq and the Pentagon is work­ing to get at least 12,000 more, using $21 bil­lion pro­vided by Congress. MRAPs cost between $500,000 and $1 mil­lion, depend­ing on their size and how they are equipped.

The cycle of war continues …

– Ward

The Sniper Dance

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

FL_mp_012508.jpg

Here’s an early look at Military.com’s lede story tomor­row morn­ing (bar­ring break­ing news, of course). Christian con­tin­ues his report­ing from Iraq, this time focus­ing on the enemy sniper threat in Tikrit:

They call it the sniper dance.

Youre out in the open. There are houses all around you — cover and con­ceal­ment for enemy sharp­shoot­ers to plink off a U.S. Soldier.

Stand there, wait a few sec­onds, shift to the right — then do it all over again.

We dont want a sniper to get a good shot off on us, one Soldier says. So we keep mov­ing all the time.

In this home region for the deposed Iraqi dic­ta­tor Saddam Hussein, the secu­rity that has only recently descended here is ten­u­ous at best. With the Iraqi army largely pushed out of the sur­round­ing towns and vil­lages to help U.S. forces root out the most tena­cious hold­outs in other areas, the focus here is on build­ing a durable police force that can secure the pop­u­la­tion and at the same time keep the insur­gency from spark­ing up again.

American Military Police units and the civil­ian advi­sors that help them rec­og­nize the man­date is a tall order. With cor­rup­tion a part of every­day life here and a polic­ing phi­los­o­phy mak­ing the tran­si­tion from being an instru­ment of oppres­sion to a force that serves the com­mu­nity, putting the local police on the right track takes con­stant inter­ac­tion and a deep reser­voir of patience.

Our motto is no free chicken, said Staff Sgt. Joe Cline, a pla­toon sergeant with the 56th Military Police Company, who added their main mis­sion is to cut the Iraqi polices depen­dence on the U.S. military.

Each of the pla­toons with the 56th Military Police Company — which is made of Army reservists from a Arizona, California and Nevada — is divided into smaller Police Transition Teams, called PiTTs. Paired with civil­ian con­trac­tors drawn from police depart­ments from across the coun­try, the PiTT teams patrol the towns out­side the sprawl­ing Camp Speicher base just to the north of Tikrit, vis­it­ing police sta­tions, meet­ing with their lead­ers and assess­ing what needs they have to keep cops on the beat.

At the Tikrit patrol sta­tion, MPs wanted to see if a shoot­ing inci­dent that occurred the pre­vi­ous day showed up on the sta­tions log books. After a furi­ous series of mis­trans­la­tions and fum­bling through piles of papers, the Iraqi police­man said he didnt have the shoot­ing — which occurred just a block away — on his books.

That was reported at another sta­tion, the Iraqi police­man told the MPs.

Frustrated, the MPs looked at each other with dismay.

Read the rest in the head­lines at Military​.com, first thing Monday morning.

And I’m headed for Kansas University tomor­row to be part of a mil­blog­ging panel with Jack Holt from DoD’s New Media Directorate and Castle of Argghhh’s John Donovan. I’ll be post­ing when I can from the road. If any DT read­ers are in or around Jayhawk Country please stop by the cam­pus and say hello after the panel on Tuesday night.

(Photo by Christian Lowe)

– Ward

The Sunday Paper (Chicken Little Edition)

Sunday, January 27th, 2008

Chicken-Little.jpg
It’s offi­cially time to freak out … or is it? The AP reports the following:

A large U.S. spy satel­lite has lost power and could hit the Earth in late February or early March, gov­ern­ment offi­cials said Saturday.

The satel­lite, which no longer can be con­trolled, could con­tain haz­ardous mate­ri­als, and it is unknown where on the planet it might come down, they said. The offi­cials spoke on con­di­tion of anonymity because the infor­ma­tion is clas­si­fied as secret. It was not clear how long ago the satel­lite lost power, or under what circumstances.

“Appropriate gov­ern­ment agen­cies are mon­i­tor­ing the sit­u­a­tion,” said Gordon Johndroe, a spokesman for the National Security Council, when asked about the sit­u­a­tion after it was dis­closed by other offi­cials. “Numerous satel­lites over the years have come out of orbit and fallen harm­lessly. We are look­ing at poten­tial options to mit­i­gate any pos­si­ble dam­age this satel­lite may cause.”

He would not com­ment on whether it is pos­si­ble for the satel­lite to per­haps be shot down by a mis­sile. He said it would be inap­pro­pri­ate to dis­cuss any specifics at this time.

A senior gov­ern­ment offi­cial said that law­mak­ers and other nations are being kept apprised of the situation.

The space­craft con­tains hydrazine — which is rocket fuel — accord­ing to a gov­ern­ment offi­cial who was not autho­rized to speak pub­licly but spoke on con­di­tion of anonymity. Hydrazine, a col­or­less liq­uid with an ammonia-​​like odor, is a toxic chem­i­cal and can cause harm to any­one who con­tacts it.

Such an uncon­trolled re-​​entry could risk expo­sure of U.S. secrets, said John Pike, a defense and intel­li­gence expert. Spy satel­lites typ­i­cally are dis­posed of through a con­trolled re-​​entry into the ocean so that no one else can access the space­craft, he said.

Pike also said it’s not likely the threat from the satel­lite could be elim­i­nated by shoot­ing it down with a mis­sile, because that would cre­ate debris that would then re-​​enter the atmos­phere and burn up or hit the ground.

Pike, direc­tor of the defense research group GlobalSecurity​.org, esti­mated that the space­craft weighs about 20,000 pounds and is the size of a small bus. He said the satel­lite would cre­ate 10 times less debris than the Columbia space shut­tle crash in 2003. Satellites have nat­ural decay peri­ods, and it’s pos­si­ble this one died as long as a year ago and is just now get­ting ready to re-​​enter the atmos­phere, he said.

Jeffrey Richelson, a senior fel­low with the National Security Archive, said the space­craft likely is a photo recon­nais­sance satel­lite. Such eyes in the sky are used to gather visual infor­ma­tion from space about adver­sar­ial gov­ern­ments and ter­ror groups, includ­ing con­struc­tion at sus­pected nuclear sites or mil­i­tant train­ing camps. The satel­lites also can be used to sur­vey dam­age from hur­ri­canes, fires and other nat­ural disasters.

The largest uncon­trolled re-​​entry by a NASA space­craft was Skylab, the 78-​​ton aban­doned space sta­tion that fell from orbit in 1979. Its debris dropped harm­lessly into the Indian Ocean and across a remote sec­tion of west­ern Australia.

In 2000, NASA engi­neers suc­cess­fully directed a safe de-​​orbit of the 17-​​ton Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, using rock­ets aboard the satel­lite to bring it down in a remote part of the Pacific Ocean.

In 2002, offi­cials believe debris from a 7,000-pound sci­ence satel­lite smacked into the Earth’s atmos­phere and rained down over the Persian Gulf, a few thou­sand miles from where they first pre­dicted it would plummet. 

Here’s how MSNBC is cov­er­ing our immi­nent demise:

So what say we? Lottery time? Will it make it through the atmos­phere intact? If so, when and where will it hit?

Big prizes await! You must be alive to win, how­ever, so if you are hit and killed by the satel­lite you are inel­i­gi­ble for your prize. On the plus side, we will def­i­nitely honor you with a DT post.

And watch out for that hydrazine creamy fill­ing, too.

(Chicken Little appears cour­tesy of Disney.)

Ward

al Qaeda’s Top Cyber Terrorist

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Younis Tsouli.jpg

The Internet has long been a crit­i­cal domain of ter­ror­ist and extrem­ist groups around the world. Perhaps the most noto­ri­ous cyber ter­ror­ist was an indi­vid­ual know as “Irhabi 007.” He was later iden­ti­fied as Younes Tsouli is a 23-​​year-​​old son of a Moroccan diplomat.

For nearly two years, Younes Tsouli was sought by global intel­li­gence sources. The online ter­ror­ist com­mu­ni­ties Tsouli cre­ated trained ter­ror­ists who con­gre­gated in those cyber com­mu­ni­ties. The train­ing included hack­ing, pro­gram­ming, exe­cut­ing online attacks and mas­ter­ing dig­i­tal and media design. He sud­denly went under­ground in September 2007 after Scotland Yard arrested a 23-​​year-​​old West Londoner believed to be tied to Younis Tsouli.

Scotland Yard believed that Tsouli par­tic­i­pated in an alleged bomb plot they were inves­ti­gat­ing. British counter-​​terror agents and inves­ti­ga­tors stormed Tsouli’s top floor flat and dis­cov­ered stolen credit card infor­ma­tion which is believed to have funded much of his activ­i­ties. They also found that the cards were used to pay American Internet providers on whose servers he had posted jihadi propaganda.

In addi­tion, Tsouli Irhabi used count­less other web sites as free hosts for mate­r­ial that the jihadists needed to upload and share. The true extent of his mate­r­ial dis­tri­b­u­tion net­work is still not known. He is cred­ited with the large scale dis­tri­b­u­tion of a film pro­duced by Zarqawi called “All Is for Allah’s Religion.”

His arrest struck a sig­nif­i­cant blow to al Qaedas cyber ter­ror­ism weaponry.

With cyber weaponry only requir­ing widely avail­able knowl­edge and skills and the only equip­ment required a com­puter that can be pur­chased any­where, cyber weapons pro­lif­er­a­tion can­not be con­trolled. These facts cou­pled with the recent cyber attacks on util­i­ties that black­out cities and regions show this is a seri­ous threat.
Spy-​​Ops pro­file on Irhabi 007:

Younes Tsouli is a 23-​​year-​​old male and stud­ied com­put­ers at a London col­lege. Tsouli is a com­puter nerd from Shepherd’s Bush, West London. He is the son of a Moroccan diplo­mat and arrived in London in 2001. He was recruited by al Qaeda in 2002 when he began his cyber cam­paign of pro­pa­ganda and ter­ror­ist train­ing. is online leg­end (cover name) was “Irhabi 007″ derived from com­bin­ing the James Bond ref­er­ence with the Arabic word for ter­ror­ist. He pub­lished a man­ual on com­puter hack­ing on one of the many al Qaeda’s web sites. He joined the closed mes­sage forum known as Muntada al-​​Ansar al-​​Islami that pro­vided mil­i­tary instruc­tions, pro­pa­ganda and recruitment.

He became the web mas­ter for al-​​Ansat, a forum used by 4,500 extrem­ists to com­mu­ni­cate. He rose to become the top cyber jihadi expert and directed all Internet-​​related activ­i­ties. He also posted a 20 page web­site hack­ing man­ual called “Seminar on Hacking Websites,” on the Ekhlas forum.

Tsouli used stolen credit card infor­ma­tion on 37,000 cards to pay American Internet providers on whose servers he had posted jihadi pro­pa­ganda. He was appre­hended as he was in the process of build­ing and deploy­ing a new web­site called YouBombIt.

Captured in his London top floor flat was a PowerPoint-​​style pre­sen­ta­tion on how to build a car bomb. His cap­ture led to the arrest of sev­eral Islamic ter­ror­ists around the world, includ­ing 17 men in Canada and two in the US.

His hack­ing skills are cat­e­go­rized as mod­er­ate to advanced com­pared to todays stan­dards. In December of 2007 his sen­tence was increased from 10 years to six­teen years in prison.

– Kevin Coleman

Air-​​to-​​Air Ain’t Dead (Video Fix)

Friday, January 25th, 2008

We’ve had some pretty good dis­cus­sions lately around the F-​​15 ground­ing issue and the num­ber of F-​​22s the Air Force needs. Some sug­gested that there is no air-​​to-​​air threat fac­ing the U.S., there­fore we need to focus on other, more vital, plat­forms.
Well, get ready for the week­end with a gan­der at this video:

That bad boy could mess a Hornet or Eagle up in a knife fight, I’m afraid.

(Gouge: NP)

– Ward

Lockheed, Boeing to Team Up on Bomber

Thursday, January 24th, 2008

Our man Bob Cox at the Fort-​​Worth Star Telegram passes the following:

Lockheed Martin and Boeing will announce Friday that they will team up to “per­form stud­ies and sys­tem devel­op­ment” for a next gen­er­a­tion long range bomber the Air Force wants to develop.

Bob also asks a fair question:

If the No. 1 and No. 2 defense con­trac­tors are team­ing up, who is going to be the com­pe­ti­tion? Northrop Grumman perhaps?

– Ward

Black Program Exposed?

Thursday, January 24th, 2008

CPEG.jpg

Back in 1985, dur­ing my first air­wing detach­ment to Fallon, Nevada, my squadron par­tic­i­pated in an exer­cise called “Constant Peg.” C-​​Peg was super clas­si­fied and involved American fighter crews fly­ing 1v1 ACM mis­sion against Soviet fight­ers like MiG-​​23s and MiG-​​21s. These fight­ers were based at Tonopah. (My pilot and I went up against a MiG-​​23.)

Now dur­ing the briefs before the exer­cise the guys fly­ing the MiGs were very hyper about us NOT land­ing at Tonopah … ever, ever, ever … even though the exer­cise took place just north of the field. “If you have an emer­gency go back to Fallon,” was the refrain, which struck us as a bit exces­sive, even con­sid­er­ing the fact these enemy air­planes were based there.

The squadron oper­a­tions offi­cer, who went on to be a cor­po­rate test pilot, said some­thing that made sense years later: “They’re not wor­ried about the MiGs. There’s some­thing else going on there.” When we pushed him for details, he said he didn’t know. He just had a hunch that C-​​Peg was a cover for another program.

Well, we now know that other pro­gram was the F-​​117 devel­op­men­tal test pro­gram. And after see­ing first­hand the V-22’s DT pro­gram for three years, I can tell you that it’s a mir­a­cle that nobody found out about the Stealth jet dur­ing that time. Incredible sto­ries have emerged about long com­mutes and clue­less fam­i­lies and night ops. They did have a cou­ple of close calls. There were reports of UFOs by local civil­ians that were quashed by Air Force officials.

So, again, have the folks in Texas seen some­thing the Air Force doesn’t want them to see?

Check out these eye­wit­nesses in this news report. They seem con­vinced that they saw some­thing weird:

– Ward

Plot Thickens in Texas UFO Crisis

Thursday, January 24th, 2008

tonopa.jpg
Tonopah redux?

As we reported here a few days back folks in Texas are see­ing UFOs and now the Air Force appears to be chang­ing it’s story a bit. The plot thick­ens. This from a report run­ning in Military.com’s head­lines right now:

Fighter jets were train­ing nearby the night dozens of Stephenville-​​area res­i­dents reported see­ing a UFO this month, Air Force Reserve offi­cials said Jan. 23, back­track­ing on ear­lier statements.

The announce­ment did lit­tle to sat­isfy res­i­dents of Texas dairy coun­try who swear that what they saw in the sky Jan. 8 was no air­plane. Some said it even bol­stered their claims, because sev­eral peo­ple reported see­ing at least two fighter jets chas­ing an object.

“This sup­ports our story that there was UFO activ­ity in that area,” said Kenneth Cherry, the Texas direc­tor of the Mutual UFO Network, which took more than 50 reports from locals at a meet­ing last week­end. “I find it curi­ous that it took them two weeks to ‘fess up. I think they’re feel­ing the heat from the publicity.”

Officials at the Joint Reserve Base Naval Air Station in Fort Worth ini­tially said none of their planes had been in the area, but on Wednesday they said 10 F-​​16s were there that day. The offi­cials said they were mis­taken and wanted to set the record straight “in the inter­est of pub­lic awareness.”

Public aware­ness, indeed. Something is rot­ten in Denmark … and Texas. Remember, this is the same orga­ni­za­tion that devel­oped the F-​​117 in the Nevada desert for years and years with­out any­body know­ing about it. Have the cit­i­zens of Texas been given an unin­ten­tional glimpse of a black program?

Read the entire report here.

(Image: Secret base at Tonopah, Nevada where the F-​​117 was developed.)

– Ward