DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Fast Movers » Breaking News — Super Hornets Collide over Gulf (Updated)

Breaking News — Super Hornets Collide over Gulf (Updated)

super-hornets.jpg
(Updated at 1338 Pacific) AP reports in more detail on the Super Hornet midair:

Two U.S. Navy fighter jets crashed Monday in the Persian Gulf, but the three pilots on board ejected safely out of the aircraft, the Navy said.

The three pilots were brought back after the crash to the USS Harry Truman, the aircraft carrier they were operating from, and are in good condition, the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet said in a written statement.

Teams from the Truman rescued the pilots who ejected after their F/A-18 Super Hornets crashed during operations in the Gulf, the statement said.

The Navy said the cause of the accident, which occurred around 1800GMT, was under investigation.

The planes were operating in the “vicinity of the Truman Carrier” at the time of the crash, said Lt. John Gay from 5th Fleet’s headquarters in Bahrain.

“They were on a routine mission in support of maritime security in the region,” said Gay, adding that Navy pilots conduct these types of flights several times a day.

Navy Vice Adm. Kevin J. Cosgriff, who is the commander of the 5th Fleet, said it was a mid-air collision. Information released by the 5th Fleet said the two aircraft were providing “close air support from Iraq when they crashed.”

One of the F-18 jets that crashed held two pilots, the other held just one. The aircraft are from Carrier Air Wing Three, which is deployed to the Persian Gulf with the Truman Carrier Strike Group.

Gay said Monday’s crash was not connected to an incident early Sunday where Iranian boats harassed and provoked three U.S. Navy ships in the strategic Straight of Hormuz. The three Navy boats involved in the incident were the cruiser USS Port Royal, destroyer USS Hopper and frigate USS Ingraham, officials said.

“There is no connection with the incident,” Gay said.

Updates will continue to be posted as we get them.

– Ward

Share |

January 7th, 2008 | Fast Movers | 377610 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/01/07/breaking-news-super-hornets-collide-over-gulf-updated/Breaking+News+-+Super+Hornets+Collide+over+Gulf+%28Updated%292008-01-07+19%3A04%3A33paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Bigger Bucks for Feds in 2008 | Video: “Send more robots!” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. DC2 Jennings says:
    January 7, 2008 at 4:40 pm

    Sounds like it might have been an air to air refueling incident to me.
    DC2

    Reply
  2. doc75 says:
    January 7, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    I thought the same thing, DC2.

    Reply
  3. Solomon says:
    January 7, 2008 at 6:11 pm

    not refueling, I bet it was just real “close” formation flying…can’t wait to get the incident report…

    Reply
  4. EM2(SS) says:
    January 7, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    I’m just glad the crew made it out and were recovered OK. And like DC2 and Doc, I figured it was a refuelling incident.
    This stuff’s dangerous all the time, even if you don’t have speedboats playing games with the surface ships.

    Reply
  5. ELP says:
    January 7, 2008 at 8:12 pm

    Cost of doing business in carrier aviation. Crews are safe which is great.

    Reply
  6. Mike says:
    January 7, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    Those jets should have been busy bombing them speed boats harassing our ships and maybe they wouldn’t have crashed into each other. Considering they were saying that they were going to blow up the ships, dropping unknown objects in the ships path, and so on, I bet it took every nerve of the Captain not to fire on them.
    Glad the pilots are safe and it will be interesting to see exactly what happened.

    Reply
  7. Lakelad says:
    January 7, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Visuals might have been tricky. 9PM local with no moon.

    Reply
  8. Nadnerbus says:
    January 8, 2008 at 1:46 am

    Whatever the cause, it is great to see the crews made it out in one piece. I’d rather pay for a new jet than a lost life or three. Equipment is expendable, people aren’t, even if they mess up. Like the previous poster said, its the cost of business in carrier aviation, and I’m just really happy that that cost didn’t involve the lives of any of our men and women.

    Reply
  9. Solomon says:
    January 8, 2008 at 4:53 pm

    DC2,
    Hey you may be right but I do remember reading that the Navy was doing experiments on how best to use that fancy new AESA of theirs. Stuff like using F models to illuminate and direct the E models so they’d remain undetected and all that jazz…so I wouldn’t be too surprised to see mixed aircraft operating together. But on this subject I’m pure spectator and have no experience so once again you all may be right and I might be the idiot in the corner.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Committing resources, doesn't mean sending troops into...
      Thunder350
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Lockheed and Boeing: working both ends of a bent over taxpayer....
      John
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Actual costs of the F-22 are now down to about $110M per...
      Dan
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We need to put an end to the defense contractor corporate...
      John
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      I beg to differ about mortar being more...
      Gunnery Instructor
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      The cost would likely (eventually) be much less...
      Gunnery Instr
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Ridiculous. Thanks goodness that F22 line hasn't...
      Robert
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      …or the Army and Marines could just develop...
      czech_6
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      "The 'Army' (as euphemism for...
      czech_6
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I'm going to stick with my previous statements...
      Vertigo
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage