http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:05:24 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-173055 2moons gold Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:57:18 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-173055 Therefore, when I practiced this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold. Therefore, when I practiced this role, I have also spent much energy and the 2moons gold.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-173054 Requiem gold Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:56:00 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-173054 My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him. My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-67656 dfghjk Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:05:13 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-67656 FX FX FX ? ? FX FX FX ? FX ? ? FX FX ? FX ? FX
FX
FX ?
?
FX
FX
FX ?
FX ?
?
FX
FX ?
FX ?

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-67655 yosailor Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:31:14 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-67655 no wonder they didn't want a physical confrontation with us. no wonder they didn’t want a physical confrontation with us.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-67654 yosailor Wed, 16 Apr 2008 19:25:42 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-67654 no wonder they didn't want a physical contact with us. no wonder they didn’t want a physical contact with us.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-173052 Goodwin Thu, 31 Jan 2008 01:52:00 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-173052 Submarine designs like this are the norm. Pipes, wires, motors etc. are exposed in case damage occurs . Nobody wants to take apart a million panels and screws underwater in a cramped sub during battle, just to repair a pipe. Submarine designs like this are the norm. Pipes, wires, motors etc. are exposed in case damage occurs . Nobody wants to take apart a million panels and screws underwater in a cramped sub during battle, just to repair a pipe.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-173051 Ex-submariner Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:59:02 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-173051 By the way, other than the automated tube doors, that torpedo room looks very similar to other submarines. They all have exposed pipes, valves, electrical, and ductwork. By the way, other than the automated tube doors, that torpedo room looks very similar to other submarines. They all have exposed pipes, valves, electrical, and ductwork.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-67650 Ex-submariner Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:56:24 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-67650 One of the early Russian SSN designs had a primary coolant loop routed through crew's mess ! You couldn't pay me to go to sea on a Russian sub. One of the early Russian SSN designs had a primary coolant loop routed through crew’s mess !
You couldn’t pay me to go to sea on a Russian sub.

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-173050 Jack D. Ripper Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:18:04 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-173050 A simple Google search on 'russian submarine disaster' has the Russians with 'four lost submarines with many others damaged to reactor accidents, fires, and weapons explosions.' A simple Google search on ‘russian submarine disaster’ has the Russians with ‘four lost submarines with many others damaged to reactor accidents, fires, and weapons explosions.’

]]> http://defensetech.org/2008/01/11/inside-a-russian-sub/#comment-67647 ron pond Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:48:32 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3786#comment-67647 I don't know anything about the naves of the worlds. I served in the Army. I do know that the Military tryed to say that the russians were lacking in expertise.that their maintance was poor due to languise problems. exected because of the 9 or 10 languise in that country. that they did not care about their troops.that they were uneducated.so on and so forth. but aparently thats not so. so don't be fooled by apperance's look at the t34 tank of ww2. the allies sherman tank could not stand up to the germans panzers nose to nose.but the t-34 did . don't get me wrong I'm solid american born and bred.there is nothing better then the good old U.S.A.. but don't turn your back on someone you don't know.never under estamate the other guy. I don’t know anything about the naves of the worlds. I served in the Army. I do know that the Military tryed to say that the russians were lacking in expertise.that their maintance was poor due to languise problems. exected because of the 9 or 10 languise in that country. that they did not care about their troops.that they were uneducated.so on and so forth. but aparently thats not so. so don’t be fooled by apperance’s look at the t34 tank of ww2. the allies sherman tank could not stand up to the germans panzers nose to nose.but the t-34 did . don’t get me wrong I’m solid american born and bred.there is nothing better then the good old U.S.A.. but don’t turn your back on someone you don’t know.never under estamate the other guy.

]]>