DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Star Wars » Plot Thickens in Texas UFO Crisis

Plot Thickens in Texas UFO Crisis

tonopa.jpg
Tonopah redux?

As we reported here a few days back folks in Texas are see­ing UFOs and now the Air Force appears to be chang­ing it’s story a bit. The plot thick­ens. This from a report run­ning in Military.com’s head­lines right now:

Fighter jets were train­ing nearby the night dozens of Stephenville-​​area res­i­dents reported see­ing a UFO this month, Air Force Reserve offi­cials said Jan. 23, back­track­ing on ear­lier statements.

The announce­ment did lit­tle to sat­isfy res­i­dents of Texas dairy coun­try who swear that what they saw in the sky Jan. 8 was no air­plane. Some said it even bol­stered their claims, because sev­eral peo­ple reported see­ing at least two fighter jets chas­ing an object.

“This sup­ports our story that there was UFO activ­ity in that area,” said Kenneth Cherry, the Texas direc­tor of the Mutual UFO Network, which took more than 50 reports from locals at a meet­ing last week­end. “I find it curi­ous that it took them two weeks to ‘fess up. I think they’re feel­ing the heat from the publicity.”

Officials at the Joint Reserve Base Naval Air Station in Fort Worth ini­tially said none of their planes had been in the area, but on Wednesday they said 10 F-​​16s were there that day. The offi­cials said they were mis­taken and wanted to set the record straight “in the inter­est of pub­lic awareness.”

Public aware­ness, indeed. Something is rot­ten in Denmark … and Texas. Remember, this is the same orga­ni­za­tion that devel­oped the F-​​117 in the Nevada desert for years and years with­out any­body know­ing about it. Have the cit­i­zens of Texas been given an unin­ten­tional glimpse of a black program?

Read the entire report here.

(Image: Secret base at Tonopah, Nevada where the F-​​117 was developed.)

– Ward

Share |

January 24th, 2008 | Star Wars | 380553 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/01/24/plot-thickens-in-texas-ufo-crisis/Plot+Thickens+in+Texas+UFO+Crisis2008-01-24+13%3A40%3A54paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Tomb of the Well Known Dictator | Black Program Exposed? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. minturn says:
    January 24, 2008 at 10:27 am

    Why would you be upset at the Air Force for keep­ing a lid on its secret pro­grams. I’m sat­is­fied with the knowl­edge that there are some­things the pub­lic doesn’t need to know.

    Reply
  2. Oogie Pringle says:
    January 24, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Yes this is the same group that devel­oped the F-​​117. That also gave us our HUGE leap in stealth tech­nol­ogy. They should con­tinue to develop tech­nolo­gies with­out the pub­lic know­ing about every­thing they are developing.

    Reply
  3. Solomon says:
    January 24, 2008 at 10:44 am

    OOGIE!
    I’ll never under­stand those who believe that the pub­lic should be kept in the dark regard­ing weapons pro­grams. Do you really believe that the USSR had no idea about our stealth pro­grams in gen­eral or the F-​​117 in par­tic­u­lar? Back in the 80’s the CIA put out a beau­ti­ful hand­book not­ing alot of Soviet air­craft that were I’m sure clas­si­fied by them. When it comes to oper­a­tives or oper­a­tions yeah clas­sify them but on pro­grams, let the sun in and get some nat­ural cleans­ing on our pro­cure­ment programs.

    Reply
  4. john lennon says:
    January 24, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    ther is no such things as ufos its all a bit 2 drunk com­ing home from the pub after a hard week at the office your mind is play­ing tricks on you
    u strange people

    Reply
  5. goatrat says:
    January 24, 2008 at 12:39 pm

    the idea that we could have some kind of new tech­nol­ogy in the works is kind of exciting

    Reply
  6. RPB says:
    January 24, 2008 at 1:14 pm

    Why is it that when­ever some­thing like this hap­pens the sto­ries are changed mul­ti­ple times? I don’t care whether there is a con­spir­acy to cover up aliens or if there are secret weapons pro­grams. The cause of these sight­ings should be viewed as largely irrel­e­vant. What is of greater inter­est is the inabil­ity, on the part of the mil­i­tary, to effec­tively man­age these news sto­ries through their press bureaus.
    What is incred­i­bly irri­tat­ing is the fact the Air Force Press corps has proven itself (time and again) unable to cover this up/​explain this in a way that does not illicit sus­pi­cion. Changing the story mul­ti­ple times con­tributes to ridicu­lous the­o­ries and sup­posed con­spir­a­cies. Even if this was an unex­pected event, couldn’t an offi­cial just deny knowl­edge until a log­i­cal (true or false) expla­na­tion can be formed?
    This seems to be part of a larger nar­ra­tive our Armed Forces inabil­ity to prop­erly chan­nel infor­ma­tion through media out­lets. We’ve lost wars because of this bla­tantly obvi­ous short­com­ing. F****** fix this prob­lem already!!!

    Reply
  7. campbell says:
    January 24, 2008 at 1:41 pm

    now were on MY turf!
    giant UFO’s? AIRSHIPS. why keep it secret? because DARPA (and oth­ers) have been testing/​using aer­ial NUKE pow­ered (ion propul­sion) ligher-​​than-​​air craft. (doesn’t sit well polit­i­caly, to have the pop­u­lace know­ing you are fly­ing nukes over their heads)
    how do I know? because when DARPA first pro­posed “wal­rus” pro­gram; they let slip that they were intend­ing to field ion propul­sion airships.….later pub­li­ca­tions had that ini­tial word­ing excised…
    I know air­ships.
    NIDS BBD’s were correct.

    Reply
  8. Hector says:
    January 24, 2008 at 3:03 pm

    The aliens — they’re crawl­ing up my pants!

    Reply
  9. Roy Smith says:
    January 24, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    They were chas­ing the Cloverfield Monster.

    Reply
  10. Roy Smith says:
    January 24, 2008 at 4:14 pm

    Damn those giant space aliens.Where are those Scientologists & their E-​​Meters when you need them? Where’s Tom Cruise?

    Reply
  11. Baluga says:
    January 24, 2008 at 5:41 pm

    While I DO agree with the com­ment above about the PA SNAFU about this inci­dent, I also agree with sev­eral of the posters. In that the gen­eral pub­lic DOES NOT NEED, Nor HAS THE NEED to know where every nut and bolt is going. If it was a new Black Project, then fine…If it was some sort of unknown, PLEASE don’t cover it up with non-​​sense F-​​16 BS. Just about every­one under a VFR MTR KNOWS what an F-​​16 looks, let alone SOUNDS like…even at night. Remember, there was NO SOUND reported and the thing was RIGHT overhead…Just tell us it was a weather balloon…we’ll believe them.…right?

    Reply
  12. Solomon says:
    January 24, 2008 at 7:00 pm

    Baluga,
    Why shouldn’t we know about these projects? Name the nation state that is tech­no­log­i­cally advanced that doesn’t have satel­lites orbit­ing the earth gath­er­ing infor­ma­tion on what mil­i­tary secret we’re work­ing on? China has pen­e­trated our nuclear labs, the Russians had peo­ple in our FBI etc…the only peo­ple who don’t know whats going on is the American peo­ple. Sorry I just don’t believe that bury­ing our heads in the sand is a good idea.

    Reply
  13. So? says:
    January 24, 2008 at 7:39 pm

    Actually the Soviet intel­li­gence got full specs of the F-​​117 in ’85, but the mil­i­tary didn’t believe them.

    Reply
  14. RAM says:
    January 24, 2008 at 8:06 pm

    The best thing about a black pro­grams is, that when you are an ememy, you will always have to ask your­self the question,“Is it worth it to f with the USA, or will I end up being a smok­ing hole and never see it com­ing”. I say keep it on the dark side boys!

    Reply
  15. ceja says:
    January 24, 2008 at 9:12 pm

    If the Air Force blow the Lid Off this UFO story, we “Can’t Handle the Truth”

    Reply
  16. ceja says:
    January 24, 2008 at 9:13 pm

    If the Air Force blow the Lid Off this UFO story, we “Can’t Handle the Truth”

    Reply
  17. Brian says:
    January 24, 2008 at 10:10 pm

    A few com­ments:
    1) It’s hard for the Air Force’s PR guys, I’m sure. If this is a black project, then undoubt­edly some­body higher up than the PR guys issued a release say­ing that there’s noth­ing out there, no planes were fly­ing, etc. The PR guys just reported it, think­ing noth­ing about it. Stories change when General McDumbass run­ning the project doesn’t give a plau­si­ble cover story. The PR guys sure as hell don’t know what is going on. All they know is a few days later, they get told some­thing dif­fer­ent. At that point, they prob­a­bly real­ize that some­thing is up, but how do you cover up a project you don’t know about?
    2) Black projects and secrecy cer­tainly have their place. Some are polit­i­cally unten­able. If they were com­mon knowl­edge, you’d have Harry Reid or some other jack­ass demand­ing we can­cel them. “You can’t hug with nuclear arms” (actu­ally, you can, it just causes radi­a­tion burns). Some projects may require secrecy or they could lose their value totally. Remember those tests of ways to make air­craft invis­i­ble to sight? What if those were incor­po­rated into the F-​​22? Right now, our ene­mies think we’ll only attack at night. The abil­ity to make an unde­tected strike dur­ing the day would be a huge advan­tage. You lose a lot of that if every­one knows about it. Finally, I don’t think our ene­mies’ espi­onage is as good as it is made out to be. I know for a fact that cer­tain clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion was still a secret at the end of the Cold War, even on things we had expected the Russians to have fig­ured out.

    Reply
  18. Kid says:
    January 24, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    I think most of you you say the pub­lic should be informed have never been in the mil­i­tary. Sometimes a bat­tle or war can hinge on the small­est thing. Intel is very impor­tant, just ask the Japnese. Also, the you may have the infor­ma­tion but may not trust it or even under­stand it. Look at 9/​11. Why would you want to offer it up on a sil­ver platter?

    Reply
  19. dickIn says:
    January 25, 2008 at 5:48 am

    “…Some high-​​schoolers made T-​​shirts depict­ing a fly­ing saucer beam­ing up a cow with the mes­sages: “Stephenville: the new Roswell” and “They’re here for the milk!” Several stores put new mes­sages on their mar­quees, includ­ing “Aliens wel­come…“
    So, are they try­ing now to make those peo­ple look stupid…?

    Reply
  20. beuvih says:
    January 25, 2008 at 8:01 am

    Try this
    http://​www​.msnbc​.msn​.com/​i​d​/​5​0​2​5​3​88/

    Reply
  21. Jose A Romero says:
    January 25, 2008 at 9:02 am

    Say are any of those aliens run­ning for office, or do they want to run. We could use some new blood! They might have a bet­ter health plan and could fix the econ­omy, and not just hot air ballons!

    Reply
  22. Baluga says:
    January 25, 2008 at 9:57 am

    Soloman;
    While bury­ing our heads in the sand is not an option, we, as amer­i­cans, DO NOT NEED TO KNOW what black projects we are run­ning at any given time. During WWII, a VERY small bit of intel came to the allies in the form of a button…that’s right, a coat but­ton. Nothing was on the coat but­ton (Microfilm, etc), but it gave the allies needed info because the but­ton was to heavy win­ter cloth­ing for the German army. They were mak­ing a TON of the things…leading the intel bub­bas to sur­mise that a win­ter offen­sive was in the making.,..they were right!!!! Imagine if the Japaneese Navy had got­ten wind of the A-​​Bomb, How it was going to be trasported, Etc…The Pacific the­ater would’ve turned into a slug­ging match and ALOT more peo­ple would’ve died on both sides (Mil and Civ). Black projects (Which is what the A-​​Bomb WAS, just that phrase wasn’t coined yet)need to stay that way. Some designs work…some don’t…but the tech­nol­ogy gleened from them has TREMENDOUS value later down the line. Just because it dosen’t make it to the assem­bly line, DOES NOT mean we didn’t get our mon­eys worth.

    Reply
  23. Michael Jones says:
    January 25, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Where the heck is Art Bell or George Noory when you need them

    Reply
  24. Denise says:
    January 25, 2008 at 10:55 am

    Sometimes we are our own worst enemy. We demand knowl­edge about every­thing the gov­ern­ment is doing and then turn around and blame the gov­ern­ment for not doing or hav­ing what it takes to pro­tect us. It’s reporters like this one that dis­closed the loca­tion under the Greenbrier Hotel which was meant to house Congress dur­ing an attack. All the money spent and steps taken to pre­serve a line of suc­ces­sion & sense of nor­malcy dur­ing the worst of times is now an aban­doned hole in the ground. If the gov­ern­ment wants to develop somethng that will, in the end, help pro­tect the United States from harm I’m all for it and I don’t need to know the details. My hus­band is a LtCol in the Air Force and has spent time away from us deployed so he can do what he does best. Lets stay out of our mil­i­tarys way and let them do their job they’ve been hired (and cer­tainly don’t get paid enough) to do shall we?

    Reply
  25. Susan Katz Keating says:
    January 25, 2008 at 11:04 am

    FYI, a mil­i­tary source con­tacted me with an inter­st­ing expla­na­tion. Stay tuned…
    http://​susankatzkeat​ing​.blogspot​.com/​2​0​0​8​/​0​1​/​m​i​l​s​o​u​r​c​e​-​o​f​f​e​r​s​-​e​x​p​l​a​n​a​t​i​o​n​-​f​o​r​-​t​e​x​a​s​.​h​tml

    Reply
  26. Joe says:
    January 25, 2008 at 11:04 am

    Black projects exist for good reasons.

    Reply
  27. DONALD HEINKE, Sr. says:
    January 25, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Why don’t the ufo’s show up in D.C. and Langly where we need them? They seem to just go to the tourity places.
    SEMPER FI

    Reply
  28. Joe says:
    January 25, 2008 at 11:32 am

    Black projects exist for good reasons.

    Reply
  29. Nothing u need 2 know says:
    January 25, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    The gov­ern­ment is hid­ing lots of help­ful stuff from us. For all we know they may have the cure for canser.Any body who thinks that the gov­ern­ment is help­ing or pro­tect­ing us well i beg the dif­fer. And by the way Im 12 and am smart anough to knew that their can be aleins

    Reply
  30. Ben says:
    January 25, 2008 at 2:03 pm

    I’m sure its just some­thing that Lockheed is test­ing. NAS/​Carswell is directly accross from Lockheed Martin. Not to men­tion, They are pump­ing out so many JSF/​Stovls and F22s.
    And they are always on manu­veurs out here…

    Reply
  31. Alfred Garcia says:
    January 25, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Who says we are the only idiots in this uni­verse??
    Think about it! Why do you think we are now con­duct­ing a way to live on other plan­ets?
    The gov­ern­ment is not as smart as they think they are, we have already been vis­ited by aliens from other parts of the univers.

    Reply
  32. Frank Henderson says:
    January 25, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    UFO’S OVER OUR CAPITAL AND PENTAGON 1952!
    Guess what? They have flown over the Washington Capital and Pentagon. There were 3 nights of intense activ­ity over Washington, D.C. On July 19/​20, July 26/​27 and August 2/​3, the skies above the nation’s cap­i­tal were crowded with UFOs dart­ing here and there, over the White House, over the Capitol Building, over the Pentagon. There’s even a great pic­ture of “them” with the Capital build­ing. The Capital story makes this one back page news.

    Reply
  33. Lady Stealth says:
    January 25, 2008 at 7:18 pm

    I am in agree­ment with Denise, whose hus­band is a LtCol in the Air Force. We are the U.S.A’s worst enemy. The media needs to back off and show some respect, along with many of the US cit­i­zens who con­tinue to down­grade what/​who our mil­i­tary is really fight­ing for. I’m really dis­gusted with the human race in this coun­try. It’s all about “me” syn­drome. Wake up America!!!!

    Reply
  34. Mepropolus says:
    January 27, 2008 at 12:29 am

    http://​impact​.arc​.nasa​.gov/​n​e​w​s​_​d​e​t​a​i​l​.​c​f​m​?​I​D​=​165
    The above link will lead you to the con­gres­sional brief­ing about a near earth object col­li­sion approach­ing for a key­hole orbit shift pos­si­bil­ity.
    The large craft that was seen was earth arc orbital craft designed to hold a lot of select peo­ple in high orbit in case there is no solu­tion to the NEO approach. The select peo­ple is the rea­son for the denial. If you read you will get the mes­sage by read­ing between the lines.
    Not UFOs, just a way to save some of the peo­ple in case the worst is all we are left with.
    Now you have the truth. Feel any better?

    Reply
  35. Brian Colfack says:
    January 27, 2008 at 10:13 pm

    Is it just me, or weren’t all the F-16’s grounded at that time due to a struc­tral fault?

    Reply
  36. David says:
    February 11, 2008 at 5:42 pm

    The US gov­ern­ment may have it’s short­com­mings
    but being really stu­pid is not one.
    Special Opps, Black Projects, new Secret
    devices, et al: Why would our gov­ern­ment (or
    ANY gov­ern­ment) have a Super Secret devise
    and fly it directly over a city or pop­u­lated
    area? Remember the Pheonix Lights, the 1952
    UFO’s over Washington D.C., etc. etc. ad nau­seum.
    In each case HUNDREDS of peo­ple saw them. In the 1952 case fight­ers were scram­bled. Why scram­ble
    fight­ers to inter­cept one of “our” machines?
    If these objects are secret then fly them over an
    ocean, over a desert, the south pole.

    Reply
  37. Brenda says:
    April 23, 2008 at 10:59 am

    Ok here’s what I think about the whole thing. Now if there are UFO’s why can’t the United States cit­i­zens know? I under­stand that may be may­hem, but last time I knew we where pay­ing taxes, and on that they pay the mil­i­tary so wouldn’t that mean the mil­i­tary works for us in a way? They are here to pro­tect us but how can they pro­tect us if we are blinded by cur­rent events? Do we want the whole inde­pen­dence things to hap­pen? Having peo­ple run around with there heads cut off. That may hap­pen if they told us the truth but at least we would have time to come down to real­ity. And then be aware of what’s going on. We have no where to run if there are ET’s out there. So why not face facts? And if there isn’t an air­craft then why to so many clam to see one? Are you going to say that whole state is crazy? And if they are flares then why that same pat­tern, and if so then couldn’t they at least say ” the things that are in the air are not UFO’s they are flares”? the are still under opps. And if they can pre­dict that before shoot­ing of flares in advance then the peo­ple would have no fur­ther rea­son to believe that these lights are UFO’s. I don’t know but why does the gov­ern­ment want us to be blind? Shouldn’t we enter this thing with eyes wide open, they are?

    Reply
  38. mc says:
    May 11, 2008 at 1:07 am

    hav­ing looked at this sub­ject for about 40 of my 43 years, it is so obvi­ous that real UFO’s do come into earth air­space, and while I am pretty cer­tain a large part of the prob­lem is the dan­ger some do pose, as well as indif­fer­ence, this is a wordl­wide phe­nom­ena and lets seper­ate it from black projects that surely do need their secrecy..
    truth will always be the best IMHO, and since there was a Catholic tak­ing a soap­box op. on here, I’ll com­ment, what could be worse than THAT PLAGUE
    geez I hope aliems are intro­duc­ing pri­ons into our culture…humanity as it stands deserves to be devoured, and yes, that includes me.…IDIOTS

    Reply
  39. mc says:
    May 11, 2008 at 1:08 am

    hav­ing looked at this sub­ject for about 40 of my 43 years, it is so obvi­ous that real UFO’s do come into earth air­space, and while I am pretty cer­tain a large part of the prob­lem is the dan­ger some do pose, as well as indif­fer­ence, this is a wordl­wide phe­nom­ena and lets seper­ate it from black projects that surely do need their secrecy..
    truth will always be the best IMHO, and since there was a Catholic tak­ing a soap­box op. on here, I’ll com­ment, what could be worse than THAT PLAGUE
    geez I hope aliems are intro­duc­ing pri­ons into our culture…humanity as it stands deserves to be devoured, and yes, that includes me.…IDIOTS

    Reply
  40. Robert Hastings says:
    May 17, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    For the Catholic blog­ger who ear­lier posted his, ahem, inter­est­ing views on ET life forms, I sub­mit the fol­low­ing:
    Church wouldnt alien­ate ETs
    Vatican astronomer: Beings would be Gods crea­tures, too
    By Associated Press
    Wednesday, May 14, 2008
    VATICAN CITY — Believing that the uni­verse may con­tain alien life does not con­tra­dict a faith in God, the Vaticans chief astronomer said in an inter­view pub­lished yes­ter­day.
    The Rev. Jose Gabriel Funes, the Jesuit direc­tor of the Vatican Observatory, said the vast­ness of the uni­verse means it is pos­si­ble there could be other forms of life out­side Earth, even intel­li­gent ones.
    How can we rule out that life may have devel­oped else­where? Funes said. Just as we con­sider earthly crea­tures as a brother, and sis­ter, why should we not talk about an extrater­res­trial brother? It would still be part of cre­ation.
    In the inter­view by the Vatican news­pa­per LOsservatore Romano, Funes said that such a notion doesnt con­tra­dict our faith because aliens would still be Gods crea­tures.
    The inter­view, head­lined The extrater­res­trial is my brother, cov­ered a vari­ety of top­ics includ­ing the rela­tion­ship between the Roman Catholic Church and sci­ence. Funes said sci­ence does not con­tra­dict reli­gion, touch­ing on a theme of Pope Benedict XVI, who has made explor­ing the rela­tion­ship between faith and rea­son a key aspect of his papacy.
    The Bible is not a sci­ence book, Funes said, adding that he believes the Big Bang the­ory is the most rea­son­able expla­na­tion for the cre­ation of the universe.

    Reply
  41. Robert Hastings says:
    May 17, 2008 at 12:48 pm

    Let’s try that again, hope­fully with­out the cyber­space trans­for­ma­tion of apos­tro­phies and quote marks as ? and ?? respec­tively.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    For the Catholic blog­ger who ear­lier posted his, ahem, inter­est­ing views on ET life forms, I sub­mit the fol­low­ing:
    Church wouldn’t alien­ate ETs
    Vatican astronomer: Beings would be God’s crea­tures, too
    By Associated Press
    Wednesday, May 14, 2008
    VATICAN CITY — Believing that the uni­verse may con­tain alien life does not con­tra­dict a faith in God, the Vatican’s chief astronomer said in an inter­view pub­lished yes­ter­day.
    The Rev. Jose Gabriel Funes, the Jesuit direc­tor of the Vatican Observatory, said the vast­ness of the uni­verse means it is pos­si­ble there could be other forms of life out­side Earth, even intel­li­gent ones.
    “How can we rule out that life may have devel­oped else­where?” Funes said. “Just as we con­sider earthly crea­tures as ‘a brother,’ and ‘sis­ter,’ why should we not talk about an ‘extrater­res­trial brother’ It would still be part of cre­ation.“
    In the inter­view by the Vatican news­pa­per L’Osservatore Romano, Funes said that such a notion ‘doesn’t con­tra­dict our faith’ because aliens would still be God’s crea­tures.
    The inter­view, head­lined “The extrater­res­trial is my brother,” cov­ered a vari­ety of top­ics includ­ing the rela­tion­ship between the Roman Catholic Church and sci­ence. Funes said sci­ence does not con­tra­dict reli­gion, touch­ing on a theme of Pope Benedict XVI, who has made explor­ing the rela­tion­ship between faith and rea­son a key aspect of his papacy.
    The Bible “is not a sci­ence book,” Funes said, adding that he believes the Big Bang the­ory is the most ‘rea­son­able’ expla­na­tion for the cre­ation of the uni­verse.
    Posted by: Robert Hastings at May 17, 2008 12:32 PM

    Reply
  42. Neo says:
    July 21, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    Many humans, long ago, believed and INSISTED the world was flat. Understanding the world is round is many times sim­pler than grasp­ing the con­cept of extrater­res­tials that are far more advanced than us humans who have trav­elled to our planet from other plan­ets, which is like a zoo to them. The ques­tion should not be “Do they exist?” or “Are they ETs?”; the ques­tion should be at the moment when see­ing them “Are they going to hurt us?” and in the long run, “What can we do to advance our­selves to an inter-​​planetary species?” One pos­si­ble the­ory to why the Sectoids (one given name for them, asides “The Grays”) are vis­it­ing us is because they are watch­ing us to see if we are advanc­ing fast enough before our world is (self-)annihilated or if we’ll anni­hi­late our­selves due prim­i­tive self-​​conflicts between us humans. And the con­cept of aliens is far more sim­pler than the con­cept of multi-​​dimentional space-​​time, which is only 4 vec­tors out of the 11 dimen­sions out there… 8-​​o Oh, and here’s another wrench to make a com­mon human go bonkers or to stop read­ing here… As Albert Eintsein says, it’s not pos­si­ble to travel time (aka jump to the past or the future), YET it IS pos­si­ble to jump back to the past or go to the future! Both state­ments are true. Don’t believe in aliens vis­it­ing us? Then don’t even bother going into tem­po­ral sci­ence. (the sub­ject doesn’t even exist at this present time) In time, we’ll evolve as humans through bet­ter edu­ca­tion. As adults, it is dif­fi­cult to grasp far-​​reaching con­cepts that were never taught when young. It’s why we should never mock the cave-​​man, because how would it feel if the future mocks at you? It’s a sad fact that humans still are far from know­ing every­thing, but we’re evolv­ing and learn­ing. Now go grab a beer! :) (if you’re at the right age and in the right place, at the right time)

    Reply
  43. James M. Essig says:
    September 15, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    The human race is all­ready quite able to think about 11 dimen­sional space time, even the con­cept of infi­nite dimen­sion­sal space time; as in 11-​​D string the­ory and the the­ory of branes respec­tively. The con­cept of time travel is widely dis­cussed among math­e­mat­i­cal the­o­ret­i­cal physics and even the con­cept of 2 tem­po­ral dimen­sions is pro­posed by the great Stephen Hawking. Attempts to indi­rectly detect or dis­cern the nature and size of the extra-​​spatial dimen­sions will be made with the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.
    Humans are far from prim­i­tive beings. The truth pro­mul­gated by all Christian Denominations includ­ing the infal­li­ble teach­ing of the Papacy in mat­ters of faith and morals is that all humans are made in the image and like­ness of GOD and all humans share a fun­da­men­tal moral equal­ity before God. We humans all have a spir­i­tual and immor­tal soul that sur­vives bod­ily death and this soul is immea­di­ately and directly cre­ated by GOD. The human soul is accord­ingly rad­i­cally endowed with free will and is ratio­nal in nature.
    Moreover, human the­ol­ogy intel­li­ga­bly dis­cusses the exis­tence of pure spir­its known as angels. These beings are much more advanced than any bod­ily ETs because these pure spir­its known as angels do not exist in time or space, nor in any dimen­sional form of such. These beings called angels do not have bod­ies or brains nor do they need such. They are as far more advanced rel­a­tive to any ETs than these ETs are advanced rel­a­tive to wolfs or cat­tle on the farms of Earth.
    As I stated ear­lier, I do not trust ETs in gen­eral although I cer­tainly believe they exist and per­haps are vis­it­ing our planet. I think we need to pre­pare for their even­tual inter­ac­tion with our species and we need to start think­ing up weapons sys­tems and defen­sive tac­tics should the ETs prove aggres­sive.
    It is a shame that we as con­tem­pory pop-​​culture American soci­ety put more hope in the exis­tence of ETs instead of the pure spir­its called angels of which there are nine lev­els or choirs, per­haps even more, and also in faith in the inter­ces­sion of the souls of the deceased who are in Heavan, Purgatory and Limbo if Limbo exists.
    Better yet is to put ones Faith in the Saving and Unique per­son and power of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Intercession of His human mother Mary, the Queen of the Cosmos accord­ing to the Apparitions allegdedly occur­ing in the for­mer Yugoslavian town of Medjugorie. At Fatima, an appari­tion offi­cially appoved by the Catholic Church, Mary stated that she is the Queen of the Universe.
    Do ETs exist? They most cer­tainly do and I do not trust any of them. Trust has to be earned and I do not trust any one who does not respect and honor their mother, and that includes their spir­i­tual mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary. The ETs phe­nom­e­non if any­thing is lead­ing peo­ple away from Christ, the belief in the Singularly unique Queen Ship of Mary and Her as Mediatrix of all Graces, and the fun­da­men­tal dig­nity of all human life as made in the image and like­ness of God, and who has not just a phys­i­cal body and prim­i­tive parts of a brain such as the lim­bic sys­tem and hypo­thal­imus, but also a higly evolved frontal lobe, and much more, a spir­i­tual and immor­tal soul that is eter­nal, not spa­tial or tem­po­ral, but eter­nal.
    Perhaps when humans cease being told that they are prim­i­tive or worth­less, then maybe they will feel more like liv­ing the life of super­nat­ural sanc­ti­fy­ing grace like they were meant to and are called by name by God to do such. Quite frankly, I think the whole UFO/​ET phe­nom­e­non is brain wash­ing the human race and even the Catholic Church is start­ing to fall vic­tim to it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      batvette: A lot of JSF money was spent before the meltdown....
      Charles
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
      Phantom Works is Boeing is it not? I dunno what...
      Charles
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Senator McCain says, “ Sticks and stones may break my bones...
      Alton
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Jimbo thats pretty much all the british government...
      Valcan
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      I hope so; flexible armor may save lives because...
      Marcase
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage