DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bubbleheads, etc. » Who’s Cutting the Cables?

Who’s Cutting the Cables?

underwater cable.jpg

Uh oh, folks! Maybe it is time to be more con­cerned about ter­ror­ists cut­ting those under­sea cables in the Middle East.

CNN and the International Herald Tribune both report that, early today (Friday) local time, another cable was cut, this time in the Persian Gulf, about 35 miles off Dubai.

The abi­gu­ity in pre­vi­ous news report­ing about whether one or two fiber optic cables were cut in the Med on Tuesday, and whether they were cut in the same place 8 miles off Alexandria or at oppo­site ends of the Med at the same time, has been replaced by a much worse conun­drum. Its not at all ambigu­ous now that at least two dis­tinct cables were cut about 250 miles apart, on oppo­site sides of the huge Arabian Peninsula landmass.

What could pos­si­bly account for such sud­den and nearly crip­pling impair­ment of Internet access, e-​​mail, and phone lines? Granted its still early hours as of this writ­ing, but a Dubai tele­com exec­u­tive told AP that the cause hadnt yet been iden­ti­fied, and this lat­est ser­vice out­age was very unusual. Congestion in the Middle East and parts of India has got­ten severe, fol­low­ing so quickly after the break(s) on Tuesday. (If you think the U.S. is immune to these prob­lems, remem­ber how depen­dent American busi­nesses and con­sumers are on sup­port out­sourced to India.)

Id rule out seis­mic activ­ity for sure: Any tec­tonic event so wide­spread would have turned up on sci­en­tific instruments.

A sheer coin­ci­dence is at this point pretty hard to swal­low: Major trunk cables sel­dom go out indi­vid­u­ally, let alone in widely dis­persed pairs or triplets like this. (The last such seri­ous prob­lem, in 2006 off Taiwan, was indeed caused by an earth­quake — but the cause was under­stood imme­di­ately, exactly because of seis­mo­graph read­ings.) OK, dragged anchors by ships near Alexandria may well be what hap­pened there. But dragged anchors within the same week in totally dif­fer­ent bod­ies of water? For storms plus stu­pid­ity to strike twice in three days seems pretty odd, even if the same weather sys­tem was involved.

So once again, we need to pon­der the pos­si­bil­ity that these cable cuts were inten­tional mali­cious acts. And even if the first inci­dent was just an inno­cent but dam­ag­ing acci­dent, the sec­ond, off Dubai, could well be a ter­ror­ist copy cat event.

Regardless of spe­cific causes, inter­na­tional Internet ser­vice already impaired by the cable break ear­lier in the week is now even more dis­rupted in the volatile Middle East, with effects being felt on con­ti­nents far from the site of the cable breaks. Which is scary.

– Joe Buff

Share |

February 1st, 2008 | Bubbleheads, etc. | 381567 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/02/01/whos-cutting-the-cables/Who%27s+Cutting+the+Cables%3F2008-02-01+19%3A40%3A27paisley You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Navy Railgun Goes For Record (Updated) | Cyber Assassination » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Vercingetorix says:
    February 1, 2008 at 2:52 pm

    Two words for ya: Cloverfield. Doh!

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    February 1, 2008 at 2:59 pm

    Good Morning Joe,
    Ok Joe, how about some details please, such as where these events hap­pened, at what depths, clos­est hos­tile folks with the abil­i­tity to do this and most impor­tant where was the 5th. Fleet and what ASW capa­bilites are needed to stop this inter­na­tional van­dal­ism.
    Finally Joe, your spec­u­la­tion of how this was pulled off.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner

    Reply
  3. paul says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    “Two words for ya: Cloverfield. Doh!“
    lol you beat me to it. I was lit­er­ally going to post the same thing!

    Reply
  4. C says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:27 pm

    you’ve got to won­der what the motive would be for ter­ror­ists (the bulk of whom have lead­er­ship in the mid­dle east) to cut ties to their own region.

    Reply
  5. Alan says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:33 pm

    These peo­ple want to live in the Stone Age? Let em. No more inter­net for you!

    Reply
  6. Vercingetorix says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:44 pm

    heh, paul. Gotta get up ear­lier in the morn­ing. ;)

    Reply
  7. Nicholas weaver says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:45 pm

    Pulling this of is easy. All it takes is know­ing where a cable runs an a boat with an anchor.

    Reply
  8. Todd says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:50 pm

    It would be worth­while to look into who has the alter­na­tive infra­struc­ture for the mid­dle east to fall back on. They are most likely the ones in a posi­tion to gain from this.

    Reply
  9. TG says:
    February 1, 2008 at 3:51 pm

    I thought this was Defense Tech, not Defense Spec[ulation].
    I’d rather stick to get­ting my com­pletely unsub­stan­ti­ated alarmist spec­u­la­tion from… well, not at all, ideally.

    Reply
  10. Eric Ericson says:
    February 1, 2008 at 4:01 pm

    I wouldn’t jump to con­clu­sions just yet. Locations for under­sea cables are tightly guarded, dif­fi­cult to find, and usu­ally buried.
    Keep in mind also that this third cable that failed was a backup cable that in the past had not been used due to it’s unre­li­a­bil­ity. (http://​isc​.sans​.org/​d​i​a​r​y​.​h​t​m​l​?​s​t​o​r​y​i​d​=​3​919)
    To quote Bruce Schneier: “Never attribute any­thing to mal­ice, that can also be attrib­uted to incompetence”

    Reply
  11. austen says:
    February 1, 2008 at 4:43 pm

    Sounds more like a NATO op if it was inten­tional. Terror net­works are always using the inter­net to broad­cast their pro­pa­ganda. There is not much rea­son for them to do stop that. I’d say its a NATO op if it really was inten­tional and we were spec­u­lat­ing here.

    Reply
  12. Nicholas Weaver says:
    February 1, 2008 at 6:28 pm

    Anyone who thinks it is Nato is paranoid/​delusional.
    We have much bet­ter IO options than cut­ting cables.
    And when we tap them, the USS Jimmy Carter does a really good job.

    Reply
  13. a4givn1 says:
    February 1, 2008 at 8:07 pm

    I much rather think this would be a com­mer­cial act
    of ter­ror­ism… Terrorists are into ter­ror not mis­chief.. cut­ting these cables had a result of loss
    of com­mu­ni­ca­tion … Great if you had a money inter­est.… Never that I know of has ter­ror­ism been
    so “strate­gic” they mur­der­ers… not sab­o­tage artists…
    Any way .. there’s the 2 cents..

    Reply
  14. Random says:
    February 1, 2008 at 8:31 pm

    “I thought this was Defense Tech, not Defense Spec[ulation].
    I’d rather stick to get­ting my com­pletely unsub­stan­ti­ated alarmist spec­u­la­tion from… well, not at all, ide­ally.“
    Thanks TG. I come­pletely agree with you. You edi­tors must be hard pressed for sto­ries to post this spec­u­la­tory crap.

    Reply
  15. Rix says:
    February 1, 2008 at 8:46 pm

    These sorts of breaks hap­pen all the time, all it takes is one une­d­u­cated freighter crew­man to drag a ship anchor over it. As an investor in fiber opticl lines, I am aware that there are sev­eral of these breaks around the world every year. Sometimes it is defec­tive cable, some­times a trawler anchor, some­times some­one with a back­hoe on the beach. It’s most likely sta­tis­ti­cal noise com­bined with a region steeped in paranoia.

    Reply
  16. doc75 says:
    February 1, 2008 at 8:54 pm

    Well, since we’re in ram­pant spec­u­la­tion mode, let’s throw another log on the fire. Isn’t the Russian fleet doing exer­cises in the Med? Aren’t the Russian’s replay­ing the Cold War again: May Day parades, Bear flights near Iceland/​US/​Canada, shoot­ing cruise mis­siles off of Europe? And what under­wa­ter prac­tice is a Cold War favorite? Cable tapping?

    Reply
  17. dialup says:
    February 1, 2008 at 10:03 pm

    i doubt it’s the rus­sians — prob­a­bly rad­i­cal islamic fun­da­men­tal­ist groups who think the inter­net is anti-​​islamic
    it’s not quite ‘ter­ror­ism’, and yet con­sid­er­ably more than ‘mischief’

    Reply
  18. Supermouse says:
    February 2, 2008 at 12:04 am

    10 bucks on CIA.

    Reply
  19. Supermouse says:
    February 2, 2008 at 1:26 am

    By the way, this reminds me of a cer­tain event. First plane, “What a ter­ri­ble pilot!”.
    Second plane, “We’re under attack!”. So now we have the third(!) plane err cable cut, but Iran still hasn’t declared war on error or launched any new-​​clear mis­siles. What’s the moral? There is none. Not in this world.

    Reply
  20. Bob Dole says:
    February 2, 2008 at 3:35 am

    Who needs facts to come to a con­clu­sion? It was the aliens from outer space!

    Reply
  21. me says:
    February 2, 2008 at 3:50 am

    the us navy cut the cables. When the repair teams from the fiber com­pa­nies come to repair the cut, the navy then splices another part of the cable miles away at the same time and inserts an eaves­drop­ping box. This is how the us gets its intelligence.

    Reply
  22. me says:
    February 2, 2008 at 4:13 am

    by the way, these cables have MILES of play in them. They are not ‘tight’ else the strong ocean cur­rents would snap the con­nec­tions. A ship anchor would have to drag the cable MILES before it broke. Ships don’t sail with anchor down. The sug­ges­tion that THREE sep­a­rate cables broke simul­ta­ne­ously due to anchors is beyond ludi­crous.
    The navy inserts the sig­int lis­ten­ing device sev­eral miles away from the point of the orig­i­nal cut, while the fiber com­pany repairs the orig­i­nal cut. It is done this way to avoid detec­tion. Otherwise the fiber com­pany would find the eaves­drop­ping device dur­ing inspec­tion of the orig­i­nal problem.

    Reply
  23. deb says:
    February 2, 2008 at 7:39 am

    Anchors? I’ve got a bridge for sale.

    Reply
  24. Ken Koll says:
    February 2, 2008 at 9:42 am

    Terrorist num­ber one moti­va­tion is to get us out of Iraqi and the whole area so they can go back to nor­mal operations…all this spec­u­la­tion that the ter­ror­ist have no moti­va­tion for it…ever hear of moral…cut com­mu­ni­ca­tion with fam­ily mem­bers of US troops and dis­rupt the gen­eral econ­omy of the area that uses com­mu­ni­ca­tion capa­bil­i­ties and you are now win­ning with­out fir­ing a shot. Come on ladies, start think­ing like soldiers…disrupt communications!!!

    Reply
  25. stephen russell says:
    February 2, 2008 at 10:30 am

    Terrorists alone.
    Since all else rules out.
    Major threat alone to the global econ­omy machine.

    Reply
  26. Roy Smith says:
    February 2, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    Infowars​.com says that 4 cables are out,but that the inter­net for Israel & Iraq are work­ing just fine.They’re won­der­ing if some­thing is about to go down,you know,knock out com­mu­ni­ca­tions before you attack​.It would how­ever seem senseless(I just don’t believe it) since nobody seems to have any forces poised to attack any­body else right now.Now if all of a sud­den var­i­ous com­mu­ni­ca­tions satel­lites start going off line.…..

    Reply
  27. Chris Saunderson says:
    February 2, 2008 at 1:17 pm

    When I worked at a telco in Australia, we had two paths of a SDH ring from Sydney to Melbourne. One was ter­res­trial, the other sub­ma­rine.
    On the sec­ond day I was in the US for conferences/​meetings, a trawler pulled up the sub­ma­rine cable, putting it out of ser­vice. No big deal, the SDH did what is was sup­posed to do and the ter­res­trial picked up the load.
    On the fourth day I was out of the coun­try, and three days before the cable repair ship was on site of the sub­ma­rine break, a back­hoe dug up the ter­res­trial link, caus­ing com­plete fail­ure of com­mu­ni­ca­tions between the two cities.
    My point is, it’s not out­side the bounds of pos­si­bil­ity that this was purely acci­den­tal. Trawlers drag­ging the floor of the ocean plus a con­tainer ship with an idiot crewmem­ber who likes to play out the anchor chain might just coin­cide, and cou­ple that with the time it takes to find, reel in, fix and test a sub­ma­rine cable makes it seem like it’s a coin­ci­dence, when it’s really an over­lap of events.

    Reply
  28. Bob says:
    February 2, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    I heard a rumour that the cables were cut by cyber-​​crabs on heat!

    Reply
  29. luvmysoldier says:
    February 3, 2008 at 6:15 am

    My one and only in Iraq has inter­net. Anything is possible.

    Reply
  30. txzen says:
    February 3, 2008 at 11:51 am

    Don’t sol­diers in Iraq get access to satelite com­mu­ni­ca­tions? Such that they don’t even use the cables on the ground and the cables under the sea they use the satelites in space and dishes on the ground because they are in remote bases or prein­dus­trial areas? Aren’t cell phones even more com­mon in a lot of these 2nd and 3rd world places than land lines? Also from what I have read these cables aren’t the only way for India to get inter­net. India can go the other way around the world through japan guam hawaii US. The only inter­est­ing con­spir­acy there is that with the cuts going from the Middle East to the West cut that forces all traf­fic to go to the east through the United States. It slows every­thing down but some can get through it just passes through the UNited States telecoms.

    Reply
  31. Brian says:
    February 3, 2008 at 1:22 pm

    It’s obvi­ous what has hap­pened here. This is all Bush’s fault.
    You see, by not sign­ing the Kyoto agree­ment, Bush directly caused global warm­ing to increase. This has caused tem­per­a­ture change and many ani­mals that once lived in peace and har­mony to have to move to new habi­tats, some of which are not ide­ally suited to sup­port their new inhab­i­tants. This is the case with the Persian Gulf and its newest res­i­dent, the Great White Shark. Now every­one knows that the Gulf can­not sup­port the food require­ments of a Great White. None of the animal’s nor­mal prey reside within the Gulf’s waters. This has caused starv­ing Great Whites to seek new sources of food. These crea­tures have there­fore cut our inter­net lines so that repair crews will be sent to inves­ti­gate. Once the divers descend into the depths of the waters, the sharks who have clev­erly hid­den them­selves amongst undet­o­nated mines from the Iran/​Iraq war (the fault of George Bush Sr and Ronald Reagan), will spring out to attack their new food sup­ply.
    You see, this is cer­tainly the fault of the Republicans in gen­eral, and Bush specif­i­cally. The fam­i­lies of those soon to be dead repair crews can lay the blame at the feet of our “President”.

    Reply
  32. Living Hope In Jesus says:
    February 3, 2008 at 6:12 pm

    We are in the last days spo­ken about in God’s inerrant and infal­li­ble Word. Things are going to get a lot worse world-​​wide.
    Living Hope In Jesus
    http://​www​.liv​ing​hopein​je​sus​.com

    Reply
  33. paul says:
    February 3, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Terrorists,know that we need comms only from their
    own needs,and since they hate us,they cut the cables!What other,nonesens do we need to know?

    Reply
  34. txzen says:
    February 3, 2008 at 11:20 pm

    Funny the ter­ror­ists would cut their access to the inter­net while leav­ing the West vir­tu­ally untouched since there is a ver­i­ta­ble spi­der web under the atlantic. And not to men­tion that it’s the US Europe and Russia that have the most satelites… china too I guess

    Reply
  35. conleyelaine@yahoo.com says:
    February 3, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    is this really important

    Reply
  36. michael slater says:
    February 3, 2008 at 11:34 pm

    If it wasn’t an acci­dent, it was the USA. They did the same thing to pak­istan a year or two ago. They want to tap every­thing they can get their ears on.

    Reply
  37. autosellers says:
    February 4, 2008 at 2:04 am

    Russians are cut­ting every­thing cuz they are so full of stupidity.

    Reply
  38. Timour El-Husseini says:
    February 4, 2008 at 8:15 am

    Who is the ben­e­fi­ciary ? Thats the ques­tion. If we don’t know him now. Wait for news, he may come up with the solu­tion to this unre­li­able cable setup,to a new reli­a­bil­ity that we shall fol­low and buy, when he does, i will know. Otherwise blame it on the waiter or Al Qaida because thats common.

    Reply
  39. J. Bell says:
    February 4, 2008 at 8:39 am

    I think it was aliens, teach­ing thier alein kids how to drive the fam­ily UFO’s (or USO uniden­ti­fed sub­merg­ered objects). Illegal aliens are always up to some­thing!
    Oh yeah it’s Bushs Fault too.….….….……

    Reply
  40. Paul Michaelis says:
    February 4, 2008 at 10:02 am

    Having worked on cable ships, I know that search­ing for a cable thou­sands of feet down on the ocean bot­tom is no triv­ial task. This can take days or weeks even when the cable’s orig­i­nal loca­tion was well known. The par­ties that lay the cable know it’s rest posi­tion on the bot­tom to a remark­able degree of pre­ci­sion. On the other hand, when a cable is bro­ken, par­tic­u­larly by drag­ging, it’s posi­tion can be shifted by sig­nif­i­cant amounts. My con­clu­sion would be that either some­one pro­vided accu­rate loca­tion data,unlikely sit­u­a­tion, or they failed by unfor­tu­nate mistake.

    Reply
  41. Grandjester says:
    February 4, 2008 at 10:50 am

    Where is the USS Jimmy Carter at the moment?
    Other than that, I would sug­gest Mynocks.

    Reply
  42. Mathew says:
    February 4, 2008 at 11:29 am

    Well I could tell you who done it. But then they would want to kill both of us. and that my friend would just be redun­tant. um, best guess, Al Gore, he invented the inter­net and global warm­ing. so klnow he is try­ing to cool it off a little.

    Reply
  43. divedi says:
    February 5, 2008 at 11:39 pm

    Unidentified sub­merged object
    http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​U​n​i​d​e​n​t​i​f​i​e​d​_​s​u​b​m​e​r​g​e​d​_​o​b​j​ect
    UFO Files — Deep Sea UFOs-​​1
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​9​3​3​G​u​c​7​_​VE4
    UFO Files — Deep Sea UFOs Red Alert-​​1
    http://​www​.youtube​.com/​w​a​t​c​h​?​v​=​P​b​T​y​8​F​H​A​mQQ

    Reply
  44. citanon says:
    February 6, 2008 at 1:52 pm

    http://​www​.dai​lytech​.com/​B​a​d​+​t​o​+​W​o​r​s​e​+​F​i​f​t​h​+​U​n​d​e​r​s​e​a​+​C​a​b​l​e​+​C​u​t​+​i​n​+​M​i​d​d​l​e​+​E​a​s​t​/​a​r​t​i​c​l​e​1​0​5​9​8​c​.​htm
    Another one cut. Sure doesn’t look like an acci­dent now.

    Reply
  45. Joe Buff says:
    February 6, 2008 at 2:40 pm

    UPDATE at 2:30 pm EST on Wed 2/​6: Well folks, a Google News search on ’”under­sea cable” + cut’ just now turned up sev­eral sources that say two intrigu­ing things:
    1. As citanon posted, a fifth cable has been cut, although the cut might actu­ally have been a sec­ond cut to one of the ear­lier 4 cables — not sure this minor dis­tinc­tion makes much dif­fer­ence re who or what is caus­ing said prob­lems,
    and
    2. Several news sources state that the Egyptian tele­coms min­istry insists that the cable-​​lay area off Alexandria is very well pro­tected and marked, and NO ships either anchored in or tran­sited through the area where 2 cables were cut a week ago.

    Reply
  46. Takeo says:
    February 6, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    Grandjester:
    Mynocks only chew on power cables.

    Reply
  47. Anonymous says:
    July 21, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    thaaaaaank you MAN

    Reply
  48. ???? ????? says:
    July 21, 2008 at 2:34 pm

    thaaaaaank you MAN

    Reply
  49. Guild Wars Cheats and Dupes Guild Wars Farming and Guild Wars Guides says:
    January 4, 2009 at 12:56 pm

    excel­lent blog

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage