<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fighter Mafia Alumns on the Defense Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-196865</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 03:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-196865</guid>
		<description>F-22 Analysis: The Good, the Mad and the Surly : 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#q=%22Today,+America+spends+more+on+defense+than+at+any+time%22&amp;hl=en&amp;filter=0&amp;fp=ca6b5a4f84435186&amp;num=100&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#q=%22Today,+Ame...&lt;/a&gt; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F-22 Analysis: The Good, the Mad and the Surly :<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#q=%22Today,+America+spends+more+on+defense+than+at+any+time%22&amp;hl=en&amp;filter=0&amp;fp=ca6b5a4f84435186&amp;num=100" target="_blank">http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#q=%22Today,+Ame…</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilat</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-69318</link>
		<dc:creator>bilat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 20:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-69318</guid>
		<description>pogspogspogspogspogspogspogspogspgosgpgosgpsospsgosgspgosgspgosgspogsgposgsgposgspgosgposop
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pogspogspogspogspogspogspogspogspgosgpgosgpsospsgosgspgosgspgosgspogsgposgsgposgspgosgposop</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tibia coins</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-69313</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibia coins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-69313</guid>
		<description>Characters have a variety of Tibia coins skills that will raise through training.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Characters have a variety of Tibia coins skills that will raise through training.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silk road gold</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174528</link>
		<dc:creator>Silk road gold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174528</guid>
		<description>Now I cherish the memory of my better friend who once help me and give me much more Silk road gold.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I cherish the memory of my better friend who once help me and give me much more Silk road gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navblk4</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-69305</link>
		<dc:creator>navblk4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 02:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-69305</guid>
		<description>This article discusses the defense budget in
somewhat a negative fashion.
Appears time and money has been saved here.
http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123038314
In house seems to be one solution for effective
budgeting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article discusses the defense budget in<br />
somewhat a negative fashion.<br />
Appears time and money has been saved here.<br />
<a href="http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123038314" rel="nofollow">http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?storyID=123038314</a><br />
In house seems to be one solution for effective<br />
budgeting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navblk4</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174522</link>
		<dc:creator>navblk4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174522</guid>
		<description>But Gates is concerned that each F-22 costs $140 million, while the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter &quot;will be about half that, about $77 million a copy.&quot;
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-35.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II
Seems to be some very large discreprencies?
Cole,
shorter range dog fighting here?
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-22.htm
See per unit costs.
This seems very pricey for capability?
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-120.htm
Price seems to be improved with capability?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM
AIM-120D: &gt;180km (112 mi)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Gates is concerned that each F-22 costs $140 million, while the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter “will be about half that, about $77 million a copy.“<br />
<a href="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-35.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-35.htm</a><br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-35_Lightning_II</a><br />
Seems to be some very large discreprencies?<br />
Cole,<br />
shorter range dog fighting here?<br />
<a href="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-22.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/f-22.htm</a><br />
See per unit costs.<br />
This seems very pricey for capability?<br />
<a href="http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-120.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/aim-120.htm</a><br />
Price seems to be improved with capability?<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM</a><br />
AIM-120D: &gt;180km (112 mi)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navblk4</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174521</link>
		<dc:creator>navblk4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174521</guid>
		<description>X-Version: militarycom 7.5.2333.0
X-SenderIP: 71.128.65.59
X-SenderID: 27082853
From: navblk4@military.com
Message-Id:
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:22:16 -0800
X-Priority: 3
Priority: Normal
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
To: noahmax@inch.com,Christian.Lowe@military-inc.com
Subject: http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html
X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html
Can you provide me a login to my post to either
delete them or edit them. Again I just posted to the subject and the post appears to be written to at the same I submitted it causing bad output to the appearance.
navblk4
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X-Version: militarycom 7.5.2333.0<br />
X-SenderIP: 71.128.65.59<br />
X-SenderID: 27082853<br />
From: <a href="mailto:navblk4@military.com">navblk4@military.com</a><br />
Message-Id:<br />
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:22:16 –0800<br />
X-Priority: 3<br />
Priority: Normal<br />
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal<br />
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859–1<br />
To: <a href="mailto:noahmax@inch.com">noahmax@inch.com</a>,Christian.Lowe@military-inc.com<br />
Subject: <a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html</a><br />
X-Mailer: Web Based Pronto<br />
Mime-Version: 1.0<br />
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit<br />
<a href="http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003992.html</a><br />
Can you provide me a login to my post to either<br />
delete them or edit them. Again I just posted to the subject and the post appears to be written to at the same I submitted it causing bad output to the appearance.<br />
navblk4</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: navblk4</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174520</link>
		<dc:creator>navblk4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 19:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174520</guid>
		<description>Cole,
The reason I posted that, along with lower level
processing mentioned posted in the past was to
make engineers think about 24 bits? al,ah are
8 bit registers. ax is 16 bits and eax is 32
bits, and I don&#039;t know of a 24 bit register? I take these occurences and mistakes highly serious myself.
Yes iv&#039;e heard the old joke, and from law it
appears it&#039;s not an old joke in the past. Those
being ordered at times to kill have been done so not following due process, and they themselves end
up damaged sometimes monetarily with prison or the same outcome to them. Falcon and the Snowman was due process, and of course i&#039;m neither of those 2, and would have been pleased to prosecute them myself. I agree fully with you there.
AMRAAM I did not mention exact mileage though mileage is avaliable over the public internet.
I&#039;m sure any classified aspects are not public
over the internet. This article appears to show
alleged spending problems, however no solutions.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cole,<br />
The reason I posted that, along with lower level<br />
processing mentioned posted in the past was to<br />
make engineers think about 24 bits? al,ah are<br />
8 bit registers. ax is 16 bits and eax is 32<br />
bits, and I don’t know of a 24 bit register? I take these occurences and mistakes highly serious myself.<br />
Yes iv’e heard the old joke, and from law it<br />
appears it’s not an old joke in the past. Those<br />
being ordered at times to kill have been done so not following due process, and they themselves end<br />
up damaged sometimes monetarily with prison or the same outcome to them. Falcon and the Snowman was due process, and of course i’m neither of those 2, and would have been pleased to prosecute them myself. I agree fully with you there.<br />
AMRAAM I did not mention exact mileage though mileage is avaliable over the public internet.<br />
I’m sure any classified aspects are not public<br />
over the internet. This article appears to show<br />
alleged spending problems, however no solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven, editor</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174519</link>
		<dc:creator>VNCCC-VHJM van Neerven, editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 18:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174519</guid>
		<description>According to JDW, the Defense Secretary, Mr. Gates, has stated that the F-22 is useless at the moment. It is operational in Iraq and Afghanistan, but, he said to JDW, not one sortie has been flown.
And he continued by saying that a peer-to-near-peer conflict is far away.
So methinks that, when India, Russia and China are up to snuff, then the Raptor might dive down on its smaller kin.
But when wil there be a war with any of these three?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to JDW, the Defense Secretary, Mr. Gates, has stated that the F-22 is useless at the moment. It is operational in Iraq and Afghanistan, but, he said to JDW, not one sortie has been flown.<br />
And he continued by saying that a peer-to-near-peer conflict is far away.<br />
So methinks that, when India, Russia and China are up to snuff, then the Raptor might dive down on its smaller kin.<br />
But when wil there be a war with any of these three?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/02/07/fighter-mafia-alumns-on-the-defense-budget/#comment-174518</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 06:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=3828#comment-174518</guid>
		<description>Insaint:
&quot;@Vercingetorix
What country ever atacked the US, besides Japan at Pearl Harbor?&quot;
* England in the war of 1812 -- they burned Washington.
* Mexico.  1840s.
* The Confederate State of America 1861.
* Germany (sabateurs during WWII forming the basis for the leading pre-GWB precedent on domestic enemy combatants).
Of course, U.S. forces have been fired upon far more often.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Insaint:<br />
”@Vercingetorix<br />
What country ever atacked the US, besides Japan at Pearl Harbor?“<br />
* England in the war of 1812 — they burned Washington.<br />
* Mexico.  1840s.<br />
* The Confederate State of America 1861.<br />
* Germany (sabateurs during WWII forming the basis for the leading pre-GWB precedent on domestic enemy combatants).<br />
Of course, U.S. forces have been fired upon far more often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

