DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » The Invisible Cloak

The Invisible Cloak

predator-cloak.jpg

A very cool story in today’s Washington Post.

My understanding is that early attempts at this “light bending” technique required bulky power sources and crazy optics. But from this Washington Post piece, it looks as if materials science is beginning to catch up.

Seems to me at least in the early stages, vehicles and aircraft could use the technology since they can carry more weight and generate a lot of power.

And heck, I could sure use some of this stuff on my hunting forays…those damned deer keep spotting me…

From the Post…

Their Deepest Darkest Discovery

Black is getting blacker.

Researchers in New York reported this month that they have created a paper-thin material that absorbs 99.955 percent of the light that hits it, making it by far the darkest substance ever made — about 30 times as dark as the government’s current standard for blackest black.

The material, made of hollow fibers, is a Roach Motel for photons — light checks in, but it never checks out. By voraciously sucking up all surrounding illumination, it can give those who gaze on it a dizzying sensation of nothingness.

“It’s very deep, like in a forest on the darkest night,” said Shawn-Yu Lin, a scientist who helped create the material at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y. “Nothing comes back to you. It’s very, very, very dark.”

But scientists are not satisfied. Using other new materials, some are trying to manufacture rudimentary Harry Potter-like cloaks that make objects inside of them literally invisible under the right conditions — the pinnacle of stealthy technology.

Both advances reflect researchers’ growing ability to manipulate light, the fleetest and most evanescent of nature’s offerings. The nascent invisibility cloak now being tested, for example, is made of a material that bends light rays “backward,” a weird phenomenon thought to be impossible just a few years ago.

Known as transformation optics, the phenomenon compels some wavelengths of light to flow around an object like water around a stone. As a result, things behind the object become visible while the object itself disappears from view.

“Cloaking is just the tip of the iceberg,” said Vladimir Shalaev, a professor of electrical and computer engineering at Purdue University and an expert in the fledgling field. “With transformation optics you can do many other tricks,” perhaps including making things appear to be located where they are not and focusing massive amounts of energy on microscopic spots.

U.S. military and intelligence agencies have funded the cloaking research “for obvious reasons,” said David Schurig, a physicist and electrical engineer at North Carolina State University who recently designed and helped test a cloaking device. In that experiment, a shielded object a little smaller than a hockey puck was made invisible to a detector that uses microwaves to “see.”

The first working cloaks will be limited that way, he said — able to steer just a limited part of the light spectrum around objects — and it could be years before scientists make cloaks that work for all wavelengths, including the visible spectrum used by the human eye.

But even cloaks that work on just a few key wavelengths could offer huge benefits, making objects invisible to laser beams used for weapons targeting, for example, or rendering an enemy’s night goggles useless because objects would be invisible to the infrared rays those devices use.

The Defense Department did not fund development of the new blacker-than-black material, created by Lin and his colleagues. But military officials were among the first to call after a description of the work appeared in this month’s issue of the journal Nano Letters, Lin said in an interview.

Substances that absorb every smidgeon of incoming visible light could complement existing stealth coatings that absorb radar waves, Lin said. He and others emphasized, however, that there are also peaceful and more immediate applications for the blackest stuff on Earth.

Solar panels coated with it would be much more efficient than those coated with conventional black paint, which reflects 5 percent or more of incoming light. Telescopes lined with it would sop up random flecks of incidental light, providing a blacker background to detect faint stars.

And a wide array of heat detectors and energy-measuring devices, including climate-tracking equipment on satellites, would become far more accurate than they are today if they were coated with energy-grabbing superblack.

That helps explain why Lin has been fielding queries from solar-energy companies such as SolFocus of Mountain View, Calif., and the European Space Agency.

“The more black the material the better,” said Gerald Fraser, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the federal agency that specializes in fine measurements and industrial standards.

That agency offers scientists a chemical mix it calls “standard black,” which for years has been the defining measure of blackness. Photographers and printers use it to calibrate their gray scales. Industrial radiologists use it to calibrate X-ray imaging systems that detect radiation or hidden defects in building materials.

That black reflects about 1.4 percent of incoming visible light, and in recent years it has become somewhat outmoded. In 2003, scientists developed a substance made of nickel and phosphorus that reflected just 0.17 percent of visible light, winning it a Guinness World Records listing and kudos in Time magazine as one of that year’s 300 “coolest inventions.”

The newest black — which when held next to something conventionally black, such as a tuxedo jacket, is noticeably blacker — reflects just 0.045 percent of visible light.

It is made of carbon nanotubes: microscopic, hollow fibers whose walls are just one atom thick. Importantly, the fibers are widely spaced, providing plenty of space to allow light in and almost no surfaces to bounce it back out.

“There are a lot of materials that are very absorbing of light so that once the light gets in, very little is reflected. That is not the big issue,” said John Pendry, a physics professor at Imperial College London. “The big issue is persuading the light to go in there in the first place” — something the New York team accomplished by spacing the nanotubes so widely…

While Lin and his colleagues, including Pulickel Ajayan, now at Rice University, pursue applications for their superblack, Pendry and others are hoping to go further by perfecting complete invisibility. The big difference is that a superblack object, even if invisible to the eye, still casts a shadow behind it, while an object shielded by an invisibility cloak does not.

Pendry pioneered much of modern thinking about how to attain full invisibility using “metamaterials” — substances engineered to manhandle light. Ordinary matter, such as glass or water, slows and bends light as it passes through. Metamaterials contain bits of metal or other substances embedded in precise patterns to make the light bend in an opposite direction from normal paths.

“In a sense you have some negative space,” Pendry said. “The light appears to go backward in space.”

The first generation, metamaterial “cloaks” are not thin and flexible like Harry Potter’s imagined version but are inches thick and solid, resembling canisters, making them able to hide a stationary object but not a moving person. But the science is progressing quickly, physicist Schurig said.

To make a thin, flexible metamaterial cloak, Schurig said, “is technically challenging but not fundamentally impossible.” And although no cloak can yet make objects fully invisible to the human eye, he added, it may not be long before scientists can bend the visible spectrum enough to make an object hard to see…

Read the rest of this fascinating story at Washingtopost​.com.

– Christian

Share |

February 20th, 2008 | Bizarro | 384692 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/02/20/the-invisible-cloak/The+Invisible+Cloak2008-02-20+12%3A35%3A30Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Spy Satellite Not the First to Fall | And Now a Way to BE Seen » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. David Hambling says:
    February 20, 2008 at 8:41 am

    No, this does not require any power input — it’s entirely down to how the “metamaterial” intereacts with light.
    Unfortunately the defense applications mentioned are rather in the realm of science fiction due to the broad range of wavelengths involved (even in the infra-red).
    You could be ‘invisible’ to one specific type of laser, but that’s a rather limited advantage for a massive outlay.
    Things look much more promising in the radio/microwave spectrum.

    Reply
  2. gxavier says:
    February 20, 2008 at 9:15 am

    Very cool!
    Now I need a new italian suit made in this new black!

    Reply
  3. Vercingetorix says:
    February 20, 2008 at 10:00 am

    David, I wouldn’t go that far. It is still a young technology and a different, complex molecular structure may found that can embrace a wide swath of the spectrum, from near-infrared to UV.
    A complimentary technology is multi-spectral optics which is also a developing science. Progress in one might be amenable to progress in the other.
    So I would rule out a near future use, but within a generation, I would not be surprised to see real world, even tactical uses.

    Reply
  4. tai says:
    February 20, 2008 at 11:21 am

    We better snatch this up before it gets in the hands of civillian companies, especially european ones. We all know how much damage greed can do.

    Reply
  5. Brian says:
    February 20, 2008 at 11:25 am

    It sounds like this “blacker than black” would be very useful for making more accurate heat-seeking missiles. If it helps make telescopes more sensitive, the same can be done with other types of sensors.

    Reply
  6. ellis says:
    February 20, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    “It’s like… how much more black can it be? And the answer is none. None more black.“
    –Nigel Tufnel

    Reply
  7. Mike says:
    February 20, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    Well, It can only be 100% black. It has a finite amount. Just like something can only be so cold.. and not colder. This reminds me of lasers a few decades ago. I though we would have laser guns, jet pack soldiers, and flying cars. Well… not yet.

    Reply
  8. dave w says:
    February 20, 2008 at 4:26 pm

    Hi there, been looking at a multitude of “cloaking devices for years”.….just check youtube, youll find plenty. Most are camera mounted on someones back, connected to a “bendable poncho” like layering of lcd/plasma, simply, the camera just shows whats behind you no matter which direction you turn.
    As far as “spacing nanotube to capture photons”, I’ll be the first to stick my neck out and say BS.
    why? Carbon nanotubes are something I know about, whether its stand bucky’s/c-60 or swnt or mwnt and utilized in a myriad of “sci fi fill in the script roles” at this point. The one thing tubes will be able to do is add strength to things, thus some patents on armor including these “lil buggers”… Carbon is not capable of “absorbing or trapping light in any configuration.” the idea that they could is interesting, but not the way it was told. The would all have to be bunched but not crushed, so the virtually NO space was between them, as only the tube section of the nanotube may possibly be able to capture protons. Thus they would need to be the exact same lengths, or bouncing (reflection) would take place.…..
    A story I take with a grain of salt. Then again, thats just my two cents.
    Have a great day, D.W. Pres. SCI

    Reply
  9. st6ng says:
    February 20, 2008 at 4:29 pm

    A few years back I thought Boeing’s Bird of Prey was suppose to have light bending properties. What ever happened to the aircraft I wonder.

    Reply
  10. Brian says:
    February 20, 2008 at 4:56 pm

    st6ng,
    I just read something about the Bird of Prey yesterday. Apparently it was a Boeing-funded experimental one-off. It was not intended for mass production, apparently only used as a test vehicle/technology demonstrator.
    Reportedly, Boeing is using some of the lessons learned on the Bird of Prey on its later UAVs.

    Reply
  11. freefallingbomb says:
    February 20, 2008 at 10:20 pm

    Folks, I can tell you straightaway which household application based on a simple physical formula neutralizes this whole “invisibility cloak” concept, and it’s dirt-cheap too, but then the C.I.A. would have to exterminate us all… so sorry.
    Maybe I’ll just ring the Chinese Embassy and tell them the trick, for a Coke!

    Reply
  12. B Chan says:
    February 21, 2008 at 12:14 am

    Fuligin!
    Paging Gene Wolfe!

    Reply
  13. stephen russell says:
    February 21, 2008 at 9:36 am

    If wearable & developed, Very Cool & very scary in the wrong hands.
    But anyone invisible would leave footmarks in Mud, water, snow, to denote Weight.
    Otherwise doable.
    Great for Jungle Combat mode.
    See Rambo 4.

    Reply
  14. alexander lynn morgan says:
    June 8, 2008 at 9:56 pm

    you need to sell them i want to buy one

    Reply
  15. grqew says:
    June 11, 2008 at 10:34 am

    FX ?
    FX ?
    ?
    Abnaki Ski & Outing Club
    The Ave Maria Foundation
    ?
    ?
    ?
    ?
    ?

    Reply
  16. any says:
    May 30, 2009 at 10:20 pm

    a href=“http://soft.leaderol.com”>Enjoy Most Popular Products Here On Electronics,Shopping Makes Easy Now– Up To 39% OFF — TomTom, Portable GPS Car Navigation Systems — GO 910 / Nokia 8800 Sirocco ARTE / Bose Headphones.

    Reply
  17. lala says:
    July 18, 2009 at 2:17 pm

    this is crazy i just read this… its now 2009 towards the end of 2009 i can only imagine how far developed this is now :| pretty scary

    Reply
  18. lala says:
    July 18, 2009 at 2:18 pm

    this is crazy i just read this… its now 2009 towards the end of 2009 i can only imagine how far developed this is now :| pretty scary

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
    • Author Steven Pressfield Blogs Afghan Visit With Gen. Mattis
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
    • JSF Costs Jump 50 Percent
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
    • More Vehicle Digital Camouflage
    • Chinese Digi-Camo
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
    Recent Comments
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      Logistics: If you only have to hump 1/10 the number of...
      toad
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Exactly what committment have we made to...
      TMB
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      "This analysis does not take into...
      Steve B.
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
      For all the budget grips about entitlement programs, they...
      ohwilleke
    • Defense Spending Headed Down
      "[G]ive the military full control over their...
      ohwilleke
    • Let’s Talk AirSea Battle
      "The Chinese military buildup aims to threaten key...
      ohwilleke
    • That Elephant’s Going To Do What? Where?
      Part of the F-35's problem is that...
      ohwilleke
    • Army Fast Tracks GPS Mortar Round
      "Any word on what they cost per round? "...
      ohwilleke
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Maybe we need to sell some amphibious...
      ohwilleke
    • Rise of the Cyber Arms Dealers
      I hope so. The idea of having to hire Ukrainian or Bulgarian...
      Matt
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage