DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Trimble on the Case » More B-​​2 Crash Speculation

More B-​​2 Crash Speculation

You can look this one up. See FY 09 bud­get request, jus­ti­fi­ca­tion mate­ri­als, US Air Force, Aircraft procurement-​​Vol. 2, page 71.

You’ll find on that page a detailed descrip­tion for not one, but two poten­tial mechan­i­cal prob­lems that could cause a B-​​2A to crash.

Here’s a sam­pling (read high­lighted text):

b2enginefanblade5.jpg

The prob­lem is caused by the B-2A’s dis­torted engine inlets. 

The dis­tor­tion causes exces­sive wear on the stage 1 fan blades for the F118-​​GE-​​100 engines. Take that and an unplanned “for­eign object dam­age event”, and, voila, your $1.1 bil­lion bomber may expe­ri­ence a “cat­a­strophic in-​​flight emergency”. 

But there’s another prob­lem. A loose fan blade also can spark an “uncon­tained tita­nium fire”. According to the same doc­u­ment, the tita­nium fire — what­ever that is — may cause a “Class A event”, or what nor­mal peo­ple call a “crash”.

The prob­lem is listed in the bud­get jus­ti­fi­ca­tion doc­u­ments because the USAF is buy­ing repair blades this year to fix the prob­lem. I’m sure it will be inter­est­ing for the inves­ti­ga­tors to find out whether the “Spirit of Kansas” had received the repairs before the crash, among other items of inter­est, of course.

– Steve Trimble

Share |

February 29th, 2008 | Trimble on the Case | 386626 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/02/29/more-b-2-crash-speculation/More+B-2+Crash+Speculation2008-02-29+15%3A45%3A32Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Mughniyeh Done in by Hezbollah | BAE/​Navistar JLTV Prototype Unveiled » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Josh says:
    February 29, 2008 at 11:31 am

    Titanium can burn, but I’ve only seen (or was that caused)it hap­pen dur­ing a turn­ing oper­a­tion on a lathe. There has to be a lot of sur­face area, good access to oxy­gen, and a strong igni­tion source.
    It was kind of like mag­ne­sium, but much harder to ignite.

    Reply
  2. George Skinner says:
    February 29, 2008 at 1:43 pm

    Josh,
    So, from what you’re say­ing, a tita­nium fire would be easy to achieve with a loose com­pres­sor blade. Titanium blade rotat­ing at thou­sands of RPM, rub­bing on a com­pres­sor hous­ing, with a huge vol­u­met­ric air­flow thanks to all the other blades on the com­pres­sor stages before and after…

    Reply
  3. josh says:
    February 29, 2008 at 2:00 pm

    George,
    Yea, sure sounds plau­si­ble, but I’m no foren­sic scientist.

    Reply
  4. Vercingetorix says:
    February 29, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    FOD — Foreign Object Damage — at those speeds, at those tem­per­a­tures, is com­pletely destruc­tive. I’ve seen a sin­gle 2 cm piece of safety wire destroy an entire com­pres­sor stage.
    You don’t need extra­ne­ous mechan­i­cal fail­ures to take down a plane; a cot­ter key smash­ing a com­pres­sor, the com­pres­sor blast­ing shrap­nel, shrap­nel mak­ing impor­tant things smoke like a Roaring Twenties star­let, that’s all you need.

    Reply
  5. Mac says:
    February 29, 2008 at 2:25 pm

    A friend of mine who makes cus­tom tita­nium parts for motor­cy­cle rac­ers had a fairly nasty tita­nium fire ignited by a weld­ing spark. No large sur­face area, no more oxy­gen required than plain old sea-​​level air. As I recall he couldn’t put it out, he just had to grab the parts with tongs and put them out­side and let them burn them­selves out…

    Reply
  6. ohwilleke says:
    February 29, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    Deferred main­te­nance ain’t cheap.

    Reply
  7. DC2 Jennings says:
    February 29, 2008 at 4:09 pm

    I don’t know about the cause of the fire, but the only way to put out a fire caused by the met­als men­tioned is to take away the oxy­gen. That is usu­ally done by pour­ing sand on it, which obvi­ously is not avail­able in mid air.
    DC2

    Reply
  8. Vercingetorix says:
    February 29, 2008 at 4:10 pm

    BTW, it actu­ally shocked me to learn that the trans­mis­sions of my series air­craft were made of mag­ne­sium. The rea­son being of course that while Mg is a bitch once it catches fire, it has a very high igni­tion tem­per­a­ture. For what it is worth.

    Reply
  9. DC2 Jennings says:
    February 29, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    Ver,
    You are cor­rect, it does take a high amount of heat to cause com­bus­tion. The wheels of most air­craft are also made of mag­ne­sium. And mag­ne­sium fires are spe­cial in that they can­not be put out with water. Either the source of fuel burns out or you take away the cxy­gen by smoth­er­ing it.
    Magnesium will burn straight through the decks on a ship.
    With the excep­tion of alu­minum, it takes a lot of heat for a metal to com­bust. We learned the alu­minum les­son on the USS Stark. That is why the DDG-​​51s are made of steel.
    DC2

    Reply
  10. Jayhawk says:
    February 29, 2008 at 5:48 pm

    When you base the “Spirit of Kansas” in Missouri you should expect some­thing like that!

    Reply
  11. matt hood says:
    February 29, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    All I want to know is did we get all of our money out of this bil­lion dol­lar play thing that flys B2

    Reply
  12. Nate says:
    February 29, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    It’s amaz­ing to me that this is actu­ally the first B-​​2 bomber to ever crash. Granted the num­ber of B-​​2 Bombers on the mar­ket are much lower than say the Boeing 357, 747, or 757 but up until recently they had a 0% crash rat­ing, where as each of those Boeings have crashed at least a dozen times.
    One thing in engi­neer­ing, whether it be build­ings or soft­ware, stands true always; the more com­pli­cated the design the greater the chance for sys­tem fail­ure. This is why Windows oper­at­ing sys­tems tend to crash more than Linux. Jets are get­ting increas­ingly more com­plex. Computers run the vast major­ity of the vehi­cle (Hopefully not using Windows as an oper­at­ing sys­tem) while a per­son main­tains about 20% of any of the con­trols.
    This isn’t just for mil­i­tary mind you, this is for even com­mer­cial. The more com­plex some­thing is the more areas there are to miss in pre­flight checks. The increased odds that some­thing could go wrong in mid air (while it was pos­si­bly fine on the ground) or God for­bid we pay atten­tion to all the com­put­ers and for­get to check the sim­ple things on the vehi­cle like oh I don’t know the blades or the tur­bine engine.
    The fact that a B-​​2 crashed isn’t amaz­ing to me. What is amaz­ing to me is that we don’t see more air­crafts falling out of the air on a reg­u­lar basis. (I said all this unafraid to fly and hav­ing a love for just about all new tech­nolo­gies regard­less of the fact that I don’t actu­ally need it.)

    Reply
  13. pk says:
    March 2, 2008 at 2:43 pm

    heve you ever seen a chain saw burn.
    the gaso­line fire ignites the mag­ne­sium parts which ingite the alu­minum parts which melt the steel parts.
    when all is said and done there’s a lit­tle pile of white pow­der with a rusty lump in the mid­dle.
    thats funny air­planes have those ingre­di­ants in them also: fuel, alu­minum, mag­ne­sium, steel.
    Hmmmmmmmmmm.
    C

    Reply
  14. Roy Smith says:
    March 3, 2008 at 7:30 am

    Any thread going to start on Hugo Chavez threat­en­ing war with Colombia? he wants to try out his new Su-​​27s. NOW THIS IS TAILOR MADE FOR OUR F-​​22s!!!! Now we’ll find out how they’ll per­form against each other. Yesssss,bring it on!!!!!!

    Reply
  15. George says:
    March 6, 2008 at 7:33 am

    Both mag­ne­sium and alu­minum are crit­i­cal com­po­nents of metal alloys which most air­craft today are made of to reduce weight and increase strength. Magnesium alloys tend to be more strong than alu­minum and thus are used more exten­sively. (Remember those alloy wheels called Mags? What do you think those are made of?)
    Magnesium fires burn very quickly and with extremely high temps. They can’t be put out with water. They need foam. They will usu­ally con­sume their prey faster than any­one can put them out. That’s what makes them so dangerous.

    Reply
  16. Robert says:
    March 6, 2008 at 8:07 am

    THE B IN B2 stands Bomber not Boeing. Also there are fewer B2’s than com­mer­cial planes fly­ing in the sky hence the dif­fer­ent num­ber of com­mer­cial plane crashes to mil­i­tary plane crashes. No less it it tragic.

    Reply
  17. Robert says:
    March 6, 2008 at 8:09 am

    THE B IN B2 stands Bomber not Boeing. Also there are fewer B2’s than com­mer­cial planes fly­ing in the sky hence the dif­fer­ent num­ber of com­mer­cial plane crashes to mil­i­tary plane crashes. No less it it tragic.

    Reply
  18. marvin says:
    March 6, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    I ques­tion the high igni­tion temps required to burn these 2 met­als. I used to grind 1/​4″ thick mag­ne­sium stamp­ing dies using a 7″ grinder, col­lect­ing the dust in a bin behind the grinder. If I for­got to empty the bin before grind­ing steel or iron, one red hot piece of the fer­rous mate­r­ial in the bin would ignite the mag­ne­sium dust. The red hot fer­rous piece was prob­a­bly about 800F, that’s not very hot in the world of burn­ing met­als. Cast iron will melt at 2300-​​2400F, steel melts slighty higher. The tip of a lit cig­a­rette is about 800F, so I’m say­ing mag­ne­sium, in dust form, will ignite at 800F or slightly above.
    When machin­ing (turn­ing) tita­nium pieces it’s stan­dard pro­ce­dure to have a fire extin­guisher (at least one) within reach to attempt to dose the fire should it ignite. Cutting is done slowly to reduce the temps cre­ated as much as pos­si­ble, to inhibit igni­tion. I agree that water is not the answer with burn­ing met­als, it may even cause an explo­sion. A sticky foam, for fires in the ver­ti­cal posi­tion, would be best.

    Reply
  19. Rick says:
    March 7, 2008 at 8:00 am

    My first assump­tion on read­ing the words “tita­nium fire” go back to my days work­ing at GE Aircraft Engines.
    Part of the engine case (could be the area sur­round­ing the fan, or com­pres­sor, or both…I don’t know the specifics of the F118 engine) is made from tita­nium. A loose blade can cause fric­tion, and at the high rate of rota­tion can cause enough fric­tion to actu­ally ignite the tita­nium.
    Titanium is sim­i­lar to mag­ne­sium in that it burns, and once ignited burns hot and is dif­fi­cult to extin­guish. It isn’t easy to ignite tita­nium, but engine blade fric­tion can do it (and has, F/​A-​​18s have expe­ri­enced the prob­lem on rare occa­sion).
    Once a tita­nium fire starts in an air­craft, there is lit­tle to do but get out ASAP. I don’t know of any air­craft that con­tains a sys­tem to extin­guish a tita­nium fire in the engine area.

    Reply
  20. AF Guy says:
    April 4, 2008 at 9:59 am

    Gents, just sat on the plane with a B-​​2 crew chief who said the plane crashed due to pilot error: stalling on take­off. He said the word inside his cir­cle of B-​​2 main­tain­ers is that it wasn’t a mechan­i­cal fail­ure but rather an abrupt climb that the aircraft’s comps didn’t reg­u­late enough. No other proof of that, but it’s a pretty reli­able source.

    Reply
  21. jmd says:
    April 10, 2008 at 12:14 pm

    The imme­di­ate cause does indeed appear to have been a stall and con­se­quent loss of lift dur­ing take­off. It’s still unclear if it was pilot error, i.e., yank­ing the stick back too far, or some sort of fcs prob­lem. It is a known char­ac­ter­is­tic of the a/​c that the cg is very far aft when the tanks are full for ferry flights (a/​c nor­mally doesn’t carry that much fuel on train­ing and oper­a­tional mis­sions). talk about a bad day for that crew…

    Reply
  22. AlamedaRich says:
    May 30, 2008 at 2:13 pm

    Speculation to fit the reports go this way:
    Hydraulic fail­ure in the Right side drag rud­der con­trol caused all four sys­tems to that to fail­from the small resul­tant fire near the engine. The right drag rud­ders close, blown shut by the air stream. The now heavy drag on the left side causes a hard yaw to the left, the right wing being nearly straight to the air streem causes a hard pitch up and a sud­den snap-​​roll to the left. All of this tak­ing just a cou­ple of sec­onds. Inverted the B-​​2 hits the ground level, upside­down, a lit­tle to the left of the intended flight path. They need lock­outs to pre­vent this on the sur­faces and in the hydraulic systems.

    Reply
  23. Buck says:
    June 7, 2008 at 4:00 pm

    G2,
    I also worked at GE Aircraft Engines and I can attest to tita­nium fires. I was present when a bear­ing fail­ure occurred on a dif­fer­ent type engine and the com­pres­sor rub was enough to ignite the tita­nium. It was not a pretty sight. The alu­minum cowl­ing just melted away. Carbon diox­ide finally put out the fire but it took a while. The floor of the test cell had lit­tle pud­dles of molten metal that had dripped down and resolidified.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage