DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » ‘Google Earth’ Seen as Potential Space Threat

‘Google Earth’ Seen as Potential Space Threat

From this morning’s front page at Military​.com.

The threat from an adversary’s use of space is more than just zapping a satellite out of sky. It could be as mundane as grabbing an up-to-date reconnaissance image from a free Web site.

That’s a scenario a top Air Force official is trying to counter as more countries push their own commercial payloads into the highest frontier. With the easy access to free online imagery services such as Google Earth and Yahoo Maps, and other paid sites, military officials are worried an enemy might gain vital intelligence on U.S. and allied military positions anonymously and with little investment.


“It could be as simple as how is it that an adversary gets an image off of Google Earth that could somehow threaten American lives or interests,” said Lt. Gen. Michael Hamel, who manages space and missile systems development for the Air Force. “That is an example of a space threat that we may face in the future,”


Hamel told Military reporters at a March 11 breakfast meeting in Washington he is pressuring domestic licensing authorities to force satellite imagery providers to reduce the resolution of their images in areas where American troops are engaged, or to delay their image feed so that an adversary can’t get up-to-the-minute information on U.S. and allied military moves.


Most free online imaging tools block the resolution of their satellite photos in sensitive regions, though sometimes detailed information does slip through. On March 7, the head of the Northern Command banned Google Earth photo teams from U.S. military installations after one group shot panoramic images of Fort Sam Houston in Texas for the company’s “Street View” component.


Google officials quickly pulled the images from its Google Earth site and apologized for the incident, saying it wasn’t their policy to photo military bases.


That’s the kind of slip up that worries space managers like Hamel.


“We want our aerospace industry to be at the cutting edge of commercial providers” for imagery, Hamel explained. “We also want to make sure that the kind of information that can get out into the public domain and used is not going to threaten our legitimate security interests.”


“We’d like to have U.S. companies that are at the forefront of this such that we could … ensure that there is not data of greater currency than what we believe would be militarily acceptable.


But international commercial operators who aren’t beholden to any U.S. laws might balk at protecting America’s security interests in the face of cold hard cash. So Hamel hopes to either beat them into space and edge them out of the neighborhood, or cajole them into sticking to the American licensing standards.


“It’s part of our national interest to ensure that we set the conditions not only for U.S. companies but also set some of the norms in terms of how systems on an international or allied basis are used,” he added.


Though U.S. officials and military brass can try to strong-arm other countries into going America’s way, the rapid increase in demand for information that was once the only accessible by governments and the tools to deliver that data means the risk will only increase.


“We’re seeing a significant growth in both civil and commercial remote sensing capabilities … in this country and with friends and in various other nations are actively developing and fielding capabilities,” Hamel said. “It wasn’t too many years ago that what would have been our cutting edge reconnaissance capability, now are commercially purchasable products.

– Christian

Share |

March 14th, 2008 | Space | 389626 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/03/14/google-earth-seen-as-potential-space-threat/%27Google+Earth%27+Seen+as+Potential+Space+Threat2008-03-14+12%3A09%3A42Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « NASA Moon Mission in Jeopardy | Have You Heard of This Bomb? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mapper99 says:
    March 14, 2008 at 9:37 am

    I certainly don’t think Google Street View is such a risk. What’s the difference between Google taking the pictures or some guy driving by with a camera? Take a look at this bloggers list of harmless Google Street View sightings:
    http://​streetviewgallery​.corank​.com

    Reply
  2. Pharsalus says:
    March 14, 2008 at 10:36 am

    “GoogleEarth can be a very valuable tool for both sides. I’ve used it A LOT for mission planning.“
    ~DA
    » Me too. Brilliant program. But in this time of GPS-guided gadgets, nothing beats the human “mark one” eyeball. If I’d be planning a raid somewhere, I’d be doing recce. Personally, that is.
    GoogleEarth is a marvellous tool that enables us to look beyond our borders and peep into the lives of others in a land far far away. It generates empathy and compassion; ever compared your street with an average North Korean neighbourhood?
    “It could be as simple as how is it that an adversary gets an image off of Google Earth that could somehow threaten American lives or interests,” said Lt. Gen. Michael Hamel.
    » Right… and pigs can fly. Or rather, the good General may wish a Pig Ban because *if* pigs *could* fly they might somehow hurt US interests. Phah! Asteriods and comets are a far bigger threat (albeit a very small chance) but I see no one build anti-lump-o’-spacerock defense systems.

    Reply
  3. TB says:
    March 14, 2008 at 11:37 am

    Freedom of information is always a threat.

    Reply
  4. Andy says:
    March 14, 2008 at 12:03 pm

    Another fine example of how convenience and privacy/security clash.
    Stop taking away our freedoms and conviences for our “protection”. The government only helps terrorism by stating that something such as a satellite photo/mapping program available to anyone is unsecure. Why scare the people? Keep us safe but don’t take away our amenities and rights as free people.
    Ideas like this remind me of the Patriot Act and what a big load of crap it is.

    Reply
  5. inconel710 says:
    March 14, 2008 at 8:26 pm

    @Mapper99 — Google Streets on military bases is a threat it means the bad guys don’t have to do their own recce anymore. Google has done it for them! Access points, guard shacks, vehicle barriers, fence heights — it’s all there! At least the guy sitting outside the base taking photos might get noticed by the gate guard and picked up before his mission planning is complete.
    You guys are kidding yourselves if you think every terrorist organization with an Internet connection hasn’t figured out how to use Google Earth already. Why make it easier?

    Reply
  6. Pharsalus says:
    March 15, 2008 at 3:41 am

    @ inconel710
    I guess you never used GE in a Bad Way… The lay of the land is important too, and you won’t get everything off a sattelite picture.

    Reply
  7. mthebold says:
    March 15, 2008 at 10:15 am

    “Right… and pigs can fly. Or rather, the good General may wish a Pig Ban because *if* pigs *could* fly they might somehow hurt US interests. Phah! Asteriods and comets are a far bigger threat (albeit a very small chance) but I see no one build anti-lump-o’-spacerock defense systems.“
    – Please consider this: the “good General” is a professional who has spent his entire life studying war. He also has a staff of professionals to study the issue in great depth and make recommendations. Therefore, his opinion shouldn’t be lightly dismissed. Only another professional with years of experience and a clearly articulated argument can confidently declare that the good general is wrong. The rest of us should be skeptical and ask tough questions without assuming our generals are stupid.

    Reply
  8. Matt Caplan says:
    March 15, 2008 at 10:12 pm

    For what it’s worth, The Telegraph (UK) reported on this phenomenon in late 2005, link here:
    http://​www​.telegraph​.co​.uk/​n​e​w​s​/​m​a​i​n​.​j​h​t​m​l​?​x​m​l​=​/​n​e​w​s​/​2​0​0​5​/​1​2​/​1​8​/​n​g​o​o​g​1​8​.​xml

    Reply
  9. DoubleTapper says:
    March 17, 2008 at 11:44 am

    Here in Israel, google earth doesn’t zoom in a close as it does elsewhere.
    It’s not quite as threatening this way.
    DoubleTapper
    DoubleTapper@gmail.com
    DoubleTapper, blogging on Guns Politics Defense from Israel

    Reply
  10. GuildWars money says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:43 pm

    Virtual net works, virtual role of the game, I did not as him what people. It is only a game; happy is the purpose of the game. I chat with him happy. I have an on line he will not be alone to upgrade and earn GuildWars money, but rather for the first time chat with me, in this way we often sit together.

    Reply
  11. buy gaia gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 11:50 pm

    I have not had to play Gaia, and occasionally I will play friend number, in order to spent time. One day, one more than 20 levels player asked me if I can as her husband. At that time, I think she is a fraudsters, I think that number had no things. So I asked her if she had QQ and video. She said she had. So we added QQ and started video, after a short of time video chat, I knew that she was not a liar, she just a new player of Gaia. Soon, we closed the video, we returned to the game, and I bought Gaia gold change some things that married need use, and we married.

    Reply
  12. rappelz money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:00 am

    Looking back at the past, in those days, we played together; we have no much rappelz money, we have no need equipment and no senior friends too us, but I am still playing very happy. Rappelz left everywhere in our laughter. There is only one reason is that I have her around, I would meet, everything becomes unimportant. One thing I feel very sorry, that is when I married her, mo gorgeous fireworks, mo friends of blessing. Now I have heart, I feel wronged her, I am sorry to her.

    Reply
  13. cheap zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:04 am

    I always adhere to and keep a distance from everyone. Until now, I did not have a true friend, although I was a lonely, although I did not like the other players that they have many friends send them cheap zeny, I must be rely on myself, at least I will not hurt anybody, and perhaps this is kind of happiness.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      why don't we go to the boneyards and museums and...
      Jim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Why take American when the foreign one is better? Enough of...
      american1776
    • South of the Border Mayhem
      Invade Mexico?
      kim
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Why is that the angriest...
      kim
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Buy American!!!!
      kim
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      One approach to spotting road mines is an old...
      Max Friedman
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      Gentlemen,from a...
      Roy M Brown
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Mac, has the Air Force ever asked the Army what it...
      TMB
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      With unlimited resources, the US could buy an...
      SMSgt Mac
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      RE: “A LAAR aircraft capability has the...
      smsgtmac
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage