DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Robots » Army Also Wants Bat Recce Capability

Army Also Wants Bat Recce Capability

Bionic bat.bmp
As a sup­ple­ment to the UAV plan out­lined in the post below, Gizmodo has a post about this wild con­cept the Army has laid at the feet of select engi­neer­ing schools, includ­ing the University of Michigan. Here’s an excerpt:

The pro­posal is for the bat to be just six inches in length, weigh only four ounces and use just one watt of power, backed by a lithium-​​ion bat­tery, which could be charged by not just solar energy, but wind energy and ran­dom vibra­tions as well. The bat’s intended goal would be to run sur­veil­lance ops and relay data in real­time, includ­ing sights and sounds from mini­cams and mini-​​microphones, but also radi­a­tion and poi­son gas readings. 

The UMich grant con­sists of $10 mil­lion over five years, cre­at­ing the U-​​M Center for Objective Microelectronics and Biomimetic Advanced Technology (dubbed “COM-BAT“pun intended). The focus is to shrink down many elec­tron­ics that while cur­rently avail­able would only be good if the US Army wanted, say, a 12-​​foot spy-​​bat. Not too stealthy.

For energy recov­ery, UMich will work to develop “quan­tum dot solar cells,” mak­ing cur­rent solar cells twice as nice. The bat’s autonomous navi sys­tem will be 1,000 times smaller than cur­rent sys­tems, and that much more energy effi­cient too. The comms sys­tem will be shrunk to one-​​tenth the cur­rent size, too.

The Army … giv­ing new mean­ing to shrinkage.

(Gouge: CM)

– Ward

Share |

March 19th, 2008 | Robots | 482511 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/03/19/army-also-wants-bat-recce-capability/Army+Also+Wants+Bat+Recce+Capability2008-03-19+12%3A37%3A55lowe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Army Embarks on Ambitious UAV Plan | Navy Short on Shipbuilding Funds » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. campbell says:
    March 19, 2008 at 10:14 am

    oh hit me! hit me! just can’t resist observ­ing that ARMY’s always been batty any­way.
    Semper Fi babe!

    Reply
  2. Jimbo Jones says:
    March 19, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Batfink? Wings of steel?

    Reply
  3. Bryan2020 says:
    March 19, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    UAV Kamikazes would be cool. Thousands of them swarm­ing Iraq, would instill some fear. “The Birds”, but for real.

    Reply
  4. JB says:
    March 19, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    I was reflect­ing on this the other week if a robot with the flight style of say a bird would be tech­no­log­i­cally pos­si­ble. I don’t under­stand why the Army didn’t call upon the Airforce to help develop some­thing of this nature besides the need to fund is beyond me. I’m cur­rently enlisted in the Airforce at the moment, it’d be great once I have my train­ing to help develop this kind of tech­nol­ogy for our coun­try. Bravo! Hope to see more from these lit­tle devils.

    Reply
  5. WA DT Reader says:
    March 19, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    Combine hun­dreds or thou­sands of BATs with GPS and soft­ware tech­nol­ogy sim­i­lar to Microsoft’s SEADRAGON. It would cre­ate a mosaic image of any com­bat area. Let the blue force see what is going on in real time before they arrive at another ambush after a road­side bomb­ing. Imagine being able to deploy the BATs via arty rounds or air­craft dropped bombs. We could have sev­eral B52’s on sta­tion over a hot spot 24–7 ready to launch a recon bat cloud.

    Reply
  6. The Cenobyte says:
    March 19, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    I don’t under­stand why they are spend­ing $10 mil­lion to develop a 12ft plus wing spand sys­tem. When $10 mil­lion would buy thosands of remote con­trol planes retail. Sure you need to change the radio and add some things but I think that could be devel­oped quickly. Don’t the marines already have some small rub­ber­band launched planes?

    Reply
  7. Grammaticus says:
    March 19, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    @ The Cenobyte:
    They’re spend­ing the $10M on shrink­ing the bat from 12′ to 6 inches:
    “The pro­posal is for the bat to be just six inches in length, weigh only four ounces and use just one watt of power“
    The 12′ wingspan com­ment refers to the size of a ‘recon bat’ if it were pro­duced today. $10M & 5 years will hope­fully shrink that 12′ to the tar­get of 6″.

    Reply
  8. Bane0311 says:
    March 20, 2008 at 8:38 am

    The appli­ca­tions of this tech would be a huge asset on the ground, but i agree with The Cenobyte, we have tech that is the size needed, kid’s toys… a few mods and you have a few hun­dered dol­lar spy cam deploy­able any where… Plus i dont see why we are fund­ing these prod­jects… set a chal­lenge, first team to make a spy bat (within required specs) gets the con­tract… look at the auto­mated vehi­cle race not to long ago… i realy love the swarm con­cept, give’em a small weapon to… or mini jammer…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage