DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Robots » Army Also Wants Bat Recce Capability

Army Also Wants Bat Recce Capability

Bionic bat.bmp
As a supplement to the UAV plan outlined in the post below, Gizmodo has a post about this wild concept the Army has laid at the feet of select engineering schools, including the University of Michigan. Here’s an excerpt:

The proposal is for the bat to be just six inches in length, weigh only four ounces and use just one watt of power, backed by a lithium-ion battery, which could be charged by not just solar energy, but wind energy and random vibrations as well. The bat’s intended goal would be to run surveillance ops and relay data in realtime, including sights and sounds from minicams and mini-microphones, but also radiation and poison gas readings.

The UMich grant consists of $10 million over five years, creating the U-M Center for Objective Microelectronics and Biomimetic Advanced Technology (dubbed “COM-BAT“pun intended). The focus is to shrink down many electronics that while currently available would only be good if the US Army wanted, say, a 12-foot spy-bat. Not too stealthy.

For energy recovery, UMich will work to develop “quantum dot solar cells,” making current solar cells twice as nice. The bat’s autonomous navi system will be 1,000 times smaller than current systems, and that much more energy efficient too. The comms system will be shrunk to one-tenth the current size, too.

The Army … giving new meaning to shrinkage.

(Gouge: CM)

– Ward

Share |

March 19th, 2008 | Robots | 482511 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/03/19/army-also-wants-bat-recce-capability/Army+Also+Wants+Bat+Recce+Capability2008-03-19+12%3A37%3A55lowe You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Army Embarks on Ambitious UAV Plan | Navy Short on Shipbuilding Funds » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. campbell says:
    March 19, 2008 at 10:14 am

    oh hit me! hit me! just can’t resist observing that ARMY’s always been batty anyway.
    Semper Fi babe!

    Reply
  2. Jimbo Jones says:
    March 19, 2008 at 11:06 am

    Batfink? Wings of steel?

    Reply
  3. Bryan2020 says:
    March 19, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    UAV Kamikazes would be cool. Thousands of them swarming Iraq, would instill some fear. “The Birds”, but for real.

    Reply
  4. JB says:
    March 19, 2008 at 3:58 pm

    I was reflecting on this the other week if a robot with the flight style of say a bird would be technologically possible. I don’t understand why the Army didn’t call upon the Airforce to help develop something of this nature besides the need to fund is beyond me. I’m currently enlisted in the Airforce at the moment, it’d be great once I have my training to help develop this kind of technology for our country. Bravo! Hope to see more from these little devils.

    Reply
  5. WA DT Reader says:
    March 19, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    Combine hundreds or thousands of BATs with GPS and software technology similar to Microsoft’s SEADRAGON. It would create a mosaic image of any combat area. Let the blue force see what is going on in real time before they arrive at another ambush after a roadside bombing. Imagine being able to deploy the BATs via arty rounds or aircraft dropped bombs. We could have several B52’s on station over a hot spot 24–7 ready to launch a recon bat cloud.

    Reply
  6. The Cenobyte says:
    March 19, 2008 at 4:45 pm

    I don’t understand why they are spending $10 million to develop a 12ft plus wing spand system. When $10 million would buy thosands of remote control planes retail. Sure you need to change the radio and add some things but I think that could be developed quickly. Don’t the marines already have some small rubberband launched planes?

    Reply
  7. Grammaticus says:
    March 19, 2008 at 6:15 pm

    @ The Cenobyte:
    They’re spending the $10M on shrinking the bat from 12′ to 6 inches:
    “The proposal is for the bat to be just six inches in length, weigh only four ounces and use just one watt of power“
    The 12′ wingspan comment refers to the size of a ‘recon bat’ if it were produced today. $10M & 5 years will hopefully shrink that 12′ to the target of 6″.

    Reply
  8. Bane0311 says:
    March 20, 2008 at 8:38 am

    The applications of this tech would be a huge asset on the ground, but i agree with The Cenobyte, we have tech that is the size needed, kid’s toys… a few mods and you have a few hundered dollar spy cam deployable any where… Plus i dont see why we are funding these prodjects… set a challenge, first team to make a spy bat (within required specs) gets the contract… look at the automated vehicle race not to long ago… i realy love the swarm concept, give’em a small weapon to… or mini jammer…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Dumb and dumber………. The F35 is a...
      blackbull
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Why not bring in dirgibles( the original...
      mike rose
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Just give Burt Rutaan a Million bucks and he will...
      Dale
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You just keep it up there, you've shown your contempt...
      Why
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage