DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Star Wars » Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo

Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo

sat-shootdown.jpg

The U.S. Navy mar­shaled its resources quickly to shoot down a bro­ken satel­lite recently, but there are no plans to stay ready for a repeat per­for­mance, a senior Navy offi­cial said Wednesday.

When the U.S. gov­ern­ment decided that the falling spy satel­lite posed a risk, mis­sile defense offi­cials assem­bled a take­down plan within weeks. It worked — last month, the Pentagon smacked the satel­lite out of the sky and demol­ished the bird’s hydrazine fuel tank, which the mil­i­tary offi­cials said could have sur­vived re-​​entry and spilled its poi­so­nous cargo.

Despite this suc­cess, the Missile Defense Agency ducked when asked whether it could spring into action faster for a repeat per­for­mance. It would depend on too many tech­ni­cal specifics to say, said Rear Adm. Alan “Brad” Hicks, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense pro­gram man­ager, at a Navy League press conference.

He said there’s no fur­ther work on the con­cept because last month’s shoot­down was a one-​​time event, so there’s no active require­ment for the tech­nol­ogy to work against satel­lites on an ongo­ing basis.

“It is not a core mis­sion. It is not a capa­bil­ity out there for us to use,” Hicks said.

The U.S. Navy’s satel­lite shoot­down cost around $90 mil­lion, he said. That’s not includ­ing addi­tional costs for sen­sors, engi­neers and other sup­port that isn’t fac­tored into the ini­tial ball­park estimate.

– Rebecca Christie

Share |

March 20th, 2008 | Star Wars | 27436 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/Navy+Ducks+Sat+Shootdown+Redo2008-03-20+14%3A44%3A02Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More Gov Agencies to Defend Cyberspace | The Growlers Are Coming Out to Play. » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mike says:
    March 20, 2008 at 11:18 pm

    What type of ship was the satel­lite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser?

    Reply
  2. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:15 am

    It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-​​70); a Ticonderoga-​​class guided-​​missile cruiser accord­ing to Wikipedia http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​U​S​S​_​L​a​k​e​_​E​r​i​e​_​(​C​G​-70)

    Reply
  3. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:39 am

    Did the Ticonderoga-​​class mod­ern­iza­tion pro­gram get scrapped? It was due to com­mence in 2006 accord­ing to http://​www​.glob​alse​cu​rity​.org/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​/​s​y​s​t​e​m​s​/​s​h​i​p​/​c​g​-​4​7​-​m​o​d​.​htm
    “CG mod­ern­iza­tion begins in FY 2006. The first ship sched­uled to undergo mod­ern­iza­tion is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remain­ing 21 base­line 2, 3 and 4 cruis­ers have vary­ing capa­bil­i­ties. The cruiser con­ver­sion pro­gram will result in all 22 ships hav­ing a com­mon warfight­ing baseline.”

    Reply
  4. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:51 am

    I’ll answer my own ques­tion:
    It looks like it just com­menced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:
    http://​peo​ships​.crane​.navy​.mil/​N​e​w​s​/​F​e​b​2​1​_​2​0​0​8​_​0​1​.​h​t​m​?​s​t​o​r​y​_​i​d​=​3​5​130

    Reply
  5. yousaf says:
    March 23, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    have a look at:
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec
    Specifically the part:

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage