DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Star Wars » Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo

Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo

sat-shootdown.jpg

The U.S. Navy marshaled its resources quickly to shoot down a broken satellite recently, but there are no plans to stay ready for a repeat performance, a senior Navy official said Wednesday.

When the U.S. government decided that the falling spy satellite posed a risk, missile defense officials assembled a takedown plan within weeks. It worked — last month, the Pentagon smacked the satellite out of the sky and demolished the bird’s hydrazine fuel tank, which the military officials said could have survived re-entry and spilled its poisonous cargo.

Despite this success, the Missile Defense Agency ducked when asked whether it could spring into action faster for a repeat performance. It would depend on too many technical specifics to say, said Rear Adm. Alan “Brad” Hicks, Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense program manager, at a Navy League press conference.

He said there’s no further work on the concept because last month’s shootdown was a one-time event, so there’s no active requirement for the technology to work against satellites on an ongoing basis.

“It is not a core mission. It is not a capability out there for us to use,” Hicks said.

The U.S. Navy’s satellite shootdown cost around $90 million, he said. That’s not including additional costs for sensors, engineers and other support that isn’t factored into the initial ballpark estimate.

– Rebecca Christie

Share |

March 20th, 2008 | Star Wars | 27436 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/Navy+Ducks+Sat+Shootdown+Redo2008-03-20+14%3A44%3A02Ward You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More Gov Agencies to Defend Cyberspace | The Growlers Are Coming Out to Play. » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Mike says:
    March 20, 2008 at 11:18 pm

    What type of ship was the satellite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser?

    Reply
  2. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:15 am

    It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-70); a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser according to Wikipedia http://​en​.wikipedia​.org/​w​i​k​i​/​U​S​S​_​L​a​k​e​_​E​r​i​e​_​(​C​G​-70)

    Reply
  3. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:39 am

    Did the Ticonderoga-class modernization program get scrapped? It was due to commence in 2006 according to http://​www​.globalsecurity​.org/​m​i​l​i​t​a​r​y​/​s​y​s​t​e​m​s​/​s​h​i​p​/​c​g​-​4​7​-​m​o​d​.​htm
    “CG modernization begins in FY 2006. The first ship scheduled to undergo modernization is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remaining 21 baseline 2, 3 and 4 cruisers have varying capabilities. The cruiser conversion program will result in all 22 ships having a common warfighting baseline.”

    Reply
  4. Aussie ArmchairGeneral says:
    March 21, 2008 at 12:51 am

    I’ll answer my own question:
    It looks like it just commenced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:
    http://​peoships​.crane​.navy​.mil/​N​e​w​s​/​F​e​b​2​1​_​2​0​0​8​_​0​1​.​h​t​m​?​s​t​o​r​y​_​i​d​=​3​5​130

    Reply
  5. yousaf says:
    March 23, 2008 at 6:27 pm

    have a look at:
    http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec
    Specifically the part:

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You just keep it up there, you've shown your contempt...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      At a price of 135mil. ea our suspected future enemies...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The rest of the world must be laughing their asses off...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Got a program question for you Mac. What is the definition...
      TMB
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Re: #3 While maintaining that cutting edge is great, let us...
      TMB
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It lowers the overall price tag though. It was done...
      STemplar
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      This is a great, fiscally sound, idea and it is...
      mr5t3v3n
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      Alright then good sir, fair enough. I just don't want...
      american1776
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage