<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:53:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: yousaf</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/#comment-177442</link>
		<dc:creator>yousaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177442</guid>
		<description>have a look at:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec
Specifically the part:
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have a look at:<br />
<a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec" rel="nofollow">http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec</a><br />
Specifically the part:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/#comment-36986</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-36986</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll answer my own question:
It looks like it just commenced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:
http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll answer my own question:<br />
It looks like it just commenced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:<br />
<a href="http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130" rel="nofollow">http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/#comment-177440</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177440</guid>
		<description>Did the Ticonderoga-class modernization program get scrapped? It was due to commence in 2006 according to http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm
&quot;CG modernization begins in FY 2006. The first ship scheduled to undergo modernization is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remaining 21 baseline 2, 3 and 4 cruisers have varying capabilities. The cruiser conversion program will result in all 22 ships having a common warfighting baseline.&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Ticonderoga-class modernization program get scrapped? It was due to commence in 2006 according to <a href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm</a><br />
“CG modernization begins in FY 2006. The first ship scheduled to undergo modernization is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remaining 21 baseline 2, 3 and 4 cruisers have varying capabilities. The cruiser conversion program will result in all 22 ships having a common warfighting baseline.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/#comment-36984</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-36984</guid>
		<description>It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-70); a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-70); a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser according to Wikipedia <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/#comment-177439</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177439</guid>
		<description>What type of ship was the satellite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of ship was the satellite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

