<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Navy Ducks Sat Shootdown Redo</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: yousaf</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/comment-page-1/#comment-177442</link> <dc:creator>yousaf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177442</guid> <description>have a look at:
http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec
Specifically the part: </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have a look at:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&#038;plckScript=blogScript&#038;plckElementId=blogDest&#038;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&#038;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec" rel="nofollow">http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/blogs/defense/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3a27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3ac0a7d1cf-700c-4054-acb2-e44de336e7ec</a><br
/> Specifically the part:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/comment-page-1/#comment-36986</link> <dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:51:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-36986</guid> <description>I&#039;ll answer my own question:
It looks like it just commenced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:
http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130 </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ll answer my own question:<br
/> It looks like it just commenced in February 2008 with the USS Bunker Hill going in to dry dock. See:<br
/> <a
href="http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130" rel="nofollow">http://peoships.crane.navy.mil/News/Feb21_2008_01.htm?story_id=35130</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/comment-page-1/#comment-177440</link> <dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:39:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177440</guid> <description>Did the Ticonderoga-class modernization program get scrapped? It was due to commence in 2006 according to http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm
&quot;CG modernization begins in FY 2006. The first ship scheduled to undergo modernization is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remaining 21 baseline 2, 3 and 4 cruisers have varying capabilities. The cruiser conversion program will result in all 22 ships having a common warfighting baseline.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Ticonderoga-class modernization program get scrapped? It was due to commence in 2006 according to <a
href="http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/cg-47-mod.htm</a><br
/> “CG modernization begins in FY 2006. The first ship scheduled to undergo modernization is USS Cape St. George (CG 71). The remaining 21 baseline 2, 3 and 4 cruisers have varying capabilities. The cruiser conversion program will result in all 22 ships having a common warfighting baseline.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aussie ArmchairGeneral</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/comment-page-1/#comment-36984</link> <dc:creator>Aussie ArmchairGeneral</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:15:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-36984</guid> <description>It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-70); a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser according to Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70) </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the USS Lake Erie (CG-70); a Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser according to Wikipedia <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70)" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Lake_Erie_(CG-70)</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2008/03/20/navy-ducks-sat-shootdown-redo/comment-page-1/#comment-177439</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:18:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2743#comment-177439</guid> <description>What type of ship was the satellite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What type of ship was the satellite shot down with? A Ticonderoga Class cruiser?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/20 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-18 10:38:45 -->